SourceForge logo
SourceForge logo
Menu

matplotlib-devel — matplotlib developers

You can subscribe to this list here.

2003 Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
(1)
Nov
(33)
Dec
(20)
2004 Jan
(7)
Feb
(44)
Mar
(51)
Apr
(43)
May
(43)
Jun
(36)
Jul
(61)
Aug
(44)
Sep
(25)
Oct
(82)
Nov
(97)
Dec
(47)
2005 Jan
(77)
Feb
(143)
Mar
(42)
Apr
(31)
May
(93)
Jun
(93)
Jul
(35)
Aug
(78)
Sep
(56)
Oct
(44)
Nov
(72)
Dec
(75)
2006 Jan
(116)
Feb
(99)
Mar
(181)
Apr
(171)
May
(112)
Jun
(86)
Jul
(91)
Aug
(111)
Sep
(77)
Oct
(72)
Nov
(57)
Dec
(51)
2007 Jan
(64)
Feb
(116)
Mar
(70)
Apr
(74)
May
(53)
Jun
(40)
Jul
(519)
Aug
(151)
Sep
(132)
Oct
(74)
Nov
(282)
Dec
(190)
2008 Jan
(141)
Feb
(67)
Mar
(69)
Apr
(96)
May
(227)
Jun
(404)
Jul
(399)
Aug
(96)
Sep
(120)
Oct
(205)
Nov
(126)
Dec
(261)
2009 Jan
(136)
Feb
(136)
Mar
(119)
Apr
(124)
May
(155)
Jun
(98)
Jul
(136)
Aug
(292)
Sep
(174)
Oct
(126)
Nov
(126)
Dec
(79)
2010 Jan
(109)
Feb
(83)
Mar
(139)
Apr
(91)
May
(79)
Jun
(164)
Jul
(184)
Aug
(146)
Sep
(163)
Oct
(128)
Nov
(70)
Dec
(73)
2011 Jan
(235)
Feb
(165)
Mar
(147)
Apr
(86)
May
(74)
Jun
(118)
Jul
(65)
Aug
(75)
Sep
(162)
Oct
(94)
Nov
(48)
Dec
(44)
2012 Jan
(49)
Feb
(40)
Mar
(88)
Apr
(35)
May
(52)
Jun
(69)
Jul
(90)
Aug
(123)
Sep
(112)
Oct
(120)
Nov
(105)
Dec
(116)
2013 Jan
(76)
Feb
(26)
Mar
(78)
Apr
(43)
May
(61)
Jun
(53)
Jul
(147)
Aug
(85)
Sep
(83)
Oct
(122)
Nov
(18)
Dec
(27)
2014 Jan
(58)
Feb
(25)
Mar
(49)
Apr
(17)
May
(29)
Jun
(39)
Jul
(53)
Aug
(52)
Sep
(35)
Oct
(47)
Nov
(110)
Dec
(27)
2015 Jan
(50)
Feb
(93)
Mar
(96)
Apr
(30)
May
(55)
Jun
(83)
Jul
(44)
Aug
(8)
Sep
(5)
Oct
Nov
(1)
Dec
(1)
2016 Jan
Feb
Mar
(1)
Apr
May
Jun
(2)
Jul
Aug
(3)
Sep
(1)
Oct
(3)
Nov
Dec
2017 Jan
Feb
(5)
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
(3)
Aug
Sep
(7)
Oct
Nov
Dec
2018 Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
(2)
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
S M T W T F S




1
(1)
2
3
4
5
6
(3)
7
(3)
8
(3)
9
(4)
10
(1)
11
(5)
12
(2)
13
14
(2)
15
(1)
16
(6)
17
(7)
18
(3)
19
20
21
22
(1)
23
24
25
26
27
(1)
28
(1)
29
30
31

Showing 3 results of 3

From: Benjamin R. <ben...@ou...> - 2011年12月07日 16:25:56
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Michael Droettboom <md...@st...> wrote:
> On 12/06/2011 10:10 PM, Benjamin Root wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, December 6, 2011, Michael Droettboom <md...@st...> wrote:
> > Yesterday I managed to accidentally move the v1.1.x branch pointer to
> > point to master. I have since moved it back, but you may need to rebase
> > if you have any active branches based on the (wrong) v1.1.x branch. The
> > following should suffice:
> >
> > git fetch upstream
> > git rebase upstream/v1.1.x
> >
> > Mike
> >
>
> I am getting a whole bunch of conflict errors. I wonder if it is because
> I rebased already when v1.1.x was pointed to master? Are we sure that
> v1.1.x is ok? If so, I could just delete my copy and refetch it from
> upstream?
>
> It's quite possible to get conflict errors if you rebased on v1.1.x when
> it was the same as master and are now going back. I'm really sorry for the
> inconvenience this mistake caused.
>
> But it should be possible to reapply your new commits on top of v1.1.x
> without too much trouble. Feel free to contact me off list and maybe we
> can get to the bottom of what's going on for you.
>
> Cheers,
> Mike
>
As a note, it appears that doing "git rebase upstream/v1.1.x -s ours"
produces the correct result. Although, I think it might have set my push
remote to point to the matplotlib repo and not my own github repo, but I
might be wrong on that.
Ben Root
From: Michael D. <md...@st...> - 2011年12月07日 14:57:01
On 12/06/2011 10:10 PM, Benjamin Root wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, December 6, 2011, Michael Droettboom <md...@st... 
> <mailto:md...@st...>> wrote:
> > Yesterday I managed to accidentally move the v1.1.x branch pointer to
> > point to master. I have since moved it back, but you may need to rebase
> > if you have any active branches based on the (wrong) v1.1.x branch. The
> > following should suffice:
> >
> > git fetch upstream
> > git rebase upstream/v1.1.x
> >
> > Mike
> >
>
> I am getting a whole bunch of conflict errors. I wonder if it is 
> because I rebased already when v1.1.x was pointed to master? Are we 
> sure that v1.1.x is ok? If so, I could just delete my copy and 
> refetch it from upstream?
It's quite possible to get conflict errors if you rebased on v1.1.x when 
it was the same as master and are now going back. I'm really sorry for 
the inconvenience this mistake caused.
But it should be possible to reapply your new commits on top of v1.1.x 
without too much trouble. Feel free to contact me off list and maybe we 
can get to the bottom of what's going on for you.
Cheers,
Mike
From: Benjamin R. <ben...@ou...> - 2011年12月07日 03:10:34
On Tuesday, December 6, 2011, Michael Droettboom <md...@st...> wrote:
> Yesterday I managed to accidentally move the v1.1.x branch pointer to
> point to master. I have since moved it back, but you may need to rebase
> if you have any active branches based on the (wrong) v1.1.x branch. The
> following should suffice:
>
> git fetch upstream
> git rebase upstream/v1.1.x
>
> Mike
>
I am getting a whole bunch of conflict errors. I wonder if it is because I
rebased already when v1.1.x was pointed to master? Are we sure that v1.1.x
is ok? If so, I could just delete my copy and refetch it from upstream?
Ben Root

Showing 3 results of 3

Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X





Briefly describe the problem (required):
Upload screenshot of ad (required):
Select a file, or drag & drop file here.
Screenshot instructions:

Click URL instructions:
Right-click on the ad, choose "Copy Link", then paste here →
(This may not be possible with some types of ads)

More information about our ad policies

Ad destination/click URL:

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /