On May 7 00:44, jdzstz wrote: > Hi Corinna, >> I have recompiled and tested Varnish Cache 3.0.5 against cygwin > snapshot 2014年05月05日 (64 bits), removing my workaround, and now > TCP_NODELAY functionality works fine. >> In order to planning the release of fixed varnish 3.0.5, Do you have > any estimated release date for future Cygwin 1.7.30? Not yet, no. The new SAM/AD code(1) needs a bit more testing and at least one more change(2) and, worst of all, I still have to change the User's Guide and FAQ to reflect this big change. Corinna (1) http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-05/txtClll38W8u9.txt (2) http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-05/msg00098.html -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/attachments/20140507/7d70f493/attachment.sig>