You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(56) |
Nov
(65) |
Dec
(37) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(78) |
Mar
(153) |
Apr
(205) |
May
(184) |
Jun
(123) |
Jul
(171) |
Aug
(156) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(223) |
2005 |
Jan
(184) |
Feb
(267) |
Mar
(214) |
Apr
(286) |
May
(320) |
Jun
(299) |
Jul
(348) |
Aug
(283) |
Sep
(355) |
Oct
(293) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(203) |
2006 |
Jan
(352) |
Feb
(358) |
Mar
(403) |
Apr
(313) |
May
(165) |
Jun
(281) |
Jul
(316) |
Aug
(228) |
Sep
(279) |
Oct
(243) |
Nov
(315) |
Dec
(345) |
2007 |
Jan
(260) |
Feb
(323) |
Mar
(340) |
Apr
(319) |
May
(290) |
Jun
(296) |
Jul
(221) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(242) |
Oct
(248) |
Nov
(242) |
Dec
(332) |
2008 |
Jan
(312) |
Feb
(359) |
Mar
(454) |
Apr
(287) |
May
(340) |
Jun
(450) |
Jul
(403) |
Aug
(324) |
Sep
(349) |
Oct
(385) |
Nov
(363) |
Dec
(437) |
2009 |
Jan
(500) |
Feb
(301) |
Mar
(409) |
Apr
(486) |
May
(545) |
Jun
(391) |
Jul
(518) |
Aug
(497) |
Sep
(492) |
Oct
(429) |
Nov
(357) |
Dec
(310) |
2010 |
Jan
(371) |
Feb
(657) |
Mar
(519) |
Apr
(432) |
May
(312) |
Jun
(416) |
Jul
(477) |
Aug
(386) |
Sep
(419) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(320) |
Dec
(202) |
2011 |
Jan
(321) |
Feb
(413) |
Mar
(299) |
Apr
(215) |
May
(284) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(207) |
Aug
(314) |
Sep
(321) |
Oct
(259) |
Nov
(347) |
Dec
(209) |
2012 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(414) |
Mar
(377) |
Apr
(179) |
May
(173) |
Jun
(234) |
Jul
(295) |
Aug
(239) |
Sep
(276) |
Oct
(355) |
Nov
(144) |
Dec
(108) |
2013 |
Jan
(170) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(204) |
Apr
(133) |
May
(142) |
Jun
(89) |
Jul
(160) |
Aug
(180) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(136) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(32) |
2014 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(90) |
Mar
(161) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(78) |
Jun
(94) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(83) |
Sep
(102) |
Oct
(132) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(96) |
2015 |
Jan
(45) |
Feb
(138) |
Mar
(176) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(119) |
Jun
(124) |
Jul
(77) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(9) |
2016 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2025 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
1
(2) |
2
(3) |
3
|
4
(3) |
5
(11) |
6
(3) |
7
(2) |
8
(6) |
9
(6) |
10
(8) |
11
(3) |
12
(7) |
13
(8) |
14
(5) |
15
(11) |
16
(11) |
17
(3) |
18
(2) |
19
(7) |
20
(11) |
21
(6) |
22
(5) |
23
(1) |
24
|
25
|
26
(6) |
27
(3) |
28
(8) |
29
(2) |
30
(1) |
|
> > > > Essentially, you want a similar behavior to the markers in the scatter > plots, right? As you zoom or resize the plot, the circle markers stay as > circles and have the same size relative to the size of the figure. If that > is what you want, the way to do that is very easy. > > ax1.scatter([0.5], [0.5], s=30) > > Or whatever size you want (units of points). > > I hope that helps! > Ben Root > > Hi Ben, Thanks. I actually tried this before and it didn't appear to work for me. But I think the problem was that I thought s was the radius in units of my axes, and so was simply not seeing the dot on top of the line that was already there. I was just choosing values that were way too small to see. This should meet my needs. I wonder if you would mind expanding on that sentence? Does the example I > provide do what you want? > > Thanks, > Phil Phil, thanks for this example as well. It also would work for my purposes. All I meant by that sentence is that, in my real script, I am plotting a bunch of lines as well, and I just wanted these circles to also be present in the plot (the example code I attached was simply the circles/ellipses). Best, Brad
On 11/5/12 3:50 PM, klo uo wrote: > You can see there how to use Gimp and create mpl colormap and then later > there is nifty code that will allow you to shift colormaps with a slider Nice! I couldn't resist doing a Sage interact version of the slider thing: http://aleph.sagemath.org/?q=89b0c945-2ce3-4645-bf61-dbe0eed2c5cd&lang=sage Thanks, Jason -- Jason Grout
I asked same question with different problem here: http://matplotlib.1069221.n5.nabble.com/How-to-shift-colormap-td18451.html You can see there how to use Gimp and create mpl colormap and then later there is nifty code that will allow you to shift colormaps with a slider >From your problem I assume you would want the first. Here is ready made for you: ======================================== import matplotlib as mpl import matplotlib.pyplot as plt ccm = { 'red' : ( (0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000), (0.000001, 1.000000, 1.000000), (0.500000, 0.500000, 0.500000), (1.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000) ), 'green' : ( (0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000), (0.000001, 1.000000, 1.000000), (0.500000, 0.500000, 0.500000), (1.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000) ), 'blue' : ( (0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000), (0.000001, 1.000000, 1.000000), (0.500000, 0.500000, 0.500000), (1.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000) ) } cm = mpl.colors.LinearSegmentedColormap('my_map', ccm) from numpy import outer, arange, ones a = outer(arange(0, 1, 0.01), ones(10)) plt.imshow(a, cmap=cm) plt.show() ========================================
Hi Brad, I didn't quite follow what it was that you were trying to achieve, but the following example may be of interest to you: import matplotlib.pyplot as plt from matplotlib.patches import Ellipse, Circle import matplotlib.transforms as mtrans fig = plt.figure() ax1 = fig.add_subplot(111) x_in_axes_coords, y_in_axes_coords = 0.5, 0.5 radius_in_axes = 0.3 coords = [[x_in_axes_coords, y_in_axes_coords], [x_in_axes_coords + radius_in_axes, y_in_axes_coords]] coords = ax1.transAxes.transform(coords) x_device, y_device = coords[0, :] radius = coords[1, 0] - x_device circle = Circle((x_device, y_device), radius, transform=mtrans.IdentityTransform()) fig.artists.append(circle) plt.show() Clearly, you will always have circles with this approach (the circle is defined in device coordinates, i.e. pixels), but with the way this is implemented, it does not behave in the same way as axes coordinates do when you resize your window. > I am trying to plot some small circles in my plotting window, in addition to the curves I'm already plotting. I wonder if you would mind expanding on that sentence? Does the example I provide do what you want? Thanks, Phil On 5 November 2012 20:51, Brad Malone <bra...@gm...> wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to plot some small circles in my plotting window, in addition > to the curves I'm already plotting. If I don't want to set my x- and y- > axis scales equal to each other, a naive drawing of a circle results in an > ellipse. To fix this problem I found some nice example code online here : > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9230389/why-is-matplotlib-plotting-my-circles-as-ovals, > which solves the problem by basically plotting an ellipse, but an ellipse > which will look like a circle in the display window. > > That works all fine for me, but then, if I change my xlim or ylim using > ax1.set_xlim((something1,something2)) then the solution no longer works, > and I get an ellipse. > > A minimal example showing the breaking behavior can be seen below. > > > > import matplotlib.pyplot as plt >> from matplotlib.patches import Ellipse, Circle >> >> fig = plt.figure() >> ax1 = fig.add_subplot(111) >> # uncomment the following line to see it break >> #ax1.set_xlim((0.2,1)) >> >> # calculate asymmetry of x and y axes: >> x0, y0 = ax1.transAxes.transform((0, 0)) # lower left in pixels >> x1, y1 = ax1.transAxes.transform((1, 1)) # upper right in pixes >> dx = x1 - x0 >> dy = y1 - y0 >> maxd = max(dx, dy) >> width = .15 * maxd / dx >> height = .15 * maxd / dy >> # a circle you expect to be a circle, but it is not >> ax1.add_artist(Circle((.5, .5), .15)) >> # an ellipse you expect to be an ellipse, but it's a circle >> ax1.add_artist(Ellipse((.75, .75), width, height)) >> >> plt.show() > > > I suppose the problem is that ax1.transAxes.transform commands return the > same numbers, regardless of whether I've changed the limits or not. Is > there an easy and clean way to fix this (perhaps a different command for > getting x0,y0,x1, and y1)? > > Thanks for the help! > > Best, > Brad > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > LogMeIn Central: Instant, anywhere, Remote PC access and management. > Stay in control, update software, and manage PCs from one command center > Diagnose problems and improve visibility into emerging IT issues > Automate, monitor and manage. Do more in less time with Central > http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein12331_d2d > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-users mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users > >
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Jason Grout <jas...@cr...>wrote: > On 11/5/12 3:19 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Brad Malone <bra...@gm... > > <mailto:bra...@gm...>> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I am trying to plot some small circles in my plotting window, in > > addition to the curves I'm already plotting. If I don't want to set > > my x- and y- axis scales equal to each other, a naive drawing of a > > circle results in an ellipse. To fix this problem I found some nice > > example code online here : > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9230389/why-is-matplotlib-plotting-my-circles-as-ovals > , > > which solves the problem by basically plotting an ellipse, but an > > ellipse which will look like a circle in the display window. > > > > That works all fine for me, but then, if I change my xlim or ylim > > using ax1.set_xlim((something1,something2)) then the solution no > > longer works, and I get an ellipse. > > > > A minimal example showing the breaking behavior can be seen below. > > > > > > I am probably gonna reply to that stackoverflow question with a better > > response... > > > > Essentially, you want a similar behavior to the markers in the scatter > > plots, right? As you zoom or resize the plot, the circle markers stay > > as circles and have the same size relative to the size of the figure. > > If that is what you want, the way to do that is very easy. > > > > ax1.scatter([0.5], [0.5], s=30) > > > > Or whatever size you want (units of points). > > I think the units are points^2, i.e., area of the circle... > > Thanks, > > Jason > > Right, thank you. I keep forgetting that. Ben Root
On 11/5/12 3:19 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Brad Malone <bra...@gm... > <mailto:bra...@gm...>> wrote: > > Hello, > > I am trying to plot some small circles in my plotting window, in > addition to the curves I'm already plotting. If I don't want to set > my x- and y- axis scales equal to each other, a naive drawing of a > circle results in an ellipse. To fix this problem I found some nice > example code online here : > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9230389/why-is-matplotlib-plotting-my-circles-as-ovals, > which solves the problem by basically plotting an ellipse, but an > ellipse which will look like a circle in the display window. > > That works all fine for me, but then, if I change my xlim or ylim > using ax1.set_xlim((something1,something2)) then the solution no > longer works, and I get an ellipse. > > A minimal example showing the breaking behavior can be seen below. > > > I am probably gonna reply to that stackoverflow question with a better > response... > > Essentially, you want a similar behavior to the markers in the scatter > plots, right? As you zoom or resize the plot, the circle markers stay > as circles and have the same size relative to the size of the figure. > If that is what you want, the way to do that is very easy. > > ax1.scatter([0.5], [0.5], s=30) > > Or whatever size you want (units of points). I think the units are points^2, i.e., area of the circle... Thanks, Jason
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Brad Malone <bra...@gm...> wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to plot some small circles in my plotting window, in addition > to the curves I'm already plotting. If I don't want to set my x- and y- > axis scales equal to each other, a naive drawing of a circle results in an > ellipse. To fix this problem I found some nice example code online here : > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9230389/why-is-matplotlib-plotting-my-circles-as-ovals, > which solves the problem by basically plotting an ellipse, but an ellipse > which will look like a circle in the display window. > > That works all fine for me, but then, if I change my xlim or ylim using > ax1.set_xlim((something1,something2)) then the solution no longer works, > and I get an ellipse. > > A minimal example showing the breaking behavior can be seen below. > I am probably gonna reply to that stackoverflow question with a better response... Essentially, you want a similar behavior to the markers in the scatter plots, right? As you zoom or resize the plot, the circle markers stay as circles and have the same size relative to the size of the figure. If that is what you want, the way to do that is very easy. ax1.scatter([0.5], [0.5], s=30) Or whatever size you want (units of points). I hope that helps! Ben Root
Hello, I am trying to plot some small circles in my plotting window, in addition to the curves I'm already plotting. If I don't want to set my x- and y- axis scales equal to each other, a naive drawing of a circle results in an ellipse. To fix this problem I found some nice example code online here : http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9230389/why-is-matplotlib-plotting-my-circles-as-ovals, which solves the problem by basically plotting an ellipse, but an ellipse which will look like a circle in the display window. That works all fine for me, but then, if I change my xlim or ylim using ax1.set_xlim((something1,something2)) then the solution no longer works, and I get an ellipse. A minimal example showing the breaking behavior can be seen below. import matplotlib.pyplot as plt > from matplotlib.patches import Ellipse, Circle > > fig = plt.figure() > ax1 = fig.add_subplot(111) > # uncomment the following line to see it break > #ax1.set_xlim((0.2,1)) > > # calculate asymmetry of x and y axes: > x0, y0 = ax1.transAxes.transform((0, 0)) # lower left in pixels > x1, y1 = ax1.transAxes.transform((1, 1)) # upper right in pixes > dx = x1 - x0 > dy = y1 - y0 > maxd = max(dx, dy) > width = .15 * maxd / dx > height = .15 * maxd / dy > # a circle you expect to be a circle, but it is not > ax1.add_artist(Circle((.5, .5), .15)) > # an ellipse you expect to be an ellipse, but it's a circle > ax1.add_artist(Ellipse((.75, .75), width, height)) > > plt.show() I suppose the problem is that ax1.transAxes.transform commands return the same numbers, regardless of whether I've changed the limits or not. Is there an easy and clean way to fix this (perhaps a different command for getting x0,y0,x1, and y1)? Thanks for the help! Best, Brad
Hi all, I am a newbie in matplotlib and I'd like to use colormap for z-axis. I can use in basic mode but would like to shift the existed colormap - binary - for using in this way: i would not like to set the white color for z=0.0 For describing: I would like to use the binary colormap but without the white color because this color I would like to leave for not-defined value for (x,y). Is it possible to do this? Maybe create new colormap on the basis of the "binary" but without the white color. Any suggestions? Thanks in advance for your help. best, Marian
On 2012年11月02日 16:45:22 +0100, <mat...@li...> wrote: > Message: 5 > Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 12:01:35 +0100 > From: Vlastimil Brom <vla...@gm...> > Subject: Re: [Matplotlib-users] Figures piling up in Tkinter GUI > (1.2.0rc2) > To: mat...@li... > Message-ID: > <CAH...@ma...> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > 2012年11月1日 Hans Bering <han...@ar...>: >> Hello everybody, >> >> I'm building a small Tkinter GUI using matplotlib, in which I have to >> change/update plots quite often depending on user input (with different >> contents & sizes, in different places in the GUI, etc.; but always only >> one figure at a time). >> >> As a first resort, I regenerated the figures with plt.figure(...) >> whenever necessary; unfortunately, the program happily accumulated >> memory with >> every new figure until the computer would no longer cooperate in a >> timely fashion. The following minimal script should demonstrate the >> tendency: >> > ... > > Hi, > I'd recommend to use an embedded plot and only clear and replace its > content [...] > I only roughly adapted that source to use your function and the memory > usage appears to be more effective (although there is some increase > too - as displayed in Process Explorer). Would some variation of the > following work for you? [...] Hi Vlastimil, thanks for your effort; I had tried the approach of clearing & replacing the plot myself, too. Unfortunately, that approach has a different problem: Because of the figure's size, I have to present it with scrollbars, and clearing & reusing the plot does not seem to work when resizing & scrolling the plot. I had posted that problem as a question at Stackoverflow (as http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13197469 ), since I hoped it might be "easier"; i.e., just a misunderstanding on my part of how to wire together the scrollbars/canvas/figure. Please note that, while I also use plt.figure(...) in the post at Stackoverflow, the effect remains the same when using Figure(...) and ax.plot(...). So basically I'm stuck between a rock and a hard place - I can either have the memory issue reported previously; or the plot won't behave properly with scrolling+resizing. I am wondering: Should repeatedly creating Figures in a Tkinter GUI work, and could this be a Matplotlib bug worth mentioning on some bug tracker? Thanks & Regards Hans
It looks like I have found a solution. I work for many hours on a problem before posting so I am surprised I found this only one day after posting my original question. I went digging in places I am not sure I should and came with this command that appears to be a solution to my focus problem. It would be nice to know from an expert if this the recommended method for forcing focus in Matplotlib. The command: fig.canvas.get_tk_widget().focus_force() My original demo code with the new command showing the focus behavior I want: import matplotlib.pyplot as plt plt.ion() fig = plt.figure(figsize=(10,8)) ax = fig.add_axes([.15,.1,.8,.65]) ax.plot([1,2,3]) ax.set_title('Fisrt Plot') fig.canvas.get_tk_widget().focus_force() raw_input('Enter to close and Continue: ') #plt.close(fig) fig2 = plt.figure(figsize=(10,8)) ax = fig2.add_axes([.15,.1,.8,.65]) ax.plot([1,2,3]) ax.set_title('Second Plot') fig2.canvas.get_tk_widget().focus_force() raw_input('Enter to close and Continue: ') #plt.close(fig2) fig.canvas.get_tk_widget().focus_force() raw_input('Enter to close and Continue: ') Bob Kestner -- View this message in context: http://matplotlib.1069221.n5.nabble.com/Force-focus-on-Figure-tp39652p39654.html Sent from the matplotlib - users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
In an Qt application I am extending, I display a list of thumbnails, selecting a thumbnail opens a plot window with the source of the thumbnail. I a newbie at all this but did manage to write a simple widget which embedded a matplotlib FigureCanvas. It appears that I also need to code the zoom to rectangle and save view functionality I like in the default plot window. I have no idea if this is easy or hard, so thought it may just be easier be able to reuse the default plotting window. When I show() a plot form within a Qt application I get the following message printed on the console: QCoreApplication::exec: The event loop is already running I think I understand the error, obviously the application I calling form control the even loop. I suppose I need to somehow supply a parent window to pylab plot or the show() function. Is there a way to create a plot and show so as not to use the main loop? Thanks. Brickle. --
Hello, I have a package that has many functions that bring up plots to show data and interactive plots to interact with data. How can I have my figures show and both be on top and be in focus? The best way I have found to manage Matplotlib plots in my package is to use interactive mode plt.ion() and pause the program with raw_input() statements to show or interact with the plots. This has been working fine with one exception. I have not been able to figure out how have the plot figure come up and have the figure both be on top and in focus. I am using Window XP,Python 2.5.4, Matplotlib version 1.0.0 with backend Tkagg. Tk has a command focus_force(), I have not been able to find a similar command in Matplotlib. This is a simple example demonstrating the plotting behavior. The second plot is rendered but is not in windows focus. import matplotlib.pyplot as plt plt.ion() fig = plt.figure(figsize=(10,8)) ax = fig.add_axes([.15,.1,.8,.65]) ax.plot([1,2,3]) ax.set_title('Fisrt Plot') raw_input('Enter to close and Continue: ') plt.close(fig) fig2 = plt.figure(figsize=(10,8)) ax = fig2.add_axes([.15,.1,.8,.65]) ax.plot([1,2,3]) ax.set_title('Second Plot') raw_input('Enter to close and Continue: ') plt.close(fig2) Thank you, Bob Kestner
Hi all, I am aware when using overlapping axes twinx I can only pick the objects in the active axes. I would like to pick objects (lines) in both axes. Does anyone have the workaround to this problem Regards, Arek
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Alexandr <o.p...@gm...> wrote: > Benjamin Root <ben.root@...> writes: > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Benjamin Root <ben.root <at> ou.edu> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Richard Hofmeister <richard.hofmeister- > 3jV...@pu...> wrote: > > Hello mplot3d specialists,I would like to change the aspect ratio of the > 3d > axes similar to matlab's functionality with daspect() or the > 'dataaspectratio' > property of 3d-axes.In the end, the x-y-plane should be non-square due to > different lengths (not range) of the x and y axis (i know that i can use > the > aspect property of the axes to set the x-z/y-z aspect ratio).There is also > the > package "scitools", which provides all the matlab-3d functions including > daspect > via a VTK-backend; that would be my next try.For the simple 3d-plotting > without > fancy shading, i would like to stick to mplot3d: > > > > > > > > Is it possible to change the axis lengths/aspect ratios > independently?Richard > > > > > > > > > > Richard,Good question. I have never thought about such a feature for > mplot3d. Looking back at the code, it does not appear to be feasible to > do in > its current state, as the code seems to assume that the 3d grid is a > constructed > from a unit cube. However, I will see if I can add aspect multipliers to > the > point calculation and get arbitrary aspects. Maybe I can get that feature > added > into the upcoming 1.1.0 release.Ben Root > > > > > > > > > > Richard,I took a look at how this might be implemented. There would > have to > be some extra work to make the plots look right when experiencing changes > in > aspect. I first tried an implementation of just the plot box aspect ratio > (pbaspect) as a member variable of the axes object. It will probably turn > into > a property so that I can link it with a daspect value. Also, the values > should > be normalized to 1, unless you want to see some interesting > shrinkage/growth of > your plot area.Try my branch here: > https://github.com/WeatherGod/matplotlib/tree/mplot3d/pbaspectAfterbuilding > that branch, try the following script (shamelessly adapted from some > Matlab help > pages for pbaspect and daspect).import matplotlib.pyplot as pltfrom > mpl_toolkits.mplot3d import Axes3Dimport numpy as npfig = plt.figure()ax = > fig.gca(projection='3d')x, y = np.mgrid[-2:2:.2, -2:2:.2]z = x * > np.exp(-x**2 - > y**2) > > > > ax.plot_surface(x, y, z, rstride=1, cstride=1)ax.pbaspect = [1.0, 1.0, > 0.25]plt.show()While this will squash the z-axis nicely, it does not force > the > z-ticks to be pruned, so it gets a little ugly. However, the axis ticks > can be > changed manually. Also, with some of my other changes coming soon, it > should be > possible for the Axes3D object to automatically adjust the spacing of the > tick > labels so that it is not impacted by the changes in aspect ratio in the > perpendicular direction (i.e. - the x and y tick labels are closer to the > axis > due to the z-axis scaling).Keep an eye on that branch as I work to improve > this > feature, and feel free to contribute to it as well!Ben Root > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content > > authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image > > Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Matplotlib-users mailing list > > Matplotlib-users@... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users > > > > > Hello! > > I am looking for a tool like pbaspect. The only question is how to > implement it > into matplotlib? Do you have a step by step instruction? > > Thank you. > Regards, > Alexandr > > I guess there has been enough interest in this feature that I probably should devote some time to correctly implementing it. I'll see what I can do! Ben Root
2012年11月1日 Hans Bering <han...@ar...>: > Hello everybody, > > I'm building a small Tkinter GUI using matplotlib, in which I have to > change/update plots quite often depending on user input (with different > contents & sizes, in different places in the GUI, etc.; but always only > one figure at a time). > > As a first resort, I regenerated the figures with plt.figure(...) whenever > necessary; unfortunately, the program happily accumulated memory with > every new figure until the computer would no longer cooperate in a timely > fashion. The following minimal script should demonstrate the tendency: > ... > Now I am wondering if I am missing some detail, e.g., some other clean-up > procedure? Or should this work & could be a memory leak in matplotlib or > Tkinter? And/or is this approach (of generating a new figure every time) > not recommended in the first place? I tried reusing the figure, but some > aspects like changing the layout in the GUI and applying new size and dpi > then proved tricky in their own ways. > > Many thanks in advance, > Hans > Hi, I'd recommend to use an embedded plot and only clear and replace its content (rather than tu use pyplot and recreate the figure multiple times. I believe, changing of the figure should be possible too. see e.g. the sample for tkinter http://matplotlib.org/examples/user_interfaces/embedding_in_tk.html I only roughly adapted that source to use your function and the memory usage appears to be more effective (although there is some increase too - as displayed in Process Explorer). Would some variation of the following work for you? hth, vbr ######################################## #!/usr/bin/env python import matplotlib matplotlib.use('TkAgg') import math from matplotlib.backends.backend_tkagg import FigureCanvasTkAgg, NavigationToolbar2TkAgg from matplotlib.figure import Figure import Tkinter root = Tkinter.Tk() root.wm_title("Embedding in TK") fig = Figure(figsize=(5,4), dpi=100) ax = fig.add_subplot(111) canvas = FigureCanvasTkAgg(fig, master=root) canvas.show() canvas.get_tk_widget().pack(side=Tkinter.TOP, fill=Tkinter.BOTH, expand=1) toolbar = NavigationToolbar2TkAgg( canvas, root ) toolbar.update() canvas._tkcanvas.pack(side=Tkinter.TOP, fill=Tkinter.BOTH, expand=1) plotShift = 0 def replot(): global plotShift, a, f ax.clear() xVals = xrange(100) ax.plot(xVals, [math.sin(x + plotShift) for x in xVals]) fig.canvas.draw() plotShift += 10 button = Tkinter.Button(master=root, text='replot', command=replot) button.pack(side=Tkinter.BOTTOM) Tkinter.mainloop()
Benjamin Root <ben.root@...> writes: > > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Benjamin Root <ben.root <at> ou.edu> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Richard Hofmeister <richard.hofmeister- 3jV...@pu...> wrote: > Hello mplot3d specialists,I would like to change the aspect ratio of the 3d axes similar to matlab's functionality with daspect() or the 'dataaspectratio' property of 3d-axes.In the end, the x-y-plane should be non-square due to different lengths (not range) of the x and y axis (i know that i can use the aspect property of the axes to set the x-z/y-z aspect ratio).There is also the package "scitools", which provides all the matlab-3d functions including daspect via a VTK-backend; that would be my next try.For the simple 3d-plotting without fancy shading, i would like to stick to mplot3d: > > > > Is it possible to change the axis lengths/aspect ratios independently?Richard > > > > > Richard,Good question. I have never thought about such a feature for mplot3d. Looking back at the code, it does not appear to be feasible to do in its current state, as the code seems to assume that the 3d grid is a constructed from a unit cube. However, I will see if I can add aspect multipliers to the point calculation and get arbitrary aspects. Maybe I can get that feature added into the upcoming 1.1.0 release.Ben Root > > > > > Richard,I took a look at how this might be implemented. There would have to be some extra work to make the plots look right when experiencing changes in aspect. I first tried an implementation of just the plot box aspect ratio (pbaspect) as a member variable of the axes object. It will probably turn into a property so that I can link it with a daspect value. Also, the values should be normalized to 1, unless you want to see some interesting shrinkage/growth of your plot area.Try my branch here: https://github.com/WeatherGod/matplotlib/tree/mplot3d/pbaspectAfter building that branch, try the following script (shamelessly adapted from some Matlab help pages for pbaspect and daspect).import matplotlib.pyplot as pltfrom mpl_toolkits.mplot3d import Axes3Dimport numpy as npfig = plt.figure()ax = fig.gca(projection='3d')x, y = np.mgrid[-2:2:.2, -2:2:.2]z = x * np.exp(-x**2 - y**2) > > ax.plot_surface(x, y, z, rstride=1, cstride=1)ax.pbaspect = [1.0, 1.0, 0.25]plt.show()While this will squash the z-axis nicely, it does not force the z-ticks to be pruned, so it gets a little ugly. However, the axis ticks can be changed manually. Also, with some of my other changes coming soon, it should be possible for the Axes3D object to automatically adjust the spacing of the tick labels so that it is not impacted by the changes in aspect ratio in the perpendicular direction (i.e. - the x and y tick labels are closer to the axis due to the z-axis scaling).Keep an eye on that branch as I work to improve this feature, and feel free to contribute to it as well!Ben Root > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content > authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image > Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev > > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-users mailing list > Matplotlib-users@... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users > Hello! I am looking for a tool like pbaspect. The only question is how to implement it into matplotlib? Do you have a step by step instruction? Thank you. Regards, Alexandr
Hello everybody, I'm building a small Tkinter GUI using matplotlib, in which I have to change/update plots quite often depending on user input (with different contents & sizes, in different places in the GUI, etc.; but always only one figure at a time). As a first resort, I regenerated the figures with plt.figure(...) whenever necessary; unfortunately, the program happily accumulated memory with every new figure until the computer would no longer cooperate in a timely fashion. The following minimal script should demonstrate the tendency: --- start of script --- import math from Tkinter import Tk, Button import Tkconstants from matplotlib.backends.backend_tkagg import FigureCanvasTkAgg from matplotlib.figure import Figure from matplotlib import pyplot as plt def replot(): global globalCanvas, globalFigure, plotShift # any variety of clean-up calls if globalFigure is not None: plt.close() globalCanvas.get_tk_widget().destroy() globalFigure.clf() globalFigure = Figure(dpi=120, figsize=(4, 4)) globalCanvas = FigureCanvasTkAgg(globalFigure, master=root) globalCanvas.get_tk_widget().grid(row=0, column=1) xVals = xrange(100) ax = globalFigure.add_subplot(111) ax.plot(xVals, [math.sin(x + plotShift) for x in xVals]) plotShift += 10 # MAIN globalCanvas = None globalFigure = None plotShift = 0 # just to see the plot change root = Tk() draw_button = Button(root, text="Replot", command=replot) draw_button.grid(row=0, column=0, sticky=Tkconstants.N) root.mainloop() --- end of script --- I have tried various clean-up calls, but the effect (of memory piling up) is always the same. Using objgraph (http://mg.pov.lt/objgraph/), I took a look at object counts by adding the following snippet at the end of the "replot" call: --- start of insertion --- import gc import objgraph gc.collect() print "---" for c in ('FigureCanvasTkAgg', 'Figure'): print "{}\t{}".format(len(objgraph.by_type(c)), c) --- end of insertion --- The output shows that the total number of both Figures and FigureCanvasTkAggs increases constantly (i.e., one each after the first call, then two each, etc.), whereas I had expected that old ones get released, and that the count remains at one each. Now I am wondering if I am missing some detail, e.g., some other clean-up procedure? Or should this work & could be a memory leak in matplotlib or Tkinter? And/or is this approach (of generating a new figure every time) not recommended in the first place? I tried reusing the figure, but some aspects like changing the layout in the GUI and applying new size and dpi then proved tricky in their own ways. Many thanks in advance, Hans
Hello Daryl, On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Daryl Herzmann <ak...@gm...> wrote: > Howdy, > > I built basemap 1.0.5 and matplotlib 1.2.0rc3 via the simple command 'python > setup.py bdist_rpm' without an error that I can tell. When I attempt to > install them, I get a conflict between the two. For example: > > file /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/mpl_toolkits/__init__.pyc from > install of basemap-1.0.5-1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package > matplotlib-1.2.0rc3-1.x86_64 > file /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/mpl_toolkits/__init__.pyo from > install of basemap-1.0.5-1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package > matplotlib-1.2.0rc3-1.x86_64 > > Working around this error is easy with some rpm flags, but was curious what > the proper solution for this situation is? In Debian we're dealing with this situation letting 'matplotlib' package owning the "mpl_toolkits" namespace (so only matplotlib will install the __init__.py file in that directory) and basemap will install stuff in "mpl_toolkits/basemap" directory and depending on matplotlib (it requires to NOT install mpl_toolkits/__init__.py file when install basemap, by either remote it when creating the package or similar solution). This way matplotlib package will create the namespace for all the other packages to install modules in it, and avoiding conflicts like the one you described. HTH, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi