SourceForge logo
SourceForge logo
Menu

matplotlib-users — Discussion related to using matplotlib

You can subscribe to this list here.

2003 Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
(3)
Jun
Jul
Aug
(12)
Sep
(12)
Oct
(56)
Nov
(65)
Dec
(37)
2004 Jan
(59)
Feb
(78)
Mar
(153)
Apr
(205)
May
(184)
Jun
(123)
Jul
(171)
Aug
(156)
Sep
(190)
Oct
(120)
Nov
(154)
Dec
(223)
2005 Jan
(184)
Feb
(267)
Mar
(214)
Apr
(286)
May
(320)
Jun
(299)
Jul
(348)
Aug
(283)
Sep
(355)
Oct
(293)
Nov
(232)
Dec
(203)
2006 Jan
(352)
Feb
(358)
Mar
(403)
Apr
(313)
May
(165)
Jun
(281)
Jul
(316)
Aug
(228)
Sep
(279)
Oct
(243)
Nov
(315)
Dec
(345)
2007 Jan
(260)
Feb
(323)
Mar
(340)
Apr
(319)
May
(290)
Jun
(296)
Jul
(221)
Aug
(292)
Sep
(242)
Oct
(248)
Nov
(242)
Dec
(332)
2008 Jan
(312)
Feb
(359)
Mar
(454)
Apr
(287)
May
(340)
Jun
(450)
Jul
(403)
Aug
(324)
Sep
(349)
Oct
(385)
Nov
(363)
Dec
(437)
2009 Jan
(500)
Feb
(301)
Mar
(409)
Apr
(486)
May
(545)
Jun
(391)
Jul
(518)
Aug
(497)
Sep
(492)
Oct
(429)
Nov
(357)
Dec
(310)
2010 Jan
(371)
Feb
(657)
Mar
(519)
Apr
(432)
May
(312)
Jun
(416)
Jul
(477)
Aug
(386)
Sep
(419)
Oct
(435)
Nov
(320)
Dec
(202)
2011 Jan
(321)
Feb
(413)
Mar
(299)
Apr
(215)
May
(284)
Jun
(203)
Jul
(207)
Aug
(314)
Sep
(321)
Oct
(259)
Nov
(347)
Dec
(209)
2012 Jan
(322)
Feb
(414)
Mar
(377)
Apr
(179)
May
(173)
Jun
(234)
Jul
(295)
Aug
(239)
Sep
(276)
Oct
(355)
Nov
(144)
Dec
(108)
2013 Jan
(170)
Feb
(89)
Mar
(204)
Apr
(133)
May
(142)
Jun
(89)
Jul
(160)
Aug
(180)
Sep
(69)
Oct
(136)
Nov
(83)
Dec
(32)
2014 Jan
(71)
Feb
(90)
Mar
(161)
Apr
(117)
May
(78)
Jun
(94)
Jul
(60)
Aug
(83)
Sep
(102)
Oct
(132)
Nov
(154)
Dec
(96)
2015 Jan
(45)
Feb
(138)
Mar
(176)
Apr
(132)
May
(119)
Jun
(124)
Jul
(77)
Aug
(31)
Sep
(34)
Oct
(22)
Nov
(23)
Dec
(9)
2016 Jan
(26)
Feb
(17)
Mar
(10)
Apr
(8)
May
(4)
Jun
(8)
Jul
(6)
Aug
(5)
Sep
(9)
Oct
(4)
Nov
Dec
2017 Jan
(5)
Feb
(7)
Mar
(1)
Apr
(5)
May
Jun
(3)
Jul
(6)
Aug
(1)
Sep
Oct
(2)
Nov
(1)
Dec
2018 Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
(1)
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2020 Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
(1)
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2025 Jan
(1)
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
S M T W T F S



1
(3)
2
(2)
3
(1)
4
(2)
5
6
(6)
7
8
(4)
9
(15)
10
(9)
11
12
(2)
13
(1)
14
(1)
15
(8)
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
(2)
23
24
25
26
27
(1)
28
(6)
29
(2)
30
(9)
31
(3)

Showing 2 results of 2

This has been discussed and the consensus was that getting the heuristics
right is probably impossible (I work with dark-current subtracted image
data so it can have negative values, but using a diverging color map is
_very_ wrong, taking 0 as the center only makes sense some of the time).
Defaulting to a linear norm and sequential color map is in the worst case
not helpful, where as using the wrong center (or incorrectly using a
diverging color map) can be misleading. We are prioritizing not being
misleading over being slightly more convenient in the core library.
A function with a call signature like you describe should definitely be in
the examples.
Also see PR https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/3858 which is
adding a new normalizer to make setting up non-symmetric diverging color
maps easier.
Tom
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:49 AM George Nurser <gn...@gm...> wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been following the discussions about the new default colormaps.
> I think it might be really helpful if the default behaviour were that
> matplotlib simply examined your data (Z, say), and if
> (1) Z.max() & Z.min() had the same sign then used a sequential colormap
> whereas if
> (2) Z.max() & Z.min() had opposite signs then it used a diverging
> colormap, centered on zero.
> Keywords e.g. Anomaly=True & centre = 10. could be extra arguments to
> override this behaviour.
>
> I realise that
> a) this really only requires a user to write a simple helper application.
> But 99% of users will never do this.
>
> b) it may not always be desired; but again 99% of the time it probably is.
>
> This would enable people just starting to use matplotlib perhaps to see
> that it can give 'better' plots than matlab
>
> Anyway, just a thought.
>
> George Nurser.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud.
> GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that
> you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business.
> Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today.
> https://www.gigenetcloud.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Matplotlib-users mailing list
> Mat...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
>
From: George N. <gn...@gm...> - 2015年07月02日 15:48:29
Hi,
I've been following the discussions about the new default colormaps.
I think it might be really helpful if the default behaviour were that
matplotlib simply examined your data (Z, say), and if
(1) Z.max() & Z.min() had the same sign then used a sequential colormap
whereas if
(2) Z.max() & Z.min() had opposite signs then it used a diverging colormap,
centered on zero.
Keywords e.g. Anomaly=True & centre = 10. could be extra arguments to
override this behaviour.
I realise that
a) this really only requires a user to write a simple helper application.
 But 99% of users will never do this.
b) it may not always be desired; but again 99% of the time it probably is.
This would enable people just starting to use matplotlib perhaps to see
that it can give 'better' plots than matlab
Anyway, just a thought.
George Nurser.

Showing 2 results of 2

Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X





Briefly describe the problem (required):
Upload screenshot of ad (required):
Select a file, or drag & drop file here.
Screenshot instructions:

Click URL instructions:
Right-click on the ad, choose "Copy Link", then paste here →
(This may not be possible with some types of ads)

More information about our ad policies

Ad destination/click URL:

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /