SourceForge logo
SourceForge logo
Menu

matplotlib-users — Discussion related to using matplotlib

You can subscribe to this list here.

2003 Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
(3)
Jun
Jul
Aug
(12)
Sep
(12)
Oct
(56)
Nov
(65)
Dec
(37)
2004 Jan
(59)
Feb
(78)
Mar
(153)
Apr
(205)
May
(184)
Jun
(123)
Jul
(171)
Aug
(156)
Sep
(190)
Oct
(120)
Nov
(154)
Dec
(223)
2005 Jan
(184)
Feb
(267)
Mar
(214)
Apr
(286)
May
(320)
Jun
(299)
Jul
(348)
Aug
(283)
Sep
(355)
Oct
(293)
Nov
(232)
Dec
(203)
2006 Jan
(352)
Feb
(358)
Mar
(403)
Apr
(313)
May
(165)
Jun
(281)
Jul
(316)
Aug
(228)
Sep
(279)
Oct
(243)
Nov
(315)
Dec
(345)
2007 Jan
(260)
Feb
(323)
Mar
(340)
Apr
(319)
May
(290)
Jun
(296)
Jul
(221)
Aug
(292)
Sep
(242)
Oct
(248)
Nov
(242)
Dec
(332)
2008 Jan
(312)
Feb
(359)
Mar
(454)
Apr
(287)
May
(340)
Jun
(450)
Jul
(403)
Aug
(324)
Sep
(349)
Oct
(385)
Nov
(363)
Dec
(437)
2009 Jan
(500)
Feb
(301)
Mar
(409)
Apr
(486)
May
(545)
Jun
(391)
Jul
(518)
Aug
(497)
Sep
(492)
Oct
(429)
Nov
(357)
Dec
(310)
2010 Jan
(371)
Feb
(657)
Mar
(519)
Apr
(432)
May
(312)
Jun
(416)
Jul
(477)
Aug
(386)
Sep
(419)
Oct
(435)
Nov
(320)
Dec
(202)
2011 Jan
(321)
Feb
(413)
Mar
(299)
Apr
(215)
May
(284)
Jun
(203)
Jul
(207)
Aug
(314)
Sep
(321)
Oct
(259)
Nov
(347)
Dec
(209)
2012 Jan
(322)
Feb
(414)
Mar
(377)
Apr
(179)
May
(173)
Jun
(234)
Jul
(295)
Aug
(239)
Sep
(276)
Oct
(355)
Nov
(144)
Dec
(108)
2013 Jan
(170)
Feb
(89)
Mar
(204)
Apr
(133)
May
(142)
Jun
(89)
Jul
(160)
Aug
(180)
Sep
(69)
Oct
(136)
Nov
(83)
Dec
(32)
2014 Jan
(71)
Feb
(90)
Mar
(161)
Apr
(117)
May
(78)
Jun
(94)
Jul
(60)
Aug
(83)
Sep
(102)
Oct
(132)
Nov
(154)
Dec
(96)
2015 Jan
(45)
Feb
(138)
Mar
(176)
Apr
(132)
May
(119)
Jun
(124)
Jul
(77)
Aug
(31)
Sep
(34)
Oct
(22)
Nov
(23)
Dec
(9)
2016 Jan
(26)
Feb
(17)
Mar
(10)
Apr
(8)
May
(4)
Jun
(8)
Jul
(6)
Aug
(5)
Sep
(9)
Oct
(4)
Nov
Dec
2017 Jan
(5)
Feb
(7)
Mar
(1)
Apr
(5)
May
Jun
(3)
Jul
(6)
Aug
(1)
Sep
Oct
(2)
Nov
(1)
Dec
2018 Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
(1)
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2020 Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
(1)
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2025 Jan
(1)
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
S M T W T F S


1
(8)
2
(7)
3
(8)
4
(12)
5
(1)
6
(1)
7
(9)
8
(2)
9
10
(1)
11
12
(6)
13
(6)
14
(2)
15
(7)
16
(10)
17
18
(3)
19
(4)
20
(4)
21
(10)
22
(8)
23
(17)
24
(13)
25
(9)
26
(1)
27
(1)
28
(4)
29
(7)
30
(2)
31
(10)


Showing 10 results of 10

From: Gökhan S. <gok...@gm...> - 2012年05月16日 15:45:21
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Michael Droettboom <md...@st...> wrote:
>
>
> Or, in an existing clone of the main repository, add my fork as a remote
>
> git remote add mdboom git://github.com/mdboom/matplotlib.git
> git fetch mdboom
> git checkout mdboom/clipping-bug
>
Here are my steps following your 2nd suggestion:
1-) Cloned the master:
git clone git://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib.git
2-) go into matplotlib dir and then execute:
sudo python setupegg.py develop
Tested my existing code and verified that the plotting error I reported in
the first message was still there.
3-) in the matplotlib dir I executed the 3 commands you typed to get your
fork
4-) Removed the build dir in matplotlib folder then re-executed setupegg.py
script
5-) Testing with your change my plot looks fine now, lines are drawn
correctly.
Thanks for easy to follow instructions and quick response.
From: Michael D. <md...@st...> - 2012年05月16日 15:31:20
On 05/16/2012 11:15 AM, Gökhan Sever wrote:
> Hmm, how can I test this change the easiest way?
>
> Clone the master and replace with your changes? or can I directly 
> clone your experimental branch?
You can either clone my fork and then checkout the branch with the change:
 git checkout clipping-bug
Or, in an existing clone of the main repository, add my fork as a remote
 git remote add mdboom git://github.com/mdboom/matplotlib.git
 git fetch mdboom
 git checkout mdboom/clipping-bug
Or, since the diff is only a few lines in path_converters.h, you could 
just apply it manually.
Be sure to remove your build directory before rebuilding: distutils 
doesn't pick up header file changes.
Mike
>
>
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Michael Droettboom <md...@st... 
> <mailto:md...@st...>> wrote:
>
> I have a proposed solution here:
>
> https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/872
>
> Git bisect found that the first commit where this happens was here:
>
> https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/commit/4cd75cdf
>
> This is the script I used to reproduce -- I assume it's the same
> thing you're seeing:
>
> from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
> import numpy as np
>
> x = np.linspace(0, 3.14 * 2, 3000)
> y = np.sin(x)
> x[::100] = np.nan
> plt.plot(x, y)
> plt.ylim(-0.25, 0.25)
> plt.show()
>
> Mike
>
>
> On 05/16/2012 10:44 AM, Gökhan Sever wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> Could you inform me about your progress? I can test your sample
>> script. I was thinking to test from v1.1.x branch downwards to
>> spot the source of the issue, but I just don't know how to clone
>> at particular commit in git.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Michael Droettboom
>> <md...@st... <mailto:md...@st...>> wrote:
>>
>> Nevermind -- I've got something to reproduce this and am
>> looking into it now.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> On 05/16/2012 08:13 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>>> On 05/15/2012 07:57 PM, Gökhan Sever wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I have encountered a weird plotting issue recently using a
>>>> recent mpl clone. See the linked pdfs for better
>>>> demonstration of the issue:
>>>>
>>>> http://atmos.uwyo.edu/~gsever/data/vocals_RF04_NU05_newmpl.pdf
>>>> <http://atmos.uwyo.edu/%7Egsever/data/vocals_RF04_NU05_newmpl.pdf>
>>>> http://atmos.uwyo.edu/~gsever/data/vocals_RF04_NU05_oldmpl.pdf
>>>> <http://atmos.uwyo.edu/%7Egsever/data/vocals_RF04_NU05_oldmpl.pdf>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> newmpl file is created using the latest master branch
>>>> (cloned and setup today)
>>>> oldmpl is created using mpl v1.1.0
>>>> (https://github.com/downloads/matplotlib/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.1.0.tar.gz)
>>>>
>>>> Scroll down to page 4 in each file and you will see the
>>>> wrong plotted behavior of alwp_lcl (black line) variable on
>>>> newmpl file comparing to the correct version that is shown
>>>> on oldmpl.
>>>>
>>>> I was trying to figure out a way to correct this and I
>>>> raised y-axis max to 2400 and then the line looks fine.
>>>> However I have other data that show similar
>>>> wrong behaviors, so I decided to try earlier mpl versions
>>>> since I know that those plots were looking correct earlier
>>>> (at least a few months back). Trying v1.1.x branch gave me
>>>> the same results. Note that these data contain "nans". Are
>>>> nan handling changed in recent mpl code or the way the data
>>>> is plotted out of margins? I can't reproduce this
>>>> with synthetic data.
>>>>
>>> There have been changes to that code lately. Is there any
>>> way you can pack up a small script and data to reproduce
>>> this? Then I can poke at it and see what I find (it would
>>> also make a good regression test).
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Live Security Virtual Conference
>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
>>> threats.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Matplotlib-users mailing list
>>> Mat...@li... <mailto:Mat...@li...>
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Live Security Virtual Conference
>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond.
>> Discussions
>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the
>> latest in malware
>> threats.
>> http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Matplotlib-users mailing list
>> Mat...@li...
>> <mailto:Mat...@li...>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Gökhan
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Gökhan
From: Gökhan S. <gok...@gm...> - 2012年05月16日 15:16:18
Bisecting is definitely a better idea than my one-by-one setup iteration :)
Thanks for sharing the tip.
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Michael Droettboom <md...@st...> wrote:
> On 05/16/2012 10:44 AM, Gökhan Sever wrote:
>
> Could you inform me about your progress? I can test your sample script. I
> was thinking to test from v1.1.x branch downwards to spot the source of the
> issue, but I just don't know how to clone at particular commit in git.
>
>
> Also, to answer this question directly -- "git bisect" is a great way to
> find this:
>
> http://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Debugging-with-Git#Binary-Search
>
> Cheers,
> Mike
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Michael Droettboom <md...@st...>wrote:
>
>> Nevermind -- I've got something to reproduce this and am looking into it
>> now.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> On 05/16/2012 08:13 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>>
>> On 05/15/2012 07:57 PM, Gökhan Sever wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have encountered a weird plotting issue recently using a recent mpl
>> clone. See the linked pdfs for better demonstration of the issue:
>>
>> http://atmos.uwyo.edu/~gsever/data/vocals_RF04_NU05_newmpl.pdf
>> http://atmos.uwyo.edu/~gsever/data/vocals_RF04_NU05_oldmpl.pdf
>>
>>
>> newmpl file is created using the latest master branch (cloned and setup
>> today)
>> oldmpl is created using mpl v1.1.0 (
>> https://github.com/downloads/matplotlib/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.1.0.tar.gz
>> )
>>
>> Scroll down to page 4 in each file and you will see the wrong
>> plotted behavior of alwp_lcl (black line) variable on newmpl file comparing
>> to the correct version that is shown on oldmpl.
>>
>> I was trying to figure out a way to correct this and I raised y-axis
>> max to 2400 and then the line looks fine. However I have other data that
>> show similar wrong behaviors, so I decided to try earlier mpl versions
>> since I know that those plots were looking correct earlier (at least a few
>> months back). Trying v1.1.x branch gave me the same results. Note that
>> these data contain "nans". Are nan handling changed in recent mpl code or
>> the way the data is plotted out of margins? I can't reproduce this
>> with synthetic data.
>>
>> There have been changes to that code lately. Is there any way you can
>> pack up a small script and data to reproduce this? Then I can poke at it
>> and see what I find (it would also make a good regression test).
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Live Security Virtual Conference
>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Matplotlib-users mailing lis...@li...https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Live Security Virtual Conference
>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Matplotlib-users mailing list
>> Mat...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Gökhan
>
>
>
-- 
Gökhan
From: Gökhan S. <gok...@gm...> - 2012年05月16日 15:15:17
Hmm, how can I test this change the easiest way?
Clone the master and replace with your changes? or can I directly clone
your experimental branch?
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Michael Droettboom <md...@st...> wrote:
> I have a proposed solution here:
>
> https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/872
>
> Git bisect found that the first commit where this happens was here:
>
> https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/commit/4cd75cdf
>
> This is the script I used to reproduce -- I assume it's the same thing
> you're seeing:
>
> from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
> import numpy as np
>
> x = np.linspace(0, 3.14 * 2, 3000)
> y = np.sin(x)
> x[::100] = np.nan
> plt.plot(x, y)
> plt.ylim(-0.25, 0.25)
> plt.show()
>
> Mike
>
>
> On 05/16/2012 10:44 AM, Gökhan Sever wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> Could you inform me about your progress? I can test your sample script.
> I was thinking to test from v1.1.x branch downwards to spot the source of
> the issue, but I just don't know how to clone at particular commit in git.
>
> Thank you.
>
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Michael Droettboom <md...@st...>wrote:
>
>> Nevermind -- I've got something to reproduce this and am looking into it
>> now.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> On 05/16/2012 08:13 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>>
>> On 05/15/2012 07:57 PM, Gökhan Sever wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have encountered a weird plotting issue recently using a recent mpl
>> clone. See the linked pdfs for better demonstration of the issue:
>>
>> http://atmos.uwyo.edu/~gsever/data/vocals_RF04_NU05_newmpl.pdf
>> http://atmos.uwyo.edu/~gsever/data/vocals_RF04_NU05_oldmpl.pdf
>>
>>
>> newmpl file is created using the latest master branch (cloned and setup
>> today)
>> oldmpl is created using mpl v1.1.0 (
>> https://github.com/downloads/matplotlib/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.1.0.tar.gz
>> )
>>
>> Scroll down to page 4 in each file and you will see the wrong
>> plotted behavior of alwp_lcl (black line) variable on newmpl file comparing
>> to the correct version that is shown on oldmpl.
>>
>> I was trying to figure out a way to correct this and I raised y-axis
>> max to 2400 and then the line looks fine. However I have other data that
>> show similar wrong behaviors, so I decided to try earlier mpl versions
>> since I know that those plots were looking correct earlier (at least a few
>> months back). Trying v1.1.x branch gave me the same results. Note that
>> these data contain "nans". Are nan handling changed in recent mpl code or
>> the way the data is plotted out of margins? I can't reproduce this
>> with synthetic data.
>>
>> There have been changes to that code lately. Is there any way you can
>> pack up a small script and data to reproduce this? Then I can poke at it
>> and see what I find (it would also make a good regression test).
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Live Security Virtual Conference
>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Matplotlib-users mailing lis...@li...https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Live Security Virtual Conference
>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Matplotlib-users mailing list
>> Mat...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Gökhan
>
>
>
-- 
Gökhan
From: Michael D. <md...@st...> - 2012年05月16日 14:55:31
On 05/16/2012 10:44 AM, Gökhan Sever wrote:
> Could you inform me about your progress? I can test your sample 
> script. I was thinking to test from v1.1.x branch downwards to spot 
> the source of the issue, but I just don't know how to clone at 
> particular commit in git.
Also, to answer this question directly -- "git bisect" is a great way to 
find this:
http://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Debugging-with-Git#Binary-Search
Cheers,
Mike
>
> Thank you.
>
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Michael Droettboom <md...@st... 
> <mailto:md...@st...>> wrote:
>
> Nevermind -- I've got something to reproduce this and am looking
> into it now.
>
> Mike
>
>
> On 05/16/2012 08:13 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>> On 05/15/2012 07:57 PM, Gökhan Sever wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have encountered a weird plotting issue recently using a
>>> recent mpl clone. See the linked pdfs for better demonstration
>>> of the issue:
>>>
>>> http://atmos.uwyo.edu/~gsever/data/vocals_RF04_NU05_newmpl.pdf
>>> <http://atmos.uwyo.edu/%7Egsever/data/vocals_RF04_NU05_newmpl.pdf>
>>> http://atmos.uwyo.edu/~gsever/data/vocals_RF04_NU05_oldmpl.pdf
>>> <http://atmos.uwyo.edu/%7Egsever/data/vocals_RF04_NU05_oldmpl.pdf>
>>>
>>>
>>> newmpl file is created using the latest master branch (cloned
>>> and setup today)
>>> oldmpl is created using mpl v1.1.0
>>> (https://github.com/downloads/matplotlib/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.1.0.tar.gz)
>>>
>>> Scroll down to page 4 in each file and you will see the wrong
>>> plotted behavior of alwp_lcl (black line) variable on newmpl
>>> file comparing to the correct version that is shown on oldmpl.
>>>
>>> I was trying to figure out a way to correct this and I raised
>>> y-axis max to 2400 and then the line looks fine. However I have
>>> other data that show similar wrong behaviors, so I decided to
>>> try earlier mpl versions since I know that those plots were
>>> looking correct earlier (at least a few months back). Trying
>>> v1.1.x branch gave me the same results. Note that these data
>>> contain "nans". Are nan handling changed in recent mpl code or
>>> the way the data is plotted out of margins? I can't reproduce
>>> this with synthetic data.
>>>
>> There have been changes to that code lately. Is there any way
>> you can pack up a small script and data to reproduce this? Then
>> I can poke at it and see what I find (it would also make a good
>> regression test).
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Live Security Virtual Conference
>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
>> threats.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Matplotlib-users mailing list
>> Mat...@li... <mailto:Mat...@li...>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond.
> Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in
> malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Matplotlib-users mailing list
> Mat...@li...
> <mailto:Mat...@li...>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Gökhan
From: Michael D. <md...@st...> - 2012年05月16日 14:54:38
I have a proposed solution here:
https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/872
Git bisect found that the first commit where this happens was here:
https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/commit/4cd75cdf
This is the script I used to reproduce -- I assume it's the same thing 
you're seeing:
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
x = np.linspace(0, 3.14 * 2, 3000)
y = np.sin(x)
x[::100] = np.nan
plt.plot(x, y)
plt.ylim(-0.25, 0.25)
plt.show()
Mike
On 05/16/2012 10:44 AM, Gökhan Sever wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> Could you inform me about your progress? I can test your sample 
> script. I was thinking to test from v1.1.x branch downwards to spot 
> the source of the issue, but I just don't know how to clone at 
> particular commit in git.
>
> Thank you.
>
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Michael Droettboom <md...@st... 
> <mailto:md...@st...>> wrote:
>
> Nevermind -- I've got something to reproduce this and am looking
> into it now.
>
> Mike
>
>
> On 05/16/2012 08:13 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>> On 05/15/2012 07:57 PM, Gökhan Sever wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have encountered a weird plotting issue recently using a
>>> recent mpl clone. See the linked pdfs for better demonstration
>>> of the issue:
>>>
>>> http://atmos.uwyo.edu/~gsever/data/vocals_RF04_NU05_newmpl.pdf
>>> <http://atmos.uwyo.edu/%7Egsever/data/vocals_RF04_NU05_newmpl.pdf>
>>> http://atmos.uwyo.edu/~gsever/data/vocals_RF04_NU05_oldmpl.pdf
>>> <http://atmos.uwyo.edu/%7Egsever/data/vocals_RF04_NU05_oldmpl.pdf>
>>>
>>>
>>> newmpl file is created using the latest master branch (cloned
>>> and setup today)
>>> oldmpl is created using mpl v1.1.0
>>> (https://github.com/downloads/matplotlib/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.1.0.tar.gz)
>>>
>>> Scroll down to page 4 in each file and you will see the wrong
>>> plotted behavior of alwp_lcl (black line) variable on newmpl
>>> file comparing to the correct version that is shown on oldmpl.
>>>
>>> I was trying to figure out a way to correct this and I raised
>>> y-axis max to 2400 and then the line looks fine. However I have
>>> other data that show similar wrong behaviors, so I decided to
>>> try earlier mpl versions since I know that those plots were
>>> looking correct earlier (at least a few months back). Trying
>>> v1.1.x branch gave me the same results. Note that these data
>>> contain "nans". Are nan handling changed in recent mpl code or
>>> the way the data is plotted out of margins? I can't reproduce
>>> this with synthetic data.
>>>
>> There have been changes to that code lately. Is there any way
>> you can pack up a small script and data to reproduce this? Then
>> I can poke at it and see what I find (it would also make a good
>> regression test).
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Live Security Virtual Conference
>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
>> threats.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Matplotlib-users mailing list
>> Mat...@li... <mailto:Mat...@li...>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond.
> Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in
> malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Matplotlib-users mailing list
> Mat...@li...
> <mailto:Mat...@li...>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Gökhan
From: Gökhan S. <gok...@gm...> - 2012年05月16日 14:44:48
Hi Mike,
Could you inform me about your progress? I can test your sample script. I
was thinking to test from v1.1.x branch downwards to spot the source of the
issue, but I just don't know how to clone at particular commit in git.
Thank you.
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Michael Droettboom <md...@st...> wrote:
> Nevermind -- I've got something to reproduce this and am looking into it
> now.
>
> Mike
>
>
> On 05/16/2012 08:13 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>
> On 05/15/2012 07:57 PM, Gökhan Sever wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have encountered a weird plotting issue recently using a recent mpl
> clone. See the linked pdfs for better demonstration of the issue:
>
> http://atmos.uwyo.edu/~gsever/data/vocals_RF04_NU05_newmpl.pdf
> http://atmos.uwyo.edu/~gsever/data/vocals_RF04_NU05_oldmpl.pdf
>
>
> newmpl file is created using the latest master branch (cloned and setup
> today)
> oldmpl is created using mpl v1.1.0 (
> https://github.com/downloads/matplotlib/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.1.0.tar.gz
> )
>
> Scroll down to page 4 in each file and you will see the wrong
> plotted behavior of alwp_lcl (black line) variable on newmpl file comparing
> to the correct version that is shown on oldmpl.
>
> I was trying to figure out a way to correct this and I raised y-axis max
> to 2400 and then the line looks fine. However I have other data that show
> similar wrong behaviors, so I decided to try earlier mpl versions since I
> know that those plots were looking correct earlier (at least a few months
> back). Trying v1.1.x branch gave me the same results. Note that these data
> contain "nans". Are nan handling changed in recent mpl code or the way the
> data is plotted out of margins? I can't reproduce this with synthetic data.
>
> There have been changes to that code lately. Is there any way you can
> pack up a small script and data to reproduce this? Then I can poke at it
> and see what I find (it would also make a good regression test).
>
> Mike
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Matplotlib-users mailing lis...@li...https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Matplotlib-users mailing list
> Mat...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
>
>
-- 
Gökhan
From: Michael D. <md...@st...> - 2012年05月16日 12:52:18
Nevermind -- I've got something to reproduce this and am looking into it 
now.
Mike
On 05/16/2012 08:13 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> On 05/15/2012 07:57 PM, Gökhan Sever wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have encountered a weird plotting issue recently using a recent mpl 
>> clone. See the linked pdfs for better demonstration of the issue:
>>
>> http://atmos.uwyo.edu/~gsever/data/vocals_RF04_NU05_newmpl.pdf 
>> <http://atmos.uwyo.edu/%7Egsever/data/vocals_RF04_NU05_newmpl.pdf>
>> http://atmos.uwyo.edu/~gsever/data/vocals_RF04_NU05_oldmpl.pdf 
>> <http://atmos.uwyo.edu/%7Egsever/data/vocals_RF04_NU05_oldmpl.pdf>
>>
>>
>> newmpl file is created using the latest master branch (cloned and 
>> setup today)
>> oldmpl is created using mpl v1.1.0 
>> (https://github.com/downloads/matplotlib/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.1.0.tar.gz)
>>
>> Scroll down to page 4 in each file and you will see the wrong 
>> plotted behavior of alwp_lcl (black line) variable on newmpl file 
>> comparing to the correct version that is shown on oldmpl.
>>
>> I was trying to figure out a way to correct this and I raised y-axis 
>> max to 2400 and then the line looks fine. However I have other data 
>> that show similar wrong behaviors, so I decided to try earlier mpl 
>> versions since I know that those plots were looking correct earlier 
>> (at least a few months back). Trying v1.1.x branch gave me the same 
>> results. Note that these data contain "nans". Are nan handling 
>> changed in recent mpl code or the way the data is plotted out of 
>> margins? I can't reproduce this with synthetic data.
>>
> There have been changes to that code lately. Is there any way you can 
> pack up a small script and data to reproduce this? Then I can poke at 
> it and see what I find (it would also make a good regression test).
>
> Mike
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Matplotlib-users mailing list
> Mat...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
From: Michael D. <md...@st...> - 2012年05月16日 12:14:39
On 05/15/2012 07:57 PM, Gökhan Sever wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have encountered a weird plotting issue recently using a recent mpl 
> clone. See the linked pdfs for better demonstration of the issue:
>
> http://atmos.uwyo.edu/~gsever/data/vocals_RF04_NU05_newmpl.pdf 
> <http://atmos.uwyo.edu/%7Egsever/data/vocals_RF04_NU05_newmpl.pdf>
> http://atmos.uwyo.edu/~gsever/data/vocals_RF04_NU05_oldmpl.pdf 
> <http://atmos.uwyo.edu/%7Egsever/data/vocals_RF04_NU05_oldmpl.pdf>
>
>
> newmpl file is created using the latest master branch (cloned and 
> setup today)
> oldmpl is created using mpl v1.1.0 
> (https://github.com/downloads/matplotlib/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.1.0.tar.gz)
>
> Scroll down to page 4 in each file and you will see the wrong 
> plotted behavior of alwp_lcl (black line) variable on newmpl file 
> comparing to the correct version that is shown on oldmpl.
>
> I was trying to figure out a way to correct this and I raised y-axis 
> max to 2400 and then the line looks fine. However I have other data 
> that show similar wrong behaviors, so I decided to try earlier mpl 
> versions since I know that those plots were looking correct earlier 
> (at least a few months back). Trying v1.1.x branch gave me the same 
> results. Note that these data contain "nans". Are nan handling changed 
> in recent mpl code or the way the data is plotted out of margins? I 
> can't reproduce this with synthetic data.
>
There have been changes to that code lately. Is there any way you can 
pack up a small script and data to reproduce this? Then I can poke at 
it and see what I find (it would also make a good regression test).
Mike
From: Benjamin R. <ben...@ou...> - 2012年05月16日 01:46:14
On Tuesday, May 15, 2012, Gökhan Sever wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have encountered a weird plotting issue recently using a recent mpl
> clone. See the linked pdfs for better demonstration of the issue:
>
> http://atmos.uwyo.edu/~gsever/data/vocals_RF04_NU05_newmpl.pdf
> http://atmos.uwyo.edu/~gsever/data/vocals_RF04_NU05_oldmpl.pdf
>
>
> newmpl file is created using the latest master branch (cloned and setup
> today)
> oldmpl is created using mpl v1.1.0 (
> https://github.com/downloads/matplotlib/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.1.0.tar.gz
> )
>
> Scroll down to page 4 in each file and you will see the wrong
> plotted behavior of alwp_lcl (black line) variable on newmpl file comparing
> to the correct version that is shown on oldmpl.
>
> I was trying to figure out a way to correct this and I raised y-axis max
> to 2400 and then the line looks fine. However I have other data that show
> similar wrong behaviors, so I decided to try earlier mpl versions since I
> know that those plots were looking correct earlier (at least a few months
> back). Trying v1.1.x branch gave me the same results. Note that these data
> contain "nans". Are nan handling changed in recent mpl code or the way the
> data is plotted out of margins? I can't reproduce this with synthetic data.
>
> Any ideas as to what could be going wrong here?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Gökhan
>
I do recall some changes were made for v1.1.x with regards to autoscaling.
 Another change was also made with respect to Bbox clipping. I can't
recall enough details to know if they are a part of this issue.
Ben Root

Showing 10 results of 10

Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X





Briefly describe the problem (required):
Upload screenshot of ad (required):
Select a file, or drag & drop file here.
Screenshot instructions:

Click URL instructions:
Right-click on the ad, choose "Copy Link", then paste here →
(This may not be possible with some types of ads)

More information about our ad policies

Ad destination/click URL:

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /