You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
1
(6) |
2
(5) |
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
(4) |
7
(3) |
8
|
9
(5) |
10
|
11
|
12
(1) |
13
|
14
|
15
(4) |
16
(1) |
17
(4) |
18
(1) |
19
(4) |
20
(4) |
21
(5) |
22
(1) |
23
(3) |
24
(6) |
25
(1) |
26
(19) |
27
(13) |
28
(9) |
|
|
|
|
Sounds good to me. I guess when this is done I need an example rc file and a little info on how it should work. On 2/9/06, Darren Dale <dd...@co...> wrote: > On Thursday 09 February 2006 11:31, you wrote: > > I think there should be some global variable that makes it easy to > > scale all the fonts, but how to do that and still give the user fine > > control is challenging. There are 4 or 5 places where I have changed > > the default font size for tickmarks, legend entries, etc. I have some > > set at 18 pt, some at 16, and some at 14. I don't know if there is an > > easy way to do all of this and make it possible to shift everything my > > adjusting one setting. Does it make sense to allow the user to set > > offset values - so that legend font is main-4 and tickmarks are > > main-2? > > This is what I am trying to accomplish, using the existing scaling framew= ork. > Rather than "main + or - X", it multiplies main by one of the following: > > {'xx-small': 0.579, 'x-small': 0.694, 'small': 0.833, > 'medium': 1.0, 'large': 1.200, 'x-large': 1.440, > 'xx-large': 1.728} > > Darren >
On Thursday 09 February 2006 11:31, you wrote: > I think there should be some global variable that makes it easy to > scale all the fonts, but how to do that and still give the user fine > control is challenging. There are 4 or 5 places where I have changed > the default font size for tickmarks, legend entries, etc. I have some > set at 18 pt, some at 16, and some at 14. I don't know if there is an > easy way to do all of this and make it possible to shift everything my > adjusting one setting. Does it make sense to allow the user to set > offset values - so that legend font is main-4 and tickmarks are > main-2? This is what I am trying to accomplish, using the existing scaling framework. Rather than "main + or - X", it multiplies main by one of the following: {'xx-small': 0.579, 'x-small': 0.694, 'small': 0.833, 'medium': 1.0, 'large': 1.200, 'x-large': 1.440, 'xx-large': 1.728} Darren
On Thursday 09 February 2006 11:22, you wrote: > >>>>> "Darren" == Darren Dale <dd...@co...> writes: > > Darren> I just want to double check before I commit this. We offer > Darren> a font.size rc setting, and users can modify that size by > Darren> setting fontsize='medium' or 'large', etc. However, > Darren> font.size does not globally set the default font size, to > Darren> axis labels, ticklabels, etc, they remain 12pt as > Darren> default. Should this be changed? If so, the change is > Darren> simple: from this: def __init__(self, size=12.0, > Darren> weight='normal'): to this: def __init__(self, > Darren> size=rcParams['font.size'], weight='normal'): > > If you want to use rc defaults for kwargs, you do not want to use them > in the function definition, because then they will be set a module > load time and the defaults cannot be changed dynamically. Rather, you > want to use this idiom (eg lines.py) > > > def __init__(self, xdata, ydata, > linewidth = None, # all Nones default to rc > ...): > if linewidth is None : linewidth=rcParams['lines.linewidth'] > > Then if the user changes the rc param value, the constructor default > changes too. Ok. So currently a user can put font.size:23.0, or font.size:medium or even "large". The latter makes things very confusing, because who knows what the reference point is? (Its 12, but its not clear.) I propose the following change: font.defaultsize demands a point size, and then allow the relative font sizes to scale that size. Also, add a text.fontsize rc parameter to allow such scaling for text (this is what font.size does now, I think). Are these changes ok, or should I just leave everything alone? Darren
>>>>> "Darren" == Darren Dale <dd...@co...> writes: Darren> I just want to double check before I commit this. We offer Darren> a font.size rc setting, and users can modify that size by Darren> setting fontsize='medium' or 'large', etc. However, Darren> font.size does not globally set the default font size, to Darren> axis labels, ticklabels, etc, they remain 12pt as Darren> default. Should this be changed? If so, the change is Darren> simple: from this: def __init__(self, size=12.0, Darren> weight='normal'): to this: def __init__(self, Darren> size=rcParams['font.size'], weight='normal'): If you want to use rc defaults for kwargs, you do not want to use them in the function definition, because then they will be set a module load time and the defaults cannot be changed dynamically. Rather, you want to use this idiom (eg lines.py) def __init__(self, xdata, ydata, linewidth = None, # all Nones default to rc ...): if linewidth is None : linewidth=rcParams['lines.linewidth'] Then if the user changes the rc param value, the constructor default changes too. JDH
I just want to double check before I commit this. We offer a font.size rc setting, and users can modify that size by setting fontsize='medium' or 'large', etc. However, font.size does not globally set the default font size, to axis labels, ticklabels, etc, they remain 12pt as default. Should this be changed? If so, the change is simple: from this: def __init__(self, size=12.0, weight='normal'): to this: def __init__(self, size=rcParams['font.size'], weight='normal'): Darren