You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(56) |
Nov
(65) |
Dec
(37) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(78) |
Mar
(153) |
Apr
(205) |
May
(184) |
Jun
(123) |
Jul
(171) |
Aug
(156) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(223) |
2005 |
Jan
(184) |
Feb
(267) |
Mar
(214) |
Apr
(286) |
May
(320) |
Jun
(299) |
Jul
(348) |
Aug
(283) |
Sep
(355) |
Oct
(293) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(203) |
2006 |
Jan
(352) |
Feb
(358) |
Mar
(403) |
Apr
(313) |
May
(165) |
Jun
(281) |
Jul
(316) |
Aug
(228) |
Sep
(279) |
Oct
(243) |
Nov
(315) |
Dec
(345) |
2007 |
Jan
(260) |
Feb
(323) |
Mar
(340) |
Apr
(319) |
May
(290) |
Jun
(296) |
Jul
(221) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(242) |
Oct
(248) |
Nov
(242) |
Dec
(332) |
2008 |
Jan
(312) |
Feb
(359) |
Mar
(454) |
Apr
(287) |
May
(340) |
Jun
(450) |
Jul
(403) |
Aug
(324) |
Sep
(349) |
Oct
(385) |
Nov
(363) |
Dec
(437) |
2009 |
Jan
(500) |
Feb
(301) |
Mar
(409) |
Apr
(486) |
May
(545) |
Jun
(391) |
Jul
(518) |
Aug
(497) |
Sep
(492) |
Oct
(429) |
Nov
(357) |
Dec
(310) |
2010 |
Jan
(371) |
Feb
(657) |
Mar
(519) |
Apr
(432) |
May
(312) |
Jun
(416) |
Jul
(477) |
Aug
(386) |
Sep
(419) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(320) |
Dec
(202) |
2011 |
Jan
(321) |
Feb
(413) |
Mar
(299) |
Apr
(215) |
May
(284) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(207) |
Aug
(314) |
Sep
(321) |
Oct
(259) |
Nov
(347) |
Dec
(209) |
2012 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(414) |
Mar
(377) |
Apr
(179) |
May
(173) |
Jun
(234) |
Jul
(295) |
Aug
(239) |
Sep
(276) |
Oct
(355) |
Nov
(144) |
Dec
(108) |
2013 |
Jan
(170) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(204) |
Apr
(133) |
May
(142) |
Jun
(89) |
Jul
(160) |
Aug
(180) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(136) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(32) |
2014 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(90) |
Mar
(161) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(78) |
Jun
(94) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(83) |
Sep
(102) |
Oct
(132) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(96) |
2015 |
Jan
(45) |
Feb
(138) |
Mar
(176) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(119) |
Jun
(124) |
Jul
(77) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(9) |
2016 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2025 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
(4) |
2
(13) |
3
(4) |
4
(6) |
5
(6) |
6
|
7
|
8
(6) |
9
(2) |
10
(2) |
11
(3) |
12
(3) |
13
(2) |
14
(2) |
15
(2) |
16
(6) |
17
(8) |
18
(10) |
19
(17) |
20
(8) |
21
(4) |
22
(10) |
23
(7) |
24
(7) |
25
(8) |
26
(11) |
27
(5) |
28
|
29
(5) |
30
|
31
(4) |
|
|
|
Eric, This works great and fixes all the issues I saw. Thanks much. I didn't see the anomaly you mentioned. PS My ISP (dreamhost.com)'s email server is SpamCop's blackhole, which means SourceForge will reject it from the mailing list unless they've resolved the issue already. Eric Firing wrote: >Andrew, > >I have committed another revision of the aspect-ratio handling. It seems to work pretty well, and I think pan/zoom work in a reasonable fashion now. Many times in the past, however, I have thought that aspect-ratio handling was working adequately, and every time someone has found a major bug. This time is probably no exception. > >There can be some anomalies when the window is resized quickly--that is, grabbing a window corner and slinging it around with axis('equal') can cause some incorrect choices of the view limits. I haven't figured out why. Although I certainly would like to understand and fix it, it is not a top priority at the moment because I don't think it is a major problem in practice. > >
Andrew, I have committed another revision of the aspect-ratio handling. It seems to work pretty well, and I think pan/zoom work in a reasonable fashion now. Many times in the past, however, I have thought that aspect-ratio handling was working adequately, and every time someone has found a major bug. This time is probably no exception. There can be some anomalies when the window is resized quickly--that is, grabbing a window corner and slinging it around with axis('equal') can cause some incorrect choices of the view limits. I haven't figured out why. Although I certainly would like to understand and fix it, it is not a top priority at the moment because I don't think it is a major problem in practice. Eric ----- Original Message ----- From: Andrew Straw <str...@as...> Date: Saturday, May 27, 2006 12:07 pm Subject: Re: [Matplotlib-users] autoscale and "equal aspect" mode To: Eric Firing <ef...@ha...>, mat...@li... > I'm having trouble with axis('equal') myself -- I'm happy to take a > lookin the source, but maybe it's a simple and easy bug. The issue I'm > having is readily apparent with examples/axis_equal_demo.py -- > using the > pan/zoom mode and holding the right-mouse button down to zoom, I > noticeseveral issues: > > 1) moving left-and-right seems to affect the position, not the zoom > level2) moving up seems to zoom in (as expected) > 3) moving down zooms out as expected, but past a certain point, > only the > vertical axis gets re-scaled and breaking the equal-aspect. > > Eric Firing wrote: > > > Mike, > > > > I thought all the aspect handling was finally working correctly. If > > you generate a simple example, I will take a look. The simpler the > > better, of course. I presume you are working with a recent svn > version.> > > Eric > > > > Michael P. Mossey wrote: > > > >> I'm using this aspect mode: > >> > >> axes.set_aspect( 'equal', adjustable='datalim' ) > >> > >> With several xy line plots on the axes, autoscaling doesn't seem to > >> occur properly. It cuts off part of the data. Is this a known > issue?>> I don't have a simple script to replicate it---I'll have > to pull that > >> out of a larger program---but just wanted to check if it is > known. I > >> don't see anything in the bug tracker. > >> > >> Mike > >> > >
Hum, I did, but it is still pretty rough. I did some changes to it a while ago t= o use objects and it still isn't complete. I'll try to get the class in working order by the weekend. Cheers, David
The 0.87.2 release requires numpy-0.9.6. - Charlie On 5/29/06, Uri Nix <Ur...@zo...> wrote: > > > Hi, > > I'm using Python 2.4.1, numpy-0.9.8, and matplotlib-0.87.2 on a Windo= ws > XP computer. > Problem is that any attempt to import pylab results in a crash. > Using "python -v", the culprit seems to be the following line: > > # > c:\Python24\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\_transforms.pyc > matches > c:\Python24\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\_transforms.py > import matplotlib._transforms # precompiled from > c:\Python24\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\_transforms.pyc > > Any ideas and solutions to this issue? > > Cheers, > Uri
Hi, =20 I'm using Python 2.4.1, numpy-0.9.8, and matplotlib-0.87.2 on a Windows XP computer. Problem is that any attempt to import pylab results in a crash. Using "python -v", the culprit seems to be the following line: =20 # c:\Python24\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\_transforms.pyc matches c:\Python24\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\_transforms.py import matplotlib._transforms # precompiled from c:\Python24\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\_transforms.pyc Any ideas and solutions to this issue? =20 Cheers, Uri