You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1
(2) |
2
(5) |
3
(1) |
4
(5) |
5
|
6
(2) |
7
(3) |
8
(1) |
9
|
10
(7) |
11
(13) |
12
|
13
|
14
(1) |
15
|
16
(2) |
17
|
18
(6) |
19
(2) |
20
(1) |
21
(14) |
22
(12) |
23
(15) |
24
(11) |
25
(15) |
26
|
27
|
28
(1) |
29
|
30
(1) |
31
(2) |
|
|
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Todd <tod...@gm...> wrote: > I think one thing that contributes a lot to the API issues is the > inconsistency between pyplot API and the OO API. There isn't any reason > the APIs need to be so different. > indeed. I hadn't even realized how different they were. > So the idea would be to have essentially all of the pyplot functions just > be wrappers for methods from other classes, using the same name and same > call signature (minus "self"). All of the actual functionality would be > implemented in the methods, the pyplot functions should not have any logic > or tests. > + inf However, doing this with full backward compatibility could be a real challenge... This will make it easy to transition between the two, learning to use the > OO interface would just involve learning what object the pyplot function is > targeting (this should be in the pyplot function docstring). > That would help, though a namespace without any non-OO stuff would be still be good, and, of course, docs and tutorials. -Chris -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer Emergency Response Division NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception Chr...@no...
Thank you all for the thoughts so far I have raised a pull request: https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/2554 To be clear, this is a 'structure only' pull request, I have made no documentation changes as yet. I see this as a part of the process. If we can agree structure we can work on aspects of the user guide, adding content into appropriate sections. all the best mark On 2013年9月25日 08:19:59 +0000 mark <ma...@me...> wrote: > hi matplotlib developers > > I have been considering the matplotlib user guide structure and it > has occured to me that there are two user guides interleaved here: > 1. Introduction for new users > 2. Library tour for developers > > I think that this structure makes it challenging for new users to > benefit from the user guide as much as they could. > > I would like to see the user guide separated into two sections, with > the two different audiences in mind. I feel this would enable new > users of the library to have a more targeted introduction to some of > the neat features without getting bogged down in details they are > unlikely to need (or comprehend). > > I am very happy to have a go at this and put up a set of suggested > changes but I would value input from the community on this approach > and my category suggestions before I submit a pull request. > > many thanks > mark > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > October Webinars: Code for Performance > Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. > Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the > most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts > and register > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ Matplotlib-devel > mailing list Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel