You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(56) |
Nov
(65) |
Dec
(37) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(78) |
Mar
(153) |
Apr
(205) |
May
(184) |
Jun
(123) |
Jul
(171) |
Aug
(156) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(223) |
2005 |
Jan
(184) |
Feb
(267) |
Mar
(214) |
Apr
(286) |
May
(320) |
Jun
(299) |
Jul
(348) |
Aug
(283) |
Sep
(355) |
Oct
(293) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(203) |
2006 |
Jan
(352) |
Feb
(358) |
Mar
(403) |
Apr
(313) |
May
(165) |
Jun
(281) |
Jul
(316) |
Aug
(228) |
Sep
(279) |
Oct
(243) |
Nov
(315) |
Dec
(345) |
2007 |
Jan
(260) |
Feb
(323) |
Mar
(340) |
Apr
(319) |
May
(290) |
Jun
(296) |
Jul
(221) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(242) |
Oct
(248) |
Nov
(242) |
Dec
(332) |
2008 |
Jan
(312) |
Feb
(359) |
Mar
(454) |
Apr
(287) |
May
(340) |
Jun
(450) |
Jul
(403) |
Aug
(324) |
Sep
(349) |
Oct
(385) |
Nov
(363) |
Dec
(437) |
2009 |
Jan
(500) |
Feb
(301) |
Mar
(409) |
Apr
(486) |
May
(545) |
Jun
(391) |
Jul
(518) |
Aug
(497) |
Sep
(492) |
Oct
(429) |
Nov
(357) |
Dec
(310) |
2010 |
Jan
(371) |
Feb
(657) |
Mar
(519) |
Apr
(432) |
May
(312) |
Jun
(416) |
Jul
(477) |
Aug
(386) |
Sep
(419) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(320) |
Dec
(202) |
2011 |
Jan
(321) |
Feb
(413) |
Mar
(299) |
Apr
(215) |
May
(284) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(207) |
Aug
(314) |
Sep
(321) |
Oct
(259) |
Nov
(347) |
Dec
(209) |
2012 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(414) |
Mar
(377) |
Apr
(179) |
May
(173) |
Jun
(234) |
Jul
(295) |
Aug
(239) |
Sep
(276) |
Oct
(355) |
Nov
(144) |
Dec
(108) |
2013 |
Jan
(170) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(204) |
Apr
(133) |
May
(142) |
Jun
(89) |
Jul
(160) |
Aug
(180) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(136) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(32) |
2014 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(90) |
Mar
(161) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(78) |
Jun
(94) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(83) |
Sep
(102) |
Oct
(132) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(96) |
2015 |
Jan
(45) |
Feb
(138) |
Mar
(176) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(119) |
Jun
(124) |
Jul
(77) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(9) |
2016 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2025 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
(16) |
2
(22) |
3
(28) |
4
(17) |
5
(17) |
6
(7) |
7
|
8
(15) |
9
(28) |
10
(26) |
11
(28) |
12
(19) |
13
(5) |
14
(3) |
15
(21) |
16
(28) |
17
(11) |
18
(18) |
19
(6) |
20
(5) |
21
(18) |
22
(11) |
23
(22) |
24
(28) |
25
(17) |
26
(17) |
27
(7) |
28
(16) |
29
(24) |
30
(25) |
31
(14) |
|
|
|
Hi All, I believe this question has been already asked in the past (I found something at http://old.nabble.com/A-good,-interactive-plotting-package-td15396445.html). I use matplotlib extensively in our applications, and some of my users repetitively asked for a way to customize *in runtime* the plots my apps generate. I.e., the app brings up a figure with a bunch of lines, points and texts, and they would like to change this linewidth, the colour of that point, the appearance of an axis, the legend keys and so on. I am currently answering "it can't be done at the moment" :-D. It is obviously not true, it just require some (a lot, maybe) work. Now, I know nothing about the other backends, but I know something about wx and I believe it is doable. Obviously, if my job was software programming and not reservoir engineering I would already have given it a try, but unfortunately we only get 24 hours per day... I don't think anything like this already exists, but it's an innocent question and I hope I won't be kicked for asking :-D . If someone knows about a possible/existing implementation, or even a start of an implementation, please let me know. Thank you. Andrea. "Imagination Is The Only Weapon In The War Against Reality." http://xoomer.alice.it/infinity77/ http://thedoomedcity.blogspot.com/
Hi all, I'm playing around with plotting with the Lambert transform. I want to only plot one hemisphere at a time. I see that if I create the appropriate axes: ax = plt.subplot(111, projection='lambert') the resulting axis object's ax.get_xlim() and ax.get_ylim() methods give the limits in rads of the plot, but the corresponding ax.set_xlim(), and ax.set_ylim() functions don't do anything. Is there an alternative way to achieve my goal? Many thanks, Angus. -- AJC McMorland Post-doctoral research fellow Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh
Bringing this to the list and not to Jon alone ... 2010年3月1日 Jon Moore <jon...@ya...>: > I'm using the Python(x,y) distribution which comes with matplotlib for > Windows. My OS is Windows XP with all updates and service packs on an > AMD Athlon 2600+ PC with ATI Radeon 9600 graiphics card. > > Python will work fine for anything that doesn't import the pylab > component (I can import matplotlib itself no problem as well as numpy > etc) but if I try to import pylab I get:- > > "An unhandled exception occured in pythonw.exe [3976]" Hmm, I'm wondering why no one in answering your post. May you please do the following: I assume that you aren't so much familiar with Python etc., because you didn't do the following steps on your own. If this is wrong, please feel not offended. Please try: import matplotlib.mpl import matplotlib.dates import matplotlib.mlab import matplotlib.pyplot This should be the essential imports done by import matplotlib.pylab Can you also do the following: import __builtin__ old_import = __import__ def new_import(name, *args, **kwargs): print name return old_import(name, *args, **kwargs) __builtin__.__import__ = new_import and then type: import matplotlib.pylab Or do the monkeypatch after import matplotlib, if that makes no trouble at all. It will print all the import attempts before executing them. I'm curious at what import it fails ... I also wonder why it's pythonw.exe. It means that you have no output on console. In this case: import sys outfile = open('log.txt', 'w') sys.stdout = outfile sys.stderr = outfile This will log the hidden output in "log.txt". Friedrich
Do you have any link to an example plot? I googled it but not much luck. Is it like a polar plot without the bottom half? Regards, -JJ On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:48 AM, R Fritz <rfritz@u.washington.edu> wrote: > I'd like to be able to generate type C photometry plots with > matplotlib. The standard co-ordinate system for these has 0 degrees at > the bottom (nadir) of the plot, with values increasing > counterclockwise. Is there anyway I can transform the co-ordinates that > matplotlib uses to do this? > -- > Randolph Fritz > design machine group, architecture department, university of washington > rfritz@u.washington.edu -or- rfr...@gm... > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-users mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users >
Here is a partial solution. If you use the SVN code, check out this example: http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/trunk-docs/examples/mplot3d/pathpatch3d_demo.html I haven't ever done it, but I think you can create some kind of image patch. -Ben -----Original Message----- From: John [H2O] [mailto:was...@gm...] Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 1:10 PM To: mat...@li... Subject: [Matplotlib-users] Axes3D and basemap Has anyone ever used a basemap instance as the 'floor' of an Axes3D plot? What I'm looking for is example code to do something like this: http://www.dfanning.com/tips/scatter3d_on_map.jpg Thanks, john -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Axes3D-and-basemap-tp27759152p27759152.html Sent from the matplotlib - users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Matplotlib-users mailing list Mat...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
Hi, I use the text.latex.preamble rc setting to customize my plots. Everything works fine. However, a comma in this rc setting is interpreted as a new-line, thus, I wonder how can I create a LaTeX preamble that contains a comma? The statement matplotlib.rcParams['text.latex.preamble']=r"\usepackage[garamond,sfscaled=false]{mathdesign}" will produce a preamble with the two lines \usepackage[garamond sfscaled=false]{mathdesign} Which is not what I desire. Regards, Heiko -- -- Talente finden Lösungen, Genies entdecken Probleme. -- (Hans Krallsheimer) -- Cluster Computing @ http://www.clustercomputing.de -- Heiko Bauke @ http://www.mpi-hd.mpg.de/personalhomes/bauke
Has anyone ever used a basemap instance as the 'floor' of an Axes3D plot? What I'm looking for is example code to do something like this: http://www.dfanning.com/tips/scatter3d_on_map.jpg Thanks, john -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Axes3D-and-basemap-tp27759152p27759152.html Sent from the matplotlib - users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
March is shaping up to be as busy as ever: planning SciPy 2010 (http://conference.scipy.org/scipy2010), two great webinars...and a new release of EPD! * Enthought Python Distribution 6.1 * In EPD 6.1, NumPy and SciPy are dynamically linked against the MKL linear algebra routines. This allows EPD users to seamlessly benefit from the highly optimized BLAS and LAPACK routines in the MKL. We were certainly expecting to observe performance improvements, but we were surprised at just how dramatic the optimizations were for applications run on dual and multi-core Intel(R) processors. Refer to our benchmarking tests for more info: http://www.enthought.com/epd/mkl/ Then try it yourself! http://www.enthought.com/products/getepd.php * Enthought March Webinars * This Friday, Travis Oliphant will lead a webinar on optimization methods in EPD. Then, on the 19th, we'll host a webinar on Python libraries for integrating C and C++ code, namely Weave, Cython, and ctypes. Enthought Python Distribution Webinar How do I... optimize? Friday, March 5: 1pm CST/7pm UTC Wait-list (for non-subscribers): email am...@en... Scientific Computing with Python Webinar Weave, Cython, and ctypes Friday, March 19: 1pm CST/7pm UTC Register: https://www.gotomeeting.com/register/335697152 Enjoy! ~ The Enthought Team ~ Open Course Austin, TX: http://www.enthought.com/training/open-austin-sci.php Python for Scientists and Engineers * May 17- 19 Interfacing with C / C++ and Fortran * May 20 Introduction to UIs and Visualization * May 21 Financial Open Course, London, UK: http://www.enthought.com/training/open-london-fin.php Python for Quants * March 8-10 Software Craftsmanship * March 11 Introduction to UIs and Visualization * March 12 * Pricing, licensing, and training inquiries * Didrik and Matt are dedicated to answering your questions and getting you the support you need. US : Matt Harward mha...@en... Europe: Didrik Pinte dp...@en...
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 5:13 AM, Dunx <du...@ho...> wrote: > > Hi, > > I know about the difference between pylab.psd and mlab.psd, but in theory > the only difference between the returned values is: > > pylab.psd = 10*log10(mlab.psd) > > Except this is not true, there is noticeable difference: > > pylab.psd = 23.4962 (all these pylab.psd values are read from graph) > 10*log10(mlab.psd) = 17.2852 > > pylab.psd = 18.8973 > 10*log10(mlab.psd) = 12.8149 > > pylab.psd = 4.92 > 10*log10(mlab.psd) = -2.247 > > These all look suspiciously out by around 2pi, although by no means exact. > Any ideas? > > code is: > pylab.psd(input, NFFT=512, Fs=sampleRate, window=blackman(512)) #graph > x,y = mlab.psd(input, NFFT=512, Fs=sampleRate, window=blackman(512)) #look > at x What version of mpl are you using? Could you try setting your matplotlib rc parameter path.simplify to False? There is a known bug in the released version of mpl that causes path simplification to render lines improperly. Looking at the code, Axes.psd just calls mlab.psd and then plots 10*log10(pxx), so if there is a difference the most likely culprit is a rendering bug. See http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/users/customizing.html for information on how to change your default matplotlib rc parameters. Christoph, this is a serious bug that merits a branch bugfix release ASAP. I will do the src release if you can do the win32 release. Perhaps we can find someone who can build the OSX binaries for us since my OSX box is dead. By I don't want to hold the release for want of OSX binaries since this is a recurrent and serious problem. JDH
On 2/25/2010 6:22 PM, Friedrich Romstedt wrote: > Ok, it's rereleased now under MIT, > github.com/friedrichromstedt/diagram_cl . I'm having somewhat trouble > accessing my web server at the moment, so please find it on github. > The docu onwww.friedrichromstedt.org Including the link http://www.friedrichromstedt.org/index.php?m=186 would be helpful; it took a couple clicks to find it. Also, apologies if you did and I do not recall, but posting to the SciPy list might hook you up with more interested people. Be sure to include a clear statement of the problem you are addressing. (It is kind of buried in your introductory text.) Cheers, Alan
Hi, that is very interesting. So what about the following image: test_large.png which has been create with the exact same code. Does this file has an alpha channel? Because this file I can see clearly on my browser. Cheers Alex On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 15:05, Renato Alves <rj...@ig...> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Quoting Alexander Dietz on 03/02/2010 01:27 PM: >> Hi, >> >> thanks for testing. So it looks like a bug in firefox from 3.5.8 -> >> 3.6, or do you see any strange things happening in the file to create >> this image? > > Tested here on firefox 3.6 (Ubuntu) and I cannot reproduce what you > described. > > Looking at the files, the only difference is that one png has an alpha > channel while the other one doesn't. The one that caused you problems is > the one that has the alpha channel. > > You should probably check external dependencies like libpng (1.2.37-1 here). > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAkuNGzAACgkQYh11EUYTX9SarQCdHuUkqBzcLJq7A8R37QCrh0p4 > Vl8AmQGE/ye1ylMueVUq5pWxEj924udU > =QYcO > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 4:05 AM, Alexander Dietz <ale...@la...> wrote: > Hi, > > I have trouble seeing a png image that I have created with matplotlib > (0.99.1.1) in my firefox browser( 2.6) and I am not sure if it is a > browser issue of a bug in matplotlib. Strange -- I can see it fine in firefox 3.5 on Solaris. Haven't seen this problem before. JDH
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:30 PM, kotsumu <tru...@ho...> wrote: > > I have a X Variable in years and 2 y variables. That I want to plot on a > single graph. > I have already listed my X variable and 2 y variables in a list but I don't > know how to plot them on the single graph. > > My x variable for example 1948 is not in the scale of for example 0.48... > > What should I do? The list are all in consistent lenght. Take a look at the pyplot tutorial -- the first section covers how to do this. Ie, see the 3rd graph/example from the top http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/users/pyplot_tutorial.html JDH
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Quoting Alexander Dietz on 03/02/2010 01:27 PM: > Hi, > > thanks for testing. So it looks like a bug in firefox from 3.5.8 -> > 3.6, or do you see any strange things happening in the file to create > this image? Tested here on firefox 3.6 (Ubuntu) and I cannot reproduce what you described. Looking at the files, the only difference is that one png has an alpha channel while the other one doesn't. The one that caused you problems is the one that has the alpha channel. You should probably check external dependencies like libpng (1.2.37-1 here). -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkuNGzAACgkQYh11EUYTX9SarQCdHuUkqBzcLJq7A8R37QCrh0p4 Vl8AmQGE/ye1ylMueVUq5pWxEj924udU =QYcO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hi, thanks for testing. So it looks like a bug in firefox from 3.5.8 -> 3.6, or do you see any strange things happening in the file to create this image? Cheers Alex On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 14:19, Johann Rohwer <jr...@su...> wrote: > On Tuesday 02 March 2010, Alexander Dietz wrote: >> This is the original image created with the script in the same >> directory (and which I can't see. I don't neither get a warning nor >> an error, just a bnalk screen: >> http://atlas3.atlas.aei.uni-hannover.de/~dietz/Test/test.png >> >> while this one I have created with converting to jpg and back to >> png. The sizes are different, and this one I can see in my browser >> http://atlas3.atlas.aei.uni-hannover.de/~dietz/Test/test2.png > > I can see both images in my browser, they look (virtually) identical. > > Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100218 > Mandriva Linux/1.9.1.8-0.1mdv2010.0 (2010.0) Firefox/3.5.8 (.NET CLR > 3.5.30729) > > Johann > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-users mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users >
On Tuesday 02 March 2010, Alexander Dietz wrote: > This is the original image created with the script in the same > directory (and which I can't see. I don't neither get a warning nor > an error, just a bnalk screen: > http://atlas3.atlas.aei.uni-hannover.de/~dietz/Test/test.png > > while this one I have created with converting to jpg and back to > png. The sizes are different, and this one I can see in my browser > http://atlas3.atlas.aei.uni-hannover.de/~dietz/Test/test2.png I can see both images in my browser, they look (virtually) identical. Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100218 Mandriva Linux/1.9.1.8-0.1mdv2010.0 (2010.0) Firefox/3.5.8 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729) Johann
Hi, I know about the difference between pylab.psd and mlab.psd, but in theory the only difference between the returned values is: pylab.psd = 10*log10(mlab.psd) Except this is not true, there is noticeable difference: pylab.psd = 23.4962 (all these pylab.psd values are read from graph) 10*log10(mlab.psd) = 17.2852 pylab.psd = 18.8973 10*log10(mlab.psd) = 12.8149 pylab.psd = 4.92 10*log10(mlab.psd) = -2.247 These all look suspiciously out by around 2pi, although by no means exact. Any ideas? code is: pylab.psd(input, NFFT=512, Fs=sampleRate, window=blackman(512)) #graph x,y = mlab.psd(input, NFFT=512, Fs=sampleRate, window=blackman(512)) #look at x -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/PSD-amplitude-disparity-tp27754632p27754632.html Sent from the matplotlib - users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi, I have trouble seeing a png image that I have created with matplotlib (0.99.1.1) in my firefox browser( 2.6) and I am not sure if it is a browser issue of a bug in matplotlib. Here are two examples of the image: This is the original image created with the script in the same directory (and which I can't see. I don't neither get a warning nor an error, just a bnalk screen: http://atlas3.atlas.aei.uni-hannover.de/~dietz/Test/test.png while this one I have created with converting to jpg and back to png. The sizes are different, and this one I can see in my browser http://atlas3.atlas.aei.uni-hannover.de/~dietz/Test/test2.png Could the png file be corrupted? In other browsers or tools like kview, okular etc I have no problems to open/print both images. Thanks Alex
I'd like to be able to generate type C photometry plots with matplotlib. The standard co-ordinate system for these has 0 degrees at the bottom (nadir) of the plot, with values increasing counterclockwise. Is there anyway I can transform the co-ordinates that matplotlib uses to do this? -- Randolph Fritz design machine group, architecture department, university of washington rfritz@u.washington.edu -or- rfr...@gm...
John and T J, L1587 at lines.py def set_mfc(self, val): 'alias for set_markerfacecolor' self.set_markerfacecolor(val, alt=alt) "alt" is not defined and it currently raises an exception. By the way, I noticed that the current approach is to implement fillstyle for EVERY markers. An alternative approach would be using a big enough circle for fillstyle and clip it with the full marker path. The number of "draw_markers" call increases but the code will be much simplified and more easy to maintain. Just a thought. Regards, -JJ On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 9:39 PM, John Hunter <jd...@gm...> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 8:28 PM, T J <tj...@gm...> wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 5:22 PM, John Hunter <jd...@gm...> wrote: >>> Very nice and thorough work. I think this should be included, but >>> I'll wait to hear from other developers before committing. Could you >>> confirm that the unit tests pass? >>> >>>>>> import matplotlib >>>>>> matplotlib.test() >>> >> >> Confirmed on rev 8133: >> >> Ran 124 tests in 341.585s >> >> FAILED (KNOWNFAIL=2, errors=2) >> and the errors were something to do with hexbin extents and the figimage method. >> > > Great -- I committed this patch in r8138 > > >>> I think the markerangle would also be a useful contribution, though it >>> would render some of the markers redundant (eg triangle left, right, >>> etc, would all just be triangles with different angles...) >>> >> >> That was a concern I had as well, but I suppose > ^ v < (etc) could >> just be considered shortcuts to particular angles. Presumably, we >> would not be removing them. Correct? Also, is the standard to have >> the angle specified in degrees? So what is more useful: markerangle >> or markerdeg? > > We would definitely be leaving these as shortcuts and for backward > compatibility. And yes the standard is to use degrees -- for > consistency with the text "rotation" property, we may want > markerrotation specified in degrees. > >> >> The other difference is that when one specifies fillstyle='left', then >> it would only apply to the marker at 0 degrees. Whereas, marker='v', >> fillstyle='left', markerangle=0 would correspond to marker='^', >> fillstyle='right', markerangle=180 (or something like that). > > You can think about what the right way to do this is. My first > inclination is that that left, right, etc, apply to the unrotated > marker, and then you apply the rotation. So 'd' with markerrotation=0 > and fillstyle='left' would be identical to 'd' with fillstyle='right' > and markerrotation=180. But any convention you want to apply would > probably be fine as long as it is documented. Note I am not sure this > is a terribly useful feature, but it might be marginally useful and it > seems like something that could be implemented unobtrusively. So > don't kill yourself on it. > > Thanks again for the nice work. > > JDH > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, > Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW > http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-users mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users >
I have a X Variable in years and 2 y variables. That I want to plot on a single graph. I have already listed my X variable and 2 y variables in a list but I don't know how to plot them on the single graph. My x variable for example 1948 is not in the scale of for example 0.48... What should I do? The list are all in consistent lenght. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Plotting-2-Y-Vars-1-X-Var-tp27751576p27751576.html Sent from the matplotlib - users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Jae-Joon Lee <lee...@gm...> wrote: > John and T J, > > L1587 at lines.py > > def set_mfc(self, val): > 'alias for set_markerfacecolor' > self.set_markerfacecolor(val, alt=alt) > > "alt" is not defined and it currently raises an exception. Fixed -- thanks for the catch. > By the way, I noticed that the current approach is to implement > fillstyle for EVERY markers. > An alternative approach would be using a big enough circle for > fillstyle and clip it with the full marker path. > The number, of "draw_markers" call increases but the code will be much > simplified and more easy to maintain. Just a thought. We do some significant optimizations in the agg backend in RendererAgg::draw_markers with cached rendered markers, so some extra machinery would have to be pushed into the backend to continue supporting this optimization if we wanted to follow this suggestion.