You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(56) |
Nov
(65) |
Dec
(37) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(78) |
Mar
(153) |
Apr
(205) |
May
(184) |
Jun
(123) |
Jul
(171) |
Aug
(156) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(223) |
2005 |
Jan
(184) |
Feb
(267) |
Mar
(214) |
Apr
(286) |
May
(320) |
Jun
(299) |
Jul
(348) |
Aug
(283) |
Sep
(355) |
Oct
(293) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(203) |
2006 |
Jan
(352) |
Feb
(358) |
Mar
(403) |
Apr
(313) |
May
(165) |
Jun
(281) |
Jul
(316) |
Aug
(228) |
Sep
(279) |
Oct
(243) |
Nov
(315) |
Dec
(345) |
2007 |
Jan
(260) |
Feb
(323) |
Mar
(340) |
Apr
(319) |
May
(290) |
Jun
(296) |
Jul
(221) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(242) |
Oct
(248) |
Nov
(242) |
Dec
(332) |
2008 |
Jan
(312) |
Feb
(359) |
Mar
(454) |
Apr
(287) |
May
(340) |
Jun
(450) |
Jul
(403) |
Aug
(324) |
Sep
(349) |
Oct
(385) |
Nov
(363) |
Dec
(437) |
2009 |
Jan
(500) |
Feb
(301) |
Mar
(409) |
Apr
(486) |
May
(545) |
Jun
(391) |
Jul
(518) |
Aug
(497) |
Sep
(492) |
Oct
(429) |
Nov
(357) |
Dec
(310) |
2010 |
Jan
(371) |
Feb
(657) |
Mar
(519) |
Apr
(432) |
May
(312) |
Jun
(416) |
Jul
(477) |
Aug
(386) |
Sep
(419) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(320) |
Dec
(202) |
2011 |
Jan
(321) |
Feb
(413) |
Mar
(299) |
Apr
(215) |
May
(284) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(207) |
Aug
(314) |
Sep
(321) |
Oct
(259) |
Nov
(347) |
Dec
(209) |
2012 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(414) |
Mar
(377) |
Apr
(179) |
May
(173) |
Jun
(234) |
Jul
(295) |
Aug
(239) |
Sep
(276) |
Oct
(355) |
Nov
(144) |
Dec
(108) |
2013 |
Jan
(170) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(204) |
Apr
(133) |
May
(142) |
Jun
(89) |
Jul
(160) |
Aug
(180) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(136) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(32) |
2014 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(90) |
Mar
(161) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(78) |
Jun
(94) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(83) |
Sep
(102) |
Oct
(132) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(96) |
2015 |
Jan
(45) |
Feb
(138) |
Mar
(176) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(119) |
Jun
(124) |
Jul
(77) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(9) |
2016 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2025 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
(11) |
2
|
3
(6) |
4
(19) |
5
(20) |
6
(3) |
7
(9) |
8
(1) |
9
(1) |
10
(8) |
11
(4) |
12
(15) |
13
(6) |
14
(14) |
15
(3) |
16
(3) |
17
(2) |
18
(9) |
19
(11) |
20
(26) |
21
(12) |
22
(2) |
23
(6) |
24
(9) |
25
(6) |
26
(16) |
27
(13) |
28
(4) |
29
|
30
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 9/27/07, Charles Seaton <cs...@st...> wrote: > I am having the same problem as Eugen, and the suggested solution of using > a.xaxis.get_major_locator().refresh() > to force the creation of the full set of ticklabels doesn't seem to work for > me. matplotlib creates a prototypical tick (the prototick) and then creates new ones on as as needed basis, copying properties from the prototick. Of course, position is one of the properties that cannot be copied, which is why you are having trouble in your example. Fortunately, there is an easy solution. Call ax.xaxis.get_major_ticks() and access the label attribute: for tick in ax.xaxis.get_major_ticks(): label = tick.label1 Axis.get_major_ticks will force a call to the locator and update the tick list. The Axes methods like get_xticklabels are just working on the existing tick list rather than calling the get_major_ticks method which is why you are not getting the full list. This is a bug. I just made changes in svn so that all the accessor methods (ax.get_xticklines, ax.get_yticklabels, and friends) all trigger a call to axis.get_major_ticks rather so they should give the same results going forward. JDH FYI, the Tick attributes are: tick1line : a Line2D instance tick2line : a Line2D instance gridline : a Line2D instance label1 : a Text instance label2 : a Text instance gridOn : a boolean which determines whether to draw the tickline tick1On : a boolean which determines whether to draw the 1st tickline tick2On : a boolean which determines whether to draw the 2nd tickline label1On : a boolean which determines whether to draw tick label label2On : a boolean which determines whether to draw tick label
On Friday 28 September 2007 07:36:23 am John Hunter wrote: > On 9/27/07, Darren Dale <dd...@co...> wrote: > > Hi Eric, John, > > > > Have either of you been following this thread? > > I am now :-) > > As Eric suggests, None is overloaded vis-a-vis color handling, because > for mpl properties it generally means do the default as defined by rc. > For colors people often want to use None for "no color" which is why > we added support for the string "None". Does this work in your use > case Tom? The above exchange was off-list, we're back on now. I think that would be what Tom is looking for, but it doesnt work: In [1]: plot([1,2]) Out[1]: [<matplotlib.lines.Line2D instance at 0x710cb0>] In [2]: savefig('dsd.png', facecolor='None', edgecolor='None') --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ValueError Traceback (most recent call last) /home/darren/<ipython console> in <module>() /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/matplotlib/pyplot.py in savefig(*args, **kwargs) 272 def savefig(*args, **kwargs): 273 fig = gcf() --> 274 return fig.savefig(*args, **kwargs) 275 if Figure.savefig.__doc__ is not None: 276 savefig.__doc__ = dedent(Figure.savefig.__doc__) /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/matplotlib/figure.py in savefig(self, *args, **kwargs) 768 kwargs[key] = rcParams['savefig.%s'%key] 769 --> 770 self.canvas.print_figure(*args, **kwargs) 771 772 def colorbar(self, mappable, cax=None, **kw): /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/matplotlib/backends/backend_qt4agg.py in print_figure(self, *args, **kwargs) 153 self.update(l, self.renderer.height-t, w, h) 154 155 def print_figure(self, *args, **kwargs): --> 156 FigureCanvasAgg.print_figure(self, *args, **kwargs) 157 self.draw() /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/matplotlib/backend_bases.py in print_figure(self, filename, dpi, facecolor, edgecolor, orientation, format, **kwargs) 1194 edgecolor=edgecolor, 1195 orientation=orientation, -> 1196 **kwargs) 1197 finally: 1198 self.figure.dpi.set(origDPI) /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/matplotlib/backends/backend_agg.py in print_png(self, filename, *args, **kwargs) 415 416 def print_png(self, filename, *args, **kwargs): --> 417 self.draw() 418 self.get_renderer()._renderer.write_png(str(filename)) 419 /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/matplotlib/backends/backend_qt4agg.py in draw(self) 140 if DEBUG: print "FigureCanvasQtAgg.draw", self 141 self.replot = True --> 142 FigureCanvasAgg.draw(self) 143 self.update() 144 /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/matplotlib/backends/backend_agg.py in draw(self) 377 378 self.renderer = self.get_renderer() --> 379 self.figure.draw(self.renderer) 380 381 def get_renderer(self): /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/matplotlib/figure.py in draw(self, renderer) 586 self.transFigure.freeze() # eval the lazy objects 587 --> 588 if self.frameon: self.figurePatch.draw(renderer) 589 590 for p in self.patches: p.draw(renderer) /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/matplotlib/patches.py in draw(self, renderer) 198 #renderer.open_group('patch') 199 gc = renderer.new_gc() --> 200 gc.set_foreground(self._edgecolor) 201 gc.set_linewidth(self._linewidth) 202 gc.set_alpha(self._alpha) /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/matplotlib/backend_bases.py in set_foreground(self, fg, isRGB) 617 self._rgb = fg 618 else: --> 619 self._rgb = colors.colorConverter.to_rgb(fg) 620 621 def set_graylevel(self, frac): /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/matplotlib/colors.py in to_rgb(self, arg) 277 278 except (KeyError, ValueError, TypeError), exc: --> 279 raise ValueError('to_rgb: Invalid rgb arg "%s"\n%s' % (str(arg), exc)) 280 # Error messages could be improved by handling TypeError 281 # separately; but this should be rare and not too hard ValueError: to_rgb: Invalid rgb arg "None" invalid literal for float(): None
After thinking it over, I did not go for Robert or David's cool numpy tricks, but I'll append a simple object in case someone else wants to do more. Cheers, Alan Isaac class EmpiricalCDF(object): '''Empirical cdf. First point will be (xmin,0). Last point will be (xmax,1). ''' def __init__(self, data, sortdata=True): if sortdata: data = N.sort(data) self.data = data self.nobs = len(data) def gen_xp(self): data, nobs = self.data, self.nobs prob = N.linspace(0, 1, nobs+1) xsteps = ( data[(idx)//2] for idx in xrange(2*nobs) ) psteps = ( prob[(idx+1)//2] for idx in xrange(2*nobs) ) return xsteps, psteps def get_steps(self): '''Return: 2-tuple of arrays, the data values and corresponding cumulative probabilities. ''' xsteps, psteps = self.gen_xp() return N.fromiter(xsteps,'f'), N.fromiter(psteps,'f')
Hal Huntley wrote: > Thanks to Eric Firing and Christopher Barker for input on trying to > resolve the problem. Christopher said: > %%% > You might try just: > > easy_install numpy > > easy_install matplotlib. > %%% > > > I did that and now the problem moved and I get: > === >>>> from pylab import * > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "<stdin>", line 1, in ? > File > "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/matplotlib-0.90.1-py2.4-linux-i686.egg/pylab.py", line 1, in ? > from matplotlib.pylab import * > File > "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/matplotlib-0.90.1-py2.4-linux-i686.egg/matplotlib/pylab.py", line 222, in ? > new_figure_manager, draw_if_interactive, show = pylab_setup() > File > "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/matplotlib-0.90.1-py2.4-linux-i686.egg/matplotlib/backends/__init__.py", line 24, in pylab_setup > globals(),locals(),[backend_name]) > File > "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/matplotlib-0.90.1-py2.4-linux-i686.egg/matplotlib/backends/backend_gtkagg.py", line 10, in ? > from matplotlib.backends.backend_gtk import gtk, FigureManagerGTK, > FigureCanvasGTK,\ > File > "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/matplotlib-0.90.1-py2.4-linux-i686.egg/matplotlib/backends/backend_gtk.py", line 21, in ? > from matplotlib.backends.backend_gdk import RendererGDK, FigureCanvasGDK > File > "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/matplotlib-0.90.1-py2.4-linux-i686.egg/matplotlib/backends/backend_gdk.py", line 35, in ? > from matplotlib.backends._ns_backend_gdk import pixbuf_get_pixels_array > ImportError: No module named _ns_backend_gdkd4 > === Is it a rotten egg? > > Googling around has indicated that the X11 stuff wasn't available when the > numpy and matplotlib were made. The gtk files and "-devel" seem to be there > when I do an "rpm -qa". I went and got a new numpy from source and did > "python setup.py install". It is interesting that when I get in to python > now, I can do: > >>>> import gtk >>>> import numpy >>>> import matplotlib > > and they all just return the prompt, indicating, I thought, that the > programs were installed ok. > > Here is the naive question -> Is there something wrong, then with a > "from pylab import *"? The user is trying to do that. No, that should work fine. I don't know how the egg-based matplotlib/pylab should work with the installed-from-source numpy, though. If the versions are compatible, then I expect it would work. You gave a traceback resulting from "from pylab import *" after installing the two eggs, correct? If so, what was the result after you installed numpy from source? I would expect no difference, because the problem reported in the traceback is a missing matplotlib module, not a missing numpy module. Or did you mean that you installed matplotlib from source? That would make more sense, and certainly should work if all the right header files and libraries are present. If you installed matplotlib from source, what do you get from ls /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/matplotlib/backends/*.so Another diagnostic would be to delete the build directory from the matplotlib source tree (assuming you are now building matplotlib from source), and save the output from the "python setup.py build" command. This should make it clear whether the necessary headers really were found. Eric