71

Java IO has File.deleteOnExit(), which is a method that deletes the file it is called on during normal termination of the JVM. I've found this to be very useful for cleaning up temporary files, especially during unit tests.

However, I don't see a method by the same name in Java NIO's Files class. I am aware that I can do path.toFile().deleteOnExit(), but I'd like to know if there is an alternative using NIO.

Is there an alternative? If not, why is there not one?

asked Feb 26, 2015 at 20:22
11
  • 2
    What would the NIO version do which is different or better? (Apart from dropping .toFile() from the call chain.) Commented Feb 26, 2015 at 20:24
  • 1
    @Thunderforge DataInputStream.readLine() was actually @Deprecated in 1998, it is still there. What are the benefits of "living entirely in NIO"? Commented Feb 26, 2015 at 20:48
  • 6
    @PeterLawrey I'm aware that Java tends to not remove things that they deprecate (which seems bizarre to me coming from Python), but they could one day. As for "living entirely in NIO", the code would be easier to grasp if it is entirely in NIO instead of using both (especially for younger developers who might have started with NIO and would never have used IO before). Regardless of whether or not you agree with the rationale, I'd still like to know if there is an alternative. Commented Feb 26, 2015 at 20:58
  • 3
    @Thunderforge the point I was trying to make is that in Java they avoid adding things unless there is a compelling reason to do some. Every method they add is considered very carefully and if all it would do is much the same as an existing one, I suspect it won't happen. Commented Feb 26, 2015 at 21:01
  • 3
    'Living entirely in NIO' isn't a benefit, it's just an arbitrary self-imposed constraint. Commented Feb 26, 2015 at 21:07

3 Answers 3

48

Short Answer

You can't delete arbitrary files in Java NIO, but you can use the StandardOpenOption.DELETE_ON_CLOSE when opening a new stream, which will delete the file as soon as the stream closes, either by calling .close() (including from a try-with-resources statement) or the JVM terminating. For instance:

Files.newOutputStream(Paths.get("Foo.tmp"), StandardOpenOption.DELETE_ON_CLOSE);

Long Answer

After a great deal of digging around, I found that Java NIO does have a way to delete on exit, but it approaches it in a different way that Java I/O.

First off, the Javadoc for Files.createTempFile() describes three ways to delete files:

Where used as a work files [sic], the resulting file may be opened using the DELETE_ON_CLOSE option so that the file is deleted when the appropriate close method is invoked. Alternatively, a shutdown-hook, or the File.deleteOnExit() mechanism may be used to delete the file automatically.

The last choice, File.deleteOnExit() is of course a Java I/O method, which we are trying to avoid. A shutdown-hook is what is happening behind the scenes when you call the aforementioned method. But the DELETE_ON_CLOSE option is pure Java NIO.

Rather than deleting arbitrary files, Java NIO assumes that you are only interested in deleting files that you are actually opening. Therefore, methods that create a new stream such as Files.newOutputStream() can optionally take several OpenOptions, where you can input StandardOpenOption.DELETE_ON_CLOSE. What that does is delete the file as soon as the stream is closed (either by a call to .close() or the JVM exiting).

For instance:

Files.newOutputStream(Paths.get("Foo.tmp"), StandardOpenOption.DELETE_ON_CLOSE);

...will delete the file associated with the stream when the stream is closed, either from an explicit call to .close(), the stream being closed as part of a try-with-resources statement, or the JVM terminating.

Update: On some operating systems such as Linux, StandardOpenOption.DELETE_ON_CLOSE deletes as soon as the OutputStream is created. If all you need is one OutputStream, that may still be okay. See DELETE_ON_CLOSE deletes files before close on Linux for more info.

So Java NIO adds new functionality over Java I/O in that you can delete a file when closing a stream. If that's a good enough alternative to deleting during JVM exit, you can do it in pure Java NIO. If not, you'll have to rely on Java I/O's File.deleteOnExit() or a shutdown-hook to delete the file.

answered Mar 3, 2015 at 0:08
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

3 Comments

This is a dangerous answer; DELETE_ON_CLOSE is not a drop-in replacement for File.deleteOnExit() because it forces you to keep the output stream open for as long as you want to work with the file. Also, the file is actually deleted immediately on some platforms.
@megaflop I noted in my answer that DELETE_ON_CLOSE works differently in that it will "delete the file as soon as the stream is closed", so I thought that I already made it clear that it doesn't work the same way as File.deleteOnExit(). If you are okay with it deleting right away (which in my use cases, I was), then that's a fine replacement.
If it's not the same then the question is not answered.
31

Behind the scenes, File.deleteOnExit() will just create a shutdown hook via Runtime.addShutdownHook().

Then, you can do the same thing with NIO:

Runtime.getRuntime().addShutdownHook(new Thread() {
 public void run() {
 Path path = ...;
 Files.delete(path);
 }
});
answered Feb 26, 2015 at 20:26

1 Comment

+1 It seems in the accepted answer the shutdown hook gets coupled to the OutputStream, so if you intent to return the Path from the method where the temporary file gets created - you will find that your temporary file has been deleted
12

I would not suggest shoe-horning StandardOpenOption.DELETE_ON_CLOSE into a replacement for File.deleteOnExit(). As the documentation mentions it's neither intended to be general-purpose, nor is it likely to work correctly outside of trivial cases.

DELETE_ON_CLOSE, as the name implies, is designed to be used to remove a file once it's closed to immediately clean up a no-longer-needed resource. The documentation for Files.createTempFile() is similarly clear on this point, DELETE_ON_CLOSE can be used for "work files" only needed while the file is open.

The Files.createTempFile() docs suggest directly either writing your own shutdown hook or simply continuing to use File.deleteOnExit(). Despite your desire to use NIO there's nothing inherently wrong with using File.deleteOnExit() if you're only working with the local filesystem. If you aren't using (or aren't certain you're using) the local filesystem and therefore can't use File.deleteOnExit() it's straightforward enough to write your own shutdown hook just like what File does:

public final class DeletePathsAtShutdown {
 private static LinkedHashSet<Path> files = new LinkedHashSet<>();
 static {
 Runtime.getRuntime().addShutdownHook(
 new Thread(DeletePathsAtShutdown::shutdownHook));
 }
 private static void shutdownHook() {
 LinkedHashSet<Path> local;
 synchronized {
 local = paths;
 paths = null;
 }
 ArrayList<Path> toBeDeleted = new ArrayList<>(theFiles);
 Collections.reverse(toBeDeleted);
 for (Path p : toBeDeleted) {
 try {
 Files.delete(p);
 } catch (IOException | RuntimeException e) {
 // do nothing - best-effort
 }
 }
 }
 public static synchronized void register(Path p) {
 if (paths == null) {
 throw new IllegalStateException("ShutdownHook already in progress.");
 }
 paths.add(p);
 }
}

Sure, it might be nice if NIO included a similar shutdown hook out of the box, but its absence is no reason to use the wrong tool for the job. You can also add more functionality to DeletePathsAtShutdown, such as a remove() function, or support for deleting directories.

answered Feb 22, 2017 at 10:46

Comments

Your Answer

Draft saved
Draft discarded

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google
Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Required, but never shown

Post as a guest

Required, but never shown

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.