You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(56) |
Nov
(65) |
Dec
(37) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(78) |
Mar
(153) |
Apr
(205) |
May
(184) |
Jun
(123) |
Jul
(171) |
Aug
(156) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(223) |
2005 |
Jan
(184) |
Feb
(267) |
Mar
(214) |
Apr
(286) |
May
(320) |
Jun
(299) |
Jul
(348) |
Aug
(283) |
Sep
(355) |
Oct
(293) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(203) |
2006 |
Jan
(352) |
Feb
(358) |
Mar
(403) |
Apr
(313) |
May
(165) |
Jun
(281) |
Jul
(316) |
Aug
(228) |
Sep
(279) |
Oct
(243) |
Nov
(315) |
Dec
(345) |
2007 |
Jan
(260) |
Feb
(323) |
Mar
(340) |
Apr
(319) |
May
(290) |
Jun
(296) |
Jul
(221) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(242) |
Oct
(248) |
Nov
(242) |
Dec
(332) |
2008 |
Jan
(312) |
Feb
(359) |
Mar
(454) |
Apr
(287) |
May
(340) |
Jun
(450) |
Jul
(403) |
Aug
(324) |
Sep
(349) |
Oct
(385) |
Nov
(363) |
Dec
(437) |
2009 |
Jan
(500) |
Feb
(301) |
Mar
(409) |
Apr
(486) |
May
(545) |
Jun
(391) |
Jul
(518) |
Aug
(497) |
Sep
(492) |
Oct
(429) |
Nov
(357) |
Dec
(310) |
2010 |
Jan
(371) |
Feb
(657) |
Mar
(519) |
Apr
(432) |
May
(312) |
Jun
(416) |
Jul
(477) |
Aug
(386) |
Sep
(419) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(320) |
Dec
(202) |
2011 |
Jan
(321) |
Feb
(413) |
Mar
(299) |
Apr
(215) |
May
(284) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(207) |
Aug
(314) |
Sep
(321) |
Oct
(259) |
Nov
(347) |
Dec
(209) |
2012 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(414) |
Mar
(377) |
Apr
(179) |
May
(173) |
Jun
(234) |
Jul
(295) |
Aug
(239) |
Sep
(276) |
Oct
(355) |
Nov
(144) |
Dec
(108) |
2013 |
Jan
(170) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(204) |
Apr
(133) |
May
(142) |
Jun
(89) |
Jul
(160) |
Aug
(180) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(136) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(32) |
2014 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(90) |
Mar
(161) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(78) |
Jun
(94) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(83) |
Sep
(102) |
Oct
(132) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(96) |
2015 |
Jan
(45) |
Feb
(138) |
Mar
(176) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(119) |
Jun
(124) |
Jul
(77) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(9) |
2016 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2025 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1
(18) |
2
(8) |
3
(2) |
4
(8) |
5
(5) |
6
(3) |
7
(17) |
8
(3) |
9
(3) |
10
(3) |
11
(14) |
12
(1) |
13
|
14
(2) |
15
(9) |
16
(23) |
17
(12) |
18
(13) |
19
(7) |
20
(4) |
21
(2) |
22
(6) |
23
(7) |
24
(6) |
25
(2) |
26
|
27
(4) |
28
(1) |
29
(10) |
30
(7) |
31
(14) |
|
|
>>>>> "Alex" == Alex Rada <ale...@ya...> writes: Alex> Hi all, I'm trying to make some nice plots, but I have the Alex> following problem. I think that ticks labels are too close Alex> to axes. Are there some trics to set this distance? Set these two parameters in matplotlibrc http://matplotlib.sf.net/.matplotlibrc tick.major.pad : 4 # distance to major tick label in points tick.minor.pad : 4 # distance to the minor tick label in points You can also set rc parameters with the rc function.
Hi all, I'm trying to make some nice plots, but I have the following problem. I think that ticks labels are too close to axes. Are there some trics to set this distance? thanks, Alex
>>>>> "Humufr" == Humufr <hu...@ya...> writes: Humufr> Hi, when I wrote a script like: Humufr> import numarray image = numarray.ones((30,30)) Humufr> from pylab import * matshow(image) show() Humufr> I obtain an error message: Humufr> Traceback (most recent call last): File "test.py", line 6, Humufr> in ? matshow(image) File Humufr> "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/matplotlib/pylab.py", Humufr> line 1647, in matshow w,h = figaspect(arr) File Humufr> "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/matplotlib/figure.py", Humufr> line 480, in figaspect nr,nc = arr.shape[:2] Humufr> AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'shape' Humufr> if I'm call pylab before to create the numarray array it's Humufr> ok: It looks like your numerix setting is your .matplotlibrc file may be Numeric, and you are trying to pass a Numeric array. Make sure that the rc setting agrees with the actual array type used. To insure this, we recommend that you use matplotlib.numerix to import the array object and methods, rather than explicitly importing numarray directly. matplotlib numerix, and by extension the pylab module, already provide the proper array packages based on your rc setting. Please see several FAQs on this issue regarding rc and numerix. JDH
>>>>> "matthew" == matthew arnison <ma...@ca...> writes: matthew> To make a long story short, _winreg is failing to deal matthew> with some Japanese font registry keys, and throwing the matthew> WindowsError (ErrNo 234). A good workaround is to add a matthew> "try / except WindowsError: pass" around the matthew> _winreg.EnumValue() stanza inside the for loop. From my matthew> testing, for a system with 93 fonts, this should skip the matthew> 3 troublesome fonts and catalog the rest. matthew> My apologies that I cannot provide a patch or a simple matthew> test case at this time, but I hope this report is useful. Hi Matthew -- thanks for your efforts on this. I have to honestly say that I don't have a lot of time to work on this bug -- I don't know enough about Japanese fonts or the windows registry. None of the other matplotlib developers seem to have taken up the banner either. If you can provide a patch that fixes or works around the bug, I'd be very happy to include it. I could work figure out the appropriate patch by reading your email closely, but I don't have a good environment to test it, so it would be more efficient if you simply submitted a patch that has your try/except workaround until we can come up with something better. Thanks! JDH
Hi, A few months back I gave a little report to matplotlib-users on using matplotlib on Japanese Windows. There were several issues that I managed to find workarounds for. I wanted to give an update on the font_manager.py bug. This bug is still in matplotlib (as of CVS earlier today) and causes a matplotlib import to throw a WindowsError exception (ErrNo 234). This has happened to me on every Windows 2000 Japanese PC I've tried it on, including PCs which had a pretty fresh installs of Win2K. (It may also happen on Japanese WinXP, I haven't tried it.) In other words, it's a showstopper. And it happens even without py2exe. A bit of google searching turned up a couple of *.jp blogs mentioning the error. The workaround I suggested last Novemeber works (see my message quoted below), but it's a bit of a kludge. I dug a bit into the bug today and discovered it's actually a side-effect of what appears to be a Microsoft Win32 API registry bug. _winreg uses RegQueryInfoKey to ask for the maximum length of all the subkeys in the fonts registry key. Then _winreg creates a buffer of that length (plus 1 for NULL termination) and uses RegEnumValue to grab the subkey, but for some fonts Windows returns ERROR_MORE_DATA (234) indicating that the buffer size is too small. There are at least 3 fonts that trigger it, which seem to be standard on Japanese Win2k. To make a long story short, _winreg is failing to deal with some Japanese font registry keys, and throwing the WindowsError (ErrNo 234). A good workaround is to add a "try / except WindowsError: pass" around the _winreg.EnumValue() stanza inside the for loop. From my testing, for a system with 93 fonts, this should skip the 3 troublesome fonts and catalog the rest. My apologies that I cannot provide a patch or a simple test case at this time, but I hope this report is useful. Cheers, Matthew. p.s. It may be there are ways to work around this bug in _winreg, which I think would be the better place to do it. E.g. by using RegEnumValue to query the subkey size instead of RegQueryInfoKey. But I haven't isolated a simple test case yet, apart from "import matplotlib" on Japanese Win2k. Here is the code fragment: MSFontDirectories = [ r'SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Fonts', r'SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Fonts'] ... def win32InstalledFonts(directory=None, fontext='ttf'): """Search for fonts in the specified font directory, or use the system directories if none given. A list of TrueType fonts are returned by default with AFM fonts as an option. """ import _winreg if directory is None: directory = win32FontDirectory() key, items = None, {} for fontdir in MSFontDirectories: try: local = _winreg.OpenKey(_winreg.HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE, fontdir) except OSError: continue if not local: return glob.glob(os.path.join(directory, '*.'+fontext)) try: for j in range(_winreg.QueryInfoKey(local)[1]): key, direc, any = _winreg.EnumValue( local, j) if not os.path.dirname(direc): direc = os.path.join(directory, direc) direc = os.path.abspath(direc).lower() if direc[-4:] == '.'+fontext: items[direc] = 1 return items.keys() finally: _winreg.CloseKey(local) return None On 1/11/2004 3:32 PM, matthew arnison wrote: > I thought I'd mention some small isuues I found with using py2exe to deploy matplotlib 0.63.2 on Japanese Windows 2000. > > [...snip...] > > * font_manager.py throws an exception, I suspect to do with Japanese font names or font directory names: > > File "c:\Python23\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\font_manager.py", line 111, in > win32InstalledFonts > key, direc, any = _winreg.EnumValue( local, j) > WindowsError: [Errno 234] > > from this site: > > http://www.google.com.au/search?q=cache:B8BlgKwVYxcJ:www.cubelab.com/ymasuda/python/index_jp.html+matplotlib+local+None+windowserror&hl=en > > I found a workaround to add > > local = None > > at line 107 of font_manager.py to give this: > > for fontdir in MSFontDirectories: > try: > local = _winreg.OpenKey(_winreg.HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE, fontdir) > except OSError: > continue > > local = None > > if not local: > return glob.glob(os.path.join(directory, '*.'+fontext))