You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(56) |
Nov
(65) |
Dec
(37) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(78) |
Mar
(153) |
Apr
(205) |
May
(184) |
Jun
(123) |
Jul
(171) |
Aug
(156) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(223) |
2005 |
Jan
(184) |
Feb
(267) |
Mar
(214) |
Apr
(286) |
May
(320) |
Jun
(299) |
Jul
(348) |
Aug
(283) |
Sep
(355) |
Oct
(293) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(203) |
2006 |
Jan
(352) |
Feb
(358) |
Mar
(403) |
Apr
(313) |
May
(165) |
Jun
(281) |
Jul
(316) |
Aug
(228) |
Sep
(279) |
Oct
(243) |
Nov
(315) |
Dec
(345) |
2007 |
Jan
(260) |
Feb
(323) |
Mar
(340) |
Apr
(319) |
May
(290) |
Jun
(296) |
Jul
(221) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(242) |
Oct
(248) |
Nov
(242) |
Dec
(332) |
2008 |
Jan
(312) |
Feb
(359) |
Mar
(454) |
Apr
(287) |
May
(340) |
Jun
(450) |
Jul
(403) |
Aug
(324) |
Sep
(349) |
Oct
(385) |
Nov
(363) |
Dec
(437) |
2009 |
Jan
(500) |
Feb
(301) |
Mar
(409) |
Apr
(486) |
May
(545) |
Jun
(391) |
Jul
(518) |
Aug
(497) |
Sep
(492) |
Oct
(429) |
Nov
(357) |
Dec
(310) |
2010 |
Jan
(371) |
Feb
(657) |
Mar
(519) |
Apr
(432) |
May
(312) |
Jun
(416) |
Jul
(477) |
Aug
(386) |
Sep
(419) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(320) |
Dec
(202) |
2011 |
Jan
(321) |
Feb
(413) |
Mar
(299) |
Apr
(215) |
May
(284) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(207) |
Aug
(314) |
Sep
(321) |
Oct
(259) |
Nov
(347) |
Dec
(209) |
2012 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(414) |
Mar
(377) |
Apr
(179) |
May
(173) |
Jun
(234) |
Jul
(295) |
Aug
(239) |
Sep
(276) |
Oct
(355) |
Nov
(144) |
Dec
(108) |
2013 |
Jan
(170) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(204) |
Apr
(133) |
May
(142) |
Jun
(89) |
Jul
(160) |
Aug
(180) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(136) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(32) |
2014 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(90) |
Mar
(161) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(78) |
Jun
(94) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(83) |
Sep
(102) |
Oct
(132) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(96) |
2015 |
Jan
(45) |
Feb
(138) |
Mar
(176) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(119) |
Jun
(124) |
Jul
(77) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(9) |
2016 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2025 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
(10) |
2
(12) |
3
(6) |
4
(5) |
5
(6) |
6
(2) |
7
(1) |
8
(20) |
9
(11) |
10
(3) |
11
(6) |
12
(3) |
13
(1) |
14
(2) |
15
(1) |
16
(5) |
17
(9) |
18
(17) |
19
(7) |
20
|
21
(1) |
22
(1) |
23
(1) |
24
|
25
(4) |
26
(4) |
27
|
28
(2) |
29
(2) |
30
(6) |
31
(5) |
|
|
|
>>>>> "Steve" == Steve Chaplin <ste...@ya...> writes: Steve> John, I noticed that when plotting sine waves Steve> (simple_plot.py for example) with the gtk backend that the Steve> lowest points are not plotted. Hi Steve, thanks for letting me know. There is an off-by-one error and it looks like and easy fix. For future reference, you may want to consider using GTKAgg as your default GUI. This has the GTK widget but uses agg for rendering. Agg supports subpixel rendering and so isn't susceptible to one pixel errors that crop up in GTK in a number of contexts. At low resolutions, these become particularly noticeable. Other benefits over the GTK backend are alpha blending, anti-aliased drawing, and faster image support - http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/backends.html#GTKAgg Steve> So I wrote a test script to plot a square, the result is Steve> that the left and top edges are plotted and the bottom and Steve> right edges are clipped off (I can pan the view to display Steve> the missing lines). I can't think of any reason why you Steve> would plot data points and then expect them to be clipped Steve> off, so to me it looks like an off-by-one error. Now on to your problem. In backend_gtk draw_rectangle, change x, y = int(x), self.height-int(math.ceil(y+height)) to x, y = int(x), self.height-int(y+height) and the GraphicsContext.set_clip_rectangle method to def set_clip_rectangle(self, rectangle): GraphicsContextBase.set_clip_rectangle(self, rectangle) l,b,w,h = rectangle rectangle = (int(l), self.renderer.height-int(b+h)+1, int(w), int(h)) self.gdkGC.set_clip_rectangle(rectangle) This fixes the bug, but doesn't handle your test case. The lines in your example are still clipped, but there is a reason for that. In your example, the lines are exactly where the axes lines will be drawn. It's a judgment call whether you want to see the axes line or your line at that location. In interactive navigation when you pan and zoom around, it often happens that your data extend beyond the axes lines; in this case you usually want a clean axes line not partially obscured by your data. If I set the clip so that the lines in your example are plotted, then the axes lines are also overridden in other where the data extend beyond the axes. By tweaking the clip rectangle, eg rectangle = (int(l), self.renderer.height-int(b+h), int(w+1), int(h+2)) you can get your lines drawn but then the axes lines are obscured, eg in subplot_demo and arctest. Try experimenting with a few different demos and clip settings to see what you think is the best compromise; let me know. In Agg this is less of a problem since agg uses pixel blending when two pixels are drawn at the same location so the data pixel over the axes line pixel is less glaring. Cheers, JDH
>>>>> "Greg" == Greg Whittier <gr...@th...> writes: Greg> As a temporary solution you might try just transforming your Greg> r,theta data to x, y and then drawing a grid over it. A nice workaround. You may want to add axis('off') To get rid of the background axes. Greg> I looked at the classes and with the loglog already done as Greg> an example, it shouldn't be too hard to add polar plotting. Greg> So far though I haven't got any further than printing out Greg> some of the code. I was planning on taking a different tack, and derive a PolarAxes from Axes and RadialAxis from Axis, etc, which uses circles rather then lines for the radial gridlines, and so on. But you get so close with so little code that your approach may be better. If you want to keep forging ahead, I'm happy to leave the ball in your court. On an unrelated note, from Numeric import * from matplotlib.matlab import * is redundant because matplotlib.matlab imports all of numeric/numarray as well as MLab, fft, and some stuff from LinearAlgebra and Matrix. This is to provide a matlab like environment where most of the things you need are there. JDH
John, I noticed that when plotting sine waves (simple_plot.py for example) with the gtk backend that the lowest points are not plotted. So I wrote a test script to plot a square, the result is that the left and top edges are plotted and the bottom and right edges are clipped off (I can pan the view to display the missing lines). I can't think of any reason why you would plot data points and then expect them to be clipped off, so to me it looks like an off-by-one error. Test program: from matplotlib.matlab import * figure(1) x = arange(0, 10+1, 1) plot(x, x*0+10, 'r-', x, x*0, 'r-', x*0, x, 'r-', x*0+10, x, 'r-') show() Regards, Steve
John Hunter wrote: >>>>>>"LUK" == LUK ShunTim <shu...@po...> writes: > > > LUK> If matplotlib honours the HOME environmental variable, could > LUK> it not be used on windows system as well? > > Could you provide the context for your question? What are you trying > to do and what isn't working? > > JDH > Hello John, I'm sorry I was in a hurry to go home and tried to read my mail before that. I did not make myself clear. I just clicked on the link in the message to take a peek at the .matplotlibrc file and found that "On windows, this would be, for example, C:\Python23\share\matplotlib." That led me to wonder whether HOME will take effect in windows installation. I had not updated matplotlib for a while and I know it has seen big improvements. I've now downloaded version 0.52 and I can see now when HOME is set, matplotlib will first read the config file there. Perhaps the comments in the original .matplotlibrc can be altered to make this clear. It's a really a very good idea to be able to set everything using just one config file. I'm sure the people on the list will agree that matplotlib is a great piece of work and you have been wonderful in answering questions. Good day, ST --
As a temporary solution you might try just transforming your r,theta data to x, y and then drawing a grid over it. I looked at the classes and with the loglog already done as an example, it shouldn't be too hard to add polar plotting. So far though I haven't got any further than printing out some of the code. Here's a very rough example of a workaround. #!/usr/bin/python from Numeric import * from matplotlib.matlab import * def drawgrid(sp,rticlevels,thetaticlevels): for r in rticlevels: theta = arange(0,2*pi+0.05,0.05) x = r*cos(theta) y = r*sin(theta) sp.plot(x,y,'k-') for theta in thetaticlevels: x = rticlevels[-1]*cos(theta) y = rticlevels[-1]*sin(theta) sp.plot([0,x],[0,y],'k-') def polar(sp,r,theta,marker,rticlevels,thetaticlevels): x = r*cos(theta) y = r*sin(theta) sp.plot(x,y,marker) drawgrid(sp,rticlevels,thetaticlevels) return sp sp = subplot(111) theta = arange(0,pi,0.1) r = 0.5 + cos(theta) polar(sp,r,theta,'b-',arange(0.5,2.0,0.5),arange(0.,2*pi,pi/9.)) On Tue, 2004年03月30日 at 14:32, Peter Groszkowski wrote: > Hello: > > I am currently using matplotlib for all the plotting in the software I am writing. I will however need to produce polar plots. As John has mentioned they should be added at one point. So my shameless question is roughly what version could I expect them to be included in? My options are to either wait for it, write it on my own, or write a simple interface (for my code) to GNUPlot or some other tool. I have not done very much poking around in the current matplotlib libraries (other than changing some rather minor details) and have a feeling that this might take me the longest. Interfacing GNUPLot to my code would not take more than a few hours, but I would prefer to stay with matplotlib. > > Thanks for the great work. > Best,