You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1
|
2
(6) |
3
(6) |
4
(9) |
5
(3) |
6
(4) |
7
|
8
(8) |
9
(4) |
10
|
11
(4) |
12
(2) |
13
(4) |
14
(3) |
15
(1) |
16
(1) |
17
(6) |
18
(3) |
19
|
20
(2) |
21
(3) |
22
(4) |
23
(2) |
24
(5) |
25
(1) |
26
|
27
(3) |
28
(3) |
29
(3) |
30
(1) |
31
(2) |
|
|
|
|
Hi Everyone, There is a new formatter in ticker.py called NewScalarFormatter. If you have scientific notation in your plots, you may like the results. If you would like to try it out, you need to change ScalarFormatter->OldScalarFormatter, and NewScalarFormatter->ScalarFormatter. It will then be the default for linear scale axes. I would appreciate feedback, it will hopefully become the default at some point. Darren
It looks like there is a bug in the text bounding boxes. It causes some problems in the postscript backend, where I noticed badly formatted logscale ticks. It looks like the bug exists in the AGG backend as well, although it is less noticeable there. I filed two bugs at the sf website, with images of bboxes that dont fit their associated text. You can also run the script below, but you will need a recent update of patches.py, John fixed a bug there today. I assigned the PS bug to myself. If anyone has some insight, I could definitely use it. Darren http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1177396&group_id=80706&atid=560720 from pylab import * def addtext(props): text(0.5, 0.5, 'xx-small', props, fontsize='xx-small') text(1.5, 0.5, 'x-small', props, fontsize='x-small') text(2.5, 0.5, 'small', props, fontsize='small') text(3.5, 0.5, 'medium', props, fontsize='medium') text(4.5, 0.5, 'large', props, fontsize='large') yticks([0,.5,1]) # the text bounding box bbox = {'fc':0.8, 'pad':0} figure(1,figsize=(5,2)) axes() addtext({'ha':'center', 'va':'center', 'bbox':bbox}) xlim(0,5) savefig('/home/darren/temp/bbox.eps') savefig('/home/darren/temp/bbox.png') show()
Matt Newville wrote: > For my apps, I provide interactivity by binding left-click to > 'report x,y coords', left-down-and-drag (ie, move more than a > few pixels) to 'Zoom to Rectangle', and have right-click bring > up a pop-up menu with 'zoom back 1 level', 'zoom back to full > view', and 'save image', among other things. That makes the I'll think about it, perhaps its a better solution. With 3 buttons and 1 wheel most of actions can be easily accessed. > I do think it would be possible to come up with yet another > binding mode (toolbar, toolbar2, ... no_toolbar, or toolbar0??), > where the above behavior was provided. I don't know if that > would be considered generally useful or not. Probably it will be useful for me. Marcin --=20 Marcin Wojdyr | http://www.unipress.waw.pl/~wojdyr
John Hunter wrote: > > What do you mean by updating plot -- calling a plot command? Calling Yes > "plot" and related functions does autoscale the axes -- is this the > problem you are referring to? Yes, that was the problem. > It might be useful to add and > autoscale=3DFalse option, much in the way we have a hold=3DTrue|False > option, to the plot command, so one could issue a plot command w/o > changing the current view lim. > Yes, but I would also like to allow user explicitly autoscale, ie. show whole plot when when pressing home (or another) button. So I don't want to change the current view lim when calling plot command, but I want to know what the new data lims are, to be able to use it later= . Marcin --=20 Marcin Wojdyr | http://www.unipress.waw.pl/~wojdyr
Hi Marcin, > And why wx and gtk toolbars are different -- in GTK button > descriptions are in tooltips and x,y position is displayed in > toolbar, and in wx statusbar is used? Are they different by > design? I prefer the first way, without statusbar. Hmm, I'd guess they're different because no one noticed or because 'desired behavior' is not obvious. Having tooltips does seem like a good idea, and doable, but reporting x,y to the statusbar seems like the right place to me. > And last thing: what do you think about making toolbar2 more > hmm.. interactive(?), i mean disabled back/forward buttons > whan there is no history, pressed pan/zoom buttons when in > pan/zoom mode etc? I don't know if I'll try to do it, but if > someone would do it, would it be included in MPL? I think this is a good suggestion and not too difficult to do for wx. For the rest of your post, I realize this doesn't answer your immediate questions, and may not be mpl-correct, but....: My preference for Apps is to not use the toolbars at all. Maybe this is because I never used Matlab, or maybe because I confuse toolbar and toolbar2, and don't remember the meaning of all the icons (is the left arrow "move left" or "back one view"? which one is "pan/zoom" and which is "zoom to rectangle"? why does 'axis' show up for plots with only one axis?). Also, the toolbars take up room for something that is not used all the time, and this functionality is (IMO) better in the menus or toolbars of the Application or in pop-up menus. In short, I don't think the toolbars are appropriate for Apps. For my apps, I provide interactivity by binding left-click to 'report x,y coords', left-down-and-drag (ie, move more than a few pixels) to 'Zoom to Rectangle', and have right-click bring up a pop-up menu with 'zoom back 1 level', 'zoom back to full view', and 'save image', among other things. That makes the most important actions (report x,y, zoom in) always "on", and the second most important actions (zoom out, save image) are relatively easy to get to (right click on the plot then use menu, as opposed to clicking on a toolbar button). Maybe this negative opinion of the toolbars disqualifies me from commenting on them (in which case, my apologies). Or maybe the toolbars really aren't what you want in your apps, either. I do think it would be possible to come up with yet another binding mode (toolbar, toolbar2, ... no_toolbar, or toolbar0??), where the above behavior was provided. I don't know if that would be considered generally useful or not. --Matt
>>>>> "Marcin" == Marcin Wojdyr <wo...@un...> writes: Marcin> Hi, I was trying to make updating plot not cause to change Marcin> zoom. I have wxPython program with embedded plot and I Marcin> can change some parameters what makes some changes on the Marcin> plot. User should be able to zoom and then change these What do you mean by updating plot -- calling a plot command? Calling "plot" and related functions does autoscale the axes -- is this the problem you are referring to? It might be useful to add and autoscale=False option, much in the way we have a hold=True|False option, to the plot command, so one could issue a plot command w/o changing the current view lim. I ready through your post several times but still am not quite sure what problem you are describing. Could you elaborate? Could you be more specific: what are the "parameters" for example? Marcin> parameters and see how it influences plot, OTOH it should Marcin> be easy to show whole plot, eg. using home button. Marcin> Perhaps I'm wrong, but I think its quite common Marcin> requirement. Marcin> BTW pressing home button calls toolbar's draw() twice: OK, I'll fix this. Thanks. Marcin> And why wx and gtk toolbars are different -- in GTK button Marcin> descriptions are in tooltips and x,y position is displayed Marcin> in toolbar, and in wx statusbar is used? Are they Marcin> different by design? I prefer the first way, without Marcin> statusbar. This is mainly due to historical accident. He who write the backend generally does it the way they want. The wx backend was the 2nd GUI ever and there was no policy. Since then we've worked to make the interface between the backends fairly uniform but there are some historical differences. I don't feel strongly about it, but am amenable to accepting a patch to change wx to behave like the other backends. Marcin> And last thing: what do you think about making toolbar2 Marcin> more hmm.. interactive(?), i mean disabled back/forward Marcin> buttons whan there is no history, pressed pan/zoom buttons Marcin> when in pan/zoom mode etc? I don't know if I'll try to do Marcin> it, but if someone would do it, would it be included in Marcin> MPL? Yes, this would be nice. I think fltk already does this. It's mainly a matter of getting to this to work on each and every backend. I think Steve and I both looked at this for gtk, but couldn't an easy way to do this. Part of the problem, I think, is that mpl is using custom images for these buttons and it wasn't clear to me how to indicate "pressed" status with button relief, etc... Patches gladly accepted. JDH