You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
|
2
|
3
(27) |
4
(16) |
5
(1) |
6
(1) |
7
(4) |
8
|
9
(1) |
10
(1) |
11
(1) |
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
(6) |
16
(2) |
17
(8) |
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
(8) |
23
|
24
(2) |
25
(2) |
26
(1) |
27
(1) |
28
|
29
(1) |
30
|
|
|
|
|
On 2015年06月07日 12:05 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Eric Firing <ef...@ha...> wrote: >> Matplotlib's pyplot retains quite a few vestiges from its original >> Matlab-workalike heritage; we would like to gradually eliminate those >> that no longer make sense. One such candidate is the "hold" kwarg that >> every pyplot function has, with a "True" default. I don't think it >> serves any useful purpose now, and getting rid of it would allow >> considerable simplification to the code and, to a lesser extent, the >> documentation. The default behavior would not change, only the ability >> to change that behavior via either the rcParams['axes.hold'] parameter >> or the "hold" kwarg in a pyplot function call. >> >> If you routinely use 'hold=False' and believe that removing it would be >> a mistake, please let us know. > > I do actually use it with some regularity interactively, though I'm > not particularly attached to it. Is there some equivalent though, like > plt.whatever(..., hold=False) > can become > plt.clear(); plt.whatever(...) It's exactly equivalent to: plt.cla(); plt.whatever(...) > ? The semantics would be that the current figure remains the current > figure, but is reset so that the next operation starts from scratch. I > notice that plt.clear() does not exist, but maybe it has another > spelling :-). There are two types of "clear": plt.clf() # clear the current Figure plt.cla() # clear the current Axes Eric > > (Basically the use case here is getting something like the > edit-and-rerun-a-cell workflow, but when using a classic interactive > REPL rather than the ipython notebook -- so I have a specific plot > window up on my screen at a size and place where I can see it, and > maybe some other plots in other windows in the background somewhere, > and I want to quickly display different things into that window.) > > -n >
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Eric Firing <ef...@ha...> wrote: > Matplotlib's pyplot retains quite a few vestiges from its original > Matlab-workalike heritage; we would like to gradually eliminate those > that no longer make sense. One such candidate is the "hold" kwarg that > every pyplot function has, with a "True" default. I don't think it > serves any useful purpose now, and getting rid of it would allow > considerable simplification to the code and, to a lesser extent, the > documentation. The default behavior would not change, only the ability > to change that behavior via either the rcParams['axes.hold'] parameter > or the "hold" kwarg in a pyplot function call. > > If you routinely use 'hold=False' and believe that removing it would be > a mistake, please let us know. I do actually use it with some regularity interactively, though I'm not particularly attached to it. Is there some equivalent though, like plt.whatever(..., hold=False) can become plt.clear(); plt.whatever(...) ? The semantics would be that the current figure remains the current figure, but is reset so that the next operation starts from scratch. I notice that plt.clear() does not exist, but maybe it has another spelling :-). (Basically the use case here is getting something like the edit-and-rerun-a-cell workflow, but when using a classic interactive REPL rather than the ipython notebook -- so I have a specific plot window up on my screen at a size and place where I can see it, and maybe some other plots in other windows in the background somewhere, and I want to quickly display different things into that window.) -n -- Nathaniel J. Smith -- http://vorpus.org
Matplotlib's pyplot retains quite a few vestiges from its original Matlab-workalike heritage; we would like to gradually eliminate those that no longer make sense. One such candidate is the "hold" kwarg that every pyplot function has, with a "True" default. I don't think it serves any useful purpose now, and getting rid of it would allow considerable simplification to the code and, to a lesser extent, the documentation. The default behavior would not change, only the ability to change that behavior via either the rcParams['axes.hold'] parameter or the "hold" kwarg in a pyplot function call. If you routinely use 'hold=False' and believe that removing it would be a mistake, please let us know. Thanks. Eric
Is there any news about this thing? anyone know of a working matplotlib on arm chips? -- View this message in context: http://matplotlib.1069221.n5.nabble.com/Matplotlib-on-Android-tp44304p45739.html Sent from the matplotlib - devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.