You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(56) |
Nov
(65) |
Dec
(37) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(78) |
Mar
(153) |
Apr
(205) |
May
(184) |
Jun
(123) |
Jul
(171) |
Aug
(156) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(223) |
2005 |
Jan
(184) |
Feb
(267) |
Mar
(214) |
Apr
(286) |
May
(320) |
Jun
(299) |
Jul
(348) |
Aug
(283) |
Sep
(355) |
Oct
(293) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(203) |
2006 |
Jan
(352) |
Feb
(358) |
Mar
(403) |
Apr
(313) |
May
(165) |
Jun
(281) |
Jul
(316) |
Aug
(228) |
Sep
(279) |
Oct
(243) |
Nov
(315) |
Dec
(345) |
2007 |
Jan
(260) |
Feb
(323) |
Mar
(340) |
Apr
(319) |
May
(290) |
Jun
(296) |
Jul
(221) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(242) |
Oct
(248) |
Nov
(242) |
Dec
(332) |
2008 |
Jan
(312) |
Feb
(359) |
Mar
(454) |
Apr
(287) |
May
(340) |
Jun
(450) |
Jul
(403) |
Aug
(324) |
Sep
(349) |
Oct
(385) |
Nov
(363) |
Dec
(437) |
2009 |
Jan
(500) |
Feb
(301) |
Mar
(409) |
Apr
(486) |
May
(545) |
Jun
(391) |
Jul
(518) |
Aug
(497) |
Sep
(492) |
Oct
(429) |
Nov
(357) |
Dec
(310) |
2010 |
Jan
(371) |
Feb
(657) |
Mar
(519) |
Apr
(432) |
May
(312) |
Jun
(416) |
Jul
(477) |
Aug
(386) |
Sep
(419) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(320) |
Dec
(202) |
2011 |
Jan
(321) |
Feb
(413) |
Mar
(299) |
Apr
(215) |
May
(284) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(207) |
Aug
(314) |
Sep
(321) |
Oct
(259) |
Nov
(347) |
Dec
(209) |
2012 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(414) |
Mar
(377) |
Apr
(179) |
May
(173) |
Jun
(234) |
Jul
(295) |
Aug
(239) |
Sep
(276) |
Oct
(355) |
Nov
(144) |
Dec
(108) |
2013 |
Jan
(170) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(204) |
Apr
(133) |
May
(142) |
Jun
(89) |
Jul
(160) |
Aug
(180) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(136) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(32) |
2014 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(90) |
Mar
(161) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(78) |
Jun
(94) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(83) |
Sep
(102) |
Oct
(132) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(96) |
2015 |
Jan
(45) |
Feb
(138) |
Mar
(176) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(119) |
Jun
(124) |
Jul
(77) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(9) |
2016 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2025 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
(1) |
2
(4) |
3
(3) |
4
(2) |
5
(4) |
6
(15) |
7
(17) |
8
(4) |
9
(5) |
10
(14) |
11
(16) |
12
(37) |
13
(38) |
14
(16) |
15
(2) |
16
(6) |
17
(4) |
18
(14) |
19
(4) |
20
(1) |
21
(14) |
22
(2) |
23
(6) |
24
(16) |
25
(4) |
26
(1) |
27
(10) |
28
(30) |
29
(7) |
30
(4) |
31
(15) |
|
|
|
|
|
>>>>> "Darius" == Darius Vainius <va...@ib...> writes: Darius> Hello, does anybody have an idea how to set the x-axis Darius> scale to logarithmic on an errorbar plot? In other words, Darius> is there any way to plot data with error bars while having Darius> x-axis scale logarithmic? Darius> Many thanks in advance for any useful suggestions. On any type of plot where the data on a given axis is strictly positive, you should be able to set the scale to 'log'. Just make sure that the axis limits are also strictly positive. Eg ax.set_xlim(0.01, 10) ax.set_xscale('log') With errorbars, you have to be careful, because if the error limits on one of your positive datapoints extend into non-positive territory, you'll get an error with log scaling. JDH
Hello, does anybody have an idea how to set the x-axis scale to logarithmic on an errorbar plot? In other words, is there any way to plot data with error bars while having x-axis scale logarithmic? Many thanks in advance for any useful suggestions. Darius
>>>>> "Michael" == Michael J T O'Kelly <mo...@MI...> writes: Michael> I want to be able to specify the size of points in a Michael> scatter plot in data coordinates rather than points^2. Michael> The points should change in size at different zoom Michael> levels. Is there a built-in way to do this, or a good Michael> workaround for now? You can't do this with the built-in scatter or RegularPolyCollection (which scatter uses) because these assume a size in points. But you can roll your own PolyCollection fairly easily import matplotlib.cm as cm import matplotlib.numerix as nx from matplotlib.collections import PolyCollection from pylab import figure, show xs, ys, radii, colors = nx.mlab.rand(4,100) radii *= 0.1 def poly(x,y,r,numsides): theta = 2*nx.pi/numsides*nx.arange(numsides) return zip(x + r*nx.cos(theta), y + r*nx.sin(theta)) verts = [poly(x,y,r,6) for x,y,r in zip(xs, ys, radii)] col = PolyCollection(verts) col.set_array(colors) col.set_cmap(cm.hot) fig = figure() ax = fig.add_subplot(111, xlim=(0,1), ylim=(0,1), aspect=1) ax.add_collection(col) show()
I want to be able to specify the size of points in a scatter plot in data coordinates rather than points^2. The points should change in size at different zoom levels. Is there a built-in way to do this, or a good workaround for now? Thanks, Michael