matplotlib-devel Mailing List for matplotlib

On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Benjamin Root <ben...@ou...> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Eric Firing <ef...@ha...> wrote:
>>
>> Can we please just release something now, so Debian doesn't have to come
>> up with their own modification of 1.0.1?
>>
>> Eric
>>
>
> As far as I am concerned, the only thing stopping us from releasing is:
>
> 1) There are figures that are failing to be generated by sphinx. I have
> noticed that all failed figures come from example code that uses "if
> __name__ == '__main__'" in the source. I have not investigated this
> further.
>
> 2) Need to update the docs to point to new bug-tracker, refer to the new
> version number in the main sidebar, and add a "What's New" section.
>
> To me, everything else is incidental and are not show-stoppers.
And Sandro mentioned this via about the ipython directive and console
highlighting: "You need to update ipython_directive.py and
ipython_console_highlighting.py.
Newer versions are available in the ipython source but they are not well
tested yet, please report problems upstream."
JDH

On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Eric Firing <ef...@ha...> wrote:
> Can we please just release something now, so Debian doesn't have to come
> up with their own modification of 1.0.1?
>
> Eric
>
>
As far as I am concerned, the only thing stopping us from releasing is:
1) There are figures that are failing to be generated by sphinx. I have
noticed that all failed figures come from example code that uses "if
__name__ == '__main__'" in the source. I have not investigated this
further.
2) Need to update the docs to point to new bug-tracker, refer to the new
version number in the main sidebar, and add a "What's New" section.
To me, everything else is incidental and are not show-stoppers.
Ben Root

Can we please just release something now, so Debian doesn't have to come 
up with their own modification of 1.0.1?
Eric
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [matplotlib] Provide ipython 0.11 compatibility (#411)
Date: 2011年8月03日 11:28:03 -0700
From: sandrotosi 
<rep...@re...>
To: ef...@ha...
Hi Eric,
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 19:59, efiring
<re...@re...>
wrote:
> As far as I know, mpl master is fully consistent with IPython 0.11. Do
> you have evidence or examples to the contrary?
Sorry I was too dense :)
Currently in Debian we provide mpl 1.0.1 and we'd like to also ship
ipython 0.11 . I've received a bug report where it states that mpl
1.0.1 needs to be adapted in order to work correctly with ipy 0.11
(and I hope the reported did his homework before submitting :) .
 From your reply I guess there was some work that it's maybe only on
master and was not released with 1.0.1 ? If so, can you please point
me to the relevant commits, so I can cherrypick them and update the
debian package?
I tried a very basic example, "plot([1, 2], [2, 4])", and it works
fine, but there might be some other snippets failing.
Thanks for your help,
-- 
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/issues/411#issuecomment-1720408