You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(56) |
Nov
(65) |
Dec
(37) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(78) |
Mar
(153) |
Apr
(205) |
May
(184) |
Jun
(123) |
Jul
(171) |
Aug
(156) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(223) |
2005 |
Jan
(184) |
Feb
(267) |
Mar
(214) |
Apr
(286) |
May
(320) |
Jun
(299) |
Jul
(348) |
Aug
(283) |
Sep
(355) |
Oct
(293) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(203) |
2006 |
Jan
(352) |
Feb
(358) |
Mar
(403) |
Apr
(313) |
May
(165) |
Jun
(281) |
Jul
(316) |
Aug
(228) |
Sep
(279) |
Oct
(243) |
Nov
(315) |
Dec
(345) |
2007 |
Jan
(260) |
Feb
(323) |
Mar
(340) |
Apr
(319) |
May
(290) |
Jun
(296) |
Jul
(221) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(242) |
Oct
(248) |
Nov
(242) |
Dec
(332) |
2008 |
Jan
(312) |
Feb
(359) |
Mar
(454) |
Apr
(287) |
May
(340) |
Jun
(450) |
Jul
(403) |
Aug
(324) |
Sep
(349) |
Oct
(385) |
Nov
(363) |
Dec
(437) |
2009 |
Jan
(500) |
Feb
(301) |
Mar
(409) |
Apr
(486) |
May
(545) |
Jun
(391) |
Jul
(518) |
Aug
(497) |
Sep
(492) |
Oct
(429) |
Nov
(357) |
Dec
(310) |
2010 |
Jan
(371) |
Feb
(657) |
Mar
(519) |
Apr
(432) |
May
(312) |
Jun
(416) |
Jul
(477) |
Aug
(386) |
Sep
(419) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(320) |
Dec
(202) |
2011 |
Jan
(321) |
Feb
(413) |
Mar
(299) |
Apr
(215) |
May
(284) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(207) |
Aug
(314) |
Sep
(321) |
Oct
(259) |
Nov
(347) |
Dec
(209) |
2012 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(414) |
Mar
(377) |
Apr
(179) |
May
(173) |
Jun
(234) |
Jul
(295) |
Aug
(239) |
Sep
(276) |
Oct
(355) |
Nov
(144) |
Dec
(108) |
2013 |
Jan
(170) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(204) |
Apr
(133) |
May
(142) |
Jun
(89) |
Jul
(160) |
Aug
(180) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(136) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(32) |
2014 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(90) |
Mar
(161) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(78) |
Jun
(94) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(83) |
Sep
(102) |
Oct
(132) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(96) |
2015 |
Jan
(45) |
Feb
(138) |
Mar
(176) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(119) |
Jun
(124) |
Jul
(77) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(9) |
2016 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2025 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
(2) |
2
(4) |
3
(16) |
4
(4) |
5
(15) |
6
(16) |
7
(6) |
8
(4) |
9
(9) |
10
(5) |
11
(8) |
12
(14) |
13
(19) |
14
(21) |
15
(8) |
16
(6) |
17
(10) |
18
(22) |
19
(15) |
20
(7) |
21
(21) |
22
(1) |
23
(6) |
24
(16) |
25
(12) |
26
(11) |
27
(27) |
28
(7) |
29
|
30
(4) |
31
(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I used the colorbar with the imshow for a while for a while, but now when I produce a pdf of svg, light stripes appear in the colorbar. When I try to modify the file with inkscape, I see that the stroke color is unset. Is this a bug, a feature, or my backend that produces the file. And how can I get rid of that? Regards, Stefan
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Daniel Mader < dan...@go...> wrote: > > Interesting... this will need to be investigated a little bit further. > In > > the meantime, making a single polycollection with all the pieces seem to > do > > the trick for now. I have attached a modified version of your script to > > demonstrate. > > Dear Ben, > > this is great news, it works perfectly well! Thanks a million times > for this great support! > > All the best, > Daniel > Oh, btw, could you please file a bug report describing the problem and that original script? I suspect it is a slightly different problem than the usual 3d stacking problem. I don't want to forget to look into it. http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=80706 Thanks, Ben Root
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Lebostein <Leb...@gm...> wrote: > > I have compared the new and old output. For example the "0.0" in a diagram: > > old eps (1.0.0): > > 35.223 19.934 m > 0 0.141 rmoveto > (0.0) show > [1 2] 0 setdash > 0.502 setgray > > new eps (1.0.1): > > 35.222810 19.933563 translate > 0.000000 rotate > 0.000000 0.140625 m /zero glyphshow > 6.362305 0.140625 m /period glyphshow > 9.541016 0.140625 m /zero glyphshow > grestore > [1 2] 0 setdash > 0.502 setgray > > ... > Ah, this bit me yesterday as well. I wanted to edit some labels using InkScape and it became easier to just modify my original script and just re-make the image. I know there were some "fixes" recently, but I don't know the specifics. Ben Root
I have compared the new and old output. For example the "0.0" in a diagram: old eps (1.0.0): 35.223 19.934 m 0 0.141 rmoveto (0.0) show [1 2] 0 setdash 0.502 setgray new eps (1.0.1): 35.222810 19.933563 translate 0.000000 rotate 0.000000 0.140625 m /zero glyphshow 6.362305 0.140625 m /period glyphshow 9.541016 0.140625 m /zero glyphshow grestore [1 2] 0 setdash 0.502 setgray ... -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Problem-with-matplotlib-1.0.1-and-psfrag-%28LaTeX%29-tp30644263p30644322.html Sent from the matplotlib - users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi, the eps output of matplotlib 1.0.1 don't work with the LaTeX macro PSfrag (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PSfrag). In the release notes (RELEASE_NOTES-1.0.1.txt) I can not find any changes to the eps output. What have you done? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Problem-with-matplotlib-1.0.1-and-psfrag-%28LaTeX%29-tp30644263p30644263.html Sent from the matplotlib - users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> Interesting... this will need to be investigated a little bit further. In > the meantime, making a single polycollection with all the pieces seem to do > the trick for now. I have attached a modified version of your script to > demonstrate. Dear Ben, this is great news, it works perfectly well! Thanks a million times for this great support! All the best, Daniel
Damien Bathory, on 2011年01月11日 15:27, wrote: > Hi All. > ... > I want to change the color of the ticklines set by set_thetagrids(), but I > am not having any luck. > ( See black instead of green ticklines here: > http://i1234.photobucket.com/albums/ff405/dbathory/circum.png ) > > Should I be able manipulating the ticklines in this way after calling > set_theagrids? > > for line in ax.xaxis.get_ticklines(): > line.set_color('g') > > I've also tried using the tick_params() call to set the default tickline > color, with no luck. > I've tried this on matplotlib v1.00 and v98.1, with the same results (black > instead of green). Hi Damien, Those aren't ticks, those are grid lines (verify by pressing 'g' after selecting the axes to toggle the grid on and off). ax.grid(color='green') is what you can use to set the grid line color (and other aspects, like linewidth, linestyle, alpha, etc). hope that helps, -- Paul Ivanov 314 address only used for lists, off-list direct email at: http://pirsquared.org | GPG/PGP key id: 0x0F3E28F7
Hi All. I am trying to create a circumplex (or "rose") plot that looks a bit like this: http://www.organizacionakultura.net/slike_fck/image/Ideal%20culture%20profile%20ENG(1).jpg At the moment I am using a Polar plot and trying to manipulate it so that it looks more like a circumplex (with each "slice of the cake" corresponding to a label). I want to change the color of the ticklines set by set_thetagrids(), but I am not having any luck. ( See black instead of green ticklines here: http://i1234.photobucket.com/albums/ff405/dbathory/circum.png ) Should I be able manipulating the ticklines in this way after calling set_theagrids? for line in ax.xaxis.get_ticklines(): line.set_color('g') I've also tried using the tick_params() call to set the default tickline color, with no luck. I've tried this on matplotlib v1.00 and v98.1, with the same results (black instead of green). Full code: #============== START CODE ===================== #!/usr/bin/python import numpy as np import matplotlib matplotlib.use('Agg') import matplotlib.pyplot as plt from matplotlib.projections.polar import PolarAxes import matplotlib.cm as cm labels = ['Label A', 'Label B', 'Label C', 'Label D', 'Label E', 'Label F', 'Label G', 'Label H', 'Label I' ] data = [ 7, 5, 3, 11, 4, 2, 9, 8, 5 ] max_size = 12 N = len(data) # This doesn't seem to change the tick color plt.tick_params(axis='both', which='both', color='g') fig = plt.figure(figsize=(8,8)) ax = fig.add_axes([0.1, 0.1, 0.8, 0.8], polar=True) theta = np.arange(0.0, 2*np.pi, 2*np.pi/N) radii = data width = np.pi*2/N bars = ax.bar(theta, radii, width=width, bottom=0.0) for r,bar in zip(radii, bars): bar.set_facecolor( cm.jet(r/10.)) bar.set_alpha(0.5) spoke_angles = theta * 180/np.pi - 180/N (g_lines, g_labels) = ax.set_thetagrids(spoke_angles, labels, color='r') for line in ax.xaxis.get_ticklines(): line.set_color('g') # This doesn't seem to change the tick color either ax.set_rgrids([10000], []) # Just moving the rgrids out the way for now fig.savefig('circum.png') #============== END CODE ===================== Thanks in advance.