You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(56) |
Nov
(65) |
Dec
(37) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(78) |
Mar
(153) |
Apr
(205) |
May
(184) |
Jun
(123) |
Jul
(171) |
Aug
(156) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(223) |
2005 |
Jan
(184) |
Feb
(267) |
Mar
(214) |
Apr
(286) |
May
(320) |
Jun
(299) |
Jul
(348) |
Aug
(283) |
Sep
(355) |
Oct
(293) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(203) |
2006 |
Jan
(352) |
Feb
(358) |
Mar
(403) |
Apr
(313) |
May
(165) |
Jun
(281) |
Jul
(316) |
Aug
(228) |
Sep
(279) |
Oct
(243) |
Nov
(315) |
Dec
(345) |
2007 |
Jan
(260) |
Feb
(323) |
Mar
(340) |
Apr
(319) |
May
(290) |
Jun
(296) |
Jul
(221) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(242) |
Oct
(248) |
Nov
(242) |
Dec
(332) |
2008 |
Jan
(312) |
Feb
(359) |
Mar
(454) |
Apr
(287) |
May
(340) |
Jun
(450) |
Jul
(403) |
Aug
(324) |
Sep
(349) |
Oct
(385) |
Nov
(363) |
Dec
(437) |
2009 |
Jan
(500) |
Feb
(301) |
Mar
(409) |
Apr
(486) |
May
(545) |
Jun
(391) |
Jul
(518) |
Aug
(497) |
Sep
(492) |
Oct
(429) |
Nov
(357) |
Dec
(310) |
2010 |
Jan
(371) |
Feb
(657) |
Mar
(519) |
Apr
(432) |
May
(312) |
Jun
(416) |
Jul
(477) |
Aug
(386) |
Sep
(419) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(320) |
Dec
(202) |
2011 |
Jan
(321) |
Feb
(413) |
Mar
(299) |
Apr
(215) |
May
(284) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(207) |
Aug
(314) |
Sep
(321) |
Oct
(259) |
Nov
(347) |
Dec
(209) |
2012 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(414) |
Mar
(377) |
Apr
(179) |
May
(173) |
Jun
(234) |
Jul
(295) |
Aug
(239) |
Sep
(276) |
Oct
(355) |
Nov
(144) |
Dec
(108) |
2013 |
Jan
(170) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(204) |
Apr
(133) |
May
(142) |
Jun
(89) |
Jul
(160) |
Aug
(180) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(136) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(32) |
2014 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(90) |
Mar
(161) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(78) |
Jun
(94) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(83) |
Sep
(102) |
Oct
(132) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(96) |
2015 |
Jan
(45) |
Feb
(138) |
Mar
(176) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(119) |
Jun
(124) |
Jul
(77) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(9) |
2016 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2025 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1
(2) |
2
(3) |
3
(14) |
4
(11) |
5
(10) |
6
(7) |
7
|
8
(3) |
9
(16) |
10
(9) |
11
(12) |
12
(1) |
13
(14) |
14
(10) |
15
|
16
(1) |
17
(7) |
18
(9) |
19
(7) |
20
(10) |
21
|
22
(1) |
23
|
24
(1) |
25
(5) |
26
(7) |
27
(1) |
28
|
29
(2) |
30
(2) |
31
(11) |
|
|
|
|
Am 2015年03月27日 um 15:01 schrieb Sappy85: > Hi all, > > tried to plot a streamline with matplotlib. So far it work's. > But my question: Is there a possibility to avoid the gaps in the streamlines > (see my picture)? > > <http://matplotlib.1069221.n5.nabble.com/file/n45276/ff850_0.png> Are you sure your flow is non divergent? Otherwise sinks and sources of streamlines are quite natural. If your flow is divergence free I I frankly admit that I have no idea how to solve the problem with the (then) spurious gaps. Regards, Foehn > > Regards > Sappy85 > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://matplotlib.1069221.n5.nabble.com/matplotlib-basemap-streamlines-plot-tp45276.html > Sent from the matplotlib - users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored > by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all > things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to > news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the > conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-users mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
Hi, For those of you following the trials and tribulations of moi, I hacked the solution. The assignment is: x0 = [ [-1.0,0.0,0.5] ] I printed the orig x0. Printed mine. Noticed mine was missing a set of brackets. Tried it. Success! --Prahas On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Prahas David Nafissian < pra...@gm...> wrote: > > Hi Mat-Plotters, > > I'm trying to modify the below code so that I can > set the initial conditions to (-1,0,0.5). > > The code below randomly sets the initial conditions: > > ************** > > # I changed the equation -- it's not Lorenz. > > N_trajectories = 1 > > def lorentz_deriv((x, y, z), t0, aa=1.1, yy=0.87): > """Compute the time-derivative of a Lorentz system.""" > return [y*(z-1+x*x)+yy*x, x*(3*z+1-x*x)+yy*y, -2*z*(aa+x*y)] > > # Choose random starting points, uniformly distributed from -15 to 15 > > np.random.seed(1) > > *# Here's the statement which assigns the initial conditions:* > > x0 = -15 + 30 * np.random.random((N_trajectories, 3)) > > ****************** > > I tried simply doing this: > > x0 = (-1,0,0.5) > > but I get this error: > > ValueError: need more than 1 value to unpack > > > What am I missing? What is the correct way to make the assignment? > > > Thanks! > > > --Prahas > > > > >