Bug at getsockopt when TCP_NODELAY is used as parameter

jdzstz jdzstz@gmail.com
Thu May 8 21:14:00 GMT 2014


Hi,
Thank you about the information.
Regards,
Jorge Díaz
El 07/05/2014 9:51, Corinna Vinschen escribió:
> On May 7 00:44, jdzstz wrote:
>> Hi Corinna,
>>>> I have recompiled and tested Varnish Cache 3.0.5 against cygwin
>> snapshot 2014年05月05日 (64 bits), removing my workaround, and now
>> TCP_NODELAY functionality works fine.
>>>> In order to planning the release of fixed varnish 3.0.5, Do you have
>> any estimated release date for future Cygwin 1.7.30?
> Not yet, no. The new SAM/AD code(1) needs a bit more testing and at
> least one more change(2) and, worst of all, I still have to change the
> User's Guide and FAQ to reflect this big change.
>>> Corinna
>> (1) http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-05/txtClll38W8u9.txt
> (2) http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-05/msg00098.html
>
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple


More information about the Cygwin mailing list

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /