You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(56) |
Nov
(65) |
Dec
(37) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(78) |
Mar
(153) |
Apr
(205) |
May
(184) |
Jun
(123) |
Jul
(171) |
Aug
(156) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(223) |
2005 |
Jan
(184) |
Feb
(267) |
Mar
(214) |
Apr
(286) |
May
(320) |
Jun
(299) |
Jul
(348) |
Aug
(283) |
Sep
(355) |
Oct
(293) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(203) |
2006 |
Jan
(352) |
Feb
(358) |
Mar
(403) |
Apr
(313) |
May
(165) |
Jun
(281) |
Jul
(316) |
Aug
(228) |
Sep
(279) |
Oct
(243) |
Nov
(315) |
Dec
(345) |
2007 |
Jan
(260) |
Feb
(323) |
Mar
(340) |
Apr
(319) |
May
(290) |
Jun
(296) |
Jul
(221) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(242) |
Oct
(248) |
Nov
(242) |
Dec
(332) |
2008 |
Jan
(312) |
Feb
(359) |
Mar
(454) |
Apr
(287) |
May
(340) |
Jun
(450) |
Jul
(403) |
Aug
(324) |
Sep
(349) |
Oct
(385) |
Nov
(363) |
Dec
(437) |
2009 |
Jan
(500) |
Feb
(301) |
Mar
(409) |
Apr
(486) |
May
(545) |
Jun
(391) |
Jul
(518) |
Aug
(497) |
Sep
(492) |
Oct
(429) |
Nov
(357) |
Dec
(310) |
2010 |
Jan
(371) |
Feb
(657) |
Mar
(519) |
Apr
(432) |
May
(312) |
Jun
(416) |
Jul
(477) |
Aug
(386) |
Sep
(419) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(320) |
Dec
(202) |
2011 |
Jan
(321) |
Feb
(413) |
Mar
(299) |
Apr
(215) |
May
(284) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(207) |
Aug
(314) |
Sep
(321) |
Oct
(259) |
Nov
(347) |
Dec
(209) |
2012 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(414) |
Mar
(377) |
Apr
(179) |
May
(173) |
Jun
(234) |
Jul
(295) |
Aug
(239) |
Sep
(276) |
Oct
(355) |
Nov
(144) |
Dec
(108) |
2013 |
Jan
(170) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(204) |
Apr
(133) |
May
(142) |
Jun
(89) |
Jul
(160) |
Aug
(180) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(136) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(32) |
2014 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(90) |
Mar
(161) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(78) |
Jun
(94) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(83) |
Sep
(102) |
Oct
(132) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(96) |
2015 |
Jan
(45) |
Feb
(138) |
Mar
(176) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(119) |
Jun
(124) |
Jul
(77) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(9) |
2016 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2025 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1
(20) |
2
(21) |
3
(21) |
4
(14) |
5
(8) |
6
(12) |
7
(16) |
8
(27) |
9
(39) |
10
(19) |
11
(12) |
12
(3) |
13
(3) |
14
(18) |
15
(14) |
16
(6) |
17
(7) |
18
(19) |
19
(5) |
20
(8) |
21
(24) |
22
(42) |
23
(12) |
24
(11) |
25
(16) |
26
(2) |
27
(4) |
28
(10) |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All, I'm looking for some suggestions about two problems: 1) I'm converting some figure generating code from IDL into Python/matplotlib. Image attached showing this figure. IDL being a functional programming language for the most part, creating wrappers around various subroutines is trivial and generally the simplest way to modify their behavior. For example, in dealing with phase data (which can take values between 0o and 360o, and are 'wrapped' around this interval, such that 270o + 180o = 90o and so on), I have some stuff in IDL that instead over simply 'overplotting' some (x,y) data, it will do a quick loop and instead overplot (x, y + n * 360o) for n = -1, ..., 1 (or some other number of repetitions, you get the idea). Now, in matplotlib, while I can do this pretty easily, I suspect there are better ways? I suppose I could write a subclass of matplotlib.axes.Axes for example, that does the 360o repetition itself across not just the plot() method but for others also? But implementing a whole new class for this may be complicated, and I am sort of lost as to how I would then get that working with the pylab stateful interface? I'm reasonably new to OO programming, and I'm still getting my head round the 'best' way to do things like this. Alternatively, having a class that describes individual data points, I could define a plot() method for them? class MyData(): ... plot(self, axes): ... axes.plot(self.x, self.y + n * 360) But then, that seems to 'break' some rules, as I don't see much matplotlib code in which you do 'data.plot()' as opposed to 'axes.plot()' - the order seems wrong? 2) Somewhat similar to the first question. The figure includes (at the top) some ancillary data (showing lengths of orbit and year numbers). In IDL its done simply by filling polygons in normal / page coordinates - but again, I think it could be better done using OO somehow? Effectively, that top row could be thought of as a separate subplot. What would be the efficient / sensible / pythonic way to go about reproducing this. Another subclass of Axes? Many thanks, Dave
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 6:48 AM, andrea crotti <and...@gm...>wrote: > 2011年2月18日 Benjamin Root <ben...@ou...>: > > > > > > Automatic layouts are difficult to do in matplotlib. This was a design > > decision trade-off made early in its development. Instead of having > > matplotlib determining optimal layouts and such, the developers decided > that > > it would be better to give the programmers full control over all > placement, > > and merely establish good defaults. > > > > Just for completeness, I like this page because it talks about the > multiple > > different ways you can specify coordinates for a text object (and > > corresponding arrow) for placement: > > > > http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/users/annotations.html > > > > Knowing ahead of time how much space an annotation will take is very > > difficult, especially if your text involves any LaTeX symbols. However, > it > > is possible. The Text object has some method calls that can return > bounding > > boxes for the text object after it is made: > > > > > http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/api/artist_api.html#matplotlib.text.Text.get_bbox_patch > > > http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/api/artist_api.html#matplotlib.text.Text.get_window_extent > > > > I haven't used these myself, so I don't know exactly what is the > difference > > between them (I think they are different coordinate systems). Once > knowing > > the size of your text object, you can change the position of the object > > using its set_position() method. It is tricky, but if positioning and > > layout is very important to you, it is possible to do. > > > > I hope this helps! > > > > Ben Root > > > > Thanks for the answer, I tried something out but well it's not so trivial. > And I think it doesn't make much sense to add the text inside the same > plot, so I thought about subplot. > > I want a bigger subplot on top and one are splitted in two parts below it. > > But if I do > subplot(221) > ... > subplot(222) > ... > subplot(223) > ... > it doesn't like it, and I didn't find any example which has this "more > advanced" subplotting. > > Once that works it might be easier to compute the size that I need > since the coordinate for the subplot are always from 0 to 1... > Andrea, If you would like more advanced control over your subplots, matplotlib v1.0.x has the new gridspec feature: http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/users/whats_new.html#sophisticated-subplot-grid-layout Maybe this can help you? Ben Root
2011年2月18日 Benjamin Root <ben...@ou...>: > > > Automatic layouts are difficult to do in matplotlib. This was a design > decision trade-off made early in its development. Instead of having > matplotlib determining optimal layouts and such, the developers decided that > it would be better to give the programmers full control over all placement, > and merely establish good defaults. > > Just for completeness, I like this page because it talks about the multiple > different ways you can specify coordinates for a text object (and > corresponding arrow) for placement: > > http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/users/annotations.html > > Knowing ahead of time how much space an annotation will take is very > difficult, especially if your text involves any LaTeX symbols. However, it > is possible. The Text object has some method calls that can return bounding > boxes for the text object after it is made: > > http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/api/artist_api.html#matplotlib.text.Text.get_bbox_patch > http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/api/artist_api.html#matplotlib.text.Text.get_window_extent > > I haven't used these myself, so I don't know exactly what is the difference > between them (I think they are different coordinate systems). Once knowing > the size of your text object, you can change the position of the object > using its set_position() method. It is tricky, but if positioning and > layout is very important to you, it is possible to do. > > I hope this helps! > > Ben Root > Thanks for the answer, I tried something out but well it's not so trivial. And I think it doesn't make much sense to add the text inside the same plot, so I thought about subplot. I want a bigger subplot on top and one are splitted in two parts below it. But if I do subplot(221) ... subplot(222) ... subplot(223) ... it doesn't like it, and I didn't find any example which has this "more advanced" subplotting. Once that works it might be easier to compute the size that I need since the coordinate for the subplot are always from 0 to 1...
Hello everyone, I'm building and application which will display a collection of several wxpanels each of which displays a FigureCanvasWxAgg with a particular subplot. The user is allowed to remove these panels. However, after a panel is deleted (call wxPanel.Destroy()), and the mouse moves over the now empty space, I get the following exception: File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/matplotlib/backends/backend_wx.py", line 1316, in _onMotion FigureCanvasBase.motion_notify_event(self, x, y, guiEvent=evt) File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/matplotlib/backend_bases.py", line 1244, in motion_notify_event guiEvent=guiEvent) File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/matplotlib/backend_bases.py", line 899, in __init__ LocationEvent.__init__(self, name, canvas, x, y, guiEvent=guiEvent) File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/matplotlib/backend_bases.py", line 817, in __init__ self._update_enter_leave() File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/matplotlib/backend_bases.py", line 844, in _update_enter_leave last.canvas.callbacks.process('axes_leave_event', last) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/wx-2.8-gtk2-unicode/wx/_core.py", line 14586, in __getattr__ raise PyDeadObjectError(self.attrStr % self._name) wx._core.PyDeadObjectError: The C++ part of the FigureCanvasWxAgg object has been deleted, attribute access no longer allowed. Looks like the deleted canvas is still listening for mouse move events. How can I prevent this? Thank you, Sandy