You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
4
|
5
(4) |
6
(4) |
7
(11) |
8
(2) |
9
(3) |
10
(10) |
|
11
(1) |
12
(21) |
13
(8) |
14
(13) |
15
(6) |
16
(1) |
17
(3) |
|
18
(1) |
19
|
20
|
21
(2) |
22
(8) |
23
(5) |
24
(6) |
|
25
|
26
(3) |
27
(1) |
28
(3) |
|
|
|
Darren Dale wrote: > We support setuptools, but we do not require it. So, it sounds like setuptools is required now if one has Python 2.3. If so, is that acceptable--is the gain worth the pain? Is there any significant pain associated with requiring setuptools, at least for people with Python 2.3? Eric > > On Friday 23 February 2007 5:46:58 am Edin Salkovic wrote: >> I'm learning a bit about setuptools and distutils, so sorry if this is >> a no brainer: Are we using only distutils for matplotlib? I.e. - no >> setuptools? >> >> This is because I stumbled across this at the setuptools page: >> http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/setuptools >> ==== >> Feature Highlights: >> >> .... >> * Include data files inside your package directories, where your >> code can actually use them. (Python 2.4 distutils also supports this >> feature, but setuptools provides the feature for Python 2.3 packages >> also, and supports accessing data files in zipped packages too.) >> .... >> >> Cheers, >> Edin >> >> On 2/22/07, Darren Dale <dd...@co...> wrote: >>> I noticed today that setup.py is using package_data. Is this absolutely >>> necessary? The most recent version of Red Hat Enterprise Linux includes >>> python-2.3, which does not support package_data. We are still supporting >>> python-2.3, aren't we? >>> >>> Darren >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT >>> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share >>> your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash >>> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Matplotlib-devel mailing list >>> Mat...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT >> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share >> your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash >> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV >> _______________________________________________ >> Matplotlib-devel mailing list >> Mat...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel > > >
Hi, I just submitted a patch to sourceforge that adds some more marker types to scatter: asterisk like symbols. They are created similar to the Starlike symbols as a Polygon collection. The patch is attached to this mail together with a modified version of scatter_star_poly.py from the examples and its output. Manuel -- --------------------------------------- Manuel Metz ............ Stw@AIfA Argelander Institut fuer Astronomie Auf dem Huegel 71 (room 3.06) D - 53121 Bonn E-Mail: mm...@as... Web: www.astro.uni-bonn.de/~mmetz Phone: (+49) 228 / 73-3660 Fax: (+49) 228 / 73-3672 ---------------------------------------
We support setuptools, but we do not require it. On Friday 23 February 2007 5:46:58 am Edin Salkovic wrote: > I'm learning a bit about setuptools and distutils, so sorry if this is > a no brainer: Are we using only distutils for matplotlib? I.e. - no > setuptools? > > This is because I stumbled across this at the setuptools page: > http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/setuptools > ==== > Feature Highlights: > > .... > * Include data files inside your package directories, where your > code can actually use them. (Python 2.4 distutils also supports this > feature, but setuptools provides the feature for Python 2.3 packages > also, and supports accessing data files in zipped packages too.) > .... > > Cheers, > Edin > > On 2/22/07, Darren Dale <dd...@co...> wrote: > > I noticed today that setup.py is using package_data. Is this absolutely > > necessary? The most recent version of Red Hat Enterprise Linux includes > > python-2.3, which does not support package_data. We are still supporting > > python-2.3, aren't we? > > > > Darren > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share > > your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash > > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > > _______________________________________________ > > Matplotlib-devel mailing list > > Mat...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share > your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-devel mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel -- Darren S. Dale, Ph.D. dd...@co...
I'm learning a bit about setuptools and distutils, so sorry if this is a no brainer: Are we using only distutils for matplotlib? I.e. - no setuptools? This is because I stumbled across this at the setuptools page: http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/setuptools ==== Feature Highlights: .... * Include data files inside your package directories, where your code can actually use them. (Python 2.4 distutils also supports this feature, but setuptools provides the feature for Python 2.3 packages also, and supports accessing data files in zipped packages too.) .... Cheers, Edin On 2/22/07, Darren Dale <dd...@co...> wrote: > I noticed today that setup.py is using package_data. Is this absolutely > necessary? The most recent version of Red Hat Enterprise Linux includes > python-2.3, which does not support package_data. We are still supporting > python-2.3, aren't we? > > Darren > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-devel mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel >
Darren Dale wrote: > I noticed today that setup.py is using package_data. Is this absolutely > necessary? The most recent version of Red Hat Enterprise Linux includes > python-2.3, which does not support package_data. We are still supporting > python-2.3, aren't we? Yes, I am sure that is the intention. The change to setup.py occurred in revision 3011 as part of the reorganization to support running from a working directory and making eggs, or something like that. Eric