You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
(2) |
3
(7) |
4
(3) |
5
(7) |
6
(18) |
7
(6) |
8
|
9
(1) |
10
(1) |
11
(1) |
12
|
13
(5) |
14
(2) |
15
(2) |
16
|
17
(2) |
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
(1) |
23
(2) |
24
(3) |
25
(6) |
26
(1) |
27
|
28
(8) |
29
(9) |
30
(3) |
31
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
On Saturday, October 22, 2011, Daniel Hyams <dh...@gm...> wrote: > matplotlib doesn't support double clicks, and I was wondering if that > was a design decision, or something that had been relegated to the "to > do" box for someday. Hoping that it was still in the "todo" box, I > think I can put most of it in without too much trouble, and supply you > with a patch. > > The changes would be: > 1) an extra flag MouseEvent, so that in a button_press_event > handler, you can can tell if the press was a result of a double click > or not, and > 2) code in the backends to catch and set the double click flag properly > > I looked through the backends, and it was clear what to do in order to > support double clicks for all but backend_macosx.py. I might be able > to deduce what to do there, but will likely need some support from > someone in order to get that one done. > > To support the double clicks, I would rather not create a new event > like 'button_doubleclick_event', for backwards compatibility. I > believe that if we just stick with 'button_press_event' and set an > extra flag within the MouseEvent, any existing mpl code will still > work properly, because the normal sequence of events on a double click > are; DOWN, UP, DBLCLICK, UP. In current versions of matplotlib, the > DBLCLICK event is treated as a DOWN, and the strategy of just adding a > extra flag in MouseEvent would mean that existing mpl code would still > see the double click event as a DOWN. > > Anyway, I want to "throw a feeler" out there, and ask if the patch > would be accepted were I to go ahead and do it. I didn't want to spend > the time working on it if a decision had already been made a while > back to not ever support double clicks. > My vote would be yes, but I think i would want it as a separate event. Consider some of the widgets like lasso and the zoom bbox. If one were to attach a button_press_event for the purpose of detecting double clicks, I would imagine that there may exist conflicts (or those widget codes would have to be adjusted to exclusively respond only to single clicks). Would existing widgets also fire even if a double-click occured? My 2 cents, Ben Rootl
matplotlib doesn't support double clicks, and I was wondering if that was a design decision, or something that had been relegated to the "to do" box for someday. Hoping that it was still in the "todo" box, I think I can put most of it in without too much trouble, and supply you with a patch. The changes would be: 1) an extra flag MouseEvent, so that in a button_press_event handler, you can can tell if the press was a result of a double click or not, and 2) code in the backends to catch and set the double click flag properly I looked through the backends, and it was clear what to do in order to support double clicks for all but backend_macosx.py. I might be able to deduce what to do there, but will likely need some support from someone in order to get that one done. To support the double clicks, I would rather not create a new event like 'button_doubleclick_event', for backwards compatibility. I believe that if we just stick with 'button_press_event' and set an extra flag within the MouseEvent, any existing mpl code will still work properly, because the normal sequence of events on a double click are; DOWN, UP, DBLCLICK, UP. In current versions of matplotlib, the DBLCLICK event is treated as a DOWN, and the strategy of just adding a extra flag in MouseEvent would mean that existing mpl code would still see the double click event as a DOWN. Anyway, I want to "throw a feeler" out there, and ask if the patch would be accepted were I to go ahead and do it. I didn't want to spend the time working on it if a decision had already been made a while back to not ever support double clicks. -- Daniel Hyams dh...@gm...