SourceForge logo
SourceForge logo
Menu

matplotlib-users — Discussion related to using matplotlib

You can subscribe to this list here.

2003 Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
(3)
Jun
Jul
Aug
(12)
Sep
(12)
Oct
(56)
Nov
(65)
Dec
(37)
2004 Jan
(59)
Feb
(78)
Mar
(153)
Apr
(205)
May
(184)
Jun
(123)
Jul
(171)
Aug
(156)
Sep
(190)
Oct
(120)
Nov
(154)
Dec
(223)
2005 Jan
(184)
Feb
(267)
Mar
(214)
Apr
(286)
May
(320)
Jun
(299)
Jul
(348)
Aug
(283)
Sep
(355)
Oct
(293)
Nov
(232)
Dec
(203)
2006 Jan
(352)
Feb
(358)
Mar
(403)
Apr
(313)
May
(165)
Jun
(281)
Jul
(316)
Aug
(228)
Sep
(279)
Oct
(243)
Nov
(315)
Dec
(345)
2007 Jan
(260)
Feb
(323)
Mar
(340)
Apr
(319)
May
(290)
Jun
(296)
Jul
(221)
Aug
(292)
Sep
(242)
Oct
(248)
Nov
(242)
Dec
(332)
2008 Jan
(312)
Feb
(359)
Mar
(454)
Apr
(287)
May
(340)
Jun
(450)
Jul
(403)
Aug
(324)
Sep
(349)
Oct
(385)
Nov
(363)
Dec
(437)
2009 Jan
(500)
Feb
(301)
Mar
(409)
Apr
(486)
May
(545)
Jun
(391)
Jul
(518)
Aug
(497)
Sep
(492)
Oct
(429)
Nov
(357)
Dec
(310)
2010 Jan
(371)
Feb
(657)
Mar
(519)
Apr
(432)
May
(312)
Jun
(416)
Jul
(477)
Aug
(386)
Sep
(419)
Oct
(435)
Nov
(320)
Dec
(202)
2011 Jan
(321)
Feb
(413)
Mar
(299)
Apr
(215)
May
(284)
Jun
(203)
Jul
(207)
Aug
(314)
Sep
(321)
Oct
(259)
Nov
(347)
Dec
(209)
2012 Jan
(322)
Feb
(414)
Mar
(377)
Apr
(179)
May
(173)
Jun
(234)
Jul
(295)
Aug
(239)
Sep
(276)
Oct
(355)
Nov
(144)
Dec
(108)
2013 Jan
(170)
Feb
(89)
Mar
(204)
Apr
(133)
May
(142)
Jun
(89)
Jul
(160)
Aug
(180)
Sep
(69)
Oct
(136)
Nov
(83)
Dec
(32)
2014 Jan
(71)
Feb
(90)
Mar
(161)
Apr
(117)
May
(78)
Jun
(94)
Jul
(60)
Aug
(83)
Sep
(102)
Oct
(132)
Nov
(154)
Dec
(96)
2015 Jan
(45)
Feb
(138)
Mar
(176)
Apr
(132)
May
(119)
Jun
(124)
Jul
(77)
Aug
(31)
Sep
(34)
Oct
(22)
Nov
(23)
Dec
(9)
2016 Jan
(26)
Feb
(17)
Mar
(10)
Apr
(8)
May
(4)
Jun
(8)
Jul
(6)
Aug
(5)
Sep
(9)
Oct
(4)
Nov
Dec
2017 Jan
(5)
Feb
(7)
Mar
(1)
Apr
(5)
May
Jun
(3)
Jul
(6)
Aug
(1)
Sep
Oct
(2)
Nov
(1)
Dec
2018 Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
(1)
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2020 Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
(1)
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2025 Jan
(1)
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
S M T W T F S
1
(2)
2
(3)
3
(14)
4
(11)
5
(10)
6
(7)
7
8
(3)
9
(16)
10
(9)
11
(12)
12
(1)
13
(14)
14
(10)
15
16
(1)
17
(7)
18
(9)
19
(7)
20
(10)
21
22
(1)
23
24
(1)
25
(5)
26
(7)
27
(1)
28
29
(2)
30
(2)
31
(11)




Showing 3 results of 3

From: Alexander H. <mat...@2s...> - 2015年03月02日 22:15:15
instead of having people enter all this info by hand, you should just
write a python script that extracts most of the technical details from
the current install, prints it out for cut-and paste into the form or
directly sends it to your server. ;-)
On 3 March 2015 at 02:23, Thomas Robitaille <tho...@gm...> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> If you use scientific Python packages for your research/work, I would
> appreciate if you could take a few minutes to fill out the following
> survey:
>
> http://goo.gl/PXzFAk
>
> The aim of this survey is to find out what versions of Python and
> various scientific Python packages people are using, and how people
> typically install packages, in order to determine how developers can
> better meet the needs of the Scientific Python community (for example,
> a common question is which version of Numpy need to be supported by
> packages).
>
> This is a follow-up to a similar survey which I did back in 2012 and
> which provided very interesting results that you can read about here:
>
> http://astrofrog.github.io/blog/2013/01/13/what-python-installations-are-scientists-using
>
> Please feel free to forward this survey to people in your own
> scientific Python communities!
>
> I will publish the results online in a few weeks.
>
> Thanks!
> Tom
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
> things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
> conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
> _______________________________________________
> Matplotlib-users mailing list
> Mat...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
From: Thomas R. <tho...@gm...> - 2015年03月02日 15:23:57
Hi everyone,
If you use scientific Python packages for your research/work, I would
appreciate if you could take a few minutes to fill out the following
survey:
 http://goo.gl/PXzFAk
The aim of this survey is to find out what versions of Python and
various scientific Python packages people are using, and how people
typically install packages, in order to determine how developers can
better meet the needs of the Scientific Python community (for example,
a common question is which version of Numpy need to be supported by
packages).
This is a follow-up to a similar survey which I did back in 2012 and
which provided very interesting results that you can read about here:
 http://astrofrog.github.io/blog/2013/01/13/what-python-installations-are-scientists-using
Please feel free to forward this survey to people in your own
scientific Python communities!
I will publish the results online in a few weeks.
Thanks!
Tom
From: miaocb <mi...@si...> - 2015年03月02日 03:07:16
Hi, all
 
The following code repeats the problem. Array ele1 is same as ele2 except that it is transpose of ele0, but the refined triangles using ele1 is incorrect.
The problem is also reported at https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/issues/4180
matplotlib version: 1.4.0, the UniformTriRefiner code in version 1.4.3 is the same as 1.4.0。
#!/bin/env python
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.tri as tri
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
x = np.array([ 120.39299774, 120.59100342, 120.42900085, 120.31700134])
y = np.array([ 33.99900055, 34.00899887, 34.18799973, 34.18399811])
ele0 = np.array([[2, 2], [0, 1], [3, 0]])
ele1 = ele0.transpose() # ele1 is same as ele2 except that it is transpose of ele0
ele2 = np.array([[2, 0, 3], [2, 1, 0]])
triang1 = tri.Triangulation(x, y, ele1)
triang2 = tri.Triangulation(x, y, ele2)
refiner1 = tri.UniformTriRefiner(triang1)
refiner2 = tri.UniformTriRefiner(triang2)
fine_triang1 = refiner1.refine_triangulation(subdiv=1)
fine_triang2 = refiner2.refine_triangulation(subdiv=1)
fig = plt.figure()
ha1 = fig.add_subplot(121)
ha1.set_aspect('equal')
plt.triplot(fine_triang1, color='b', linewidth=0.5)
plt.triplot(triang1, color='k', linewidth=1)
plt.title('refine_triang1 is incorrect')
ha2 = fig.add_subplot(122)
ha2.set_aspect('equal')
plt.triplot(fine_triang2, color='b', linewidth=0.5)
plt.triplot(triang2, color='k', linewidth=1)
plt.title('refine_triang2 is correct')
plt.show()
Paul

Showing 3 results of 3

Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X





Briefly describe the problem (required):
Upload screenshot of ad (required):
Select a file, or drag & drop file here.
Screenshot instructions:

Click URL instructions:
Right-click on the ad, choose "Copy Link", then paste here →
(This may not be possible with some types of ads)

More information about our ad policies

Ad destination/click URL:

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /