SourceForge logo
SourceForge logo
Menu

matplotlib-users — Discussion related to using matplotlib

You can subscribe to this list here.

2003 Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
(3)
Jun
Jul
Aug
(12)
Sep
(12)
Oct
(56)
Nov
(65)
Dec
(37)
2004 Jan
(59)
Feb
(78)
Mar
(153)
Apr
(205)
May
(184)
Jun
(123)
Jul
(171)
Aug
(156)
Sep
(190)
Oct
(120)
Nov
(154)
Dec
(223)
2005 Jan
(184)
Feb
(267)
Mar
(214)
Apr
(286)
May
(320)
Jun
(299)
Jul
(348)
Aug
(283)
Sep
(355)
Oct
(293)
Nov
(232)
Dec
(203)
2006 Jan
(352)
Feb
(358)
Mar
(403)
Apr
(313)
May
(165)
Jun
(281)
Jul
(316)
Aug
(228)
Sep
(279)
Oct
(243)
Nov
(315)
Dec
(345)
2007 Jan
(260)
Feb
(323)
Mar
(340)
Apr
(319)
May
(290)
Jun
(296)
Jul
(221)
Aug
(292)
Sep
(242)
Oct
(248)
Nov
(242)
Dec
(332)
2008 Jan
(312)
Feb
(359)
Mar
(454)
Apr
(287)
May
(340)
Jun
(450)
Jul
(403)
Aug
(324)
Sep
(349)
Oct
(385)
Nov
(363)
Dec
(437)
2009 Jan
(500)
Feb
(301)
Mar
(409)
Apr
(486)
May
(545)
Jun
(391)
Jul
(518)
Aug
(497)
Sep
(492)
Oct
(429)
Nov
(357)
Dec
(310)
2010 Jan
(371)
Feb
(657)
Mar
(519)
Apr
(432)
May
(312)
Jun
(416)
Jul
(477)
Aug
(386)
Sep
(419)
Oct
(435)
Nov
(320)
Dec
(202)
2011 Jan
(321)
Feb
(413)
Mar
(299)
Apr
(215)
May
(284)
Jun
(203)
Jul
(207)
Aug
(314)
Sep
(321)
Oct
(259)
Nov
(347)
Dec
(209)
2012 Jan
(322)
Feb
(414)
Mar
(377)
Apr
(179)
May
(173)
Jun
(234)
Jul
(295)
Aug
(239)
Sep
(276)
Oct
(355)
Nov
(144)
Dec
(108)
2013 Jan
(170)
Feb
(89)
Mar
(204)
Apr
(133)
May
(142)
Jun
(89)
Jul
(160)
Aug
(180)
Sep
(69)
Oct
(136)
Nov
(83)
Dec
(32)
2014 Jan
(71)
Feb
(90)
Mar
(161)
Apr
(117)
May
(78)
Jun
(94)
Jul
(60)
Aug
(83)
Sep
(102)
Oct
(132)
Nov
(154)
Dec
(96)
2015 Jan
(45)
Feb
(138)
Mar
(176)
Apr
(132)
May
(119)
Jun
(124)
Jul
(77)
Aug
(31)
Sep
(34)
Oct
(22)
Nov
(23)
Dec
(9)
2016 Jan
(26)
Feb
(17)
Mar
(10)
Apr
(8)
May
(4)
Jun
(8)
Jul
(6)
Aug
(5)
Sep
(9)
Oct
(4)
Nov
Dec
2017 Jan
(5)
Feb
(7)
Mar
(1)
Apr
(5)
May
Jun
(3)
Jul
(6)
Aug
(1)
Sep
Oct
(2)
Nov
(1)
Dec
2018 Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
(1)
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2020 Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
(1)
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2025 Jan
(1)
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
S M T W T F S





1
(20)
2
(8)
3
(2)
4
(7)
5
(17)
6
(20)
7
(17)
8
(18)
9
(7)
10
(4)
11
(9)
12
(20)
13
(20)
14
(17)
15
(8)
16
(2)
17
(4)
18
(4)
19
(13)
20
(4)
21
(16)
22
(9)
23
(1)
24
(5)
25
(8)
26
(13)
27
(25)
28
(25)
29
(14)
30
(10)
31
(1)






Showing 5 results of 5

From: Steve S. <el...@gm...> - 2005年07月24日 23:49:36
Hi
Hmmm now that you mention antialiasing ... I turned it off in my 
.matplotlibrc but my plots (GTKAgg on Linux) are still antialiased. I 
had the same problem on Win (TkAgg) but didn't bother too much. I 
remember that there was a discussion before about this. I'm using mpl 
0.81. Would upgrading fix this issue?
cheers,
steve
Robert Kern wrote:
> Steve Schmerler wrote:
> 
>> Hi
>>
>> Well this is kinda strange. I checked with gsview (on Win) and ggv and
>> gv on Linux. The 'mixed' points (4 and 5) _are_ purple/dark red while
>> the others are blue and (light)red.
> 
> 
> I blame antialiasing. Using Preview.app on OS X, when zoomed out, yes, I 
> can see that the middle points appear to be somewhat darker than the 
> "pure" red ones. Zooming in, however, I see little difference except for 
> a bit of fuzz. Using "DigitalColor Meter.app", I can verify that the 
> color of the middle crosses is indeed pure red with some purplish fuzz 
> at the edges. When zoomed out enough, all of the pixels are antialiased 
> fuzz and so it mixes both the top color and the bottom.
> 
> IOW, it's an issue with how the display program handles antialiasing of 
> overlaid colors, not the output generated by matplotlib.
> 
From: Robert K. <rk...@uc...> - 2005年07月24日 22:05:08
Steve Schmerler wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Well this is kinda strange. I checked with gsview (on Win) and ggv and
> gv on Linux. The 'mixed' points (4 and 5) _are_ purple/dark red while
> the others are blue and (light)red.
I blame antialiasing. Using Preview.app on OS X, when zoomed out, yes, I 
can see that the middle points appear to be somewhat darker than the 
"pure" red ones. Zooming in, however, I see little difference except for 
a bit of fuzz. Using "DigitalColor Meter.app", I can verify that the 
color of the middle crosses is indeed pure red with some purplish fuzz 
at the edges. When zoomed out enough, all of the pixels are antialiased 
fuzz and so it mixes both the top color and the bottom.
IOW, it's an issue with how the display program handles antialiasing of 
overlaid colors, not the output generated by matplotlib.
-- 
Robert Kern
rk...@uc...
"In the fields of hell where the grass grows high
 Are the graves of dreams allowed to die."
 -- Richard Harter
From: Steve S. <el...@gm...> - 2005年07月24日 21:48:33
Hi
Well this is kinda strange. I checked with gsview (on Win) and ggv and
gv on Linux. The 'mixed' points (4 and 5) _are_ purple/dark red while
the others are blue and (light)red.
cheers,
steve
N. Volbers wrote:
> Steve Schmerler schrieb:
> 
>> Hi
>>
>> Here the test. As you can see the points 1,2,3 are red, 4 and 5 are 
>> purple and 6 and 7 are red.
>>
>>
> 
> Hello Steve,
> 
> I used ghostview (gv) on Linux to display the .eps and it looks 
> perfectly fine -- only blue and red crosses. Might this be a display 
> problem of your eps viewer?
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Niklas.
> 
> 
From: N. V. <mit...@we...> - 2005年07月24日 19:08:31
Steve Schmerler schrieb:
> Hi
>
> Here the test. As you can see the points 1,2,3 are red, 4 and 5 are 
> purple and 6 and 7 are red.
>
>
Hello Steve,
I used ghostview (gv) on Linux to display the .eps and it looks 
perfectly fine -- only blue and red crosses. Might this be a display 
problem of your eps viewer?
Best regards,
Niklas.
From: Steve C. <ste...@ya...> - 2005年07月24日 11:49:28
On Wed, 2005年07月20日 at 20:27 -0700,
mat...@li... wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> 
> I just upgraded my matplotlib from 0.80 to to 0.83.1 and discovered a bug in the GTK backend. To be specific, the following code, beginning by line 171 in backend_gtk.py, is the problem:
> 
> 
> def motion_notify_event(self, widget, event):
> if event.is_hint:
> x, y, state = event.window.get_pointer()
> else:
> x = event.x
> y = event.y
> state = event.state
> 
> # flipy so y=0 is bottom of canvas
> y = self.figure.bbox.height() - y
> 
> if state:
> FigureCanvasBase.motion_notify_event(self, x, y)
> return True
> 
> 
> 
> Due to the 'if state' clause, the Canvas will only receive the 'motion_notify_event' if at the same time the mouse button is pressed. This has not been the case in previous version of matplotlib. There is e.g. no such distinction in backend_qt.py.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Niklas Volbers.
I agree, the if clause should not be there, and have removed it from
cvs. If the state information is required it should be passed as an
argument to FigureCanvasBase.motion_notify_event() , like x and y are.
Regards
Steve
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 

Showing 5 results of 5

Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X





Briefly describe the problem (required):
Upload screenshot of ad (required):
Select a file, or drag & drop file here.
Screenshot instructions:

Click URL instructions:
Right-click on the ad, choose "Copy Link", then paste here →
(This may not be possible with some types of ads)

More information about our ad policies

Ad destination/click URL:

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /