You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(56) |
Nov
(65) |
Dec
(37) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(78) |
Mar
(153) |
Apr
(205) |
May
(184) |
Jun
(123) |
Jul
(171) |
Aug
(156) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(223) |
2005 |
Jan
(184) |
Feb
(267) |
Mar
(214) |
Apr
(286) |
May
(320) |
Jun
(299) |
Jul
(348) |
Aug
(283) |
Sep
(355) |
Oct
(293) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(203) |
2006 |
Jan
(352) |
Feb
(358) |
Mar
(403) |
Apr
(313) |
May
(165) |
Jun
(281) |
Jul
(316) |
Aug
(228) |
Sep
(279) |
Oct
(243) |
Nov
(315) |
Dec
(345) |
2007 |
Jan
(260) |
Feb
(323) |
Mar
(340) |
Apr
(319) |
May
(290) |
Jun
(296) |
Jul
(221) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(242) |
Oct
(248) |
Nov
(242) |
Dec
(332) |
2008 |
Jan
(312) |
Feb
(359) |
Mar
(454) |
Apr
(287) |
May
(340) |
Jun
(450) |
Jul
(403) |
Aug
(324) |
Sep
(349) |
Oct
(385) |
Nov
(363) |
Dec
(437) |
2009 |
Jan
(500) |
Feb
(301) |
Mar
(409) |
Apr
(486) |
May
(545) |
Jun
(391) |
Jul
(518) |
Aug
(497) |
Sep
(492) |
Oct
(429) |
Nov
(357) |
Dec
(310) |
2010 |
Jan
(371) |
Feb
(657) |
Mar
(519) |
Apr
(432) |
May
(312) |
Jun
(416) |
Jul
(477) |
Aug
(386) |
Sep
(419) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(320) |
Dec
(202) |
2011 |
Jan
(321) |
Feb
(413) |
Mar
(299) |
Apr
(215) |
May
(284) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(207) |
Aug
(314) |
Sep
(321) |
Oct
(259) |
Nov
(347) |
Dec
(209) |
2012 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(414) |
Mar
(377) |
Apr
(179) |
May
(173) |
Jun
(234) |
Jul
(295) |
Aug
(239) |
Sep
(276) |
Oct
(355) |
Nov
(144) |
Dec
(108) |
2013 |
Jan
(170) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(204) |
Apr
(133) |
May
(142) |
Jun
(89) |
Jul
(160) |
Aug
(180) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(136) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(32) |
2014 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(90) |
Mar
(161) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(78) |
Jun
(94) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(83) |
Sep
(102) |
Oct
(132) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(96) |
2015 |
Jan
(45) |
Feb
(138) |
Mar
(176) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(119) |
Jun
(124) |
Jul
(77) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(9) |
2016 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2025 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1
|
2
(6) |
3
(5) |
4
(5) |
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
(2) |
9
|
10
(1) |
11
(4) |
12
(1) |
13
|
14
(2) |
15
(1) |
16
(3) |
17
(5) |
18
|
19
(7) |
20
(1) |
21
(1) |
22
|
23
(2) |
24
(4) |
25
(5) |
26
(3) |
27
|
28
(3) |
29
(3) |
30
(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
2013年9月3日 Michael Droettboom <md...@st...>: > That's correct. We could probably do a better job reporting that to the > user, though. Would you mind creating an issue for that? https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/issues/2379
On 09/04/2013 12:47 PM, Sylvain LÉVÊQUE wrote: > Hello > > I have a performance issue when using a Rectangle patch with linestyle > 'dotted'. Here is some code showing it: > > > from matplotlib import gridspec > > gs = gridspec.GridSpec(1, 2) > ax1 = plt.subplot(gs[0, 0]) > ax2 = plt.subplot(gs[0, 1]) > > data = [0, 1] > > r1 = Rectangle([10, 0.25], 100000, 0.5, facecolor='None', > edgecolor='red') > r2 = Rectangle([10, 0.25], 100000, 0.5, facecolor='None', > edgecolor='red', linestyle='dotted') > > ax1.add_patch(r1) > ax2.add_patch(r2) > > ax1.plot(data) > ax2.plot(data) > > > The steps to reproduce: > - %paste the code in pylab > - select the zoom tool > - zoom on the left plot to the left of the figure until you see the data > within the [0, 1] range, and zoom some more (no performance issue) > - zoom on the right plot to the left of the figure until you see the > data within the [0, 1] range, the more you try zooming, the longer it > takes to render > - try zooming on the left plot again, performance is now poor > > So I understand I have three performance issues: > - behaviour is different depending on linestyle Agg uses trapezoid rendering. To render a regular solid rectangle the trapezoid renderer only needs to manage 8 points. For a dotted line, it's (at least) 4 points per dot, and the number of dots goes into the thousands. These each must be stored in memory and repeatedly sorted as the shape is rendered. > - performance issue on second plot impacts first plot That's not surprising. Each frame is drawn in full. > - data outside of the view limits are taken into account for the > rendering (performance hit even if Rectangle starts from x=10 but xlim > was reduced by zooming to eg [0, 1]) Yes. Generally, it is much faster to just let the renderer perform culling outside the bounds than to do it upfront, so that's why it's done that way. However, the case of dotted lines on a solid object is a degenerate case. You could try drawing each side of the rectangle as a separate line -- this would bring the line clipping algorithm into effect. (matplotlib has a line-clipping algorithm, but it does not have a solid polygon clipping algorithm). Mike > > I initially observed the problem in a wx application using WxAgg, I can > reproduce it in pylab with TkAgg, on two separate computers. > > I've tracked this down to an increasingly slow call in backend_agg.py > (l.145, "self._renderer.draw_path(gc, path, transform, rgbFace)" in > matplotlib 1.3.0). It then goes to native code, I stopped there. > > Python 2.7.5, matplotlib 1.3.0 (also observed on 1.2.1). > > (I have another issue if commenting out the two last lines and > %paste-ing it to pylab, I then get an OverflowError, I don't know if > this is related) > > Thanks for your help
Hello I have a performance issue when using a Rectangle patch with linestyle 'dotted'. Here is some code showing it: from matplotlib import gridspec gs = gridspec.GridSpec(1, 2) ax1 = plt.subplot(gs[0, 0]) ax2 = plt.subplot(gs[0, 1]) data = [0, 1] r1 = Rectangle([10, 0.25], 100000, 0.5, facecolor='None', edgecolor='red') r2 = Rectangle([10, 0.25], 100000, 0.5, facecolor='None', edgecolor='red', linestyle='dotted') ax1.add_patch(r1) ax2.add_patch(r2) ax1.plot(data) ax2.plot(data) The steps to reproduce: - %paste the code in pylab - select the zoom tool - zoom on the left plot to the left of the figure until you see the data within the [0, 1] range, and zoom some more (no performance issue) - zoom on the right plot to the left of the figure until you see the data within the [0, 1] range, the more you try zooming, the longer it takes to render - try zooming on the left plot again, performance is now poor So I understand I have three performance issues: - behaviour is different depending on linestyle - performance issue on second plot impacts first plot - data outside of the view limits are taken into account for the rendering (performance hit even if Rectangle starts from x=10 but xlim was reduced by zooming to eg [0, 1]) I initially observed the problem in a wx application using WxAgg, I can reproduce it in pylab with TkAgg, on two separate computers. I've tracked this down to an increasingly slow call in backend_agg.py (l.145, "self._renderer.draw_path(gc, path, transform, rgbFace)" in matplotlib 1.3.0). It then goes to native code, I stopped there. Python 2.7.5, matplotlib 1.3.0 (also observed on 1.2.1). (I have another issue if commenting out the two last lines and %paste-ing it to pylab, I then get an OverflowError, I don't know if this is related) Thanks for your help -- Sylvain
PyInstaller 2.0 also has exactly the same error. cx_Freeze unfortunately has problems with some tricks in numpy 1.7.x. -- View this message in context: http://matplotlib.1069221.n5.nabble.com/1-3-0-and-py2exe-regression-tp41723p41972.html Sent from the matplotlib - users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi, I want to create a plot with both a broken y-axis and a secondary y-axis. While both work fine separately, I don't manage to combine both functions. The broken y-axis would look something like this: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17976103/matplotlib-broken-axis-example-uneven-subplot-size <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17976103/matplotlib-broken-axis-example-uneven-subplot-size> But then I want to have the break only in the primary y-axis at the left side and add a secondary y-axis to the plot without a break. The latter normally works with twinx() but fails when combined with the broken primary y-axis. Can someone help me? -- View this message in context: http://matplotlib.1069221.n5.nabble.com/Broken-y-axis-and-secondary-y-axis-tp41971.html Sent from the matplotlib - users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.