You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
1
|
2
(3) |
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
(2) |
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
Well, if Freetype were only distributed under the GPL, you couldn't distribute matplotlib in binary form without providing the source code. However, Freetype is distributed under more than one license. (see: https://www.freetype.org/license.html ) Because it's distributed under a BSD-style license in addition to the GPL, it can be distributed in binary form, subject to an accreditation clause: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/freetype/freetype2.git/tree/docs/FTL.TXT In the past, I have gotten approval from corporate lawyers at a very large company to use freetype (and matplotlib) in an application that was being distributed in binary form. The dual-licensing of freetype was key in that particular case. Or that's my take on it, anyway. I'm not a Lawyer, so don't consider this legal advice in any way. Cheers! -Joe On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Paul Hobson <pmh...@gm...> wrote: > Chad, > > My recollections is that matplotlib doesn't distribute the source code to > FreeType, it only uses it as a dependency. As such, MPL is in the clear > with its more permissive licensing. > -Paul > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:45 PM, CAB <ca...@ya...> wrote: > >> Hi, All, >> >> I just went to install matplotlib version 2.0.0, and it has a dependency >> called "freetype". This software appears to be licensed under GPL3. My >> reading of that latter license is that, if someone wanted to distribute a >> compiled version of a program requiring matplotlib, that entire program >> would fall under the GPL3 license. I'm sure that would be a non-starter >> for many, many projects. >> >> Does anyone have any takes on this? >> >> Chad >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> ------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> _______________________________________________ >> Matplotlib-users mailing list >> Mat...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-devel mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel > >
Chad, My recollections is that matplotlib doesn't distribute the source code to FreeType, it only uses it as a dependency. As such, MPL is in the clear with its more permissive licensing. -Paul On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:45 PM, CAB <ca...@ya...> wrote: > Hi, All, > > I just went to install matplotlib version 2.0.0, and it has a dependency > called "freetype". This software appears to be licensed under GPL3. My > reading of that latter license is that, if someone wanted to distribute a > compiled version of a program requiring matplotlib, that entire program > would fall under the GPL3 license. I'm sure that would be a non-starter > for many, many projects. > > Does anyone have any takes on this? > > Chad > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-users mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users > >
It appears that the build of matplotlib in conda-forge does not require pyqt5: https://github.com/conda-forge/matplotlib-feedstock/blob/master/recipe/meta.yaml So in your case, I would do: conda remove pyqt5 matplotlib conda install --channel=conda-forge matplotlib On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Benjamin Root <ben...@gm...> wrote: > no, pyqt5 is not a dependency for matplotlib. this looks like a conda > packaging issue. > > Side note: the sourceforge mailing list is deprecated. Please use the > python.org version instead (you'll have to re-register). > > Ben Root > > > On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Osborn, Raymond <ro...@an...> wrote: > >> I just created a new conda environment with Matplotlib included, and it >> duly installed matplotlib: 2.0.0-np111py27_0. It installed PyQt5 by >> default, whereas I need PyQt4, but when I installed PyQt4 (conda install >> pyqt=4), it automatically downgraded Matplotlib to 1.5.1. >> -------- >> The following packages will be DOWNGRADED due to dependency conflicts: >> >> matplotlib: 2.0.0-np111py27_0 --> 1.5.1-np111py27_0 >> pyqt: 5.6.0-py27_2 --> 4.11.4-py27_4 >> qt: 5.6.2-0 --> 4.8.7-4 >> -------- >> Is PyQt5 really a dependency for Matplotlib v2? I have been testing >> release candidate versions of Matplotlib v2 without any problem. This will >> cause headaches to my users who want the latest features. >> >> Ray >> -- >> Ray Osborn, Senior Scientist >> Materials Science Division >> Argonne National Laboratory >> Argonne, IL 60439, USA >> Phone: +1 (630) 252-9011 <(630)%20252-9011> >> Email: RO...@an... >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> ------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> _______________________________________________ >> Matplotlib-devel mailing list >> Mat...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-devel mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel > >
no, pyqt5 is not a dependency for matplotlib. this looks like a conda packaging issue. Side note: the sourceforge mailing list is deprecated. Please use the python.org version instead (you'll have to re-register). Ben Root On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Osborn, Raymond <ro...@an...> wrote: > I just created a new conda environment with Matplotlib included, and it > duly installed matplotlib: 2.0.0-np111py27_0. It installed PyQt5 by > default, whereas I need PyQt4, but when I installed PyQt4 (conda install > pyqt=4), it automatically downgraded Matplotlib to 1.5.1. > -------- > The following packages will be DOWNGRADED due to dependency conflicts: > > matplotlib: 2.0.0-np111py27_0 --> 1.5.1-np111py27_0 > pyqt: 5.6.0-py27_2 --> 4.11.4-py27_4 > qt: 5.6.2-0 --> 4.8.7-4 > -------- > Is PyQt5 really a dependency for Matplotlib v2? I have been testing > release candidate versions of Matplotlib v2 without any problem. This will > cause headaches to my users who want the latest features. > > Ray > -- > Ray Osborn, Senior Scientist > Materials Science Division > Argonne National Laboratory > Argonne, IL 60439, USA > Phone: +1 (630) 252-9011 > Email: RO...@an... > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-devel mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel >
I just created a new conda environment with Matplotlib included, and it duly installed matplotlib: 2.0.0-np111py27_0. It installed PyQt5 by default, whereas I need PyQt4, but when I installed PyQt4 (conda install pyqt=4), it automatically downgraded Matplotlib to 1.5.1. -------- The following packages will be DOWNGRADED due to dependency conflicts: matplotlib: 2.0.0-np111py27_0 --> 1.5.1-np111py27_0 pyqt: 5.6.0-py27_2 --> 4.11.4-py27_4 qt: 5.6.2-0 --> 4.8.7-4 -------- Is PyQt5 really a dependency for Matplotlib v2? I have been testing release candidate versions of Matplotlib v2 without any problem. This will cause headaches to my users who want the latest features. Ray -- Ray Osborn, Senior Scientist Materials Science Division Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, IL 60439, USA Phone: +1 (630) 252-9011 Email: RO...@an...