You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(56) |
Nov
(65) |
Dec
(37) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(78) |
Mar
(153) |
Apr
(205) |
May
(184) |
Jun
(123) |
Jul
(171) |
Aug
(156) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(223) |
2005 |
Jan
(184) |
Feb
(267) |
Mar
(214) |
Apr
(286) |
May
(320) |
Jun
(299) |
Jul
(348) |
Aug
(283) |
Sep
(355) |
Oct
(293) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(203) |
2006 |
Jan
(352) |
Feb
(358) |
Mar
(403) |
Apr
(313) |
May
(165) |
Jun
(281) |
Jul
(316) |
Aug
(228) |
Sep
(279) |
Oct
(243) |
Nov
(315) |
Dec
(345) |
2007 |
Jan
(260) |
Feb
(323) |
Mar
(340) |
Apr
(319) |
May
(290) |
Jun
(296) |
Jul
(221) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(242) |
Oct
(248) |
Nov
(242) |
Dec
(332) |
2008 |
Jan
(312) |
Feb
(359) |
Mar
(454) |
Apr
(287) |
May
(340) |
Jun
(450) |
Jul
(403) |
Aug
(324) |
Sep
(349) |
Oct
(385) |
Nov
(363) |
Dec
(437) |
2009 |
Jan
(500) |
Feb
(301) |
Mar
(409) |
Apr
(486) |
May
(545) |
Jun
(391) |
Jul
(518) |
Aug
(497) |
Sep
(492) |
Oct
(429) |
Nov
(357) |
Dec
(310) |
2010 |
Jan
(371) |
Feb
(657) |
Mar
(519) |
Apr
(432) |
May
(312) |
Jun
(416) |
Jul
(477) |
Aug
(386) |
Sep
(419) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(320) |
Dec
(202) |
2011 |
Jan
(321) |
Feb
(413) |
Mar
(299) |
Apr
(215) |
May
(284) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(207) |
Aug
(314) |
Sep
(321) |
Oct
(259) |
Nov
(347) |
Dec
(209) |
2012 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(414) |
Mar
(377) |
Apr
(179) |
May
(173) |
Jun
(234) |
Jul
(295) |
Aug
(239) |
Sep
(276) |
Oct
(355) |
Nov
(144) |
Dec
(108) |
2013 |
Jan
(170) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(204) |
Apr
(133) |
May
(142) |
Jun
(89) |
Jul
(160) |
Aug
(180) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(136) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(32) |
2014 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(90) |
Mar
(161) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(78) |
Jun
(94) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(83) |
Sep
(102) |
Oct
(132) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(96) |
2015 |
Jan
(45) |
Feb
(138) |
Mar
(176) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(119) |
Jun
(124) |
Jul
(77) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(9) |
2016 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2025 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
1
(17) |
2
(3) |
3
(2) |
4
(11) |
5
(8) |
6
(22) |
7
(16) |
8
(9) |
9
(14) |
10
(1) |
11
(8) |
12
(5) |
13
(7) |
14
(10) |
15
(28) |
16
(8) |
17
(20) |
18
(6) |
19
(5) |
20
(15) |
21
(8) |
22
(7) |
23
(14) |
24
(10) |
25
(6) |
26
(8) |
27
(9) |
28
(11) |
29
(13) |
30
(20) |
|
Hi all, I've run into a problem with a contour plot that has a logarithmic y-axis. The spacing around the inline contour label is too large, leading to a large segment of the contour being blocked out/erased. I tried making the plot with a linear axis and it didn't happen in that case, so I'm thinking that it has to do with the contour labeling routine not understanding logarithmic scaling. Attached is a plot demonstrating the problem. Is there a solution for this? Jon Slavin
Neal Becker wrote: > Actually, though, I didn't want to plot 2 different sets of data as in that > example, I want 1 set of data plotted with 2 different x-axis (different > units). Any suggestion on modifying this example to accomplish this? > > import numpy as np > import matplotlib.pyplot as plt > from mpl_toolkits.axes_grid.parasite_axes import SubplotHost > > fig = plt.figure(figsize=(10,8)) > host = SubplotHost(fig, 111) > fig.add_subplot(host) > parx = host.twiny() > > parx.axis["top"].set_visible(False) > offset = 0, -50 > new_axisline = parx.get_grid_helper().new_fixed_axis > parx.axis["bottom"] = new_axisline(loc="bottom", axes=parx, offset=offset) > parx.axis["bottom"].label.set_visible(True) > > hplt, = host.plot(np.random.rand(100)) > p2, = parx.plot(np.linspace(0,20,100), np.random.rand(100)*5.0, > color='green') > > plt.show() > OK, answer my own question. Just remove the line 'parx.plot(...'). I didn't realize that I'd get the second axis drawn without that plot call, but it works fine.
I have the HTML5 Canvas backend working on an Ubuntu machine using the latest EPD distribution. However, I am unable to get it to work through an ssh tunnel. - I create a tunnel forwarding port 9000 on the Ubuntu host machine through a firewall machine to port 9000 on my local client. - I run examples/subplot_demo.py in a separate ssh-tunneled terminal - I open http://127.0.0.1:9000 in Google Chrome on the client. I get the HTML 5 Canvas window, but no plot appears and it says 'Disconnected'. Same thing happens if I open a browser in a Gnome session on the host. Running the example on the host in a Gnome session and viewing from a client does not work either. But running the same example from a terminal on the host _and_ viewing it in a Gnome session on the host works. When I run the example, it tries to open a terminal based browser like lynx and w3m. I uninstalled these applications and now get nothing, but this may be an issue. On the host, it opens the window in Chrome automatically and starts the browser if necessary. Is there a way to stop this behavior? Thanks, Paul
Actually, though, I didn't want to plot 2 different sets of data as in that example, I want 1 set of data plotted with 2 different x-axis (different units). Any suggestion on modifying this example to accomplish this? import numpy as np import matplotlib.pyplot as plt from mpl_toolkits.axes_grid.parasite_axes import SubplotHost fig = plt.figure(figsize=(10,8)) host = SubplotHost(fig, 111) fig.add_subplot(host) parx = host.twiny() parx.axis["top"].set_visible(False) offset = 0, -50 new_axisline = parx.get_grid_helper().new_fixed_axis parx.axis["bottom"] = new_axisline(loc="bottom", axes=parx, offset=offset) parx.axis["bottom"].label.set_visible(True) hplt, = host.plot(np.random.rand(100)) p2, = parx.plot(np.linspace(0,20,100), np.random.rand(100)*5.0, color='green') plt.show()
Hi all, SC is the largest conference focused on high-performance computing, this year it will be held in Seattle: http://sc11.supercomputing.org/ and as part of the conference, a Python-focused workshop is being organized. The deadline for papers is coming up soon (Sept 19), so if you are interested in participating there is still time to get your submission ready! Papers up to 10 pages are welcome on any of the following topics: Python-based scientific applications and libraries High performance computing Parallel Python-based programming languages Scientific visualization Scientific computing education Python performance and language issues Problem solving environments with Python Performance analysis tools for Python application For full details, please see: http://www.dlr.de/sc/desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-1183/1638_read-31733/
The master is here. JJ had showed me those multi axes tricks and he is back again with the plenty of changes to the axes_grid toolkit. The best thing to do is to make a new clone from the master repo and experiment. On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Neal Becker <ndb...@gm...> wrote: > Jae-Joon Lee wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Neal Becker <ndb...@gm...> > wrote: > >> Yes, that's very helpful. Just one thing. How would I get a bit more > bottom > >> margin on the main figure to leave more room for the extra axis? > >> > >> I'm using this as an example. I experimented with plt.subplots_adjust, > which > >> seems like it might do the right thing. Is this the 'best' approach? > >> (I really don't know what all these methods do, just guessing) > > > > Yes, you need to fiddle with subplots_adjust command. The current > > development branch of matplotlib (not yet released) has a new function > > "tight_layout", which does this automatically for you. > > Regards, > > > > -JJ > Looking forward to that. Any idea of an ETA for a release? > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Using storage to extend the benefits of virtualization and iSCSI > Virtualization increases hardware utilization and delivers a new level of > agility. Learn what those decisions are and how to modernize your storage > and backup environments for virtualization. > http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51434361/ > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-users mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users > -- Gökhan
Jae-Joon Lee wrote: > On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Neal Becker <ndb...@gm...> wrote: >> Yes, that's very helpful. Just one thing. How would I get a bit more bottom >> margin on the main figure to leave more room for the extra axis? >> >> I'm using this as an example. I experimented with plt.subplots_adjust, which >> seems like it might do the right thing. Is this the 'best' approach? >> (I really don't know what all these methods do, just guessing) > > Yes, you need to fiddle with subplots_adjust command. The current > development branch of matplotlib (not yet released) has a new function > "tight_layout", which does this automatically for you. > Regards, > > -JJ Looking forward to that. Any idea of an ETA for a release?
Mpl 1.0.0 The way Annotation.draw (in text.py) is implemented, if an annotation is created with an annotation point (x,y) and text located at (tx,ty) and then the you pan around on the graph such that (x,y) is no longer visible, the annotation suddenly disappears. I would suggest the following modification to Annotation.draw in text.py. All it does is set a clip box so that the annotation and arrow is still drawn, but the arrow is clipped at the axes boundary. It is a much nicer effect than the annotation disappearing. I have made this modification in my source locally, and it works very well, but I thought I would suggest here for inclusion into the main code base. Modified lines are marked with a CHANGEME. It is only a four line change. @allow_rasterization def draw(self, renderer): """ Draw the :class:`Annotation` object to the given *renderer*. """ if renderer is not None: self._renderer = renderer if not self.get_visible(): return xy_pixel = self._get_position_xy(renderer) #if not self._check_xy(renderer, xy_pixel): CHANGEME (commented out) # return CHANGEME (commented out) self._update_position_xytext(renderer, xy_pixel) self.update_bbox_position_size(renderer) if self.arrow is not None: if self.arrow.figure is None and self.figure is not None: self.arrow.figure = self.figure self.arrow.set_clip_box(self.axes.bbox) # CHANGEME (new line) self.arrow.draw(renderer) if self.arrow_patch is not None: if self.arrow_patch.figure is None and self.figure is not None: self.arrow_patch.figure = self.figure self.arrow_patch.set_clip_box(self.axes.bbox) # CHANGEME (new line) self.arrow_patch.draw(renderer) Text.draw(self, renderer) -- Daniel Hyams dh...@gm...
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Neal Becker <ndb...@gm...> wrote: > Yes, that's very helpful. Just one thing. How would I get a bit more bottom > margin on the main figure to leave more room for the extra axis? > > I'm using this as an example. I experimented with plt.subplots_adjust, which > seems like it might do the right thing. Is this the 'best' approach? > (I really don't know what all these methods do, just guessing) Yes, you need to fiddle with subplots_adjust command. The current development branch of matplotlib (not yet released) has a new function "tight_layout", which does this automatically for you. Regards, -JJ
Just in case, here is a version with "axes_grid1" toolkit. Note that axes_grid is kind of deprecated. Regards, -JJ import numpy as np import matplotlib.pyplot as plt import mpl_toolkits.axes_grid1 as axes_grid1 host = axes_grid1.host_subplot(111) hplt, = host.plot(np.random.rand(100)) from matplotlib.transforms import Affine2D transfrom_from_parx_to_host = Affine2D().scale(1000, 1) parx = host.twin(transfrom_from_parx_to_host) if 1: # adjust axis postion etc. parx.axis["right"].toggle(ticklabels=False) parx.axis["top"].toggle(ticklabels=False) parx.axis["bottom"].toggle(ticklabels=True) parx.axis["bottom"].line.set_visible(True) parx.spines["bottom"].set_position(('outward',20)) plt.show() On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 6:14 AM, Gökhan Sever <gok...@gm...> wrote: > Hi, > The code below should create a properly placed 2nd x-axis. You might need to > adjust the placement of the figure canvas to match into the window. > import numpy as np > import matplotlib.pyplot as plt > from mpl_toolkits.axes_grid.parasite_axes import SubplotHost > fig = plt.figure(figsize=(10,8)) > host = SubplotHost(fig, 111) > fig.add_subplot(host) > parx = host.twiny() > parx.axis["top"].set_visible(False) > offset = 0, -50 > new_axisline = parx.get_grid_helper().new_fixed_axis > parx.axis["bottom"] = new_axisline(loc="bottom", axes=parx, offset=offset) > parx.axis["bottom"].label.set_visible(True) > hplt, = host.plot(np.random.rand(100)) > p2, = parx.plot(np.linspace(0,20,100), np.random.rand(100)*5.0, > color='green') > plt.show() > > There is also another example at: > http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/mpl_toolkits/axes_grid/users/overview.html#axisartist-with-parasiteaxes > Hope this helps. > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Neal Becker <ndb...@gm...> wrote: >> >> Neal Becker wrote: >> >> > I have a semilog plot. I'd like to add a second x axis (maybe below the >> > existing one, or else maybe on top of graph). This second x axis is >> > simply >> > describing the same existing data, in different units. >> > >> > For example imagine a plot of >> > >> > x - time in seconds >> > y - velocity >> > >> > x2 - time in minutes >> > >> > >> >> This almost works: >> fig = plt.figure() >> ax = fig.add_subplot(111) >> ... >> ax2 = ax.twiny() >> min_x, max_x = ax.get_xlim() >> ax2.set_xlim (min_x-1, max_x-1) >> >> except the 2nd x axis is on the top, and prints right on top of the title >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Why Cloud-Based Security and Archiving Make Sense >> Osterman Research conducted this study that outlines how and why cloud >> computing security and archiving is rapidly being adopted across the IT >> space for its ease of implementation, lower cost, and increased >> reliability. Learn more. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51425301/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Matplotlib-users mailing list >> Mat...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users > > > > -- > Gökhan > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Why Cloud-Based Security and Archiving Make Sense > Osterman Research conducted this study that outlines how and why cloud > computing security and archiving is rapidly being adopted across the IT > space for its ease of implementation, lower cost, and increased > reliability. Learn more. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51425301/ > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-users mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users > >
Gökhan Sever wrote: > Hi, > > The code below should create a properly placed 2nd x-axis. You might need to > adjust the placement of the figure canvas to match into the window. > > import numpy as np > import matplotlib.pyplot as plt > from mpl_toolkits.axes_grid.parasite_axes import SubplotHost > > fig = plt.figure(figsize=(10,8)) > host = SubplotHost(fig, 111) > fig.add_subplot(host) > parx = host.twiny() > > parx.axis["top"].set_visible(False) > offset = 0, -50 > new_axisline = parx.get_grid_helper().new_fixed_axis > parx.axis["bottom"] = new_axisline(loc="bottom", axes=parx, offset=offset) > parx.axis["bottom"].label.set_visible(True) > > hplt, = host.plot(np.random.rand(100)) > p2, = parx.plot(np.linspace(0,20,100), np.random.rand(100)*5.0, > color='green') > > plt.show() > > > There is also another example at: > http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/mpl_toolkits/axes_grid/users/overview.html#axisartist- with-parasiteaxes > > Hope this helps. Yes, that's very helpful. Just one thing. How would I get a bit more bottom margin on the main figure to leave more room for the extra axis? I'm using this as an example. I experimented with plt.subplots_adjust, which seems like it might do the right thing. Is this the 'best' approach? (I really don't know what all these methods do, just guessing) import numpy as np import matplotlib.pyplot as plt from mpl_toolkits.axes_grid.parasite_axes import SubplotHost from matplotlib.backends.backend_pdf import PdfPages pdf = PdfPages('results.pdf') fig = plt.figure(figsize=(10,8)) host = SubplotHost(fig, 111) ax = fig.add_subplot(host) plt.subplots_adjust (bottom=0.1) parx = host.twiny() parx.axis["top"].set_visible(False) offset = 0, -30 new_axisline = parx.get_grid_helper().new_fixed_axis parx.axis["bottom"] = new_axisline(loc="bottom", axes=parx, offset=offset) parx.axis["bottom"].label.set_visible(True) hplt, = host.plot(np.linspace(0,20,100), np.random.rand(100)) plt.xlabel ('Es/No') p2, = parx.plot(np.linspace(0,20,100)-5, np.random.rand(100)*5.0, color='green') parx.set_xlabel ('$Eb_{i}/No$') #plt.show() pdf.savefig (fig) plt.close() pdf.close()
Sorry, this is the correct link http://pcp.oxfordjournals.org/content/52/2/274/F2.expansion.html (Fig2). Thank you in advance, On 09/11/2011 04:33 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > On 09/10/2011 07:57 PM, xyz wrote: >> Hello, >> How is it possible to paint this kind graph >> http://pcp.oxfordjournals.org/content/52/2/274 with Matplotlib? > Your link leads to a journal abstract, not to a graph. There are > several figures in the paper. It looks like any of them could be made > with matplotlib--all are 2-D figures, and mpl is a capable 2-D plotting > library--but each would require some programming using that library. > > Eric > >> Thank you in advance. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Michal > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Using storage to extend the benefits of virtualization and iSCSI > Virtualization increases hardware utilization and delivers a new level of > agility. Learn what those decisions are and how to modernize your storage > and backup environments for virtualization. > http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51434361/ > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-users mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users >
On 09/10/2011 07:57 PM, xyz wrote: > Hello, > How is it possible to paint this kind graph > http://pcp.oxfordjournals.org/content/52/2/274 with Matplotlib? Your link leads to a journal abstract, not to a graph. There are several figures in the paper. It looks like any of them could be made with matplotlib--all are 2-D figures, and mpl is a capable 2-D plotting library--but each would require some programming using that library. Eric > > Thank you in advance. > > Cheers, > > Michal
Hello, How is it possible to paint this kind graph http://pcp.oxfordjournals.org/content/52/2/274 with Matplotlib? Thank you in advance. Cheers, Michal
Hello, I do not know how to extract coordinates from a dict in order to paint all three graphs: from pprint import pprint import matplotlib.pyplot as plt fig = plt.figure() data = {} # dict could contains more date, depends from the user input #d1, d2, d3, .... are labels data['d1'] = {1:2,2:5,3:6} data['d2'] = {1:4,2:6,3:8} data['d3'] = {1:1,2:2,3:2} fig = plt.figure() plt.plot(x, y1, '--bo', x, y2, '--go') # How would it be possible to replace it by dict data How is it possible to draw all three graphs? Thank you in advance.
Hi all, I am encountering a memory leak type issue when running the following, for example. http://codepad.org/TNuCLT3k Matplotlib version: 0.99.3 PyQt4 Version: 4.8.5 I found a thread in the archive relating to this issue which supposedly disappeared upon updating to PyQt 4.8.4 (I trust it would not have been reintroduced in going to .5). Can someone confirm or deny replication of this issue with their setup and/or offer a solution? Thanks very much Matt Earnshaw
Hi, The code below should create a properly placed 2nd x-axis. You might need to adjust the placement of the figure canvas to match into the window. import numpy as np import matplotlib.pyplot as plt from mpl_toolkits.axes_grid.parasite_axes import SubplotHost fig = plt.figure(figsize=(10,8)) host = SubplotHost(fig, 111) fig.add_subplot(host) parx = host.twiny() parx.axis["top"].set_visible(False) offset = 0, -50 new_axisline = parx.get_grid_helper().new_fixed_axis parx.axis["bottom"] = new_axisline(loc="bottom", axes=parx, offset=offset) parx.axis["bottom"].label.set_visible(True) hplt, = host.plot(np.random.rand(100)) p2, = parx.plot(np.linspace(0,20,100), np.random.rand(100)*5.0, color='green') plt.show() There is also another example at: http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/mpl_toolkits/axes_grid/users/overview.html#axisartist-with-parasiteaxes Hope this helps. On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Neal Becker <ndb...@gm...> wrote: > Neal Becker wrote: > > > I have a semilog plot. I'd like to add a second x axis (maybe below the > > existing one, or else maybe on top of graph). This second x axis is > simply > > describing the same existing data, in different units. > > > > For example imagine a plot of > > > > x - time in seconds > > y - velocity > > > > x2 - time in minutes > > > > > > This almost works: > fig = plt.figure() > ax = fig.add_subplot(111) > ... > ax2 = ax.twiny() > min_x, max_x = ax.get_xlim() > ax2.set_xlim (min_x-1, max_x-1) > > except the 2nd x axis is on the top, and prints right on top of the title > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Why Cloud-Based Security and Archiving Make Sense > Osterman Research conducted this study that outlines how and why cloud > computing security and archiving is rapidly being adopted across the IT > space for its ease of implementation, lower cost, and increased > reliability. Learn more. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51425301/ > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-users mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users > -- Gökhan
Neal Becker wrote: > I have a semilog plot. I'd like to add a second x axis (maybe below the > existing one, or else maybe on top of graph). This second x axis is simply > describing the same existing data, in different units. > > For example imagine a plot of > > x - time in seconds > y - velocity > > x2 - time in minutes > > This almost works: fig = plt.figure() ax = fig.add_subplot(111) ... ax2 = ax.twiny() min_x, max_x = ax.get_xlim() ax2.set_xlim (min_x-1, max_x-1) except the 2nd x axis is on the top, and prints right on top of the title
Ben and Yves, Might this be behavior defined in the matplotlibrc file? In [21]: import matplotlib as mpl In [22]: mpl.rcParams['figure.edgecolor'] Out[22]: 'w' -paul On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Benjamin Root <ben...@ou...> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 3:49 AM, Yves Revaz <yve...@ep...> wrote: >> >> On 09/08/2011 06:09 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Yves Revaz <yve...@ep...> wrote: >>> >>> Dear List, >>> >>> when I'm saving a plot with the option facecolor='k', >>> around my image, there is still a one pixel white border. >>> >>> How is it possible to remove this ? >>> >>> try for example this very simple script: >>> (using ) >>> >>> import pylab as pt >>> from numpy import * >>> >>> x = arange(0,10) >>> y = x**2 >>> pt.plot(x,y) >>> >>> pt.savefig('qq.png',facecolor='k') >>> >>> >>> Thanks in advance. >>> >>> yves >>> >> >> yves, >> >> This might depend on the version of matplotlib and which backend you are >> using. I currently do not see this white line on my development build of >> mpl using the GTKAgg backend. What are you using? >> >> >> Hi Ben, >> >> Thanks for you reply. >> >> I'm using : >> >> >>> import matplotlib >> >>> matplotlib.__version__ >> '1.0rc1' > > That version is over a year old. Since then, I know that some "off-by-one" > pixel bugs have been fixed. > >> >> with the GTKAgg backend. >> I join a zoom of a corner of the image to show that >> there is one white line and a second gray one. >> >> I tried different backend, with some of them (XV, GTKCairo), >> the white line disapears but in all cases, the gray line is present :-( . >> >> Do you really have nothing like that ? >> > > No, not in the latest development version, but I haven't checked for a gray > line. Then again, that may be dependent upon the graphics viewer. > > You could try installing v1.0.1 now, or wait a bit for the upcoming v1.1 > release. > > I hope this helps! > Ben Root > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Why Cloud-Based Security and Archiving Make Sense > Osterman Research conducted this study that outlines how and why cloud > computing security and archiving is rapidly being adopted across the IT > space for its ease of implementation, lower cost, and increased > reliability. Learn more. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51425301/ > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-users mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users > >
[resend: apologies for the html mail]. I was trying to implement something where the user could change the properties of an artist by right clicking on it...so I needed to find out what artists are under the cursor at the time of the click. It is possible that the method that I'm using isn't the recommended one; if not, I would appreciate any suggestions. I'm using fig.hitlist() to get the list of artists. This function works just fine with a regular xy plot, but if one (or both) of the axes are in log scale, I get a NotImplementedError exception and associated stack trace (run the attached demo code to see). The exception is being caused by line 249 in artists.py. Now, if I modify artists.py slightly to swallow the exception, replacing for a in self.get_children(): L.extend(a.hitlist(event)) with try: for a in self.get_children(): L.extend(a.hitlist(event)) except: pass Then everything seems to work. However, being unfamiliar with the code, I'm not sure what else that might break, or how bad of an idea swallowing the exception is here. I have attached a small demo code. The error occurs in matplotlib 1.0.0 and matplotlib 1.0.1, on both Linux and Windows. -- Daniel Hyams dh...@gm...
I have a semilog plot. I'd like to add a second x axis (maybe below the existing one, or else maybe on top of graph). This second x axis is simply describing the same existing data, in different units. For example imagine a plot of x - time in seconds y - velocity x2 - time in minutes
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 3:49 AM, Yves Revaz <yve...@ep...> wrote: > ** > On 09/08/2011 06:09 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Yves Revaz <yve...@ep...> wrote: > >> Dear List, >> >> when I'm saving a plot with the option facecolor='k', >> around my image, there is still a one pixel white border. >> >> How is it possible to remove this ? >> >> try for example this very simple script: >> (using ) >> >> import pylab as pt >> from numpy import * >> >> x = arange(0,10) >> y = x**2 >> pt.plot(x,y) >> >> pt.savefig('qq.png',facecolor='k') >> >> >> Thanks in advance. >> >> yves >> >> > yves, > > This might depend on the version of matplotlib and which backend you are > using. I currently do not see this white line on my development build of > mpl using the GTKAgg backend. What are you using? > > > Hi Ben, > > Thanks for you reply. > > I'm using : > > >>> import matplotlib > >>> matplotlib.__version__ > '1.0rc1' > That version is over a year old. Since then, I know that some "off-by-one" pixel bugs have been fixed. > > with the GTKAgg backend. > I join a zoom of a corner of the image to show that > there is one white line and a second gray one. > > I tried different backend, with some of them (XV, GTKCairo), > the white line disapears but in all cases, the gray line is present :-( . > > Do you really have nothing like that ? > > No, not in the latest development version, but I haven't checked for a gray line. Then again, that may be dependent upon the graphics viewer. You could try installing v1.0.1 now, or wait a bit for the upcoming v1.1 release. I hope this helps! Ben Root
On 9/9/2011 6:42 AM, Scott Sinclair wrote: > On 8 September 2011 19:20, Matt Funk <mat...@gm...> wrote: >> Hi, >> sorry that it has taken me so long to reply. Anyway, i could be wrong, but i >> don't think that the code: >> xi = np.linspace(llcrnlon,urcrnlon,1000) >> yi = np.linspace(llcrnlat,urcrnlat,1000) >> >> will produce a grid which gives the lat/lon coordinates with 1km spacing. >> The reason being is that the distance between 2 lons (say -117.731659 and >> -91.303642) is different depending on where you are in terms of the latitude >> (i.e. the extreme examples are of course the north pole vs the equator). So >> the above gives a regular grid in terms of degrees but not in terms of >> distance. > Yes, that's correct. You'll need to project your original data > locations into a cartesian co-ordinate system before interpolating > their values onto a regular grid in that co-ordinate system using > griddata et al. > > You might like to use pyproj (included with the basemap toolkit) to > help you project from lat/lon to your chosen co-ordinate system.. I have been using gdal for many of my geographic needs. Is there an advantage/disadvantage using pyproj vs capabilities found in gdal (from what i understand both are based on PROJ.4)? Can you comment on this? Also, i was thinking of projecting things to UTM for interpolation purposes. Is there any apparent reason this is a bad idea vs a different projected coordinate system? matt > > Cheers, > Scott > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Why Cloud-Based Security and Archiving Make Sense > Osterman Research conducted this study that outlines how and why cloud > computing security and archiving is rapidly being adopted across the IT > space for its ease of implementation, lower cost, and increased > reliability. Learn more. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51425301/ > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-users mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users -- Matt Funk Research Associate Plant and Environmental Scienc. Dept. New Mexico State University
On 8 September 2011 19:20, Matt Funk <mat...@gm...> wrote: > Hi, > sorry that it has taken me so long to reply. Anyway, i could be wrong, but i > don't think that the code: > xi = np.linspace(llcrnlon,urcrnlon,1000) > yi = np.linspace(llcrnlat,urcrnlat,1000) > > will produce a grid which gives the lat/lon coordinates with 1km spacing. > The reason being is that the distance between 2 lons (say -117.731659 and > -91.303642) is different depending on where you are in terms of the latitude > (i.e. the extreme examples are of course the north pole vs the equator). So > the above gives a regular grid in terms of degrees but not in terms of > distance. Yes, that's correct. You'll need to project your original data locations into a cartesian co-ordinate system before interpolating their values onto a regular grid in that co-ordinate system using griddata et al. You might like to use pyproj (included with the basemap toolkit) to help you project from lat/lon to your chosen co-ordinate system.. Cheers, Scott
2011年9月8日 Jeff Whitaker <js...@fa...>: > On 9/8/11 1:51 AM, Jakob Malm wrote: >> >> Picking up on an old thread. Hopefully Jeff is still listening in... >> >> On 2010年04月04日 23:24, Jeff Whitaker wrote: >>> >>> On 4/4/10 11:06 AM, Will Hewson wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi again Jeff et al... >>>> >>>> I've had a play around with the extra few lines of code - on paper this >>>> seems like it should solve the problems I'm experiencing. However, an >>>> error's being thrown up by the transform scalar function, as my lons and >>>> lats won't necessarily be increasing. The data I'm plotting is satellite >>>> data and so at the beginning and end of the orbit file lats go over the >>>> pole >>>> from 90 to -90, with a similar problem for the lons - whereby the data >>>> is >>>> taken across the satellite track. I've thought about sorting the data >>>> before >>>> passing it to transform_scalar but I'm always going to be left with the >>>> problem in either lats or lons. >>>> >>>> I've uploaded the file I'm currently working with this time. It's three >>>> columns of lons, lats and z values. >>>> >>>> Once again, many thanks for your help. >>>> >>>> Will. >>>> >>>> http://old.nabble.com/file/p28133659/test.plt test.plt >>>> >>> Will: Is it a regular lat/lon grid or a satellite swath? If it's the >>> latter, you can't use my solution. >>> >>> -Jeff >> >> What if it _is_ a satellite swath? Can I get around the problem of >> off-projection plotting with Basemap.pcolormesh()? >> Example code and plots can be found at >> >> http://pythonbits.blogspot.com/2011/09/i-have-problem-with-basemap-plotting.html >> >> Thanks, >> Jakob Malm >> > > > Jakob: I think that's the price you pay for the speed of pcolormesh (vs > pcolor). It appears to make more assumptions about the structure of your > data. I don't see any way around it. > > -Jeff > Hmm... I believe I have been able to get around it previously, but perhaps I just fell back to using pcolor... Thanks, Jakob