Have rename() semantics changed?

Fri Jul 14 09:55:00 GMT 2000

On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 07:43:22PM +1000, Chris Johns wrote:
>"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote:
>> According to the MSDN, FILE_SHARE_DELETE is a NT/W2K thingy. That implies
>> that this functionality is only available there. One would hope that
>> enabling it doesn't cause 9x to misbehave but who knows. I suppose the
>> constant could be conditionally compiled in if need be...
>>This may explain the patch problem I reported not long ago. I think I
>failed to meantion this was on Win95.

Since the change in question only affected Windows NT, this is unlikely.
cgf
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com