You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(56) |
Nov
(65) |
Dec
(37) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(78) |
Mar
(153) |
Apr
(205) |
May
(184) |
Jun
(123) |
Jul
(171) |
Aug
(156) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(223) |
2005 |
Jan
(184) |
Feb
(267) |
Mar
(214) |
Apr
(286) |
May
(320) |
Jun
(299) |
Jul
(348) |
Aug
(283) |
Sep
(355) |
Oct
(293) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(203) |
2006 |
Jan
(352) |
Feb
(358) |
Mar
(403) |
Apr
(313) |
May
(165) |
Jun
(281) |
Jul
(316) |
Aug
(228) |
Sep
(279) |
Oct
(243) |
Nov
(315) |
Dec
(345) |
2007 |
Jan
(260) |
Feb
(323) |
Mar
(340) |
Apr
(319) |
May
(290) |
Jun
(296) |
Jul
(221) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(242) |
Oct
(248) |
Nov
(242) |
Dec
(332) |
2008 |
Jan
(312) |
Feb
(359) |
Mar
(454) |
Apr
(287) |
May
(340) |
Jun
(450) |
Jul
(403) |
Aug
(324) |
Sep
(349) |
Oct
(385) |
Nov
(363) |
Dec
(437) |
2009 |
Jan
(500) |
Feb
(301) |
Mar
(409) |
Apr
(486) |
May
(545) |
Jun
(391) |
Jul
(518) |
Aug
(497) |
Sep
(492) |
Oct
(429) |
Nov
(357) |
Dec
(310) |
2010 |
Jan
(371) |
Feb
(657) |
Mar
(519) |
Apr
(432) |
May
(312) |
Jun
(416) |
Jul
(477) |
Aug
(386) |
Sep
(419) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(320) |
Dec
(202) |
2011 |
Jan
(321) |
Feb
(413) |
Mar
(299) |
Apr
(215) |
May
(284) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(207) |
Aug
(314) |
Sep
(321) |
Oct
(259) |
Nov
(347) |
Dec
(209) |
2012 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(414) |
Mar
(377) |
Apr
(179) |
May
(173) |
Jun
(234) |
Jul
(295) |
Aug
(239) |
Sep
(276) |
Oct
(355) |
Nov
(144) |
Dec
(108) |
2013 |
Jan
(170) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(204) |
Apr
(133) |
May
(142) |
Jun
(89) |
Jul
(160) |
Aug
(180) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(136) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(32) |
2014 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(90) |
Mar
(161) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(78) |
Jun
(94) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(83) |
Sep
(102) |
Oct
(132) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(96) |
2015 |
Jan
(45) |
Feb
(138) |
Mar
(176) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(119) |
Jun
(124) |
Jul
(77) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(9) |
2016 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2025 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
(3) |
2
|
3
(1) |
4
(7) |
5
(7) |
6
(11) |
7
(3) |
8
(4) |
9
(5) |
10
(5) |
11
(15) |
12
(7) |
13
(5) |
14
(4) |
15
(5) |
16
|
17
(4) |
18
(8) |
19
(12) |
20
(11) |
21
(4) |
22
(2) |
23
(4) |
24
(7) |
25
(5) |
26
(13) |
27
(3) |
28
(10) |
29
(3) |
30
(1) |
31
(15) |
|
|
|
|
|
This seems to be related to the bug reported by Eric Emsellem. If I do an imshow of an image with aspect='preserve' and activate the 'zoom to rectangle' function, the zoomed portion of the image is offset from the portion I outline with the cursor.
Stephen Walton wrote: > second would be a windowed, scrollable view into an image which is > larger than the physical display. Actually, imshow seems almost to do this. I did imshow(imdata,interpolation='nearest') where imdata was a 1024 square image. Zooming and panning _seems_ to show the full resolution image with individual pixels visible at high zooms. Is this right?
John Hunter wrote: > Stephen> [...] ability to load multiple aligned images and blink between > Stephen> them. > >With the new keypress event handling in matplotlib-0.70, and the >cleanup to make sure the visible property is respected, this is pretty >easy. > > You're right, thanks for the example code! >What's the second item on the list :-) > > Well, since you asked, and Todd originally mentioned a DS9 replacement: second would be a windowed, scrollable view into an image which is larger than the physical display. I have 2K square cameras at my observatory, and HST ACS images are 4K square; both are quite a bit larger than any display I'm likely to be able to afford in the forseeable future. Third item, and this will be a lot harder, is display and readout of FITS WCS information on the screen. Acronym glossary: HST--Hubble Space Telescope ACS--Advanced Camera for Surveys FITS--Flexible Image Transport System, the default format for astronomical images (http://fits.gsfc.nasa.gov) WCS--World Coordinate System, a standard for embedding information for mapping pixel to physical coordinates in the FITS image header
It's a bug in the contour function. In axes.py, in function 'contour', put the line y, x = indices((jmax,imax), 'd') in a condition, for example: if x == None and y == None: y, x = indices((jmax,imax), 'd') A permanent fix will go in CVS next week. Nadia Dencheva ---- Original message ---- >Date: 2005年1月01日 08:05:12 -0700 >From: Jeff Whitaker <js...@fa...> >Subject: [Matplotlib-users] contour question >To: "'matplotlib-users'" <mat...@li...> > >Hi all: > >I was experimenting with the contour demo and discovered that the x and >y keyword arguments don't behave like I expect them to (i.e. they don't >behave as they do in pcolor). > >For example: > >from pylab import * >delta = 0.025 >x = y = arange(-3.0, 3.0, delta) >X, Y = meshgrid(x, y) >Z1 = bivariate_normal(X, Y, 1.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0) >Z2 = bivariate_normal(X, Y, 1.5, 0.5, 1, 1) >#levels, colls = contour(Z2-Z1, x=X,y=Y,levels=6, ># linewidths=arange(.5, 4, .5), ># colors=('r', 'green', 'blue', (1,1,0), >'#afeeee', 0.5), ># origin='lower') >pcolor(X,Y,Z2-Z1,shading='flat') >show() > >plots the data with the x and y axes going from -3 to +3. Uncommenting >the contour call, the axes then are the same as the dimensions of the Z >array, regardless of whether the x=X, y=Y keyword args are given. In >other words, contour seems to ignore the x,y keywords. Am I missing >something? > >-Jeff > >-- >Jeffrey S. Whitaker Phone : (30the3)497-6313 >NOAA/OAR/CDC R/CDC1 FAX : (303)497-6449 >325 Broadway Web : http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/~jsw >Boulder, CO, USA 80305-3328 Office: Skaggs Research Cntr 1D-124 > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues >Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. >It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt >_______________________________________________ >Matplotlib-users mailing list >Mat...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
I'm taking off this afternoon for a vacation in sunny Brazil! So I may not be as responsive around here as I sometimes am, though I will be occasionally checking my email. Hold down the fort, and I'll think warmly of all of you who may be stuck in the northern hemisphere :-) JDH
Hi all: I was experimenting with the contour demo and discovered that the x and y keyword arguments don't behave like I expect them to (i.e. they don't behave as they do in pcolor). For example: from pylab import * delta = 0.025 x = y = arange(-3.0, 3.0, delta) X, Y = meshgrid(x, y) Z1 = bivariate_normal(X, Y, 1.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0) Z2 = bivariate_normal(X, Y, 1.5, 0.5, 1, 1) #levels, colls = contour(Z2-Z1, x=X,y=Y,levels=6, # linewidths=arange(.5, 4, .5), # colors=('r', 'green', 'blue', (1,1,0), '#afeeee', 0.5), # origin='lower') pcolor(X,Y,Z2-Z1,shading='flat') show() plots the data with the x and y axes going from -3 to +3. Uncommenting the contour call, the axes then are the same as the dimensions of the Z array, regardless of whether the x=X, y=Y keyword args are given. In other words, contour seems to ignore the x,y keywords. Am I missing something? -Jeff -- Jeffrey S. Whitaker Phone : (30the3)497-6313 NOAA/OAR/CDC R/CDC1 FAX : (303)497-6449 325 Broadway Web : http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/~jsw Boulder, CO, USA 80305-3328 Office: Skaggs Research Cntr 1D-124