matplotlib-users Mailing List for matplotlib

On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Eric Firing <ef...@ha...> wrote:
>
> setp(xticks, markeredgewidth=4)
>
> Ticks are markers.
>
> Eric
Good catch. Thanks for the fix.
-- 
Gökhan

On 10/18/2010 09:42 AM, Gökhan Sever wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Ted Kord<ted...@gm...> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> How do I make the tick size bigger as in thicker/bolder?
>>
>> matplotlib.rc('ytick.major', size=5) makes it longer but 'not' thicker.
>>
>> Ted
>
> I[1]: plt.plot(range(100))
> O[1]: [<matplotlib.lines.Line2D object at 0xb84f8ec>]
>
> I[2]: xticks = getp(gca(), 'xticklines')
>
> I[3]: xgrids = getp(gca(), 'xgridlines')
>
> I[4]: setp(xgrids, linewidth=2)
> O[4]: [None, None, None, None, None, None]
>
> I[5]: setp(xticks, linewidth=5)
> O[55]: [None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None]
setp(xticks, markeredgewidth=4)
Ticks are markers.
Eric

I ran the matplotlib.test() and got:
FAILED (KNOWNFAIL=90, errors=14)
I checked more carefully now. It turns out, all the differences are texts.
Most of them are very small differences: Some of them offset to right
and down a little bit. Some of them shrink a little bit. Maybe, it
results from that some fonts in Windows are difference form Linux.
But there is one test gave out very big difference:
the 'tests.test_axes.test_symlog'.
The Y axis tick labels >10 are completely lost.
Please check the attachments.
>>>
#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=
Python: 2.6.5 (r265:79096, Mar 19 2010, 18:02:59) [MSC v.1500 64 bit (AMD64)]
numpy: 1.4.1
matplotlib: 1.0.0
PIL: 1.1.7
#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=
>> FAILED (KNOWNFAIL=90, errors=14)
>> ======================================================================
>> ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_basic_annotate
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
>> line 186, in runTest
>>  self.test(*self.arg)
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
>> line 32, in failer
>>  result = f(*args, **kwargs)
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
>> line 126, in decorated_compare_images
>>  '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
>> ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
>> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\offset_points.png vs.
>> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\expected-offset_points.png
>> (RMS 223.063)
>>
>> ======================================================================
>> ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_fill_units
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
>> line 186, in runTest
>>  self.test(*self.arg)
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
>> line 32, in failer
>>  result = f(*args, **kwargs)
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
>> line 126, in decorated_compare_images
>>  '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
>> ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
>> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\fill_units.png vs.
>> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\expected-fill_units.png
>> (RMS 58.830)
>>
>> ======================================================================
>> ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_single_point
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
>> line 186, in runTest
>>  self.test(*self.arg)
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
>> line 32, in failer
>>  result = f(*args, **kwargs)
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
>> line 126, in decorated_compare_images
>>  '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
>> ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
>> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\single_point.png vs.
>> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\expected-single_point.png
>> (RMS 11.705)
>>
>> ======================================================================
>> ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_single_date
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
>> line 186, in runTest
>>  self.test(*self.arg)
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
>> line 32, in failer
>>  result = f(*args, **kwargs)
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
>> line 126, in decorated_compare_images
>>  '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
>> ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
>> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\single_date.png vs.
>> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\expected-single_date.png
>> (RMS 583.302)
>>
>> ======================================================================
>> ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_shaped_data
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
>> line 186, in runTest
>>  self.test(*self.arg)
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
>> line 32, in failer
>>  result = f(*args, **kwargs)
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
>> line 126, in decorated_compare_images
>>  '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
>> ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
>> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\shaped_data.png vs.
>> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\expected-shaped_data.png
>> (RMS 823.859)
>>
>> ======================================================================
>> ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_const_xy
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
>> line 186, in runTest
>>  self.test(*self.arg)
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
>> line 32, in failer
>>  result = f(*args, **kwargs)
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
>> line 126, in decorated_compare_images
>>  '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
>> ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
>> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\const_xy.png vs.
>> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\expected-const_xy.png
>> (RMS 462.317)
>>
>> ======================================================================
>> ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_polar_wrap
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
>> line 186, in runTest
>>  self.test(*self.arg)
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
>> line 32, in failer
>>  result = f(*args, **kwargs)
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
>> line 126, in decorated_compare_images
>>  '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
>> ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
>> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\polar_wrap_180.png vs.
>> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\expected-polar_wrap_180.png
>> (RMS 59.783)
>>
>> ======================================================================
>> ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_polar_units
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
>> line 186, in runTest
>>  self.test(*self.arg)
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
>> line 32, in failer
>>  result = f(*args, **kwargs)
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
>> line 126, in decorated_compare_images
>>  '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
>> ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
>> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\polar_units.png vs.
>> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\expected-polar_units.png
>> (RMS 59.557)
>>
>> ======================================================================
>> ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_polar_rmin
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
>> line 186, in runTest
>>  self.test(*self.arg)
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
>> line 32, in failer
>>  result = f(*args, **kwargs)
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
>> line 126, in decorated_compare_images
>>  '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
>> ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
>> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\polar_rmin.png vs.
>> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\expected-polar_rmin.png
>> (RMS 40.497)
>>
>> ======================================================================
>> ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_symlog
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
>> line 186, in runTest
>>  self.test(*self.arg)
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
>> line 32, in failer
>>  result = f(*args, **kwargs)
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
>> line 126, in decorated_compare_images
>>  '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
>> ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
>> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\symlog.png vs.
>> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\expected-symlog.png
>> (RMS 71.042)
>>
>> ======================================================================
>> ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_image.test_image_clip
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
>> line 186, in runTest
>>  self.test(*self.arg)
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
>> line 32, in failer
>>  result = f(*args, **kwargs)
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
>> line 126, in decorated_compare_images
>>  '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
>> ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
>> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_image\image_clip.png vs.
>> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_image\expected-image_clip.png
>> (RMS 323.003)
>>
>> ======================================================================
>> ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_mathtext.test_mathtext
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
>> line 186, in runTest
>>  self.test(*self.arg)
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
>> line 32, in failer
>>  result = f(*args, **kwargs)
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
>> line 126, in decorated_compare_images
>>  '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
>> ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
>> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_mathtext\mathtext.png vs.
>> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_mathtext\expected-mathtext.png
>> (RMS 41.845)
>>
>> ======================================================================
>> ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_mathtext.test_mathtext_stix
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
>> line 186, in runTest
>>  self.test(*self.arg)
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
>> line 32, in failer
>>  result = f(*args, **kwargs)
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
>> line 126, in decorated_compare_images
>>  '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
>> ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
>> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_mathtext\mathtext_stix.png
>> vs. D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_mathtext\expected-mathtext_stix.png
>> (RMS 29.816)
>>
>> ======================================================================
>> ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_mathtext.test_mathtext_stixsans
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
>> line 186, in runTest
>>  self.test(*self.arg)
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
>> line 32, in failer
>>  result = f(*args, **kwargs)
>> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
>> line 126, in decorated_compare_images
>>  '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
>> ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
>> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_mathtext\mathtext_stixsans.png
>> vs. D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_mathtext\expected-mathtext_stixsans.png
>> (RMS 21.471)
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Ran 150 tests in 100.386s
>>
>

On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Ted Kord <ted...@gm...> wrote:
> Hi
>
> How do I make the tick size bigger as in thicker/bolder?
>
> matplotlib.rc('ytick.major', size=5) makes it longer but 'not' thicker.
>
> Ted
I[1]: plt.plot(range(100))
O[1]: [<matplotlib.lines.Line2D object at 0xb84f8ec>]
I[2]: xticks = getp(gca(), 'xticklines')
I[3]: xgrids = getp(gca(), 'xgridlines')
I[4]: setp(xgrids, linewidth=2)
O[4]: [None, None, None, None, None, None]
I[5]: setp(xticks, linewidth=5)
O[55]: [None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None]
This should be the solution. However xgrids are finely set to a bigger
linewidth whereas xticks doesn't change.
I[6]: xticks
O[6]: <a list of 12 Text xtickline objects>
I[6]: xgrids
O[6]: <a list of 6 Line2D xgridline objects>
I[7]: xticks[0]
O[7]: <matplotlib.lines.Line2D object at 0xb8b560c>
I[8]: xgrids[1]
O[8]: <matplotlib.lines.Line2D object at 0xb8626ec>
Interestingly xticks is returned as a list of Text objects, while each
element of this list looks like a Line2D (which really supposed to
be.)
Can you try these on your side?
-- 
Gökhan

Hi all; 
I'm using the excellent font Linux Libertine for writing my thesis, in
which I do my plotting in matplotlib. I would really love to be ablu to
have consistent fonts in both text and graphs - is this possible? I know
it can be loaded by \usepackage{libertine}.
Best;
Emil

Hi,
I'm wondering if there's some relatively automatic way to have the
ticklabels to come out in scientific notation for an axis that uses a
linear scale (and has a range that warrants scientific notation)? For
example, an axis that goes from 0 to 2.E18 by default uses the labels 0,
0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and puts 1e18 at the end of the axis. To me this is
unappealing. 1e18 is a computer programming way to write the 10^{18} (in
LaTeX formatting). In IDL the ticklabels are 5.0x10^{17}, 1.0x10^{18},
1.5x10^{18}, 2.0x10^{18}. This is one instance where I think IDL gets
it right and matplotlib gets it wrong. So, as far as I can tell, one
can give the ticklabels by hand, and so I could achieve my desired
labels that way, but it'd be nice to have a more automatic way to do it.
Searching the examples, I've come up empty so far. I would also
advocate changing the default format for labeling axes that fall in this
category. Do the developers have any opinions on this?
Regards,
Jon

On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 8:25 PM, LittleBigBrain <bra...@gm...> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Friedrich Romstedt
> <fri...@gm...> wrote:
>> 2010年10月18日 LittleBigBrain <bra...@gm...>:
>>> Hi Friedrich,
>>>
>>> Thanks for produce the patch. But I do not know how to use 'git'. And
>>> I cannot find the changes you made on web.
>>> though the latest update by you is 2 hours ago, in the online source
>>> archive the latest file is modified on October 11, 2010 in 'trunk'.
>>
>> Yes I agree, I didn't check, I was too quick. Thanks for this further
>> bug report in Friedrich Romstedt.py :-). I forgot to push the new
>> branch.
>>
>> The file is here online:
>> http://github.com/friedrichromstedt/matplotlib/blob/friedrichromstedt-get_cmap/lib/matplotlib/cm.py.
>> Notice that the default branch on the repo is grayscale, when you go
>> in via http://github.com/friedrichromstedt/matplotlib.
>>
>> I send the file attached. Just rename the current cm.py and put in
>> the new one, it should work. You said you were using svn before, so I
>> assumed you compiled yourself. How did you manage to use svn without
>> compiling?
>>
>> Can you run the test suite?
>>
>> Friedrich
>>
> The colormap functions seem all OK. But I got other errors irrelevant
> to your update. I manually checked all images invoking errors, they
> are all OK. Somehow, their file handles are not closed properly before
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~No, I was wrong. For some
reason, the RMS are too big. But with a glance, I did not see any
visible difference in the pictures so far.
> reopening.
>
> Here is the test result:
>>>> import nose
>>>> print nose.__version__
> 0.11.4
>>>> import PIL
>>>> print PIL.__version__
>>>> from PIL import Image
>>>> Image.VERSION
> '1.1.7'
>>>> import matplotlib
>>>> matplotlib.__version__
> '1.0.0'
>>>> matplotlib.test()
> FAILED (KNOWNFAIL=90, errors=14)
> ======================================================================
> ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_basic_annotate
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
> line 186, in runTest
>  self.test(*self.arg)
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
> line 32, in failer
>  result = f(*args, **kwargs)
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
> line 126, in decorated_compare_images
>  '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
> ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\offset_points.png vs.
> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\expected-offset_points.png
> (RMS 223.063)
>
> ======================================================================
> ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_fill_units
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
> line 186, in runTest
>  self.test(*self.arg)
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
> line 32, in failer
>  result = f(*args, **kwargs)
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
> line 126, in decorated_compare_images
>  '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
> ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\fill_units.png vs.
> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\expected-fill_units.png
> (RMS 58.830)
>
> ======================================================================
> ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_single_point
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
> line 186, in runTest
>  self.test(*self.arg)
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
> line 32, in failer
>  result = f(*args, **kwargs)
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
> line 126, in decorated_compare_images
>  '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
> ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\single_point.png vs.
> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\expected-single_point.png
> (RMS 11.705)
>
> ======================================================================
> ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_single_date
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
> line 186, in runTest
>  self.test(*self.arg)
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
> line 32, in failer
>  result = f(*args, **kwargs)
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
> line 126, in decorated_compare_images
>  '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
> ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\single_date.png vs.
> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\expected-single_date.png
> (RMS 583.302)
>
> ======================================================================
> ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_shaped_data
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
> line 186, in runTest
>  self.test(*self.arg)
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
> line 32, in failer
>  result = f(*args, **kwargs)
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
> line 126, in decorated_compare_images
>  '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
> ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\shaped_data.png vs.
> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\expected-shaped_data.png
> (RMS 823.859)
>
> ======================================================================
> ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_const_xy
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
> line 186, in runTest
>  self.test(*self.arg)
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
> line 32, in failer
>  result = f(*args, **kwargs)
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
> line 126, in decorated_compare_images
>  '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
> ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\const_xy.png vs.
> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\expected-const_xy.png
> (RMS 462.317)
>
> ======================================================================
> ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_polar_wrap
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
> line 186, in runTest
>  self.test(*self.arg)
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
> line 32, in failer
>  result = f(*args, **kwargs)
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
> line 126, in decorated_compare_images
>  '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
> ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\polar_wrap_180.png vs.
> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\expected-polar_wrap_180.png
> (RMS 59.783)
>
> ======================================================================
> ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_polar_units
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
> line 186, in runTest
>  self.test(*self.arg)
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
> line 32, in failer
>  result = f(*args, **kwargs)
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
> line 126, in decorated_compare_images
>  '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
> ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\polar_units.png vs.
> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\expected-polar_units.png
> (RMS 59.557)
>
> ======================================================================
> ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_polar_rmin
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
> line 186, in runTest
>  self.test(*self.arg)
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
> line 32, in failer
>  result = f(*args, **kwargs)
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
> line 126, in decorated_compare_images
>  '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
> ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\polar_rmin.png vs.
> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\expected-polar_rmin.png
> (RMS 40.497)
>
> ======================================================================
> ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_symlog
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
> line 186, in runTest
>  self.test(*self.arg)
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
> line 32, in failer
>  result = f(*args, **kwargs)
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
> line 126, in decorated_compare_images
>  '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
> ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\symlog.png vs.
> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\expected-symlog.png
> (RMS 71.042)
>
> ======================================================================
> ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_image.test_image_clip
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
> line 186, in runTest
>  self.test(*self.arg)
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
> line 32, in failer
>  result = f(*args, **kwargs)
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
> line 126, in decorated_compare_images
>  '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
> ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_image\image_clip.png vs.
> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_image\expected-image_clip.png
> (RMS 323.003)
>
> ======================================================================
> ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_mathtext.test_mathtext
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
> line 186, in runTest
>  self.test(*self.arg)
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
> line 32, in failer
>  result = f(*args, **kwargs)
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
> line 126, in decorated_compare_images
>  '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
> ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_mathtext\mathtext.png vs.
> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_mathtext\expected-mathtext.png
> (RMS 41.845)
>
> ======================================================================
> ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_mathtext.test_mathtext_stix
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
> line 186, in runTest
>  self.test(*self.arg)
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
> line 32, in failer
>  result = f(*args, **kwargs)
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
> line 126, in decorated_compare_images
>  '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
> ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_mathtext\mathtext_stix.png
> vs. D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_mathtext\expected-mathtext_stix.png
> (RMS 29.816)
>
> ======================================================================
> ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_mathtext.test_mathtext_stixsans
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
> line 186, in runTest
>  self.test(*self.arg)
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
> line 32, in failer
>  result = f(*args, **kwargs)
> File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
> line 126, in decorated_compare_images
>  '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
> ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
> D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_mathtext\mathtext_stixsans.png
> vs. D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_mathtext\expected-mathtext_stixsans.png
> (RMS 21.471)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ran 150 tests in 100.386s
>

On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Friedrich Romstedt
<fri...@gm...> wrote:
> 2010年10月18日 LittleBigBrain <bra...@gm...>:
>> Hi Friedrich,
>>
>> Thanks for produce the patch. But I do not know how to use 'git'. And
>> I cannot find the changes you made on web.
>> though the latest update by you is 2 hours ago, in the online source
>> archive the latest file is modified on October 11, 2010 in 'trunk'.
>
> Yes I agree, I didn't check, I was too quick. Thanks for this further
> bug report in Friedrich Romstedt.py :-). I forgot to push the new
> branch.
>
> The file is here online:
> http://github.com/friedrichromstedt/matplotlib/blob/friedrichromstedt-get_cmap/lib/matplotlib/cm.py.
> Notice that the default branch on the repo is grayscale, when you go
> in via http://github.com/friedrichromstedt/matplotlib.
>
> I send the file attached. Just rename the current cm.py and put in
> the new one, it should work. You said you were using svn before, so I
> assumed you compiled yourself. How did you manage to use svn without
> compiling?
>
> Can you run the test suite?
>
> Friedrich
>
The colormap functions seem all OK. But I got other errors irrelevant
to your update. I manually checked all images invoking errors, they
are all OK. Somehow, their file handles are not closed properly before
reopening.
Here is the test result:
>>> import nose
>>> print nose.__version__
0.11.4
>>> import PIL
>>> print PIL.__version__
>>> from PIL import Image
>>> Image.VERSION
'1.1.7'
>>> import matplotlib
>>> matplotlib.__version__
'1.0.0'
>>> matplotlib.test()
FAILED (KNOWNFAIL=90, errors=14)
======================================================================
ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_basic_annotate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
line 186, in runTest
 self.test(*self.arg)
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
line 32, in failer
 result = f(*args, **kwargs)
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
line 126, in decorated_compare_images
 '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\offset_points.png vs.
D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\expected-offset_points.png
(RMS 223.063)
======================================================================
ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_fill_units
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
line 186, in runTest
 self.test(*self.arg)
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
line 32, in failer
 result = f(*args, **kwargs)
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
line 126, in decorated_compare_images
 '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\fill_units.png vs.
D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\expected-fill_units.png
(RMS 58.830)
======================================================================
ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_single_point
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
line 186, in runTest
 self.test(*self.arg)
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
line 32, in failer
 result = f(*args, **kwargs)
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
line 126, in decorated_compare_images
 '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\single_point.png vs.
D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\expected-single_point.png
(RMS 11.705)
======================================================================
ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_single_date
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
line 186, in runTest
 self.test(*self.arg)
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
line 32, in failer
 result = f(*args, **kwargs)
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
line 126, in decorated_compare_images
 '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\single_date.png vs.
D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\expected-single_date.png
(RMS 583.302)
======================================================================
ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_shaped_data
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
line 186, in runTest
 self.test(*self.arg)
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
line 32, in failer
 result = f(*args, **kwargs)
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
line 126, in decorated_compare_images
 '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\shaped_data.png vs.
D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\expected-shaped_data.png
(RMS 823.859)
======================================================================
ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_const_xy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
line 186, in runTest
 self.test(*self.arg)
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
line 32, in failer
 result = f(*args, **kwargs)
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
line 126, in decorated_compare_images
 '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\const_xy.png vs.
D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\expected-const_xy.png
(RMS 462.317)
======================================================================
ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_polar_wrap
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
line 186, in runTest
 self.test(*self.arg)
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
line 32, in failer
 result = f(*args, **kwargs)
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
line 126, in decorated_compare_images
 '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\polar_wrap_180.png vs.
D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\expected-polar_wrap_180.png
(RMS 59.783)
======================================================================
ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_polar_units
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
line 186, in runTest
 self.test(*self.arg)
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
line 32, in failer
 result = f(*args, **kwargs)
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
line 126, in decorated_compare_images
 '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\polar_units.png vs.
D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\expected-polar_units.png
(RMS 59.557)
======================================================================
ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_polar_rmin
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
line 186, in runTest
 self.test(*self.arg)
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
line 32, in failer
 result = f(*args, **kwargs)
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
line 126, in decorated_compare_images
 '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\polar_rmin.png vs.
D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\expected-polar_rmin.png
(RMS 40.497)
======================================================================
ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_symlog
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
line 186, in runTest
 self.test(*self.arg)
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
line 32, in failer
 result = f(*args, **kwargs)
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
line 126, in decorated_compare_images
 '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\symlog.png vs.
D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_axes\expected-symlog.png
(RMS 71.042)
======================================================================
ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_image.test_image_clip
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
line 186, in runTest
 self.test(*self.arg)
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
line 32, in failer
 result = f(*args, **kwargs)
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
line 126, in decorated_compare_images
 '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_image\image_clip.png vs.
D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_image\expected-image_clip.png
(RMS 323.003)
======================================================================
ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_mathtext.test_mathtext
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
line 186, in runTest
 self.test(*self.arg)
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
line 32, in failer
 result = f(*args, **kwargs)
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
line 126, in decorated_compare_images
 '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_mathtext\mathtext.png vs.
D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_mathtext\expected-mathtext.png
(RMS 41.845)
======================================================================
ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_mathtext.test_mathtext_stix
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
line 186, in runTest
 self.test(*self.arg)
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
line 32, in failer
 result = f(*args, **kwargs)
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
line 126, in decorated_compare_images
 '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_mathtext\mathtext_stix.png
vs. D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_mathtext\expected-mathtext_stix.png
(RMS 29.816)
======================================================================
ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_mathtext.test_mathtext_stixsans
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\nose-0.11.4-py2.6.egg\nose\case.py",
line 186, in runTest
 self.test(*self.arg)
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
line 32, in failer
 result = f(*args, **kwargs)
 File "C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\matplotlib\testing\decorators.py",
line 126, in decorated_compare_images
 '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_mathtext\mathtext_stixsans.png
vs. D:\works\matplotlibTest\result_images\test_mathtext\expected-mathtext_stixsans.png
(RMS 21.471)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 150 tests in 100.386s

Hi
How do I make the tick size bigger as in thicker/bolder?
matplotlib.rc('ytick.major', size=5) makes it longer but 'not' thicker.
Ted

2010年10月18日 LittleBigBrain <bra...@gm...>:
> Hi Friedrich,
>
> Thanks for produce the patch. But I do not know how to use 'git'. And
> I cannot find the changes you made on web.
> though the latest update by you is 2 hours ago, in the online source
> archive the latest file is modified on October 11, 2010 in 'trunk'.
Yes I agree, I didn't check, I was too quick. Thanks for this further
bug report in Friedrich Romstedt.py :-). I forgot to push the new
branch.
The file is here online:
http://github.com/friedrichromstedt/matplotlib/blob/friedrichromstedt-get_cmap/lib/matplotlib/cm.py.
 Notice that the default branch on the repo is grayscale, when you go
in via http://github.com/friedrichromstedt/matplotlib.
I send the file attached. Just rename the current cm.py and put in
the new one, it should work. You said you were using svn before, so I
assumed you compiled yourself. How did you manage to use svn without
compiling?
Can you run the test suite?
Friedrich

 Dear all,
Is there a way of avoiding the overlap between the text of the labels 
and the text of the ticks? This is what I am getting:
 http://4c.ucc.ie/~lquesada/tmp/surface.pdf
Currently I am only doing this:
 ax.set_xlabel('Distance',fontsize=16)
 ax.set_ylabel('Size',fontsize=16)
 ax.set_zlabel('Cost',fontsize=16)
Is it also possible to give an orientation to the labels? It would be 
nicer if they are oriented parallel to the axis..
Thanks in advance for your advice!
Cheers,
Luis

On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Michael Droettboom <md...@st...> wrote:
> matplotlib, under normal usage, doesn't list all files in the current
> directory. Can you provide the steps you perform before calling
> show()? What platform are you on, and which backend are you using?\
The only thing I could think of is that matplotlib.matplotlib_fname does:
 fname = os.path.join( os.getcwd(), 'matplotlibrc')
 if os.path.exists(fname): return fname
So if os.path.exists is slow for directories with many files, this
could be the culprit (though it would surprise me).
Maximilian, these lines are found in matplotlib/__init__.py -- you may
want to try commenting them out and rerunning to see if this helps
your issue.
JDH

matplotlib, under normal usage, doesn't list all files in the current 
directory. Can you provide the steps you perform before calling 
show()? What platform are you on, and which backend are you using?
Mike
On 10/18/2010 05:54 AM, mfabulous wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I encountered this particular problem quite often now. If you use matplotlib
> in a directory that contains a large number of files, things become
> extremely slow after calling pylab.show(). I suspect the interface
> internally lists all files in that directory?
>
> I often have to plot from directories with huge amounts of data, is there a
> way to change that behavior?
>
> Regards,
>
> Maximilian
> 
-- 
Michael Droettboom
Science Software Branch
Space Telescope Science Institute
Baltimore, Maryland, USA

I seem to have run into this problem with wx years ago -- destroying the 
widget that fed an event from a callback causes issues. As Chris 
suggested, the following seems to work, however:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import wx
def close_figure():
 plt.close()
def onclick(event):
 if event.button==1:
 wx.CallAfter(close_figure)
fig = plt.gcf()
cid = fig.canvas.mpl_connect('button_press_event', onclick)
plt.show()
Mike
On 10/15/2010 08:35 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
> On 10/15/10 5:16 PM, Paul Ivanov wrote:
> 
>> I want to do something like this:
>>
>> import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
>> def onclick(event):
>> if event.button==1:
>> 	plt.close()
>> fig = plt.gcf()
>> cid = fig.canvas.mpl_connect('button_press_event', onclick)
>> plt.show()
>>
>> I've tried several variations on this theme, but all of them cause
>> crashes. Am I missing something?
>>
>> I'm using 1.0.0 with WXAgg
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> 
> I don't know if MPL events do anything like this, but since you are
> using wx, you could probably use wx.CallAfter() (or wx.CallLater(), call
> one of those in your callback,a nd tehn have the function called close
> the figure.
>
> -Chris
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4
> The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 (formerly
> Flex(R) Builder(TM)) enable the development of rich applications that run
> across multiple browsers and platforms. Download your free trials today!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Matplotlib-users mailing list
> Mat...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
> 
-- 
Michael Droettboom
Science Software Branch
Space Telescope Science Institute
Baltimore, Maryland, USA

While you cannot add an axes to another axes, you can set position of
an axes "relative to" another axes. The threads below show simple
approaches.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.matplotlib.general/16373
http://old.nabble.com/embedding-figures-inside-another-%28coordinates%29-td22826126.html#a22832238
This may or may not work on your cases depending the complexity of your plots.
Of course, if you need more control on the axes position, you may
implement your own axes_locator.
Regards,
-JJ
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Radek Machulka
<rad...@gm...> wrote:
> That 'spacial plot' is just several simple plots placed in the 'parent
> figure'. So my class just create this bunch of plots as an axes and place them
> somewhere.
> This is the 'plotting core' of my class:
>
> # plot 1
> rect1 = [a, b, c, d] # where a, b, c and d values depends on the data, ...
> self.plot1 = self.figure.add_axes(rect1)
> self.plot1.plot(data1)
>
> and the same (similar) for rest of plots (with differnt a,b,c,d values, of
> course).
>
> So since it is not possible to place axes to another axes there is probably no
> solution for my problem.
> What can I probably do is create grid of figures (if figures are realy only
> element where can axes be placed), but this seems not possible, or rewrite my
> class using different elements for subplots instead of axes, if there is
> anything...
>
> Well, thanks for clarifying this, I should definitely read more documentation
> before I start code so complex apps.
> But Thank You anyway
> Radek
>
> Dne pondělí 18 října 2010 13:49:34 jste napsal(a):
>> A figure is a figure and an axes is an axes. They are NOT
>> interchangeable. The AxesGrid essentially creates a list of axes.
>>
>> As you may already know, only figure class has an add_axes method. And
>> axes can only be added to a figure. You cannot add an axes to another
>> axes.
>>
>> Since I have no idea what kind of special plot your code creates, I
>> can only suggest you to revise your code to take an axes instance as
>> an input, not a figure instance.
>>
>> If you can, please post a simple, but complete code that demonstrate
>> your problem.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> -JJ
>

2010年10月18日 Friedrich Romstedt <fri...@gm...>:
> 2010年10月18日 脑关(BrainGateway)生命科学仪器 <bra...@gm...>:
>> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Benjamin Root <ben...@ou...> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 5:35 PM, braingateway <bra...@gm...>
>>> wrote:
>>>> I tried all possible colormaps and found out: gist_rainbow, terrain,
>>>> bwr, brg, and seismic will generate the same error, all other colormaps
>>>> are OK. I wonder is this a bug or expected behavior?
>> Hi Ben,
>> Thanks a lot for answering my question! I am a newbie to matplotlib,
>> so please forgive me, if the question is stupid ;p
>
> Questions are never stupid ...
>
>> In my program I wanna know the exact RGBA value of a data point in the
>> figure, in order to plot a corresponding line with the same color in
>> another figure. That is why I need to call a(z) to get RGBA value of a
>> point at (x,y,z) (z is represented by color). If I understood it
>> correctly, you said I do not need to specify the 'lut' in
>> cm.get_cmap(name,lut)? I thought the colormap object is actually a
>> lookup table with a length specified by lut.
>
> Kind of, but it's initialised from a linear segmentation dictionary,
> so you can get cmaps with a precision you want.
>
>> It turns out I do not
>> need to specify anything here.
>
> Default param is 256.
>
>> But if I do not specify anything the
>> colormap.N is always 256. What will happen then, if I need more color
>> steps?
>
> cm = get_cmap('...', 1024)
>
>> I do notice a(2) and a(2.2) returns different values. So I am
>> very confused about the principle how the RGBA value is generated by
>> the colormaps.
>
> It's the "magic" to distinguish between integer (in the LUT range) and
> float (in [0.0, 1.0]). 2 gives the LUT entry 2, 2.0 will give the
> upper value since it's > 1, as will 2.2 do. Try 0.5, and 0.6, or 0.0
> and 0.1.
>
> Actually I cannot reproduce your error on a recently (some weeks ago)
> checked-out GitHub repo version of mpl 1.0.0. Please provide
> mpl.__version__ so that we check if that's the reason - as simple as
> it might be.
>
> MacBook-Pro-Friedrich:Report Friedrich$ python
> Python 2.6.5 (r265:79063, Jul 18 2010, 12:14:53)
> [GCC 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5659)] on darwin
> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>>> import matplotlib.cm
>>>> cm = matplotlib.cm.get_cmap('gist_rainbow')
>>>> cm(range(256))
> array([[ 1.    , 0.    , 0.16   , 1.    ],
>    [ 1.    , 0.    , 0.13908497, 1.    ],
>    [ 1.    , 0.    , 0.11816993, 1.    ],
>    ...,
>    [ 1.    , 0.    , 0.79262575, 1.    ],
>    [ 1.    , 0.    , 0.77131287, 1.    ],
>    [ 1.    , 0.    , 0.75   , 1.    ]])
>>>> print matplotlib.__version__
> 1.0.0
>
> The attribute of the cm where the error occurs on your machine is set
> to a valid value for me. I also cannot find any code path leading to
> a wrong initialisation of the attribute. Might be that the data the
> cm is init'ed from changed. There is a code path initialising the cm
> from a tuple (your attribute was a tuple used like a dict), but this
> works too: (terrain is such an example):
>
>>>> cm = matplotlib.cm.get_cmap('terrain')
>>>> cm(range(256))
> array([[ 0.2    , 0.2    , 0.6    , 1.    ],
>    [ 0.19477124, 0.21045752, 0.61045752, 1.    ],
>    [ 0.18954248, 0.22091503, 0.62091503, 1.    ],
>    ...,
>    [ 0.98431373, 0.97992157, 0.97898039, 1.    ],
>    [ 0.99215686, 0.98996078, 0.9894902 , 1.    ],
>    [ 1.    , 1.    , 1.    , 1.    ]])
>
> Might be that there was 'red' misspelled in gist_rainbow in you mpl
> version, this may explain the behaviour if we track it down. Can you
> do the following to verify this:
>
> import matplotlib._cm
> print matplotlib._cm._gist_stern_data
>
> ? Thx,
> Friedrich
>
Thanks a lot for your detailed response!
In previous posts I did give the version: '1.0.svn'. Then I installed
the latest stable version. Here is the version info:
>>> print matplotlib.__version__
1.0.0
However, the error is still there.
You could not reproduce the error in your code, because you did not
specify 'lut' when you call get_cmap
try this:
maps=[m for m in matplotlib.cm.datad if not m.endswith("_r")]
for i in maps:
	try:
		a=matplotlib.cm.get_cmap(i,256)(range(256))
	except:
		(type, value, traceback) = sys.exc_info()
		print "Problems to create %s" % (i,)
		print "The error was --> %s: %s" % (type, value)
u will reproduce the error.
Thanks very much to point out I could actually print the colormap
definition-data.
I printed all of them, and found out the colormaps invoking errors are
all tuples but not dictionaries and all other colormaps are actually
dictionaries.
###Examples without Errors###
###They are all dictionaries###
print matplotlib._cm._gist_stern_data
{'blue': ((0.0, 0.0, 0.0), (0.5, 1.0, 1.0), (0.73499999999999999, 0.0,
0.0), (1.0, 1.0, 1.0)), 'green': ((0, 0, 0), (1, 1, 1)), 'red': ((0.0,
0.0, 0.0), (0.054699999999999999, 1.0, 1.0), (0.25, 0.027, 0.25),
(1.0, 1.0, 1.0))}
print matplotlib._cm._jet_data
{'blue': ((0.0, 0.5, 0.5), (0.11, 1, 1), (0.34000000000000002, 1, 1),
(0.65000000000000002, 0, 0), (1, 0, 0)), 'green': ((0.0, 0, 0),
(0.125, 0, 0), (0.375, 1, 1), (0.64000000000000001, 1, 1),
(0.91000000000000003, 0, 0), (1, 0, 0)), 'red': ((0.0, 0, 0),
(0.34999999999999998, 0, 0), (0.66000000000000003, 1, 1),
(0.89000000000000001, 1, 1), (1, 0.5, 0.5))}
###Colormaps invoking Errors###
###They are all Tuples###
Problems to create gist_rainbow
((0.0, (1.0, 0.0, 0.16)), (0.029999999999999999, (1.0, 0.0, 0.0)),
(0.215, (1.0, 1.0, 0.0)), (0.40000000000000002, (0.0, 1.0, 0.0)),
(0.58599999999999997, (0.0, 1.0, 1.0)), (0.77000000000000002, (0.0,
0.0, 1.0)), (0.95399999999999996, (1.0, 0.0, 1.0)), (1.0, (1.0, 0.0,
0.75)))
The error was --> <type 'exceptions.TypeError'>: tuple indices must be
integers, not str
Problems to create terrain
((0.0, (0.20000000000000001, 0.20000000000000001,
0.59999999999999998)), (0.14999999999999999, (0.0,
0.59999999999999998, 1.0)), (0.25, (0.0, 0.80000000000000004,
0.40000000000000002)), (0.5, (1.0, 1.0, 0.59999999999999998)), (0.75,
(0.5, 0.35999999999999999, 0.33000000000000002)), (1.0, (1.0, 1.0,
1.0)))
The error was --> <type 'exceptions.TypeError'>: tuple indices must be
integers, not str
Problems to create bwr
((0.0, 0.0, 1.0), (1.0, 1.0, 1.0), (1.0, 0.0, 0.0))
The error was --> <type 'exceptions.TypeError'>: tuple indices must be
integers, not str
Problems to create brg
((0.0, 0.0, 1.0), (1.0, 0.0, 0.0), (0.0, 1.0, 0.0))
The error was --> <type 'exceptions.TypeError'>: tuple indices must be
integers, not str
Problems to create seismic
((0.0, 0.0, 0.29999999999999999), (0.0, 0.0, 1.0), (1.0, 1.0, 1.0),
(1.0, 0.0, 0.0), (0.5, 0.0, 0.0))
The error was --> <type 'exceptions.TypeError'>: tuple indices must be
integers, not str

A figure is a figure and an axes is an axes. They are NOT
interchangeable. The AxesGrid essentially creates a list of axes.
As you may already know, only figure class has an add_axes method. And
axes can only be added to a figure. You cannot add an axes to another
axes.
Since I have no idea what kind of special plot your code creates, I
can only suggest you to revise your code to take an axes instance as
an input, not a figure instance.
If you can, please post a simple, but complete code that demonstrate
your problem.
Regards,
-JJ

2010年10月18日 脑关(BrainGateway)生命科学仪器 <bra...@gm...>:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Benjamin Root <ben...@ou...> wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 5:35 PM, braingateway <bra...@gm...>
>> wrote:
>>> I tried all possible colormaps and found out: gist_rainbow, terrain,
>>> bwr, brg, and seismic will generate the same error, all other colormaps
>>> are OK. I wonder is this a bug or expected behavior?
> Hi Ben,
> Thanks a lot for answering my question! I am a newbie to matplotlib,
> so please forgive me, if the question is stupid ;p
Questions are never stupid ...
> In my program I wanna know the exact RGBA value of a data point in the
> figure, in order to plot a corresponding line with the same color in
> another figure. That is why I need to call a(z) to get RGBA value of a
> point at (x,y,z) (z is represented by color). If I understood it
> correctly, you said I do not need to specify the 'lut' in
> cm.get_cmap(name,lut)? I thought the colormap object is actually a
> lookup table with a length specified by lut.
Kind of, but it's initialised from a linear segmentation dictionary,
so you can get cmaps with a precision you want.
> It turns out I do not
> need to specify anything here.
Default param is 256.
> But if I do not specify anything the
> colormap.N is always 256. What will happen then, if I need more color
> steps?
cm = get_cmap('...', 1024)
> I do notice a(2) and a(2.2) returns different values. So I am
> very confused about the principle how the RGBA value is generated by
> the colormaps.
It's the "magic" to distinguish between integer (in the LUT range) and
float (in [0.0, 1.0]). 2 gives the LUT entry 2, 2.0 will give the
upper value since it's > 1, as will 2.2 do. Try 0.5, and 0.6, or 0.0
and 0.1.
Actually I cannot reproduce your error on a recently (some weeks ago)
checked-out GitHub repo version of mpl 1.0.0. Please provide
mpl.__version__ so that we check if that's the reason - as simple as
it might be.
MacBook-Pro-Friedrich:Report Friedrich$ python
Python 2.6.5 (r265:79063, Jul 18 2010, 12:14:53)
[GCC 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5659)] on darwin
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import matplotlib.cm
>>> cm = matplotlib.cm.get_cmap('gist_rainbow')
>>> cm(range(256))
array([[ 1. , 0. , 0.16 , 1. ],
 [ 1. , 0. , 0.13908497, 1. ],
 [ 1. , 0. , 0.11816993, 1. ],
 ...,
 [ 1. , 0. , 0.79262575, 1. ],
 [ 1. , 0. , 0.77131287, 1. ],
 [ 1. , 0. , 0.75 , 1. ]])
>>> print matplotlib.__version__
1.0.0
The attribute of the cm where the error occurs on your machine is set
to a valid value for me. I also cannot find any code path leading to
a wrong initialisation of the attribute. Might be that the data the
cm is init'ed from changed. There is a code path initialising the cm
from a tuple (your attribute was a tuple used like a dict), but this
works too: (terrain is such an example):
>>> cm = matplotlib.cm.get_cmap('terrain')
>>> cm(range(256))
array([[ 0.2 , 0.2 , 0.6 , 1. ],
 [ 0.19477124, 0.21045752, 0.61045752, 1. ],
 [ 0.18954248, 0.22091503, 0.62091503, 1. ],
 ...,
 [ 0.98431373, 0.97992157, 0.97898039, 1. ],
 [ 0.99215686, 0.98996078, 0.9894902 , 1. ],
 [ 1. , 1. , 1. , 1. ]])
Might be that there was 'red' misspelled in gist_rainbow in you mpl
version, this may explain the behaviour if we track it down. Can you
do the following to verify this:
import matplotlib._cm
print matplotlib._cm._gist_stern_data
? Thx,
Friedrich

Hi guys,
I made a class which create a special plot in the parent figure 
(matplotlib.pyplot.figure) given as a argument to the __init__ method.
To show more than one instance of this class in the matrix I make a grid 
(mpl_toolkits.axes_grid.AxesGrid) and initialize the class with proper element 
of this grid instead of the figure class instance.
Naturely this does not work, because this grid element 
(mpl_toolkits.axes_grid1.axes_divider.LocatableAxes) is not inherent from the 
matplotlib.pyplot.figure class, so the methods are different.
Problematic part of my code is line: axe2D = self.figure.add_axes(rect), where 
self.figure represents the 'parent area'.
Do you have any idea, howto solve this incompatibility?
Radek

Hi,
I encountered this particular problem quite often now. If you use matplotlib
in a directory that contains a large number of files, things become
extremely slow after calling pylab.show(). I suspect the interface
internally lists all files in that directory?
I often have to plot from directories with huge amounts of data, is there a
way to change that behavior?
Regards,
Maximilian
-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/plotting-slow-in-directories-with-many-files-tp29988783p29988783.html
Sent from the matplotlib - users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Benjamin Root <ben...@ou...> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 5:35 PM, braingateway <bra...@gm...>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I am trying the matplotlib. I have to say this is a powerful package for
>> scientific 2-D plotting. However, I encountered some problems when try
>> to generate several colormaps.
>>
>> for example:
>> a=cm.get_cmap('gist_rainbow',256)(range(256))
>> will give a error:
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "<pyshell#82>", line 1, in <module>
>> a=cm.get_cmap('gist_rainbow',256)(range(256))
>> File "...\site-packages\matplotlib\colors.py", line 498, in __call__
>> if not self._isinit: self._init()
>> File "...\site-packages\matplotlib\colors.py", line 649, in _init
>> self._segmentdata['red'], self._gamma)
>> TypeError: tuple indices must be integers, not str
>>
>> but other colormaps can actually work:
>> a=cm.get_cmap('gist_stern',256)(range(256))
>> >>> a
>> array([[ 0. , 0. , 0. , 1. ],
>> [ 0.0716923 , 0.00392157, 0.00784314, 1. ],
>> [ 0.14338459, 0.00784314, 0.01568627, 1. ],
>> ...,
>> [ 0.99215686, 0.99215686, 0.97040326, 1. ],
>> [ 0.99607843, 0.99607843, 0.98520163, 1. ],
>> [ 1. , 1. , 1. , 1. ]])
>>
>> I tried all possible colormaps and found out: gist_rainbow, terrain,
>> bwr, brg, and seismic will generate the same error, all other colormaps
>> are OK. I wonder is this a bug or expected behavior?
>> ###############################
>> ##matplotlib verison : '1.0.svn'
>> >>> maps=[m for m in cm.datad if not m.endswith("_r")]
>> >>> for i in maps:
>> try:
>> a=cm.get_cmap(i,256)(range(256))
>> except:
>> (type, value, traceback) = sys.exc_info()
>> print "Problems to create %s" % (i,)
>> print "The error was --> %s: %s" % (type, value)
>>
>>
>> Problems to create gist_rainbow
>> The error was --> <type 'exceptions.TypeError'>: tuple indices must be
>> integers, not str
>> Problems to create terrain
>> The error was --> <type 'exceptions.TypeError'>: tuple indices must be
>> integers, not str
>> Problems to create bwr
>> The error was --> <type 'exceptions.TypeError'>: tuple indices must be
>> integers, not str
>> Problems to create brg
>> The error was --> <type 'exceptions.TypeError'>: tuple indices must be
>> integers, not str
>> Problems to create seismic
>> The error was --> <type 'exceptions.TypeError'>: tuple indices must be
>> integers, not str
>> ##################################################################
>>
>
> Is there any particular reason why you are doing the "(range(256))"? Keep
> in mind that a colormap in matplotlib works differently than a colormap in
> Matlab. In Matlab, the colormap is a 2-D array of rgb values, while in
> matplotlib, it is an object that is used by the backends for
> color-rendering.
>
> Often times, you will not need to do anything more than specify which
> colormap you want by name e.g., pcolor(X, Y, Z, cmap='gist_rainbow'), or by
> passing in a customized or self-made colormap object to the 'cmap' keyword
> argument.
>
> What is happening in your code when you call '(range(256))' is that the
> colormap is being called for an array of values ranging from 0 to 255 and
> is determining what the color will be for each of those values. What seems
> to be happening with those few colormaps is that the call is being made
> before those maps are properly self-initialized. So, there might be some
> sort of flaw here that you have exposed, but I would suggest taking another
> look at what you are trying to accomplish to see if there is a better way.
>
> Thanks for giving matplotlib a try and I hope you continue to use it for
> your work!
>
> Ben Root
>
>
Hi Ben,
Thanks a lot for answering my question! I am a newbie to matplotlib,
so please forgive me, if the question is stupid ;p
In my program I wanna know the exact RGBA value of a data point in the
figure, in order to plot a corresponding line with the same color in
another figure. That is why I need to call a(z) to get RGBA value of a
point at (x,y,z) (z is represented by color). If I understood it
correctly, you said I do not need to specify the 'lut' in
cm.get_cmap(name,lut)? I thought the colormap object is actually a
lookup table with a length specified by lut. It turns out I do not
need to specify anything here. But if I do not specify anything the
colormap.N is always 256. What will happen then, if I need more color
steps? I do notice a(2) and a(2.2) returns different values. So I am
very confused about the principle how the RGBA value is generated by
the colormaps.
LittleBigBrain

On 10/15/2010 9:40 AM, John Hunter wrote:
> http://carlfk.blip.tv/file/2557425
>
> The dolphins story [...] starts around 39:30
Good story.