You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(56) |
Nov
(65) |
Dec
(37) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(78) |
Mar
(153) |
Apr
(205) |
May
(184) |
Jun
(123) |
Jul
(171) |
Aug
(156) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(223) |
2005 |
Jan
(184) |
Feb
(267) |
Mar
(214) |
Apr
(286) |
May
(320) |
Jun
(299) |
Jul
(348) |
Aug
(283) |
Sep
(355) |
Oct
(293) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(203) |
2006 |
Jan
(352) |
Feb
(358) |
Mar
(403) |
Apr
(313) |
May
(165) |
Jun
(281) |
Jul
(316) |
Aug
(228) |
Sep
(279) |
Oct
(243) |
Nov
(315) |
Dec
(345) |
2007 |
Jan
(260) |
Feb
(323) |
Mar
(340) |
Apr
(319) |
May
(290) |
Jun
(296) |
Jul
(221) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(242) |
Oct
(248) |
Nov
(242) |
Dec
(332) |
2008 |
Jan
(312) |
Feb
(359) |
Mar
(454) |
Apr
(287) |
May
(340) |
Jun
(450) |
Jul
(403) |
Aug
(324) |
Sep
(349) |
Oct
(385) |
Nov
(363) |
Dec
(437) |
2009 |
Jan
(500) |
Feb
(301) |
Mar
(409) |
Apr
(486) |
May
(545) |
Jun
(391) |
Jul
(518) |
Aug
(497) |
Sep
(492) |
Oct
(429) |
Nov
(357) |
Dec
(310) |
2010 |
Jan
(371) |
Feb
(657) |
Mar
(519) |
Apr
(432) |
May
(312) |
Jun
(416) |
Jul
(477) |
Aug
(386) |
Sep
(419) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(320) |
Dec
(202) |
2011 |
Jan
(321) |
Feb
(413) |
Mar
(299) |
Apr
(215) |
May
(284) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(207) |
Aug
(314) |
Sep
(321) |
Oct
(259) |
Nov
(347) |
Dec
(209) |
2012 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(414) |
Mar
(377) |
Apr
(179) |
May
(173) |
Jun
(234) |
Jul
(295) |
Aug
(239) |
Sep
(276) |
Oct
(355) |
Nov
(144) |
Dec
(108) |
2013 |
Jan
(170) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(204) |
Apr
(133) |
May
(142) |
Jun
(89) |
Jul
(160) |
Aug
(180) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(136) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(32) |
2014 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(90) |
Mar
(161) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(78) |
Jun
(94) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(83) |
Sep
(102) |
Oct
(132) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(96) |
2015 |
Jan
(45) |
Feb
(138) |
Mar
(176) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(119) |
Jun
(124) |
Jul
(77) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(9) |
2016 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2025 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
1
(19) |
2
(3) |
3
(12) |
4
(2) |
5
|
6
(9) |
7
(27) |
8
(39) |
9
(17) |
10
(22) |
11
(5) |
12
(1) |
13
(11) |
14
(12) |
15
(14) |
16
(29) |
17
(32) |
18
(8) |
19
(3) |
20
(10) |
21
(27) |
22
(11) |
23
(8) |
24
(4) |
25
(4) |
26
(3) |
27
(18) |
28
(7) |
29
(29) |
30
(13) |
31
(4) |
|
I have a small problem when saving figures with savefig.facecolor : gray #white # figure facecolor when saving savefig.edgecolor : gray #white # figure edgecolor when saving set in my rc file. If I run t=3Darange(0,1,0.1) y=3Dsin(2*pi*t) plot(t,y) xlabel('Time (sec)') ylabel('amplitude') savefig('gray.eps') and then epstopdf gray.eps, I get the attached file with the gray border not going quite low enough. This doesn't occur when saving .png. It also seems to be o.k. if I just use xlabel('time') without the parenthesis and uppercase T. I am including the figures in a Latex beamer presenation with a dark background and I need the gray border for visability. I tried switching to gs-8.50, but the problem didn't do away. I am using version 0.86.2 which is probably cvs from a month ago. Ryan
Hello, Is there a way to specify that a legend show its items horizontally instead of vertically, i.e.: x-x-x-x label1 y-y-y-y label2 z-z-z-z label3 vs. x-x-x-x label1 y-y-y-y label2 z-z-z-z label3 ? Thanks, Gerald
>>>>> "Christopher" == Christopher Barker <Chr...@no...> writes: Christopher> Nikolai Hlubek wrote: >> Wouldn't another 'axis' option make the whole thing more >> consistent? Christopher> <soapbox> Christopher> Using the OO interface everywhere would make the Christopher> whole thing more consistent: Christopher> fig = pylab.figure(1) ax = fig.add_subplot(111) Christopher> ax.set_xlim(-0.25,2.0) ax.set_ylim(0.0,1.3) Christopher> ax.set_aspect('scaled', True) Christopher> ax.set_autoscale_on(False) ax.plot((0,.2,.3,.4,1.5), Christopher> (0,.5,.3,.92,.48)) Christopher> <\soapbox> or if you want to save some typing fig = pylab.figure(1) ax = fig.add_subplot(111, xlim=(-0.25,2.0), ylim=(0.0,1.3), aspect=('scaled', True), autoscale_on=False) ax.plot((0,.2,.3,.4,1.5), (0,.5,.3,.92,.48)) JDH
Nikolai Hlubek wrote: > Wouldn't another 'axis' option make the > whole thing more consistent? <soapbox> Using the OO interface everywhere would make the whole thing more consistent: fig = pylab.figure(1) ax = fig.add_subplot(111) ax.set_xlim(-0.25,2.0) ax.set_ylim(0.0,1.3) ax.set_aspect('scaled', True) ax.set_autoscale_on(False) ax.plot((0,.2,.3,.4,1.5), (0,.5,.3,.92,.48)) <\soapbox> -Chris -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer NOAA/OR&R/HAZMAT (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception Chr...@no...
Steve Chaplin wrote: > Using the latest cairo (git), pycairo (cvs) and matplotlib (svn) and > running examples/simple_plot.py I get a 22K PDF file. But when I try to > view it with evince and xpdf I get "unable to open document" type > errors. This is just a shot in the dark, but I've been playing with pycairo a bit, and found that you need to make sure to call: cairo.Context.show_page() When you're done with the rendering. I had similar symptoms before I did that. John, What are your plans regarding Cairo and the future of rendering for MPL? I'm in the need of alpha blended rendering for wxPython stuff, so I've been looking at Cairo and Agg. Agg is a great solution for really nice rendering, but Cairo has the promise of supporting everything else I need, like PDF for instance. Now that Mozilla seems to be adopting Cairo, it might even live up to the promise of a fully cross-platform solution. If so, it would be great to develop a really general purpose, robust, numpy-aware, pythonic interface for it. -Chris -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer NOAA/OR&R/HAZMAT (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception Chr...@no...
Hi all, I've only started using matplotlib very recently, and it's hugely impressive. My current plotting is (occasionally) failing with the error copied below (Fedora Core 4 standard install, Python 2.4...). Does anyone know what causes this and whether I can tell from the data being plotted whether it might happen? Sorry if that's a dumb question, but .... Many thanks! Sarah matplotlib error report: File "./random_error3d.py", line 142, in plot_results pylab.plot(x, y0, 'ro', x, y1, 'g^', x, y2, 'b+') File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/matplotlib/pylab.py", line 2129, in plot ret =3D gca().plot(*args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/matplotlib/axes.py", line 2792, in= plot self.autoscale_view() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/matplotlib/axes.py", line 817, in autoscale_view self.set_ylim(locator.autoscale()) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/matplotlib/ticker.py", line 797, in autoscale return take(self.bin_boundaries(dmin, dmax), [0,-1]) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/matplotlib/ticker.py", line 767, in bin_boundaries scale, offset =3D scale_range(vmin, vmax, nbins) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/matplotlib/ticker.py", line 738, in scale_range ex =3D divmod(math.log10(meanv), 1)[0] OverflowError: math range error -- http://www.mis.coventry.ac.uk/research/imd/ http://varspool.blogspot.com
Hi everyone When looking at the little code example below it can be seen see that you have to mix programming paradigms to disable autoscaling: figure(1) ax = subplot(111) axis((-0.25,2.0,0.0,1.3)) axis('scaled') ax.set_autoscale_on(False) Wouldn't another 'axis' option make the whole thing more consistent? figure(1) axis((-0.25,2.0,0.0,1.3)) axis('scaled') axis(autoscale=False) Best regards, Nikolai -- "1984" is not a howto!
>>>>> "Toon" == Toon Verstraelen <Too...@UG...> writes: Toon> Currently I have written a wrapper script that allows me to Toon> set all types of margins in inches instead of relative Toon> coordinates: Toon> I wonder if their is a cleaner way of doing this, without a Toon> wrapper function? Is it possible to organize multiple axes Toon> in a plot in another way than using the pylab.subplot Toon> function? Yes, you want to use the pylab axes function http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/matplotlib.pylab.html#-axes which allows you to place an axes anywhere. Still uses relative coords, but your arithmetic will be *much easier* than it was for subplots. Eg where leftrel is the relative left border and leftin is the left border in inches, you can compute letfrel (which is what axes wants) with leftrel = leftin / figwidth Toon> I'm currently preparing a publication for which the plots Toon> are created with matplotlib, and I would like to share some Toon> of my experiences. The (future) ambition of matplotlib is to Toon> create plots that are publication-ready. For basic plots I would argue that this is the current ambition, as I do believe people are submitting matplotlib plots for publication :-) I know I have. But you are right, there is certainly work to do, because there is no end to the tinkering people have to do to comply with journal guidelines. And to satisfy their own need to tinker and avoid real work :-) Toon> this is certainly no problem at all, but for complex plots Toon> containing multiple axes etc, the pylab.subplot function is Toon> too restrictive. Right, it's just a special case helper function. Here is a screenshot using axes http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/screenshots.html#axes_demo Toon> As an example, I have attached one of the types of plots I'm Toon> working on. I have to use wrapper functions like the one Toon> given above, to make sure that the subplots are squares and Toon> the horizontal and vertical distances between them are Toon> equal. This is luckily not a blocker, but the choice of Toon> working with relative coordinates, is not always ideal. A I agree. It would be nice to be able to pass in units of your choice, inches, points, cm, relative, pixel, data for all locations. You can do this relatively easy for some datatypes (eg lines, text, etc) by using custom transforms, but not everywhere (eg axes positions are always relative). Toon> problem I could not solve up to know, is aligning the labels Toon> at the left and the bottom of the plot. Don't get me wrong, Toon> I know that it is very difficult to implement a plotting Toon> interface that is able to deal with all these details. Toon> Are their any development plans to go further that the Toon> subplot- interface? I have some experience with writing Toon> GTK-applications. The GTK library contains a series of Toon> widgets (tables, hboxes, vboxes, ...) that are purely used Toon> for organizing the positions and sizes of the actual widgets We've talked about this. layout engines like this are pretty hard to do well. As you've noticed, matplotlib doesn't try to be smart, but does try and give you handles to tweak things so that you can ultimately get them where you want them. Toon> of interest (entries, buttons, labels, ...). A similar Toon> approach in matplotlib would be a great improvement. The Toon> organizational widgets should have properties like margins, Toon> spacings, ..., that can be given in different units Toon> (relative or absolute). The actual widgets of interest in Toon> this analogy are axes, labels (for the title and Toon> axislabels), ticks with labels and legends. Toon> What do you matplotlib-people think of such an idea? Is it Toon> completely over-engineered? Maybe some parts are already Toon> partially implemented? I would be happy to work out this Toon> idea and start implementing it. It's a rather huge job, as I Toon> am not yet familiar with the complete matplotlib code. Some Toon> discussion in advance, also with non-developers, is Toon> therefore more than welcome. Shoot! You are welcome to work on this. I think it would be a nice addition. You might want to start by looking at the Axis code for example to see how the xlabel and ylabel position are chosen to not overlap the tick labels, as an example of how to work with the matplotlib bounding boxes. This kind of stuff will be essential for your layout algorithms. Cheers, JDH
Hi, I'm not sure whether my previous mail has really reached the mailing list or not. Excuse me if it is posted twice. Currently I have written a wrapper script that allows me to set all types of margins in inches instead of relative coordinates: width -- the width of the figure in inches height -- the height of the figure in inches margins -- a list of margins [left, right, bottom, top] in inches spacing -- a list containing the horizontal and the vertical spacing between the subplots. pylab.gcf().set_figsize_inches(width, height) all_axes_width = (width - margins[0] - margins[1]) axes_width = (all_axes_width - (pylab.gca().numCols - 1)*spacings[0])/pylab.gca().numCols all_axes_height = (self.height - margins[2] - margins[3]) axes_height = (all_axes_height - (pylab.gca().numRows - 1)*spacings[1])/pylab.gca().numRows pylab.subplots_adjust( left=margins[0]/width, right=1-margins[1]/width, bottom=margins[2]/height, top=1-margins[3]/height, wspace=spacings[0]/axes_width, hspace=spacings[1]/axes_height ) I wonder if their is a cleaner way of doing this, without a wrapper function? Is it possible to organize multiple axes in a plot in another way than using the pylab.subplot function? I'm currently preparing a publication for which the plots are created with matplotlib, and I would like to share some of my experiences. The (future) ambition of matplotlib is to create plots that are publication-ready. For basic plots this is certainly no problem at all, but for complex plots containing multiple axes etc, the pylab.subplot function is too restrictive. As an example, I have attached one of the types of plots I'm working on. I have to use wrapper functions like the one given above, to make sure that the subplots are squares and the horizontal and vertical distances between them are equal. This is luckily not a blocker, but the choice of working with relative coordinates, is not always ideal. A problem I could not solve up to know, is aligning the labels at the left and the bottom of the plot. Don't get me wrong, I know that it is very difficult to implement a plotting interface that is able to deal with all these details. Are their any development plans to go further that the subplot- interface? I have some experience with writing GTK-applications. The GTK library contains a series of widgets (tables, hboxes, vboxes, ...) that are purely used for organizing the positions and sizes of the actual widgets of interest (entries, buttons, labels, ...). A similar approach in matplotlib would be a great improvement. The organizational widgets should have properties like margins, spacings, ..., that can be given in different units (relative or absolute). The actual widgets of interest in this analogy are axes, labels (for the title and axislabels), ticks with labels and legends. What do you matplotlib-people think of such an idea? Is it completely over-engineered? Maybe some parts are already partially implemented? I would be happy to work out this idea and start implementing it. It's a rather huge job, as I am not yet familiar with the complete matplotlib code. Some discussion in advance, also with non-developers, is therefore more than welcome. Shoot! regards, Toon