You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
1
(1) |
2
|
3
(2) |
4
(5) |
5
(3) |
6
(5) |
7
|
8
(5) |
9
|
10
|
11
(5) |
12
(2) |
13
(6) |
14
(2) |
15
(3) |
16
(1) |
17
|
18
(9) |
19
(4) |
20
(1) |
21
(3) |
22
(2) |
23
(1) |
24
(1) |
25
|
26
(1) |
27
(1) |
28
(20) |
29
(10) |
30
(2) |
31
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Fri, 8 Aug 2008 08:47:11 -0500 "John Hunter" <jd...@gm...> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Nils Wagner > <nw...@ia...> wrote: > >> I have installed matplotlib locally on a linux box >> (without root access). >> Is it possible for o t h e r users to use my local >> matplotlib installation ? The problem is that show() >> doesn't produce a result on the screen. >> >> Any pointer would be appreciated. > > This is really a question for matplotlib-users, but, >there is no > reason this shouldn't work. Some of my colleagues have >run out of my > directory before. > > * what backend are they using? > > * what test script are they trying (I suggest > examples/pylab_examples/simple_plot.py > > * what is the output of --verbose-debug when the other >users run this script? > > * does it help to try different backends, eg if they >run the script > with -dTKAgg, -dWXAgg, -dQt4Agg or -dGTKAgg > > * what are the permissions on your install directory -- >can the > other uses see all the files? > > * what version of matplotlib are you using? What >platform (you say > linux, but when reporting problems it helps to include >as much detail > as possible). Are the users running from the console or >an X11 > session? > > JDH Hi John, I think it was a missing matplotlibrc in ~/.matplotlib Now it works fine. Thank you very much ! Next time I will post to matploblib-user. Sorry for that. Nils
Hello everybody, I have sent this message to the user group, but thinking of it, it may be more relevant to the development mailing list...so here it is again. We are looking for the best way to plot a waterfall diagram in Matplotlib. The 2 functions which could be used to do that are (as far as I have found) imshow and pcolormesh. Here is a small script that use both to compare the output: ----------------- from pylab import * delta = 0.2 x = arange(-3.0, 3.0, delta) y = arange(-2.0, 2.0, delta) X, Y = meshgrid(x, y) Z1 = bivariate_normal(X, Y, 1.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0) Z2 = bivariate_normal(X, Y, 1.5, 0.5, 1, 1) # difference of Gaussians Z = 10.0 * (Z2 - Z1) figure(1) im = imshow(Z,extent=(-3,3,-2,2)) CS = contour(X, -Y, Z, 6, colors='k', # negative contours will be dashed by default ) clabel(CS, fontsize=9, inline=1) title('Using imshow') figure(2) im = pcolormesh(X,-Y,Z) CS = contour(X, -Y, Z, 6, colors='k', # negative contours will be dashed by default ) clabel(CS, fontsize=9, inline=1) title('Using pcolormesh') show() --------------------- The problem is that we need some of the flexibility of pcolormesh (which is able to map the matrix of value on any deformed mesh), while we would like to use the interpolations available in imshow (which explain why the imshow version is much "smoother" than the pcolormesh one). In fact, what would be needed is not the full flexibility of pcolormesh (which can map the grid to any kind of shape), we "only" have to deal with rectangular grids where x- and y- graduations are irregularly spaced. Is there a drawing function in Matplotlib which would be able to work with such a rectangular non-uniform grid? And if not (and a quick look at the example and the code make me think that indeed the capability is currently not present), what about an extension of imshow which would work as this: im = imshow(Z,x_gridpos=x, y_gridpos=y) #specify the position of the grid's nodes, instead of giving the extend and assuming uniform spacing. Longer term, would a pcolormesh accepting interpolation be possible? The current behavior, averaging the color of the grids node to get a uniform cell color, is quite rough except for a large number of cells...And even then, it soon shows when you zoom in... The best would be to allow the same interpolations as in imshow (or a subset of it), and also allows to use interpolation before colormap lookup (or after), like in Matlab. Indeed, Matlab allows to finely tune interpolation by specifying Gouraud (interpolation after color lookup)/Phong(interpolation before color lookup, i.e. for each pixel). Phong is usually much better but also more CPU intensive. Phong is especially when using discrete colormap, producing banded colors equivalent to countour lines, while Gouraud does not work in those cases. Of course, the performance will be impacted by some of those interpolation options, which would degrade performance in animations for example.... but I think that having the different options available would be very useful, it allows to have the highest map quality, or have a "quick and dirty" map depending on situation (grid spacing, type of map, animation or not, ...). Best regards, Greg.
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Nils Wagner <nw...@ia...> wrote: > I have installed matplotlib locally on a linux box > (without root access). > Is it possible for o t h e r users to use my local > matplotlib installation ? The problem is that show() > doesn't produce a result on the screen. > > Any pointer would be appreciated. This is really a question for matplotlib-users, but, there is no reason this shouldn't work. Some of my colleagues have run out of my directory before. * what backend are they using? * what test script are they trying (I suggest examples/pylab_examples/simple_plot.py * what is the output of --verbose-debug when the other users run this script? * does it help to try different backends, eg if they run the script with -dTKAgg, -dWXAgg, -dQt4Agg or -dGTKAgg * what are the permissions on your install directory -- can the other uses see all the files? * what version of matplotlib are you using? What platform (you say linux, but when reporting problems it helps to include as much detail as possible). Are the users running from the console or an X11 session? JDH
Hi all, I have installed matplotlib locally on a linux box (without root access). Is it possible for o t h e r users to use my local matplotlib installation ? The problem is that show() doesn't produce a result on the screen. Any pointer would be appreciated. Nils
John Hunter wrote: > On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:51 AM, Manuel Metz <mm...@as...> wrote: > >> I think the section Controlling axes properties of >> http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/tutorial.html needs to be updated, since >> >> frame = gca(gca(), 'frame') >> setp(frame, 'linewidth', 2) >> >> doesn't work any more with mpl 0.98.x ... > > Argg, the dreaded frame/patch rears it's ugly head. Eric, did you add > the deprecation warning? It seems to me we could use set/get frame to > set the frame attr and set/get patch to set the patch attr to support > people used to the matlab idiom as in the tutorial above. Uh, I just noticed that the example couldn't have worked before ;-) frame = gca(gca(), 'frame') # fails --> frame = getp(gca(), 'frame') # ;-)