You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1
|
2
|
3
(3) |
4
(10) |
5
(1) |
6
(2) |
7
(3) |
8
(4) |
9
|
10
(7) |
11
(4) |
12
(1) |
13
(4) |
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
(1) |
18
(1) |
19
(4) |
20
(7) |
21
(1) |
22
(1) |
23
(5) |
24
(7) |
25
(8) |
26
(17) |
27
(5) |
28
|
29
(3) |
30
(10) |
31
(7) |
|
|
|
|
Matthew Brett wrote: >Hi, > >I noticed the recent call to update the new SciPy website on the >numpy-discuss list: > >http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=9585553&forum_id=4890 > >On the documentation page: > >http://new.scipy.org/Wiki/Documentation > >there is: > >http://new.scipy.org/Wiki/Plotting_Tutorial > >which has no content at the moment. > OK, I put up a bare-bones page there now. Feel free to extend it. > You are otherwise pointed to the >old page which lists plt, gplt etc scipy libraries. > The 3(!) old scipy plotting libraries have all been removed mainline scipy. Matplotlib happily made this the obvious choice. The old packages are in the scipy sandbox now, for anyone needing them. Can you please list where these old references are? Perhaps you could start a page on the wiki to collect things that need to be updated there. We need to go through and update examples to matplotlib. > I wondered what >the current thinking was on SciPy and plotting. Is it time to suggest >that SciPy users go straight to matplotlib? > > Yes! :)
That is pretty much what is suggested on the scipy mailling list. On 1/29/06, Matthew Brett <mat...@gm...> wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed the recent call to update the new SciPy website on the > numpy-discuss list: > > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=3D9585553&forum_id= =3D4890 > > On the documentation page: > > http://new.scipy.org/Wiki/Documentation > > there is: > > http://new.scipy.org/Wiki/Plotting_Tutorial > > which has no content at the moment. You are otherwise pointed to the > old page which lists plt, gplt etc scipy libraries. I wondered what > the current thinking was on SciPy and plotting. Is it time to suggest > that SciPy users go straight to matplotlib? > > Just a thought, > > Matthew > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log fi= les > for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes > searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid=103432&bid#0486&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-devel mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel >
Hi, I noticed the recent call to update the new SciPy website on the numpy-discuss list: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=3D9585553&forum_id= =3D4890 On the documentation page: http://new.scipy.org/Wiki/Documentation there is: http://new.scipy.org/Wiki/Plotting_Tutorial which has no content at the moment. You are otherwise pointed to the old page which lists plt, gplt etc scipy libraries. I wondered what the current thinking was on SciPy and plotting. Is it time to suggest that SciPy users go straight to matplotlib? Just a thought, Matthew