You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(56) |
Nov
(65) |
Dec
(37) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(78) |
Mar
(153) |
Apr
(205) |
May
(184) |
Jun
(123) |
Jul
(171) |
Aug
(156) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(223) |
2005 |
Jan
(184) |
Feb
(267) |
Mar
(214) |
Apr
(286) |
May
(320) |
Jun
(299) |
Jul
(348) |
Aug
(283) |
Sep
(355) |
Oct
(293) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(203) |
2006 |
Jan
(352) |
Feb
(358) |
Mar
(403) |
Apr
(313) |
May
(165) |
Jun
(281) |
Jul
(316) |
Aug
(228) |
Sep
(279) |
Oct
(243) |
Nov
(315) |
Dec
(345) |
2007 |
Jan
(260) |
Feb
(323) |
Mar
(340) |
Apr
(319) |
May
(290) |
Jun
(296) |
Jul
(221) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(242) |
Oct
(248) |
Nov
(242) |
Dec
(332) |
2008 |
Jan
(312) |
Feb
(359) |
Mar
(454) |
Apr
(287) |
May
(340) |
Jun
(450) |
Jul
(403) |
Aug
(324) |
Sep
(349) |
Oct
(385) |
Nov
(363) |
Dec
(437) |
2009 |
Jan
(500) |
Feb
(301) |
Mar
(409) |
Apr
(486) |
May
(545) |
Jun
(391) |
Jul
(518) |
Aug
(497) |
Sep
(492) |
Oct
(429) |
Nov
(357) |
Dec
(310) |
2010 |
Jan
(371) |
Feb
(657) |
Mar
(519) |
Apr
(432) |
May
(312) |
Jun
(416) |
Jul
(477) |
Aug
(386) |
Sep
(419) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(320) |
Dec
(202) |
2011 |
Jan
(321) |
Feb
(413) |
Mar
(299) |
Apr
(215) |
May
(284) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(207) |
Aug
(314) |
Sep
(321) |
Oct
(259) |
Nov
(347) |
Dec
(209) |
2012 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(414) |
Mar
(377) |
Apr
(179) |
May
(173) |
Jun
(234) |
Jul
(295) |
Aug
(239) |
Sep
(276) |
Oct
(355) |
Nov
(144) |
Dec
(108) |
2013 |
Jan
(170) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(204) |
Apr
(133) |
May
(142) |
Jun
(89) |
Jul
(160) |
Aug
(180) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(136) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(32) |
2014 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(90) |
Mar
(161) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(78) |
Jun
(94) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(83) |
Sep
(102) |
Oct
(132) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(96) |
2015 |
Jan
(45) |
Feb
(138) |
Mar
(176) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(119) |
Jun
(124) |
Jul
(77) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(9) |
2016 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2025 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
(3) |
4
(6) |
5
(5) |
6
(5) |
7
|
8
|
9
(1) |
10
(5) |
11
(11) |
12
(6) |
13
(6) |
14
(4) |
15
(1) |
16
(1) |
17
(10) |
18
(20) |
19
(5) |
20
(7) |
21
(1) |
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
(1) |
26
(3) |
27
(1) |
28
|
29
(1) |
30
(2) |
31
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
> What is your matplotlib.__version__ ? I think that code only made it's > way into v1.2.0 (the latest stable), and was did not make it into > v1.1.1 (or anything before it) I'm running 1.1.0 - I'll upgrade it now. Thanks for the help! Oliver
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Oliver King <oli...@gm...> wrote: > What appears to be happening is that the alpha values in the cmap I use when I create the ListedColormap object are being ignored by the add_collection function. I see that this bug (or something quite like it) was reported in late 2008: > http://matplotlib.1069221.n5.nabble.com/create-ListedColormap-with-different-alpha-values-tt18693.html#a18697 > > Did the patch from late 2008 not make it into the code, or has this bug resurfaced? Does anyone know of a workaround for this issue? It's all a blur now, but I don't think that patch made it in because colormaps were inherently RGB not RGBA. Something similar to that patch was merged in a year ago: https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/660 and attached is the result of running your code on my machine. What is your matplotlib.__version__ ? I think that code only made it's way into v1.2.0 (the latest stable), and was did not make it into v1.1.1 (or anything before it) -- Paul Ivanov 314 address only used for lists, off-list direct email at: http://pirsquared.org | GPG/PGP key id: 0x0F3E28F7
Hi, I've been trying to plot a line with varying alpha (but constant color). After much googling I have come up with the following code segment, which by all indications should work. It works when I vary an individual RGB element, but not when I vary alpha. ################################################# import numpy as np import matplotlib.pyplot as plt from matplotlib.collections import LineCollection from matplotlib.colors import ListedColormap, BoundaryNorm # the line to plot x = np.linspace(0,1,101) y = x*0.5-0.25 scaling = np.exp(-(x-0.5)**2/0.5**2) # scale the transparency of the line according to this # Create a colormap which has a constant color, but varies the transparency. N = 50 # this many different transparency levels alpha_boundaries = np.linspace(np.min(scaling),np.max(scaling),N+1) # The lowest values are transparent, the highest ones are opaque cmap = ListedColormap([(0.0,0.0,0.0,a) for a in np.linspace(0,1,N)]) norm = BoundaryNorm(alpha_boundaries, cmap.N) # Create a set of line segments so that we can color them individually # This creates the points as a N x 1 x 2 array so that we can stack points # together easily to get the segments. The segments array for line collection # needs to be numlines x points per line x 2 (x and y) points = np.array([x, y]).T.reshape(-1, 1, 2) segments = np.concatenate([points[:-1], points[1:]], axis=1) # Create the line collection object, setting the colormapping parameters. # Have to set the actual values used for colormapping separately. lc = LineCollection(segments, cmap=cmap, norm=norm) lc.set_array(scaling) ax = plt.subplot(111) ax.add_collection(lc) plt.xlim(x.min(), x.max()) plt.ylim(y.min(), y.max()) plt.show() ################################################# What appears to be happening is that the alpha values in the cmap I use when I create the ListedColormap object are being ignored by the add_collection function. I see that this bug (or something quite like it) was reported in late 2008: http://matplotlib.1069221.n5.nabble.com/create-ListedColormap-with-different-alpha-values-tt18693.html#a18697 Did the patch from late 2008 not make it into the code, or has this bug resurfaced? Does anyone know of a workaround for this issue? Cheers, Oliver
As of matplotlib v1.2.0 you can hatch a contour set directly. There is an example in the gallery: http://matplotlib.org/examples/pylab_examples/contourf_hatching.html Hope that helps, Phil On 5 December 2012 17:28, spencerahill <spe...@gm...> wrote: > Jae-Joon Lee wrote > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Jonathan Slavin > > < > > > jslavin@.harvard > > > > wrote: > >> I'm wondering if there is some way to do cross hatching as a way to fill > >> contours rather than colors (using contourf). The only references to > >> cross hatching I see in the documentation are for patches type objects. > >> As far as I can tell, contour and contourf return objects of their own > >> type (contour.QuadContourSet) that do not have hatch as an attribute. > >> > > > > Yes, it seems that hatching is only supported in patches. > > You may workaround this by converting contours to multiple patches. > > See the attachment. > > > > Matplotlib-users mailing list > > > Matplotlib-users@.sourceforge > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users > > > > > > contour_to_hatched_patches.py (1K) > > < > http://matplotlib.1069221.n5.nabble.com/attachment/23/0/contour_to_hatched_patches.py> > ; > > Hi Jae-Joon, > > Your contour_to_hatched_patches.py script works excellently. Is there a way > to suppress the contour lines and filling, leaving only stippling? I have > been experimenting with it but no luck. > > I have a contourf of a 2D variable and a separate 2D array indicating > regions of statistical significance (i.e. a mask, which equals 1 in cells > where the variable is significant and equals 0 else), and I want to put > black hatching over the contourf where it is significant. I can get this to > work, but still with a black contour line surrounding the hatched region. > I'd like to remove the line, leaving just the hatching. Thanks! > > Best, > Spencer > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://matplotlib.1069221.n5.nabble.com/cross-hatching-in-contours-tp22p39945.html > Sent from the matplotlib - users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial > Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support > Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services > Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers > http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-users mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users >
Jae-Joon Lee wrote > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Jonathan Slavin > < > jslavin@.harvard > > wrote: >> I'm wondering if there is some way to do cross hatching as a way to fill >> contours rather than colors (using contourf). The only references to >> cross hatching I see in the documentation are for patches type objects. >> As far as I can tell, contour and contourf return objects of their own >> type (contour.QuadContourSet) that do not have hatch as an attribute. >> > > Yes, it seems that hatching is only supported in patches. > You may workaround this by converting contours to multiple patches. > See the attachment. > > Matplotlib-users mailing list > Matplotlib-users@.sourceforge > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users > > > contour_to_hatched_patches.py (1K) > <http://matplotlib.1069221.n5.nabble.com/attachment/23/0/contour_to_hatched_patches.py> Hi Jae-Joon, Your contour_to_hatched_patches.py script works excellently. Is there a way to suppress the contour lines and filling, leaving only stippling? I have been experimenting with it but no luck. I have a contourf of a 2D variable and a separate 2D array indicating regions of statistical significance (i.e. a mask, which equals 1 in cells where the variable is significant and equals 0 else), and I want to put black hatching over the contourf where it is significant. I can get this to work, but still with a black contour line surrounding the hatched region. I'd like to remove the line, leaving just the hatching. Thanks! Best, Spencer -- View this message in context: http://matplotlib.1069221.n5.nabble.com/cross-hatching-in-contours-tp22p39945.html Sent from the matplotlib - users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.