You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(56) |
Nov
(65) |
Dec
(37) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(78) |
Mar
(153) |
Apr
(205) |
May
(184) |
Jun
(123) |
Jul
(171) |
Aug
(156) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(223) |
2005 |
Jan
(184) |
Feb
(267) |
Mar
(214) |
Apr
(286) |
May
(320) |
Jun
(299) |
Jul
(348) |
Aug
(283) |
Sep
(355) |
Oct
(293) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(203) |
2006 |
Jan
(352) |
Feb
(358) |
Mar
(403) |
Apr
(313) |
May
(165) |
Jun
(281) |
Jul
(316) |
Aug
(228) |
Sep
(279) |
Oct
(243) |
Nov
(315) |
Dec
(345) |
2007 |
Jan
(260) |
Feb
(323) |
Mar
(340) |
Apr
(319) |
May
(290) |
Jun
(296) |
Jul
(221) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(242) |
Oct
(248) |
Nov
(242) |
Dec
(332) |
2008 |
Jan
(312) |
Feb
(359) |
Mar
(454) |
Apr
(287) |
May
(340) |
Jun
(450) |
Jul
(403) |
Aug
(324) |
Sep
(349) |
Oct
(385) |
Nov
(363) |
Dec
(437) |
2009 |
Jan
(500) |
Feb
(301) |
Mar
(409) |
Apr
(486) |
May
(545) |
Jun
(391) |
Jul
(518) |
Aug
(497) |
Sep
(492) |
Oct
(429) |
Nov
(357) |
Dec
(310) |
2010 |
Jan
(371) |
Feb
(657) |
Mar
(519) |
Apr
(432) |
May
(312) |
Jun
(416) |
Jul
(477) |
Aug
(386) |
Sep
(419) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(320) |
Dec
(202) |
2011 |
Jan
(321) |
Feb
(413) |
Mar
(299) |
Apr
(215) |
May
(284) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(207) |
Aug
(314) |
Sep
(321) |
Oct
(259) |
Nov
(347) |
Dec
(209) |
2012 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(414) |
Mar
(377) |
Apr
(179) |
May
(173) |
Jun
(234) |
Jul
(295) |
Aug
(239) |
Sep
(276) |
Oct
(355) |
Nov
(144) |
Dec
(108) |
2013 |
Jan
(170) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(204) |
Apr
(133) |
May
(142) |
Jun
(89) |
Jul
(160) |
Aug
(180) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(136) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(32) |
2014 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(90) |
Mar
(161) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(78) |
Jun
(94) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(83) |
Sep
(102) |
Oct
(132) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(96) |
2015 |
Jan
(45) |
Feb
(138) |
Mar
(176) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(119) |
Jun
(124) |
Jul
(77) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(9) |
2016 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2025 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
(16) |
2
(22) |
3
(28) |
4
(17) |
5
(17) |
6
(7) |
7
|
8
(15) |
9
(28) |
10
(26) |
11
(28) |
12
(19) |
13
(5) |
14
(3) |
15
(21) |
16
(28) |
17
(11) |
18
(18) |
19
(6) |
20
(5) |
21
(18) |
22
(11) |
23
(22) |
24
(28) |
25
(17) |
26
(17) |
27
(7) |
28
(16) |
29
(24) |
30
(25) |
31
(14) |
|
|
|
hello, I am working in Python with TkAgg. I have several plots that I would like to display on a single figure. The problem is, when I set the figure size to 12in wide, 6in high (which is perfect for my laptop) the plots get scrunched up. If I resize the window in which they're displayed then the plots scrunch up even further. So it appears to me that the figure size is tied to the window size. I would like to set the size of the initial window in which the plots appear and then fix the size of the canvas? frame? figure? (not sure what I need to fix). I have created a scrollbar on the window to permit scrolling up and down. I have attached the Navigation Toolbar to the bottom of the window, which is where I would like it to stay. So, the plots should scroll up and down with the toolbar fixed. My small sample program is attached. I am using Tk (as opposed to another GUI) as I am generating these plots from data in SimPy and am using SimGUI to control the model execution and plotting. I would greatly appreciate any help! Regards, Bonnie Douglas
David Goldsmith: > Ah, ok, not right now (perhaps later): for the purpose of adding your code to the numpy bug ticket, I think it's best if I use something a little more ubiquitous. ;-) But it looks useful, so I'll probably grab it and try it out myself; is it pure python, i.e., should I be able to just put it in a folder containing an init file in site-packages and then it should "just work"? Yeah, simply have a look at diagram.py And yes, it should work out-of-the-box. The init file should be already included. Simply put it in a folder. It's tiny. Everything needed should be: import matplotlib.figure fig = matplotlib.figure.Figure() ax = fig.add_axes((0.2, 0.2, 0.6, 0.6)) ax.imshow(...) And would you mind if I put my opinion about the not-a-numpy-issue character on the numpy list too? I think it's a pure matplotlib problem, in my opinion numpy is behaving well, although they told you to fill in a ticket? Friedrich
--- On Sat, 3/6/10, Friedrich Romstedt <fri...@gm...> wrote: > >> d1 is a diagram_cl.Diagram instance, holding a > > > > Sorry for being dense, but where do I get diagram_cl? > > All you tried won't work, diagram_cl is not included with > matplotlib, > and as I think it never will. Please clone or > download from > http://github.com/friedrichromstedt/diagram_cl . See > also > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=4B8443E2.9000506%40gmail.com&forum_name=matplotlib-users > . Do you need advice with installing the package? I > have not provided > an setup.py so far. Ah, ok, not right now (perhaps later): for the purpose of adding your code to the numpy bug ticket, I think it's best if I use something a little more ubiquitous. ;-) But it looks useful, so I'll probably grab it and try it out myself; is it pure python, i.e., should I be able to just put it in a folder containing an init file in site-packages and then it should "just work"? Thanks again, DG DG > > Friedrich >
2010年3月6日 David Goldsmith <d_l...@ya...>: > Yeah, my email client (yahoo!) showed your example submission email as being directly to me, not the list, so I assumed that you were sending it directly to me because you saw that I had cross-posted to the numpy list. Anyway, I'm returning this thread to this list, FWIW. Yeah, my e-mail client (gmail) chooses for e-mail from the matplotlib-users list as default recipient of the answer always the sender (maybe a misconfiguration?). I have to click "Answer All", and I sometimes fail to do so, and do not recognise. >> d1 is a diagram_cl.Diagram instance, holding a > > Sorry for being dense, but where do I get diagram_cl? All you tried won't work, diagram_cl is not included with matplotlib, and as I think it never will. Please clone or download from http://github.com/friedrichromstedt/diagram_cl . See also http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=4B8443E2.9000506%40gmail.com&forum_name=matplotlib-users . Do you need advice with installing the package? I have not provided an setup.py so far. Friedrich
Try cb.orientation = "horizontal" cb.update_bruteforce(cb.mappable) it seems to work okay. However, note that "update_bruteforce" clears the axes then redraws. So, if you added some artists in the colorbar axes by yourself (although this is not likely), they will be lost. Regards, -JJ On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Thomas Robitaille <tho...@gm...> wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to change the orientation of a colorbar once it has already been drawn. So for example if I create the colorbar with: > > cb = fig.colorbar(mappable=image, cax=cax, orientation='vertical') > > I would like to be able to do > > cb.set_orientation('horizontal') > > Is there a way to do this, since set_orientation does not exist? > > Thanks for any help, > > Thomas > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-users mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users >
--- On Sat, 3/6/10, Friedrich Romstedt <fri...@gm...> wrote: > Note, that this is private discussion now and no longer on > the list > (accidentally?). If you want to put it back on the > list, please feel > free to do so. Yeah, my email client (yahoo!) showed your example submission email as being directly to me, not the list, so I assumed that you were sending it directly to me because you saw that I had cross-posted to the numpy list. Anyway, I'm returning this thread to this list, FWIW. > d1 is a diagram_cl.Diagram instance, holding a Sorry for being dense, but where do I get diagram_cl? >>> from matplotlib import diagram_cl as dc Traceback (most recent call last): File "<input>", line 1, in <module> ImportError: cannot import name diagram_cl and http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/search.html?q=diagram_cl yields: Search Results Your search did not match any documents. DG > matplotlib.figure.Figure instance and an > matplotlib.axes.Axes instance > of that figure. I used it because I was too lazy to > create them on my > own. > > fwiw, diagram_cl is used to plot single-axes > diagrams. There are also > accompanying Layer2D (f(x) plots) and Layer3D > (xy-colorplots) classes. > They hide the internals of matplotlib completely and > provide a pure > data-oriented interface. > > Friedrich >
David Arnold wrote: > All, > > In one post from John Hunter, I heard the word "traits", which I assume is from the enthought distribution. > > Is there a move in matplotlib toward the "trait" technology taking place? How about for Python in general? > No to both, as far as I know. Every now and then the question of using traits in mpl is raised, and some trials have been done, but to date it has not caught on. Eric > Thanks. > > David.