You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(56) |
Nov
(65) |
Dec
(37) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(78) |
Mar
(153) |
Apr
(205) |
May
(184) |
Jun
(123) |
Jul
(171) |
Aug
(156) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(223) |
2005 |
Jan
(184) |
Feb
(267) |
Mar
(214) |
Apr
(286) |
May
(320) |
Jun
(299) |
Jul
(348) |
Aug
(283) |
Sep
(355) |
Oct
(293) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(203) |
2006 |
Jan
(352) |
Feb
(358) |
Mar
(403) |
Apr
(313) |
May
(165) |
Jun
(281) |
Jul
(316) |
Aug
(228) |
Sep
(279) |
Oct
(243) |
Nov
(315) |
Dec
(345) |
2007 |
Jan
(260) |
Feb
(323) |
Mar
(340) |
Apr
(319) |
May
(290) |
Jun
(296) |
Jul
(221) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(242) |
Oct
(248) |
Nov
(242) |
Dec
(332) |
2008 |
Jan
(312) |
Feb
(359) |
Mar
(454) |
Apr
(287) |
May
(340) |
Jun
(450) |
Jul
(403) |
Aug
(324) |
Sep
(349) |
Oct
(385) |
Nov
(363) |
Dec
(437) |
2009 |
Jan
(500) |
Feb
(301) |
Mar
(409) |
Apr
(486) |
May
(545) |
Jun
(391) |
Jul
(518) |
Aug
(497) |
Sep
(492) |
Oct
(429) |
Nov
(357) |
Dec
(310) |
2010 |
Jan
(371) |
Feb
(657) |
Mar
(519) |
Apr
(432) |
May
(312) |
Jun
(416) |
Jul
(477) |
Aug
(386) |
Sep
(419) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(320) |
Dec
(202) |
2011 |
Jan
(321) |
Feb
(413) |
Mar
(299) |
Apr
(215) |
May
(284) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(207) |
Aug
(314) |
Sep
(321) |
Oct
(259) |
Nov
(347) |
Dec
(209) |
2012 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(414) |
Mar
(377) |
Apr
(179) |
May
(173) |
Jun
(234) |
Jul
(295) |
Aug
(239) |
Sep
(276) |
Oct
(355) |
Nov
(144) |
Dec
(108) |
2013 |
Jan
(170) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(204) |
Apr
(133) |
May
(142) |
Jun
(89) |
Jul
(160) |
Aug
(180) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(136) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(32) |
2014 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(90) |
Mar
(161) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(78) |
Jun
(94) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(83) |
Sep
(102) |
Oct
(132) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(96) |
2015 |
Jan
(45) |
Feb
(138) |
Mar
(176) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(119) |
Jun
(124) |
Jul
(77) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(9) |
2016 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2025 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
1
(4) |
2
(4) |
3
|
4
(5) |
5
|
6
(9) |
7
(1) |
8
(1) |
9
(1) |
10
|
11
(2) |
12
(6) |
13
(5) |
14
(3) |
15
(1) |
16
(1) |
17
(2) |
18
(7) |
19
(1) |
20
(4) |
21
(8) |
22
(3) |
23
(3) |
24
|
25
(1) |
26
(3) |
27
(5) |
28
(3) |
29
|
30
|
Joe's guess was right, I got identical IDs for all twinx(). I had OSX10.9, matplotlib 1.3.x and tried both Python 2.7 and 3.3. A friend of mine has Win7, matplotlib 1.2.0 and Pyhton 3.3, and also encountered the problem I described. Even the comments by Damian and Lunayo on Joe's snippet in Stackoverflow indicate that they had the same issue. I renewed all my package installations in order to get matplotlib 1.3.1 and have an environment that is similar to Dale's. Now I get the proper output with both Python 2.7 and 3.3. Problem solved - yet not understood... Thank you for your help! -- View this message in context: http://matplotlib.1069221.n5.nabble.com/Plotting-with-more-than-two-y-axes-with-twinx-tp42556p42560.html Sent from the matplotlib - users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Dani, A quick thought. You could do an interactive multiple axes graph with Plotly, either with the Python API <http://plot.ly/api/python> or from the GUI. Here's an example of how to re-make that one with Plotly and IPython. The Notebook is here <http://nbviewer.ipython.org/gist/cparmer/7685051> (and a Notebook here <http://nbviewer.ipython.org/gist/cparmer/7628933> demos multiple axes, subplots, and insets). [image: Inline image 1] Let me know if I can help with anything. Also, disclosure: I'm on the Plotly team. All my best, Matt On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Dale Chayes <da...@ld...> wrote: > > On Nov 27, 2013, at 18:38 , Joe Kington <jof...@gm...> wrote: > > > Hi Daniel, > > > > For what it's worth, the code runs perfectly for me as-is on matplotlib > 1.3.1 with python 2.7 on linux. > > Same here for what its' worth: > OS X 10.9 > python2.7 from Fink > matplotlib-py27 1.3.0-1 from Fink > > -Dale > > > > > However, based on your description, I'd guess that the second call to > `twinx` is returning the same axes object. > > > > What happens when you do: > > > > print id(axes[1]), id(axes[2]) > > > > Are the id numbers the same or different? > > > > If they're the same, there may have been a regression/change that causes > `twinx` to return the same object instead of creating a new axes. > > > > Cheers! > > -Joe > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 5:08 PM, dodermat <dan...@gm...> > wrote: > > Dear all > > > > What I want to accomplish was produced two years ago in a stackoverflow > > snippet by Joe Kington > > < > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7733693/matplotlib-overlay-plots-with-different-scales > > > > , and shown in the first figure below. However, when I use his snippet in > > matplotlib 1.3.x, I get an output where the third axis replaces the > second > > axis, and the blue dots are accordingly distributed in only the lower > half > > of the plot (see second figure below). I considered downdating to an > older > > version of matplotlib, but then I came across a remark in the matplotlib > > FAQ <http://matplotlib.org/faq/howto_faq.html#multiple-y-axis-scales> . > > According to this remark, such a feature for twinx is on the wish list > and > > thus not very likely to be available in an older version. > > > > Can someone please explain the Kington magic to me? > > > > > > <http://matplotlib.1069221.n5.nabble.com/file/n42556/ksRXk.png> > > <http://matplotlib.1069221.n5.nabble.com/file/n42556/figure_1.png> > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://matplotlib.1069221.n5.nabble.com/Plotting-with-more-than-two-y-axes-with-twinx-tp42556.html > > Sent from the matplotlib - users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT > > organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance > > affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into > your > > Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of > AppDynamics Pro! > > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > > _______________________________________________ > > Matplotlib-users mailing list > > Mat...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT > > organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance > > affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into > your > > Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of > AppDynamics Pro! > > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk_______________________________________________ > > Matplotlib-users mailing list > > Mat...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT > organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance > affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your > Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics > Pro! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-users mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users > >
On Nov 27, 2013, at 18:38 , Joe Kington <jof...@gm...> wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > For what it's worth, the code runs perfectly for me as-is on matplotlib 1.3.1 with python 2.7 on linux. Same here for what its' worth: OS X 10.9 python2.7 from Fink matplotlib-py27 1.3.0-1 from Fink -Dale > > However, based on your description, I'd guess that the second call to `twinx` is returning the same axes object. > > What happens when you do: > > print id(axes[1]), id(axes[2]) > > Are the id numbers the same or different? > > If they're the same, there may have been a regression/change that causes `twinx` to return the same object instead of creating a new axes. > > Cheers! > -Joe > > > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 5:08 PM, dodermat <dan...@gm...> wrote: > Dear all > > What I want to accomplish was produced two years ago in a stackoverflow > snippet by Joe Kington > <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7733693/matplotlib-overlay-plots-with-different-scales> > , and shown in the first figure below. However, when I use his snippet in > matplotlib 1.3.x, I get an output where the third axis replaces the second > axis, and the blue dots are accordingly distributed in only the lower half > of the plot (see second figure below). I considered downdating to an older > version of matplotlib, but then I came across a remark in the matplotlib > FAQ <http://matplotlib.org/faq/howto_faq.html#multiple-y-axis-scales> . > According to this remark, such a feature for twinx is on the wish list and > thus not very likely to be available in an older version. > > Can someone please explain the Kington magic to me? > > > <http://matplotlib.1069221.n5.nabble.com/file/n42556/ksRXk.png> > <http://matplotlib.1069221.n5.nabble.com/file/n42556/figure_1.png> > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://matplotlib.1069221.n5.nabble.com/Plotting-with-more-than-two-y-axes-with-twinx-tp42556.html > Sent from the matplotlib - users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT > organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance > affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your > Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-users mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT > organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance > affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your > Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk_______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-users mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users