You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(56) |
Nov
(65) |
Dec
(37) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(78) |
Mar
(153) |
Apr
(205) |
May
(184) |
Jun
(123) |
Jul
(171) |
Aug
(156) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(223) |
2005 |
Jan
(184) |
Feb
(267) |
Mar
(214) |
Apr
(286) |
May
(320) |
Jun
(299) |
Jul
(348) |
Aug
(283) |
Sep
(355) |
Oct
(293) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(203) |
2006 |
Jan
(352) |
Feb
(358) |
Mar
(403) |
Apr
(313) |
May
(165) |
Jun
(281) |
Jul
(316) |
Aug
(228) |
Sep
(279) |
Oct
(243) |
Nov
(315) |
Dec
(345) |
2007 |
Jan
(260) |
Feb
(323) |
Mar
(340) |
Apr
(319) |
May
(290) |
Jun
(296) |
Jul
(221) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(242) |
Oct
(248) |
Nov
(242) |
Dec
(332) |
2008 |
Jan
(312) |
Feb
(359) |
Mar
(454) |
Apr
(287) |
May
(340) |
Jun
(450) |
Jul
(403) |
Aug
(324) |
Sep
(349) |
Oct
(385) |
Nov
(363) |
Dec
(437) |
2009 |
Jan
(500) |
Feb
(301) |
Mar
(409) |
Apr
(486) |
May
(545) |
Jun
(391) |
Jul
(518) |
Aug
(497) |
Sep
(492) |
Oct
(429) |
Nov
(357) |
Dec
(310) |
2010 |
Jan
(371) |
Feb
(657) |
Mar
(519) |
Apr
(432) |
May
(312) |
Jun
(416) |
Jul
(477) |
Aug
(386) |
Sep
(419) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(320) |
Dec
(202) |
2011 |
Jan
(321) |
Feb
(413) |
Mar
(299) |
Apr
(215) |
May
(284) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(207) |
Aug
(314) |
Sep
(321) |
Oct
(259) |
Nov
(347) |
Dec
(209) |
2012 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(414) |
Mar
(377) |
Apr
(179) |
May
(173) |
Jun
(234) |
Jul
(295) |
Aug
(239) |
Sep
(276) |
Oct
(355) |
Nov
(144) |
Dec
(108) |
2013 |
Jan
(170) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(204) |
Apr
(133) |
May
(142) |
Jun
(89) |
Jul
(160) |
Aug
(180) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(136) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(32) |
2014 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(90) |
Mar
(161) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(78) |
Jun
(94) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(83) |
Sep
(102) |
Oct
(132) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(96) |
2015 |
Jan
(45) |
Feb
(138) |
Mar
(176) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(119) |
Jun
(124) |
Jul
(77) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(9) |
2016 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2025 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
1
(22) |
2
(14) |
3
(3) |
4
(2) |
5
(2) |
6
(3) |
7
(2) |
8
(5) |
9
(19) |
10
(9) |
11
(8) |
12
(4) |
13
(14) |
14
(5) |
15
(4) |
16
(8) |
17
(4) |
18
(5) |
19
(4) |
20
(17) |
21
(14) |
22
(15) |
23
(7) |
24
(6) |
25
|
26
(1) |
27
(4) |
28
(5) |
29
(6) |
30
(8) |
31
(3) |
|
Hello John, >Axel, try replacing the FigureManagerTkAgg code in >site-packages/matplotlib/backends/backend_tkagg.py with the following > > > Perfect. Problem solved ! Best wishes and a merry Christmas, Axel
Hi, Based on John's advice in a previous post about designing an Arrow class (http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=9962785), i have restarted from scratch, defining the stem as a Line2D instance and the head as a RegularPolygon instance (for now, a triangle). I can correctly set the orientation of the arrow head, and from debugging information, the class seems to be basically working. The class is imported in axes.py and i have defined the new methods add_arrow() and arrow() in Axes. Arrows are stored in a list called arrows (i know John advised to avoid the overhead of that---i am simply trying to get it to work first). Now, i know i am missing something (and this must be at the heart of matplotlib): how are 'figure coordinates' transformed into 'axes corrdinates'? I guess it has to do with the 'transforms' module but.... For instance, if i say arrow( [0,1], [0,1] ) with the intent of drawing an arrow from (0,0) to (1,1), i can't see the graphical result. Now if i say arrow( [0,100], [0,100] ) I can see something (the arrow head). And this may or may not be the source of my 2nd problem: the arrow head is drawn, but not the stem (as in the thread linked to above). The draw() method of my Arrow class is very simple: self._stem.draw(renderer) self._head.draw(renderer) Any help would be greatly appreciated. I'll be happy to add spiff to the Arrow class once i have a basic version of it working and contribute it to matplotlib. I can post some code if you would like; i just thought it would be too long in a mailing list... Thanks, Dominique ps: Thanks for the matplotlib manual! -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.6.3 - Release Date: 12/21/2004
Hi Arnd, John, all, Thanks for the profiling information on WX and WXAgg backends, and sorry I haven't been able to participate in this conversation more. I've been running experiments for several weeks, and am definitely looking forward to a break! Hopefully I'll be able to devote some time to this in January. I'm really not a wx or matplotlib expert, buit I am definitely interested in getting WX or WXAgg to go faster. Re-drawing line scans at 15Hz would be plenty fast enough for my needs but I would like that to include rescaling the axes as well as updating the line (which is what most of the current benchmarks test). Refreshing relatively small images at 1Hz would be OK for me - I think that's already good enough for me. Also, I'll have to admit my timeframe is probably going to be slower than many people on this list! So if you or someone else wants to jump in, that would be fine with me. I agree that the Agg rendering itself does not seem like the bottleneck for WXAgg. Partly because of that, I'm assuming that the WXAgg will be good enough for my needs (as opposed to completely rewriting backend_wx) and that getting to GTKAgg level of performance would be the goal. I also agree that the best solution is likely to mean converting the Agg image (pixBuffer??) into the wx.bitmap in c++. I'm not sure I have a firm grasp on how exactly to do that, but it's worth trying. --Matt
>>>>> "imaginee1" == imaginee1 <ima...@gm...> writes: imaginee1> Hi, after spending a nice afternoon profiling the imaginee1> dynamic examples and looking a bit through the code, we imaginee1> can make a few comments on the performace of the wx imaginee1> backends. We have used kcachegrind to display the imaginee1> results of hotshot - all files can be found under imaginee1> http://www.physik.tu-dresden.de/~baecker/tmp/profiling/ Hi Arnd, thanks for your profiling information - I very much like the hotshot graphs! I just have two comments. All of your suggestions are imminently reasonable. The major problem is that the wx backend has been mostly rudderless since Jeremy, the author, stopped maintaining it, though I've filled in when I can. Matthew Newville has recently signed on as the new maintainer and has CVS commit privileges, but I don't know how much time he has to address these issues right now. I don't have any extra time to devote to wx optimizations, currently. If you would like to do some work here, I would be happy to add you to the developers list. The second point is that in your previous email you appeared to indicate that GTK wasn't a good option for you because many of your students use win32. I use the gtk backend on win32 - you have to run the GTK runtime installer and the pygtk installer, but it otherwise works great, and the matplotlib gtk extension code is compiled into the matplotlib win32 installer. There are install instructions for win32 at http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/backends.html#GTK . JDH
>>>>> "Michel" == Michel Sanner <sa...@sc...> writes: Michel> Hello, I finally got around to play with matplotlib and Michel> try to create node for using it within Vision (my visual Michel> programming environemnt). Hi Michel, It's excellent to hear that you are trying to incorporate matplotlib! Only good things can come of stress testing matplotlib in such a sophisticated environment. Michel> I was wondering if there is a way the clear the area used Michel> by a given subplot. cla() seesm the clear the data, but Michel> the axis and background remain. The reason I am asking is Michel> that I envisioned that in my networks I would like to be Michel> able to create a Figure using one node and then have say a Michel> Histogram node be placed in a subplot and a scatter plot Michel> in another subplot (in the same figure). Now if the Michel> Histogram node has a subplot parameter which can be Michel> modified by the user to move this particular graph to Michel> another location in the picture I need to get ride of what Michel> I drew in the previous location, but since parts of the Michel> figure might be generated by other nodes in the network I Michel> would not want to clear the whole figure. I see what you are trying to do and there is no support in the current release for this. However, it will be mostly trivial to add, and definitely useful, so I can quickly put it in for the next release. Before doing so, it would help for me to know if you are using the OO interface (eg examples/embedding_in_tk.py) or the pylab (formerly matplotlib.matlab). The latter does a fair amount of magic under the scenes managing the current figure and axes and so is not the best for embedding in an application. It thus requires more work to delete an axes, since there is a separate figure/axes management layer. Do you envision providing a scripting interface to your Vision users, in which case the pylab interface probably makes sense, or will you ultimately be maintaining control over the creation of figure windows and axes and providing a GUI layer to your users, in which case the OO embedded approach makes sense. Note that if all you want to do is move the subplot in a figure, all you need to do is call ax = subplot(211) ax.set_position((left,bottom,width,height)) where l,b,w,h are fractions of the figure width and height. If you want to drag and drop axes from one figure to another, which is reasonable, then additional work will need to be done to remove the axes from one and add to another. Sharing a subplot in two figures will probably remain unsupported, but with a little work you could move one from one figure to another. Note that matplotlib.axes.Subplot is a special case of matplotlib.axes.Axes, and each are placed with l,b,w,h. The difference is that subplot does the l,b,w,h computation for you -- see examples/axes_demo.py. On an related note, the ticklabels in your screenshot appeared a little crowded. You may want to take a look at http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/faq.html#TEXTOVERLAP . Michel> Another question was whether it is possible to find out Michel> the figure number from the figure handle ? If I pass the Michel> Figure instance between nodes to tell drawing node in Michel> which figure to place their graphical output I need a way Michel> to active the figure that comes as an input. Currently I Michel> add a number attribute to the figure when I create it in Michel> the figure node. The Figure class doesn't have a concept of number, but the FigureManager does. In the pylab interface, calls to make a new figure create a new FigureManager (abstract class in backend_bases.FigureManager, concrete classes in the various matplotlib/backends/backend_something.py). The figure manager has a few public attributes you can access manager = get_current_fig_manager() manager.num # what you are after manager.canvas # a backend_bases.FigureCanvasBase concrete impl manager.window # the GUI window, eg tk.Window As I alluded to above though, depending on your ultimate goals, once you get past the playing stage you *may* want to forgo the pylab interface (which the figure manager is designed for) in exchange for the control of the OO interface. Note that a new examples/embedding_in_tk2.py was recently added to CVS which shows how to use tk matplotlib with the default toolbar in a tk app. There is an unreleased users guide in progress, and it has some more details and schematics on how matplotlib is organized. http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/matplotlib/users_guide/users_guide.pdf?rev=1.3 Michel> Thanks for any input .. and congratualtion on the very Michel> nice package ! High praise coming from you! Thanks. JDH
Hello, I finally got around to play with matplotlib and try to create node for using it within Vision (my visual programming environemnt). I was wondering if there is a way the clear the area used by a given subplot. cla() seesm the clear the data, but the axis and background remain. The reason I am asking is that I envisioned that in my networks I would like to be able to create a Figure using one node and then have say a Histogram node be placed in a subplot and a scatter plot in another subplot (in the same figure). Now if the Histogram node has a subplot parameter which can be modified by the user to move this particular graph to another location in the picture I need to get ride of what I drew in the previous location, but since parts of the figure might be generated by other nodes in the network I would not want to clear the whole figure. Another question was whether it is possible to find out the figure number from the figure handle ? If I pass the Figure instance between nodes to tell drawing node in which figure to place their graphical output I need a way to active the figure that comes as an input. Currently I add a number attribute to the figure when I create it in the figure node. Thanks for any input .. and congratualtion on the very nice package ! -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- o / Michel F. Sanner Ph.D. The Scripps Research Institute o Associate Professor Department of Molecular Biology \ 10550 North Torrey Pines Road o Tel. (858) 784-2341 La Jolla, CA 92037 / Fax. (858) 784-2860 o sa...@sc... http://www.scripps.edu/~sanner -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> "John" == John Hunter <jdh...@ac...> writes: John> I made some small changes which helped here - eg, deferring John> the initialization of the LUTs until they are actually John> requested. This shaved 0.3 s off startup time on my system. John> With Todd's help, I also made some changes in the core John> "fromarray" in extension code which delivered some speedups, John> and removed some extra checks in the colormapping code which John> are not needed for data that are properly normalized. I John> also think I found and fixed redundant calls to draw in some John> backends due to improper event handling and hold handling John> that crept into 0.65. Well, Xavier Gnata just pointed out to me off list that almost half the cost of the default image handling was in the normalization calls to min and max. After a little poking around, I discovered we were using python's min and max here, which means sequence API. Ouch! So we get another 2x speedup on top of the numbers I just posted using default normalization and colormapping. # GTKAgg default normalization and colormapping # 0.65 matplotlib 0.65 figimage : 9.97s matplotlib 0.65 imshow : 9.91s # optimization numbers in my last post matplotlib figimage : 5.23s matplotlib imshow : 5.18s # as above but using nxmin and nxmax matplotlib figimage : 2.21s matplotlib imshow : 2.24s So out of the box the next matplotlib will be more than 4x faster than the last release for images. A long way from MIDAS and IRAF, but still satisfying for a day's work. JDH
On Dec 21, 2004, at 1:02 PM, Xavier Gnata wrote: > > Hi, > > Please consider this code in colors.py (from 546) : > if vmin is None or vmax is None: > rval = ravel(val) > if vmin is None: > vmin = min(rval) > if vmax is None: > vmax = max(rval) > > On my computer to be much faster without using rval : > > if vmin is None or vmax is None: > #rval = ravel(val) > if vmin is None: > vmin = val.min() > if vmax is None: > vmax = val.max() > But note that .min and .max are only supported under numarray (I believe). There are a number of things we would like to take advantage of (especially with regard to array indexing) that we can't in matplotlib since the code must work with both Numeric and numarray. Perry
>>>>> "Perry" == Perry Greenfield <pe...@st...> writes: Perry> As John later alluded to, the time for the window to come Perry> up is a one time cost if you are running from an Perry> interactive prompt. It shouldn't be paid for subsequent Perry> display updates. I made some small changes which helped here - eg, deferring the initialization of the LUTs until they are actually requested. This shaved 0.3 s off startup time on my system. With Todd's help, I also made some changes in the core "fromarray" in extension code which delivered some speedups, and removed some extra checks in the colormapping code which are not needed for data that are properly normalized. I also think I found and fixed redundant calls to draw in some backends due to improper event handling and hold handling that crept into 0.65. Here are my current numbers for a 1600x1600 image # GTKAgg default normalization and colormapping matplotlib 0.65 figimage : 9.97s matplotlib 0.65 imshow : 9.91s matplotlib CVS figimage : 5.23s matplotlib CVS imshow : 5.18s # GTKAgg prenormalized data and default ("hot") colormapping matplotlib 0.65 figimage : 3.46s matplotlib 0.65 imshow : 3.37s matplotlib CVS figimage : 1.95s matplotlib CVS imshow : 2.01s # GTKAgg prenormalized data and custom grayscale colormapping matplotlib 0.65 figimage : 2.05s matplotlib 0.65 imshow : 1.95s matplotlib CVS figimage : 1.15s matplotlib CVS imshow : 1.21s So the situation is improving. As I noted before, interaction with plots via the toolbar should also be notably faster. This would make a good FAQ.... JDH
Hi, Please consider this code in colors.py (from 546) : if vmin is None or vmax is None: rval = ravel(val) if vmin is None: vmin = min(rval) if vmax is None: vmax = max(rval) On my computer to be much faster without using rval : if vmin is None or vmax is None: #rval = ravel(val) if vmin is None: vmin = val.min() if vmax is None: vmax = val.max() I am now able to do a "A=rand(2000,2000) figimage(A)" in a almost acceptable duration. Hope this helps Xavier. ps : may be in double. sorry.
Hi, after spending a nice afternoon profiling the dynamic examples and looking a bit through the code, we can make a few comments on the performace of the wx backends. We have used kcachegrind to display the results of hotshot - all files can be found under http://www.physik.tu-dresden.de/~baecker/tmp/profiling/ WXAgg (http://www.physik.tu-dresden.de/~baecker/tmp/wxagg.png): WxAgg leaves the composition of the plot frame to the agg backend and blits the calculated picture to the screen. The agg backend seems to be quite efficient since we could not find any predominant bottleneck. But, agg and wx use different image formats, therefore the picture has to be transformed using wx.Image.ConvertToBitmap which is a deprecated wx method. On the other hand, gtk-agg uses the C++ routine agg_to_gtk_drawable which seems to be faster. Optimising the agg to wxPython conversion could lead to a similar speedup. Because wxAgg leaves the drawing to agg it is faster than the wx backend. WX (http://www.physik.tu-dresden.de/~baecker/tmp/profiling/wx.png): As Chris Barker correctly presumed the wx backend doesn't do any caching. Therefore about 15% of program time is spent in the freetype2 library (ft2font.FT2Font) and another 7% for changing wxPens wxBrushes and sizes. So storing all this information on the python level (and only altering it if there is a change) would lead to a first performance increase. (draw_text and set_foreground branch in the picture) The wx device context (wxDC) is not passed as local variable or instanced as global but selected for every drawing operation and unselected afterwards. (new_gc branch) The drawXXXs (note the plural) commands in wx expect the input to be an array of points. The following line of code is from the wx-backend. > gc.DrawLines([wxPoint(int(x[i]), self.height - int(y[i])) for i in range(len(x))]) Avoiding the explicit loop and vectorizing the expression should give another speed increase (_draw_solid branch). Best, Nikolai and Arnd -- +++ Sparen Sie mit GMX DSL +++ http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl AKTION für Wechsler: DSL-Tarife ab 3,99 EUR/Monat + Startguthaben
On Dec 20, 2004, at 3:55 AM, Eric Emsellem wrote: > Sorry to get into this discussion so late. > sterday I tried with a 1600x1600 pixels image. NOTE: this is a very > reasonable > size (and typical) in my work and I expect much much bigger ones in a > near future > (up to 20 000 x 20 000). > Wow, I want your 20Kx20K image display! Seriously, it sounds like you do not intend to display the whole thing at once. In that case I would consider doing the slicing and reduction outside of matplotlib and then displaying the subsampled or sliced region using the size of the window. Applying color transformations on the whole image is going to result in a lot of wasted cpu time. I also recognize that 1.6K^2 displays are not that unreasonable so reasonable performance with this size is something one wants to achieve. > ==> Matplotlib takes ~20 seconds to display it !!! > (after 12 seconds the window opens, and then it takes > another 8 seconds to be displayed) > As John later alluded to, the time for the window to come up is a one time cost if you are running from an interactive prompt. It shouldn't be paid for subsequent display updates. > (as compared to less than .2 sec for Midas, Iraf and others so a > factor of 100 at least!!! > and less than a second using the ppgplot routines). > For better understanding the comparison, when you use Midas, what are you displaying to? It's been a long, long, time since I've used Midas so I forget (or likely, it's changed) how image display is done. Are you using DS9, ximtool or SAOIMAGE? Or a different display mechanism? By the way, we do have a module that allows displaying numarray images to DS9 and related image display programs (google numdisplay). But if you are hoping to combine matplotlib features with image display, this isn't going to help much. But if you are looking mainly to use DS9 or ximtool features, you can just use them directly and save yourself the trouble of trying to emulate them (not that wouldn't be a nice thing to have for matplotlib). Perry
just to answer your question: >You still haven't answered my question if you typically want grayscale >or colormapped images .... > > I am using colourmaps. Usually a 256 levels is usually more than enough! Here is what I did when I transformed the midas lut and itt files (3 columns RGB in ascii files see below) into local python lut (pglut for ppgplot lut). I am now thinking of using another suggestion (from Arnd) on top of what you said. If the image is very large then I only load the central region in imshow (so I extract the central part, ''central'' meaning center with respect to some predefined center, by default the centre of the image). Then if I want to see the full image in the window I scale it (factor N) by only plotting 1 out of N pixels.... This should reproduce what Midas did I think (not so sure, but Midas has a timed display of < 0.2 sec there in fact whatever the scale is / size of the window) One note from a local neird: it seems that the normalisation (colour.py) in the matplotlib 0.65 version is doing a divide by (vmax - vmin) and this was timed to be quite long (see previous mails...). But a numarray division should be instantaneous even for such a big image so there is something wrong there. Maytbe first do : dv = vmax - vmin and divide by dv? (maybe this is not the reason, using ''divide" and '/' may be different too?) Eric """###################################### # MIDAS-LIKE LUT and ITT ######################################""" class MidasLut: def __init__(self): self.LUT_PATH = '/soft/python/pcral/plotutils/midaslut/' self.R = arange(256)/255. self.G = arange(256)/255. self.B = arange(256)/255. self.L = arange(256)/255. def lut(self,name): sname = str(name) sname = self.LUT_PATH+sname+".lasc" if os.path.isfile(sname): f = open(sname) list = f.readlines() for i in range(256): self.R[i] = float(list[i].split()[0]) self.G[i] = float(list[i].split()[1]) self.B[i] = float(list[i].split()[2]) f.close else : print 'ERROR: Lut file', name,'does not exist' def itt(name): sname = str(name) sname = LUT_PATH+sname+".iasc" if os.path.isfile(sname): f = open(sname) list = f.readlines() for i in range(256): L[i] = float(list[i].split()[0]) f.close else : print 'ERROR: ITT file', name,'does not exist' pglut = MidasLut() -- =============================================================== Observatoire de Lyon ems...@ob... 9 av. Charles-Andre tel: +33 4 78 86 83 84 69561 Saint-Genis Laval Cedex fax: +33 4 78 86 83 86 France http://www-obs.univ-lyon1.fr/eric.emsellem ===============================================================
Hi Eric, On 2004年12月21日, Eric Emsellem wrote: > Hi again, > thanks a lot for the fixing and comments on figimage. This looks much > much better now. Indeed a local matplotlib user had also pointed > out to me the time it spent on cmap. > > By the way, the problem I have now is that I would like to have a quick > way of looking at my images (the 1600x1600) but being able to > size it INTO the actual opened window (so basically this calls for using > imshow > and not figimage). Just a few thoughts: - you could gain a speed-up by displaying a reduced image, e.g. by passing image_mat[::2,::2] which would correspond to a 800x800 image (but latest when zooming one would need the full image ;-(. - maybe you have to code the zooming youself in terms of figimage (In particular if you are still aiming at the 20000x20000 case) - Is it right that from imshow you would only need the """ extent is a data xmin, xmax, ymin, ymax for making image plots registered with data plots. Default is the image dimensions in pixels"""? Somehow I would guess that this should not be a part which is too slow, so maybe one could do something like this (without any interpolation) also for figimage. Not-more-than-0.5-cents-this-time-ly yours, Arnd
Hi again, thanks a lot for the fixing and comments on figimage. This looks much much better now. Indeed a local matplotlib user had also pointed out to me the time it spent on cmap. By the way, the problem I have now is that I would like to have a quick way of looking at my images (the 1600x1600) but being able to size it INTO the actual opened window (so basically this calls for using imshow and not figimage). Just to be clear here is what I usually do (e.g. with Midas): 1/ I create a display window with the size (and location on my desktop) I wish 2/ I ''load'' my big image in there. Depending on the size it will take the full window or not. 3/ then depending on the region I wish to look at I scale and recenter the image to e.g., have it all in the window or just zoom in some regions. 4/ then I can interact with the cursor to e.g. make a cut of the image (and display it in another window) or get some coordinates so this would look like this in Midas: 1/ create/disp 1 600,600 # create the display window number 1 with 600x600 px 2/ load image.fits # load the image: from a fits file 3/ load image.fits scale=-2 center=0,0 # center the image at coord 0,0 and # scale it down by a factor of 2, (- = down, + = up) 4/ get/curs #activate the cursor on the image so that a click # prints out the corresponding coordinates By using imshow in matplotlib I think I can solve all these things (and as soon as the .key fields are activated so I can use the keyboard to interact with the display), but then it will show again its very slow behaviour (interpolation, etc...) ? Would there be a way to have such a command but with a much quicker loading / interacting? (note that the pan and zoom things would probably do it - although it would need to keep the coordinates right so there is no confusion there - , but at the moment this is not usable in imshow with large images as it is much too slow) Cheers, Eric -- =============================================================== Observatoire de Lyon ems...@ob... 9 av. Charles-Andre tel: +33 4 78 86 83 84 69561 Saint-Genis Laval Cedex fax: +33 4 78 86 83 86 France http://www-obs.univ-lyon1.fr/eric.emsellem ===============================================================
On Saturday 18 December 2004 08:25 pm, John Hunter wrote: Thanks John, I got that working and spent some time fiddling with the classic toolbar as well. It seems to fit my current needs better thant the new toolbar. However, it appears to be a bit more tied to the pylab interface. My trials at extraplating from the changes you made for the new interface foundered. I need to spend more time getting up to speed on other items, such as adding menus for user file selection, etc. My application involves potentially long time series, perhaps months or even years long, of flow or water-surface elevation. It would be nice to be able to quickly pan through the series at a large scale looking for details that might need correction or where the modeling does an especially poor job. I'm continuing to poke and prode on the source and the draft guide has helped out on getting a better overview on what is going on. Clearly OOP can be obscure at first. It is sometimes unclear where the actual work gets done. > >>>>> "Delbert" == Delbert D Franz <iq...@so...> writes: > > Delbert> Quite impressed with matplotlib but the learning curve is > Delbert> steep and I am feeling my way along a tortuous cave in > Delbert> dim light!! > > Well it appears you are doing a good job of it. Fortunately, there's > often someone around here to strike a match if you lose your way. > Documentation is scant, especially on the OO / application embedding > side. Make sure you have at least read through > examples/pythonic_matplotlib.py in the examples subdirectory of the > source distribution, and here is a link to a draft version of the > users guide > http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/matplotlib/users_guide/users_guide.pdf?rev=1.3 > > But these will be no substitute for opening up > matplotlib/backends/backend_tkagg.py and learning by example. Ie, if > you want to figure out how to embed a toolbar in tkagg, the best > reference is often the source code, which does just that. > > Well, often, but not always. This list is another good resource to > turn to. I myself did not know how to do it for tkagg since I didn't > write that backend. So I read through the source and found that the > tkagg toolbar in the current implementation is actually weakly tied to > the pylab interface in that is uses a variable called figman, which is > a reference to the "FigureManager" which is a class pylab uses to > manage figures. > > No worries, it was trivial to factor out this dependence, and at the > end of this email, I'll attach a modified backend_tkagg.py which you > can drop into site-packages/matplotlib/backends that enables the > toolbar to work with matplotlib embedded in tk apps. It was a trivial > change. I'll also attach some example code showing you how to use > it. > > The example code includes the exact toolbar that matplotlib uses. Of > course, you'll probably want to customize the toolbar, maybe to add > some widgets of your own. To do that, you'll want to subclass > NavigationToolbar2TkAgg, override the default _init_toolbar method to > create the buttons and widgets you need, and define functions that > will be called when your custom buttons are clicked, eg myfunction > below. Since you're an avowed OO newbie, I'll give a sketch of that > approach below, which is untested code meant merely to shine a dim > light. But the example I'm including below, embedding_in_tk2.py, does > work, and adds the default matplotlib toolbar to a tk/matplotlib app. > Surprisingly, you appear to be the first person to ever attempt to > embed the tkagg toolbar2 into your own app. > > So here is how you might go about customizing a toolbar > > from backend_tkagg import NavigationToolbar2TkAgg > > class MyToolbar(NavigationToolbar2TkAgg) > def _init_toolbar(self): > # this was all copied verbatim from backend_tkagg.py > xmin, xmax = self.canvas.figure.bbox.intervalx().get_bounds() > height, width = 50, xmax-xmin > Tk.Frame.__init__(self, master=self.window, > width=width, height=height, > borderwidth=2) > > self.update() # Make axes menu > > self.bHome = self._Button( text="Home", file="home.ppm", > command=self.home) > > self.bBack = self._Button( text="Back", file="back.ppm", > command = self.back) > > self.bForward = self._Button(text="Forward", file="forward.ppm", > command = self.forward) > > self.bPan = self._Button( text="Pan", file="move.ppm", > command = self.pan) > > self.bZoom = self._Button( text="Zoom", > file="zoom_to_rect.ppm", > command = self.zoom) > > self.bsave = self._Button( text="Save", file="filesave.ppm", > command = self.save_figure) > > ### now I'm going to add a custom button that calls myfunction > self.mybutton = self._Button( text="Save", file="myicon.ppm", > command = self.myfunction) > self.message = Tk.StringVar(master=self) > self._message_label = Tk.Label(master=self, textvariable=self.message) > self._message_label.pack(side=Tk.RIGHT) > self.pack(side=Tk.BOTTOM, fill=Tk.X) > > def myfunction(self, *args): > # this function is called when "mybutton" is clicked > print "You clicked me!" > > > Now, all you need to do is create a MyToolbar instance rather than a > NavigationToolbar2Tkagg instance in the example code > embedding_in_tk2.py. > > Delbert> After 41 years in software development, I get to OOP and > Delbert> Python!! Most of my usage has and will be Fortran but I > Delbert> have a smattering of C (a few months on an 8-bit > Delbert> machine), a log of PL/1 a long time ago, some PDP 8-I > Delbert> assembly, and Basic. I have not used C++ and do not plan > Delbert> to do so. > > It's a long hard road I plowed myself. I cut my teeth on an A/D > controller and 8 channel digital oscilloscope that I wrote entirely > from scratch in quick basic -- not a single external library to help > me out -- with which I did all my experiments for my dissertation. I > also did a lot of numerical analysis purely in FORTRAN in those days. > Unlike you, I did willingly learn C++ after all that and it was > sunlight to me after years in the dark -- it appeared designed to > solve all the problems I had experienced firsthand in my years of > coding BASIC and FORTRAN. But you do predate me - I've never touched > a PL/1 or PDP 8. > > Anyway, you may find yourself backing away from the "and will be" part > of your statement above. Time will tell. > > Hope this helps - feel free to post again when and if you get stuck. > > JDH > >
>>>>> "Dominique" == Dominique Orban <Dom...@po...> writes: Dominique> I have also tried to resize the image but the same is Dominique> happening. Should i reset the origin of the image Dominique> manually somewhere? This bug was mentioned and fixed in the figimage code I submitted in the earlier post. Sorry if it wasn't clear. Here is the modified function again; replace the pytlab.py function by the same name # the modified figimage function def figimage(*args, **kwargs): # allow callers to override the hold state by passing hold=True|False try: ret = gcf().figimage(*args, **kwargs) except ValueError, msg: msg = raise_msg_to_str(msg) error_msg(msg) raise RuntimeError(msg) except RuntimeError, msg: msg = raise_msg_to_str(msg) error_msg(msg) raise RuntimeError(msg) draw_if_interactive() gci._current = ret return ret figimage.__doc__ = Figure.figimage.__doc__ + """ Addition kwargs: hold = [True|False] overrides default hold state""" -------------------------------------------------------
Hi John, I looked over the diffs and they look fine; your analysis sounds plausible to me. I'll try to reproduce the problem using the test script and see if your fix removes it. If so, I'll go ahead and commit the changes. Todd On Mon, 2004年12月20日 at 13:12 -0600, John Hunter wrote: > >>>>> "Axel" == Axel Kowald <A.K...@gm...> writes: > Axel> This is not really appropriate for me, since I read some > Axel> user input and decide then (after the script is running) if > Axel> I produce screen output or only a PS file :-( > > Axel> If you or anyone else finds a solution, please let me know. > > So this has nothing to do with the ps save. The core problem is > exposed by > > from pylab import * > plot([1,2,3]) > > with interactive false and no call to show. I traced the source of > the error message to binding the destroy event to the window. > Apparently the destroy is being called but the window is never shown. > By moving the destroy binding into the figure manager show method, all > appears to be fixed. Todd, you may want to look over this but I think > it's sound > > Axel, try replacing the FigureManagerTkAgg code in > site-packages/matplotlib/backends/backend_tkagg.py with the following > > class FigureManagerTkAgg(FigureManagerBase): > """ > Public attributes > > canvas : The FigureCanvas instance > num : The Figure number > toolbar : The tk.Toolbar > window : The tk.Window > """ > def __init__(self, canvas, num, window): > FigureManagerBase.__init__(self, canvas, num) > self.window = window > self.window.withdraw() > self.window.wm_title("Figure %d" % num) > self.canvas = canvas > self._num = num > t1,t2,w,h = canvas.figure.bbox.get_bounds() > w, h = int(w), int(h) > self.window.minsize(int(w*3/4),int(h*3/4)) > if matplotlib.rcParams['toolbar']=='classic': > self.toolbar = NavigationToolbar( canvas, self ) > elif matplotlib.rcParams['toolbar']=='toolbar2': > self.toolbar = NavigationToolbar2TkAgg( canvas, self.window ) > else: > self.toolbar = None > if self.toolbar is not None: > self.toolbar.update() > self.canvas._tkcanvas.pack(side=Tk.TOP, fill=Tk.BOTH, expand=1) > self._shown = False > > def resize(self, event): > width, height = event.width, event.height > self.toolbar.configure(width=width) # , height=height) > > def show(self): > def destroy(*args): > self.window = None > Gcf.destroy(self._num) > if not self._shown: self.window.bind("<Destroy>", destroy) > > _focus = windowing.FocusManager() > self.window.deiconify() > self.canvas.draw() > self._shown = True > > def add_subplot(self, *args, **kwargs): > a = FigureManagerBase.add_subplot(self, *args, **kwargs) > if self.toolbar is not None: > self.toolbar.update() > return a > > def add_axes(self, rect, **kwargs): > a = FigureManagerBase.add_axes(self, rect, **kwargs) > if self.toolbar is not None: > self.toolbar.update() > return a > > def set_current_axes(self, a): > if a not in self.axes.values(): > error_msg_tkpaint('Axes is not in current figure') > FigureManagerBase.set_current_axes(self, a) > > def destroy(self, *args): > if Gcf.get_num_fig_managers()==0 and not matplotlib.is_interactive(): > if self.window is not None: > self.window.quit() > if self.window is not None: > self.window.destroy() > self.window = None > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-users mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
>>>>> "Axel" == Axel Kowald <A.K...@gm...> writes: Axel> This is not really appropriate for me, since I read some Axel> user input and decide then (after the script is running) if Axel> I produce screen output or only a PS file :-( Axel> If you or anyone else finds a solution, please let me know. So this has nothing to do with the ps save. The core problem is exposed by from pylab import * plot([1,2,3]) with interactive false and no call to show. I traced the source of the error message to binding the destroy event to the window. Apparently the destroy is being called but the window is never shown. By moving the destroy binding into the figure manager show method, all appears to be fixed. Todd, you may want to look over this but I think it's sound Axel, try replacing the FigureManagerTkAgg code in site-packages/matplotlib/backends/backend_tkagg.py with the following class FigureManagerTkAgg(FigureManagerBase): """ Public attributes canvas : The FigureCanvas instance num : The Figure number toolbar : The tk.Toolbar window : The tk.Window """ def __init__(self, canvas, num, window): FigureManagerBase.__init__(self, canvas, num) self.window = window self.window.withdraw() self.window.wm_title("Figure %d" % num) self.canvas = canvas self._num = num t1,t2,w,h = canvas.figure.bbox.get_bounds() w, h = int(w), int(h) self.window.minsize(int(w*3/4),int(h*3/4)) if matplotlib.rcParams['toolbar']=='classic': self.toolbar = NavigationToolbar( canvas, self ) elif matplotlib.rcParams['toolbar']=='toolbar2': self.toolbar = NavigationToolbar2TkAgg( canvas, self.window ) else: self.toolbar = None if self.toolbar is not None: self.toolbar.update() self.canvas._tkcanvas.pack(side=Tk.TOP, fill=Tk.BOTH, expand=1) self._shown = False def resize(self, event): width, height = event.width, event.height self.toolbar.configure(width=width) # , height=height) def show(self): def destroy(*args): self.window = None Gcf.destroy(self._num) if not self._shown: self.window.bind("<Destroy>", destroy) _focus = windowing.FocusManager() self.window.deiconify() self.canvas.draw() self._shown = True def add_subplot(self, *args, **kwargs): a = FigureManagerBase.add_subplot(self, *args, **kwargs) if self.toolbar is not None: self.toolbar.update() return a def add_axes(self, rect, **kwargs): a = FigureManagerBase.add_axes(self, rect, **kwargs) if self.toolbar is not None: self.toolbar.update() return a def set_current_axes(self, a): if a not in self.axes.values(): error_msg_tkpaint('Axes is not in current figure') FigureManagerBase.set_current_axes(self, a) def destroy(self, *args): if Gcf.get_num_fig_managers()==0 and not matplotlib.is_interactive(): if self.window is not None: self.window.quit() if self.window is not None: self.window.destroy() self.window = None
>>>>> "John" == John Hunter <jdh...@ac...> writes: John> This change alone gives me more than a 2x speedup. So with John> GTKAgg + a custom normalizer (in this case a do nothing John> normalizer) you'll be running 4-5 times faster than you were John> before, me thinks. Of the remaining time, about half of it, on my system, is spent in the colormapping. Almost all of this is in LinearSegmentedColormap.__call__, and is split between these numerix methods 0.12s zeros : create the RGBA colormapped output array 0.23s where : make sure the data are in the [0,1] interval 0.49s take + makeMappingArray - actually doing the mapping You may not want or need some of the overhead and extra checking that matplotlib does in the colormapping. Do you want colormapping at all by the way? If not, you can special case colormapping by simply converting to RGB in the 0-255 interval. Note, as I said it is a bit inelegant that everything has to go through RGB even if you don't need it. I have some ideas here, but that will have to wait a bit. from pylab import * def mynorm(X): return X class mycmap: name = "my gray" def __call__(self, X, alpha=None): # what is the fastest way to make an MxNx3 array simply # duplicating MxN on the last dimension? m,n = X.shape Z = zeros((m,n,3), typecode=X.typecode()) Z[...,0] = X Z[...,1] = X Z[...,2] = X return Z #norm = None # default norm = mynorm #cmap = None # default cmap = mycmap() ion() rc('figure', figsize=(13,12)) X = rand(1600,1600) figimage(X, cmap=cmap, norm=norm) With the following numbers # default cmap peds-pc311:~/python/projects/matplotlib> time python ~/test.py --numarray -dGTKAgg 1.630u 0.430s 0:02.12 97.1% 0+0k 0+0io 4746pf+0w # custom cmap peds-pc311:~/python/projects/matplotlib> time python ~/test.py --numarray -dGTKAgg 1.080u 0.290s 0:01.42 96.4% 0+0k 0+0io 4745pf+0w Of this 1.42 seconds, the big chunks are 0.660 The time it takes to do from pylab import *; half of this is initializing the colormaps and dicts in cm. We should do some work to get this number down. But it is a fixed cost that doesn't scale with array size 0.320 RandomArray2.py:97(random) # creating the dummy data. We can ignore this 0.540 backend_gtkagg.py:33(draw) # this creates the entire figure, of this, 0.420s is in the function FigureImage.make_image, most of which is in the extension code _image.fromarray So ignoring for now the fixed cost of loading modules and creating your arrays (Eg by running in pylab using the "run" function you only pay the module loading costs once), the next place where a big win is going to come from is in optimizing fromarray. Note, the matplotlib figure canvas is a drawable widget. If you want bare metal speed and don't want any of the features matplotlib offers (interpolation, normalization, colormapping, etc), you can always dump your image directly to the gtk canvas, especially if you compile gtk with image support. This may be useful enough for us to consider a backend figimage pipeline which would bypass a number of extra copies. Currently we have for gtkagg numarray -> agg image buffer -> figure canvas agg buffer -> gtk canvas With some care, we might be able to simplify this, ideally doing for the canvas numarray -> gtk canvas # for screen numarray -> agg buffer # for dumping to PNG There are some subtleties to think through as to how this would work. It would probably need to be a canvas method and not a renderer method, for one thing, which would take a bit of redesign. And then Midas would have to watch its back! JDH
Hello, I just downloaded Matplotlib 0.65 in Windows XP, Python 2.3. I just wanted to give 2 comments. First, when i try to use spy2() to plot a sparsity pattern, i get an error saying that the global name 'where' cannot be found. I can't remember if this has been mentioned in the past week. I simply solved this by adding 'where' on line 8 of axes.py: from numerix import MLab, absolute, arange, array, asarray, ones, transpose, \ log, log10, Float, ravel, zeros, Int32, Float64, ceil, min, indices, \ shape, which, where Sorry if this was a duplicate. The second comment is about figimage(). Out of curiosity while reading the discussion entitles "Re: [Matplotlib-users] Is really matplotlib this slooow for displaying images ? (sorry again)" with Eric Emsellem, i have tried the sample script from matplotlib.pylab import * X = rand( 100, 100 ) figimage( X ) show() The window that pops up as an axes box but not plot inside. Instead, a small image (representing X i assume) is located in the top left corner of the window. This image 'overlaps' with the axes and its lower right chunk is masked by the axes. If i rerun the same script using instead X = rand( 1600, 1600 ) as in the discussion, the all the area _outside_ of the axes is filled with the image, and there is nothing inside the axes box. Presumably, the whole image area is filled and the axes box is added next, masking part of the image. I have also tried to resize the image but the same is happening. Should i reset the origin of the image manually somewhere? Thanks for a great package, Dominique
Test done and this is correct, here are the sets of timing : first line is without ''mynorm'', second is with ''mynorm''. time python test.py --Numeric -dTkAgg 10.432u 1.663s 0:12.37 97.7% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w 7.258u 1.302s 0:08.64 98.9% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w time python test.py --Numeric -dGTKAgg 5.209u 0.845s 0:06.10 99.0% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w 4.226u 0.700s 0:04.98 98.7% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w time python test.py --numarray -dTkAgg 16.391u 1.036s 0:17.96 96.9% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w 5.690u 0.829s 0:06.85 95.0% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w time python test.py --numarray -dGTKAgg 8.225u 0.546s 0:08.96 97.7% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w 3.363u 0.445s 0:03.86 98.4% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w Another factor of 10 and you are faster than Midas.. :-) Eric John Hunter wrote: >>>>>>"John" == John Hunter <jdh...@ac...> writes: >>>>>> >>>>>> > > John> I'll spend some time with the profiler looking for some low > John> hanging fruit. > >God bless the profiler. It turns out over half of the time to display >this image is spent in the normalizer, which takes image data in an >arbitrary scale and maps into the unit interval > > http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/matplotlib.colors.html#normalize > >The normalizer handles a lot of special cases that you may not need. >In fact, your data may already be normalized. So you can write a >custom normalizer > >from pylab import * > >def mynorm(X): # do nothing, it's already normalized > return X > >ion() > >rc('figure', figsize=(13,12)) >X = rand(1600,1600) >figimage(X, cmap=cm.hot, norm=mynorm) > > >This change alone gives me more than a 2x speedup. So with GTKAgg + a >custom normalizer (in this case a do nothing normalizer) you'll be >running 4-5 times faster than you were before, me thinks. > >peds-pc311:~/python/projects/matplotlib> time python ~/test.py --numarray >1.650u 0.450s 0:02.13 98.5% 0+0k 0+0io 4746pf+0w > >I'll keep digging through the profiler... > >JDH > > > -- =============================================================== Observatoire de Lyon ems...@ob... 9 av. Charles-Andre tel: +33 4 78 86 83 84 69561 Saint-Genis Laval Cedex fax: +33 4 78 86 83 86 France http://www-obs.univ-lyon1.fr/eric.emsellem ===============================================================
Hi, thanks for the feedback. To answer your questions: - I have both Numeric and numarry but I am using numarray in principle. - Running in verbose mode, here is the output: matplotlib data path /usr/share/matplotlib loaded rc file /home/emsellem/.matplotlibrc matplotlib version 0.65 verbose.level helpful interactive is False platform is linux2 numerix numarray 1.0 font search path ['/usr/share/matplotlib'] loaded ttfcache file /home/emsellem/.ttffont.cache Could not load matplotlib icon: 'module' object has no attribute 'window_set_default_icon_from_file' backend GTKAgg version 2.0.0 - Then a VERY important note: yes indeed I am an astronomer and I am used to have a fixed window (I first define its size or use some default) and THEN ONLY load the image itself. This is how I use ppgplot in python or Iraf, or Midas. I indeed to not then use any interpolation scheme there. - ALSO: there seems to be a bug in the figimage routine as it shows the image OUTSIDE an axis filled with white (this may be because I am not doing the right thing though...) - And finally here are the timing you asked for: (there seem to be reasonable considering the difference in CPU/RAM) Hope this helps Eric ================================================== Before correcting figima ========================= time python test.py --Numeric -dTkAgg 14.146u 2.363s 0:17.79 92.7% 0+0k 0+0io 10pf+0w time python test.py --Numeric -dGTKAgg 9.795u 1.697s 0:13.63 84.2% 0+0k 0+0io 12pf+0w time python test.py --numarray -dTkAgg 22.640u 1.443s 0:25.31 95.1% 0+0k 0+0io 13pf+0w time python test.py --numarray -dGTKAgg 15.125u 0.925s 0:16.26 98.6% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w After correcting figima ========================= time python test.py --Numeric -dTkAgg 10.432u 1.663s 0:12.37 97.7% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w time python test.py --Numeric -dGTKAgg 5.209u 0.845s 0:06.10 99.0% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w time python test.py --numarray -dTkAgg 16.391u 1.036s 0:17.96 96.9% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w time python test.py --numarray -dGTKAgg 8.225u 0.546s 0:08.96 97.7% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w -- =============================================================== Observatoire de Lyon ems...@ob... 9 av. Charles-Andre tel: +33 4 78 86 83 84 69561 Saint-Genis Laval Cedex fax: +33 4 78 86 83 86 France http://www-obs.univ-lyon1.fr/eric.emsellem ===============================================================
>>>>> "John" == John Hunter <jdh...@ac...> writes: John> I'll spend some time with the profiler looking for some low John> hanging fruit. God bless the profiler. It turns out over half of the time to display this image is spent in the normalizer, which takes image data in an arbitrary scale and maps into the unit interval http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/matplotlib.colors.html#normalize The normalizer handles a lot of special cases that you may not need. In fact, your data may already be normalized. So you can write a custom normalizer from pylab import * def mynorm(X): # do nothing, it's already normalized return X ion() rc('figure', figsize=(13,12)) X = rand(1600,1600) figimage(X, cmap=cm.hot, norm=mynorm) This change alone gives me more than a 2x speedup. So with GTKAgg + a custom normalizer (in this case a do nothing normalizer) you'll be running 4-5 times faster than you were before, me thinks. peds-pc311:~/python/projects/matplotlib> time python ~/test.py --numarray 1.650u 0.450s 0:02.13 98.5% 0+0k 0+0io 4746pf+0w I'll keep digging through the profiler... JDH
>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Emsellem <ems...@ob...> writes: Eric> Hi, I am using: Eric> IPython 0.6.6 with Python 2.3.3 and matplotlib-0.65 OK, too bad, one of the most common causes of slow behavior on earlier versions of matplotlib was a numeric/numarray incompatibility setting as discussed here - http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/faq.html#SLOW. But with 0.65, this shouldn't be a problem. But just to be certain - do you have Numeric and numarray on your system? - what is the output of any test script when run with --verbose-helpful. It is important that you are not mixing numeric and numarray in your code, because then matplotlib falls back on the python sequence protocol. So I just want to insure that you are using numarray consistently and that matplotlib knows it. Eric> (checked that this is indeed the case) Eric> Eric P.S.: by the way, just to let you know (and I will pass Eric> the message on the forum) I am sincerely very impressed by Eric> matplotlib in general (in fact 5 people just switched to it Eric> in the last 2 weeks and our group only amounts to 10 people Eric> so 1/2 still to convince!). So this kind of ''negative'' Eric> feedback/question should not undermine the rest of the soft Eric> for sure!!! I passed it on already. I suspect there are a number of others who are interested in and can contribute to this discussion so I'll keep this on list for a bit. Thanks for the moral support :-) A bit of background: as Arnd pointed out, imshow is probably doing a lot more under the hood than you need, so I suggest we stick with figimage for a while. I assume you're an astronomer, since you mentioned IRAF, no? Perry Greenfield, also an astronomer, suggested figimage because he mainly wanted a pixel dump of his data, with no interpolation that imshow provides. Do you need color mapping, or mainly grayscale? The reason I ask is that for simplicity of coding I convert everything to an RGBA under the hood, which is obviously inefficient in memory and CPU time. At some point (maybe now), we'll have to special case grayscale for people who can't pay those extra costs. I don't know if this is where your bottleneck is. So assuming figimage for now, I wrote a test script to get some numbers for comparison. Then I noticed I had introduced a bug in 0.65 in figimage when I wrongly added "hold" control to figimage, where it doesn't below. So replace figimage in pylab.py with the function I'm including below before running any tests. Since most people can't fit a 1600x1600 image on screen (I can't), we'll need a big figure window at least to get most of it.. That's what the figsize command is for. FYI, my suspicion is we should be able to get acceptable performance for 1600x1600 or 2000x2000 and images of this magnitude, with some basic refactoring and optimization. I doubt we'll get 20k x 20k in the forseeable future, in large part because the underlying image library from antigrain only does 4096x4096. With this script, I'm running in interactive mode ("ion") so the figure will be created when the figimage call is made, and then will immediately terminate rather than go into the tk mainloop since show is called. from pylab import * ion() rc('figure', figsize=(13,12)) X = rand(1600,1600) figimage(X, cmap=cm.hot) #show() Here are my numbers. Note I can get almost a 2x performance boost switching to GTKAgg - there are known performance issues blitting a large image to tkinter. Is GTKAgg as possibility for you? peds-pc311:~> time python test.py --Numeric -dTkAgg 5.750u 1.730s 0:08.20 91.2% 0+0k 0+0io 3286pf+0w peds-pc311:~> time python test.py --Numeric -dGTKAgg 3.280u 0.840s 0:04.16 99.0% 0+0k 0+0io 4579pf+0w peds-pc311:~> time python test.py --numarray -dTkAgg 8.830u 1.100s 0:09.96 99.6% 0+0k 0+0io 3455pf+0w peds-pc311:~> time python test.py --numarray -dGTKAgg 4.730u 0.560s 0:05.36 98.6% 0+0k 0+0io 4747pf+0w with a 3GHz P4 with 1GB of RAM. How do the numbers for your system compare? I'll spend some time with the profiler looking for some low hanging fruit. JDH # the modified figimage function def figimage(*args, **kwargs): # allow callers to override the hold state by passing hold=True|False try: ret = gcf().figimage(*args, **kwargs) except ValueError, msg: msg = raise_msg_to_str(msg) error_msg(msg) hold(b) raise RuntimeError(msg) except RuntimeError, msg: msg = raise_msg_to_str(msg) error_msg(msg) hold(b) raise RuntimeError(msg) draw_if_interactive() gci._current = ret return ret figimage.__doc__ = Figure.figimage.__doc__ + """ Addition kwargs: hold = [True|False] overrides default hold state"""