You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
(1) |
8
(2) |
9
|
10
(10) |
11
(4) |
12
(3) |
13
(7) |
14
(5) |
15
|
16
|
17
(2) |
18
(7) |
19
|
20
(3) |
21
(9) |
22
(1) |
23
|
24
(2) |
25
(7) |
26
|
27
|
28
(3) |
29
|
30
|
31
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 06:04:41PM -0500, bryce hendrix wrote: > How stable is the API? We (Enthought) use endo, a custom tool build on > top of docutils, to generate our docs currently. We have talked about > changing tools in the past, but the need to extend the tools to > understand Traits has held us back. Sphinx is not automated API documentation, like Endo or Epidoc. It is for manual writing of documentation. It does not compete with Endo or Epidoc, but complements them by taking a set of rst files and compiling both a set of searchable web pages, and an indexed pdf for print. Gaël
Fernando Perez wrote: > Hey guys, > > sorry for the silence, mostly on travel. I just wanted to mention > that the sphinx machinery seems quite nice, in particular it produces > both high-quality pdf and client-side searchable html. This is great, > because it measn that the entire doc set is automatically searchable > for the users in a convenient manner, even when running offline and > without the need for any special server config (and in a more > civilized fashion than brute-forcing grep searches). > > Also, Sympy (led by Ondrej), ipython, mayavi2 and at least > neuroimaging.scipy.org have all committed to using this system, and we > hope in the future numpy and scipy will follow suit (at least Jarrod > Millman and Stefan van der Walt, who are doing lots of work on those, > are fully on board with the idea). It would be really nice if all > these projects could offer unified, consistent docs to their users, > and having MPL jump along would be great. > How stable is the API? We (Enthought) use endo, a custom tool build on top of docutils, to generate our docs currently. We have talked about changing tools in the past, but the need to extend the tools to understand Traits has held us back. Thanks, Bryce
Hey guys, sorry for the silence, mostly on travel. I just wanted to mention that the sphinx machinery seems quite nice, in particular it produces both high-quality pdf and client-side searchable html. This is great, because it measn that the entire doc set is automatically searchable for the users in a convenient manner, even when running offline and without the need for any special server config (and in a more civilized fashion than brute-forcing grep searches). Also, Sympy (led by Ondrej), ipython, mayavi2 and at least neuroimaging.scipy.org have all committed to using this system, and we hope in the future numpy and scipy will follow suit (at least Jarrod Millman and Stefan van der Walt, who are doing lots of work on those, are fully on board with the idea). It would be really nice if all these projects could offer unified, consistent docs to their users, and having MPL jump along would be great. Cheers, f
Hi, I think that "collection._alpha = self.alpha" (or something better) are missing in ContoutSet.__init__, because _alpha from collections (Line or Poly) overrides the alpha value the color of "collection.set_color(color)" found in method "changed" of ContourSet. Therefore, alpha doesn't work for contours (filled or not). Nota: If "collection.set_alpha" is used, it fails with line contouring because self._edgecolors is an empty list. I hope it can help. -- Stephane Raynaud
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 7:38 AM, Darren Dale <dar...@co...> wrote: > There was some discussion a while back concerning upcoming changes to the mpl > documentation: moving the docs into the trunk and updating the website. I > can't find the thread now, could anyone summarize the current thinking? > Ondrej Certik recently implemented a sphinx-based documentation for ipython1 > (see http://ipython.scipy.org/doc/ipython1/html/ and > http://ipython.scipy.org/doc/ipython1/ipython1.pdf), I wonder if we should > consider doing the same for matplotlib. I'm definitely up for this or something close to it. We definitely want rest based docs which live in svn alongside the src distribution. If something like sphinx on top of it makes for better documents, I'm all for it. You may have seen that over the weekend I added a couple of API rst documents to the doc subdir, with some basic make.py support for building them into PDFs. If you or anyone would like to take a stab at getting a sphinx implementation going, have at it. JDH
For those of you wondering "what is sphinx?" this will save you a few seconds of searching: http://sphinx.pocoo.org/ The output looks really nice. Darren Dale wrote: > There was some discussion a while back concerning upcoming changes to the mpl > documentation: moving the docs into the trunk and updating the website. I > can't find the thread now, could anyone summarize the current thinking? > Ondrej Certik recently implemented a sphinx-based documentation for ipython1 > (see http://ipython.scipy.org/doc/ipython1/html/ and > http://ipython.scipy.org/doc/ipython1/ipython1.pdf), I wonder if we should > consider doing the same for matplotlib. > > I haven't had nearly as much time to contribute to matplotlib as I did when I > was still in grad school, but I think I will have some free time starting in > May and would like to contribute some more over the summer. Now is probably a > good time to start considering summer projects. > > Darren > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-devel mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
There was some discussion a while back concerning upcoming changes to the mpl documentation: moving the docs into the trunk and updating the website. I can't find the thread now, could anyone summarize the current thinking? Ondrej Certik recently implemented a sphinx-based documentation for ipython1 (see http://ipython.scipy.org/doc/ipython1/html/ and http://ipython.scipy.org/doc/ipython1/ipython1.pdf), I wonder if we should consider doing the same for matplotlib. I haven't had nearly as much time to contribute to matplotlib as I did when I was still in grad school, but I think I will have some free time starting in May and would like to contribute some more over the summer. Now is probably a good time to start considering summer projects. Darren