You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
1
(10) |
2
(4) |
3
(11) |
4
(4) |
5
(6) |
6
(8) |
7
(7) |
8
(9) |
9
(6) |
10
|
11
|
12
(7) |
13
(6) |
14
(18) |
15
(13) |
16
(7) |
17
(15) |
18
(1) |
19
|
20
(1) |
21
(2) |
22
(5) |
23
(3) |
24
(4) |
25
(1) |
26
|
27
(8) |
28
(2) |
29
(5) |
30
|
|
|
(CC'ing list this time) On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 4:30 AM, Dieter Weber <di...@ue...> wrote: > Hi Ryan, > well, I was rethinking the patch again after sending it, and I got it > wrong. :-/ Accessing a deprecated property would give a KeyError with my > previous patch, as this property is never set. To support deprecated > options and display warning messages, one needs some kind of custom > __getitem__ method. I've appended a diff where such a method is created > "on demand" if the verbosity level is 'helpful' or more. Which is why I left it to people more familiar with the code to do a more, ahem, thorough review. Still, I wonder if there's a better way to maintain the runtime boost without needing a __getitem__... Need coffee for that. Ryan -- Ryan May Graduate Research Assistant School of Meteorology University of Oklahoma
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Dieter Weber <di...@ue...> wrote: > Hi, > I'm currently working on speeding up the legend rendering of matplotlib > as this turns out to be a bottleneck for my application. With some > tracing and profiling, I found that > matplotlib.__init__.RcParams.__getitem__() makes up around 10% of the > total function calls (by number) in my little test program. It is called > continuously all over the matplotlib code, whenever a configuration > parameter is accessed. > > Therefore removed the __getitem__ method and moved the key validation to > a newly written __init__ function, so that validation only happens once > the object is created, and otherwise the native lookup of the dict() > class is used. This made my program around 10% faster! :-) > > The diff ("svn diff") is appended. If you are interested in the > profiling results (not only regarding this piece of code), please let me > know! First glance looks alright to me, though I haven't looked in heavy detail. I will defer, however, to those much more familiar with this code. Thanks for the patch, Ryan -- Ryan May Graduate Research Assistant School of Meteorology University of Oklahoma