Have rename() semantics changed?

Fri Jul 14 05:42:00 GMT 2000

"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote:
>>> According to the MSDN, FILE_SHARE_DELETE is a NT/W2K thingy. That implies
> that this functionality is only available there. One would hope that
> enabling it doesn't cause 9x to misbehave but who knows. I suppose the
> constant could be conditionally compiled in if need be...
>
This may explain the patch problem I reported not long ago. I think I
failed to meantion this was on Win95.
-- 
 Chris Johns, mailto:cjohns@cybertec.com.au mailto:ccj@acm.org
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com