matplotlib-users Mailing List for matplotlib

I usually install the matplotlib binaries from pipy and I don't
remember doing a separate installation of freetype.
2017年02月18日 17:20 GMT+01:00 Paul Hobson <pmh...@gm...>:
> Especially on Windows, I always install freetype from conda.
> -p
>
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 6:24 AM, CAB <ca...@ya...> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Gents,
>>
>> Many thanks for your thoughtful responses! Freetype is indeed available
>> under a BSD-like licensse. But when I tried to install freetype on my
>> Windows system using the binary provided from GnuWin32, it attempts to force
>> me to accept the GPL3, which I cannot. Freetype's link to another binary
>> supplied by GTK+ is broken. So, I guess I have two choices; compile
>> freetype from the source, or download something like Anaconda, which I'd
>> rather not do because I have Python already installed.
>>
>> If you have any other ideas, I'd be happy to hear them.
>>
>> Best,
>> Chad
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Joe Kington <jof...@gm...>
>> To: Paul Hobson <pmh...@gm...>
>> Cc: CAB <ca...@ya...>; Matplotlib Development List
>> <mat...@li...>; Matplotlib Users
>> <mat...@li...>
>> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 5:03 PM
>> Subject: Re: [matplotlib-devel] [Matplotlib-users] License, freetype
>>
>> Well, if Freetype were only distributed under the GPL, you couldn't
>> distribute matplotlib in binary form without providing the source code.
>>
>> However, Freetype is distributed under more than one license. (see:
>> https://www.freetype.org/license.html )
>>
>> Because it's distributed under a BSD-style license in addition to the GPL,
>> it can be distributed in binary form, subject to an accreditation clause:
>> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/freetype/freetype2.git/tree/docs/FTL.TXT
>>
>> In the past, I have gotten approval from corporate lawyers at a very large
>> company to use freetype (and matplotlib) in an application that was being
>> distributed in binary form. The dual-licensing of freetype was key in that
>> particular case.
>>
>> Or that's my take on it, anyway. I'm not a Lawyer, so don't consider this
>> legal advice in any way.
>> Cheers!
>> -Joe
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Paul Hobson <pmh...@gm...> wrote:
>>
>> Chad,
>>
>> My recollections is that matplotlib doesn't distribute the source code to
>> FreeType, it only uses it as a dependency. As such, MPL is in the clear with
>> its more permissive licensing.
>> -Paul
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:45 PM, CAB <ca...@ya...> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, All,
>>
>> I just went to install matplotlib version 2.0.0, and it has a dependency
>> called "freetype". This software appears to be licensed under GPL3. My
>> reading of that latter license is that, if someone wanted to distribute a
>> compiled version of a program requiring matplotlib, that entire program
>> would fall under the GPL3 license. I'm sure that would be a non-starter for
>> many, many projects.
>>
>> Does anyone have any takes on this?
>>
>> Chad
>>
>> ------------------------------ ------------------------------
>> ------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> ______________________________ _________________
>> Matplotlib-users mailing list
>> Mat...@li...urcef orge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/ lists/listinfo/matplotlib-user s
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------ ------------------------------
>> ------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>
>> ______________________________ _________________
>> Matplotlib-devel mailing list
>> Matplotlib-devel@lists. sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/ lists/listinfo/matplotlib- devel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Matplotlib-users mailing list
> Mat...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
>

Especially on Windows, I always install freetype from conda.
-p
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 6:24 AM, CAB <ca...@ya...> wrote:
> Hi, Gents,
>
> Many thanks for your thoughtful responses! Freetype is indeed available
> under a BSD-like licensse. But when I tried to install freetype on my
> Windows system using the binary provided from GnuWin32, it attempts to
> force me to accept the GPL3, which I cannot. Freetype's link to another
> binary supplied by GTK+ is broken. So, I guess I have two choices; compile
> freetype from the source, or download something like Anaconda, which I'd
> rather not do because I have Python already installed.
>
> If you have any other ideas, I'd be happy to hear them.
>
> Best,
> Chad
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Joe Kington <jof...@gm...>
> *To:* Paul Hobson <pmh...@gm...>
> *Cc:* CAB <ca...@ya...>; Matplotlib Development List <
> mat...@li...>; Matplotlib Users <
> mat...@li...>
> *Sent:* Friday, February 17, 2017 5:03 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [matplotlib-devel] [Matplotlib-users] License, freetype
>
> Well, if Freetype were only distributed under the GPL, you couldn't
> distribute matplotlib in binary form without providing the source code.
>
> However, Freetype is distributed under more than one license. (see:
> https://www.freetype.org/license.html )
>
> Because it's distributed under a BSD-style license in addition to the GPL,
> it can be distributed in binary form, subject to an accreditation clause:
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/freetype/freetype2.git/tree/docs/FTL.TXT
>
> In the past, I have gotten approval from corporate lawyers at a very large
> company to use freetype (and matplotlib) in an application that was being
> distributed in binary form. The dual-licensing of freetype was key in that
> particular case.
>
> Or that's my take on it, anyway. I'm not a Lawyer, so don't consider this
> legal advice in any way.
> Cheers!
> -Joe
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Paul Hobson <pmh...@gm...> wrote:
>
> Chad,
>
> My recollections is that matplotlib doesn't distribute the source code to
> FreeType, it only uses it as a dependency. As such, MPL is in the clear
> with its more permissive licensing.
> -Paul
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:45 PM, CAB <ca...@ya...> wrote:
>
> Hi, All,
>
> I just went to install matplotlib version 2.0.0, and it has a dependency
> called "freetype". This software appears to be licensed under GPL3. My
> reading of that latter license is that, if someone wanted to distribute a
> compiled version of a program requiring matplotlib, that entire program
> would fall under the GPL3 license. I'm sure that would be a non-starter
> for many, many projects.
>
> Does anyone have any takes on this?
>
> Chad
>
> ------------------------------ ------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> ______________________________ _________________
> Matplotlib-users mailing list
> Mat...@li...urcef orge.net
> <Mat...@li...>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/ lists/listinfo/matplotlib-user s
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------ ------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>
> ______________________________ _________________
> Matplotlib-devel mailing list
> Matplotlib-devel@lists. sourceforge.net
> <Mat...@li...>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/ lists/listinfo/matplotlib- devel
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Hi, Gents,
Many thanks for your thoughtful responses! Freetype is indeed available under a BSD-like licensse. But when I tried to install freetype on my Windows system using the binary provided from GnuWin32, it attempts to force me to accept the GPL3, which I cannot. Freetype's link to another binary supplied by GTK+ is broken. So, I guess I have two choices; compile freetype from the source, or download something like Anaconda, which I'd rather not do because I have Python already installed.
If you have any other ideas, I'd be happy to hear them.
Best,Chad
 From: Joe Kington <jof...@gm...>
 To: Paul Hobson <pmh...@gm...> 
Cc: CAB <ca...@ya...>; Matplotlib Development List <mat...@li...>; Matplotlib Users <mat...@li...>
 Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 5:03 PM
 Subject: Re: [matplotlib-devel] [Matplotlib-users] License, freetype
 
Well, if Freetype were only distributed under the GPL, you couldn't distribute matplotlib in binary form without providing the source code.
However, Freetype is distributed under more than one license. (see: https://www.freetype.org/license.html )
Because it's distributed under a BSD-style license in addition to the GPL, it can be distributed in binary form, subject to an accreditation clause: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/freetype/freetype2.git/tree/docs/FTL.TXT
In the past, I have gotten approval from corporate lawyers at a very large company to use freetype (and matplotlib) in an application that was being distributed in binary form. The dual-licensing of freetype was key in that particular case.
Or that's my take on it, anyway. I'm not a Lawyer, so don't consider this legal advice in any way.
Cheers!
-Joe
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Paul Hobson <pmh...@gm...> wrote:
Chad,
My recollections is that matplotlib doesn't distribute the source code to FreeType, it only uses it as a dependency. As such, MPL is in the clear with its more permissive licensing.-Paul
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:45 PM, CAB <ca...@ya...> wrote:
Hi, All,
I just went to install matplotlib version 2.0.0, and it has a dependency called "freetype". This software appears to be licensed under GPL3. My reading of that latter license is that, if someone wanted to distribute a compiled version of a program requiring matplotlib, that entire program would fall under the GPL3 license. I'm sure that would be a non-starter for many, many projects.
Does anyone have any takes on this?
Chad
------------------------------ ------------------------------ ------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
______________________________ _________________
Matplotlib-users mailing list
Mat...@li...urcef orge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/ lists/listinfo/matplotlib-user s
------------------------------ ------------------------------ ------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
______________________________ _________________
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
Matplotlib-devel@lists. sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/ lists/listinfo/matplotlib- devel
 

Well, if Freetype were only distributed under the GPL, you couldn't
distribute matplotlib in binary form without providing the source code.
However, Freetype is distributed under more than one license. (see:
https://www.freetype.org/license.html )
Because it's distributed under a BSD-style license in addition to the GPL,
it can be distributed in binary form, subject to an accreditation clause:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/freetype/freetype2.git/tree/docs/FTL.TXT
In the past, I have gotten approval from corporate lawyers at a very large
company to use freetype (and matplotlib) in an application that was being
distributed in binary form. The dual-licensing of freetype was key in that
particular case.
Or that's my take on it, anyway. I'm not a Lawyer, so don't consider this
legal advice in any way.
Cheers!
-Joe
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Paul Hobson <pmh...@gm...> wrote:
> Chad,
>
> My recollections is that matplotlib doesn't distribute the source code to
> FreeType, it only uses it as a dependency. As such, MPL is in the clear
> with its more permissive licensing.
> -Paul
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:45 PM, CAB <ca...@ya...> wrote:
>
>> Hi, All,
>>
>> I just went to install matplotlib version 2.0.0, and it has a dependency
>> called "freetype". This software appears to be licensed under GPL3. My
>> reading of that latter license is that, if someone wanted to distribute a
>> compiled version of a program requiring matplotlib, that entire program
>> would fall under the GPL3 license. I'm sure that would be a non-starter
>> for many, many projects.
>>
>> Does anyone have any takes on this?
>>
>> Chad
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> _______________________________________________
>> Matplotlib-users mailing list
>> Mat...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
>>
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Matplotlib-devel mailing list
> Mat...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
>
>

Chad,
My recollections is that matplotlib doesn't distribute the source code to
FreeType, it only uses it as a dependency. As such, MPL is in the clear
with its more permissive licensing.
-Paul
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:45 PM, CAB <ca...@ya...> wrote:
> Hi, All,
>
> I just went to install matplotlib version 2.0.0, and it has a dependency
> called "freetype". This software appears to be licensed under GPL3. My
> reading of that latter license is that, if someone wanted to distribute a
> compiled version of a program requiring matplotlib, that entire program
> would fall under the GPL3 license. I'm sure that would be a non-starter
> for many, many projects.
>
> Does anyone have any takes on this?
>
> Chad
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Matplotlib-users mailing list
> Mat...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
>
>

Hi, All,
I just went to install matplotlib version 2.0.0, and it has a dependency called "freetype". This software appears to be licensed under GPL3. My reading of that latter license is that, if someone wanted to distribute a compiled version of a program requiring matplotlib, that entire program would fall under the GPL3 license. I'm sure that would be a non-starter for many, many projects.
Does anyone have any takes on this?
Chad

Hi everyone,
As some of you already know, some of us are involved in the organization of
a docathon. Several of us will be meeting up to sprint on documentation or
documentation-related projects at Berkeley, New York and Seattle.
If you are interested in joining us, either remotely or on campus, don't
hesitate to join!
Cheers,
Nelle
*What's a Docathon?*
It's a week-long sprint where we focus our efforts on improving the state
of documentation in the open-source and open-science world. This means
writing better documentation, building tools, and sharing skills.
*Who’s this for?*
Anyone who is interested in improving the understandability, accessibility,
and clarity of software! This might mean developers with a particular
project, or individuals who would like to contribute to a project. You
don’t need to use a specific language (though there will be many Python and
R developers) and you don’t need to be a core developer in order to help
out.
*Where can I sign up?*
Check out the *Docathon website* <https://bids.github.io/docathon/>. You
can sign up as a *participant*
<https://goo.gl/forms/AaW2b24mMxOutxt02>, *suggest
a project* <https://goo.gl/forms/0cPpw01zehrEyDDE3> to work on, or sign up *to
host your own* <https://bids.github.io/docathon/pages/hosting.html> remote
Docathon wherever you like. You don’t have to use a specific language -
we’ll be as accommodating as possible!
*When is the Docathon?*
The Docathon will be held *March 6 through March 10*. For those coming to
BIDS at UC Berkeley, on the first day we'll have tutorials about
documentation and demos of documentation tools, followed by a few hours of
hacking. During the middle of the week, we'll set aside a few hours each
afternoon for hacking as a group at BIDS. On the last day, we'll have a
wrap-up event to show off what everybody worked on.
*Where will the Docathon take place?*
There are a *few docathons being held simultaneously*
<https://bids.github.io/docathon/pages/hosts.html>, each with their own
schedule. At Berkeley we'll have a physical presence at BIDS over the week,
and we encourage you to show up for the hours we set aside for doc hacking.
However, it is totally fine to work remotely; we will coordinate people via
email/GitHub, too.
*Where can I get more information?*
Check out an updated schedule, list of tutorials, and more information at
our website here: *bids.github.io/docathon* <http://bids.github.io/docathon>
.
*Contact*
If you have any questions, open an issue on our *GitHub repo*
<https://github.com/BIDS/docathon>. We look forward to hearing from you!
Please feel free to forward this email to anyone who may be interested.
We'd love for other institutions/groups to get involved.