You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
1
(1) |
2
(7) |
3
|
4
|
5
(16) |
6
(11) |
7
|
8
(1) |
9
(4) |
10
(10) |
11
|
12
(4) |
13
(4) |
14
(5) |
15
(5) |
16
(11) |
17
(3) |
18
(2) |
19
(5) |
20
(2) |
21
(5) |
22
(2) |
23
(2) |
24
|
25
|
26
(4) |
27
(8) |
28
(9) |
29
(9) |
30
(5) |
31
(1) |
John Hunter wrote: > After reading in a separate thread that Eric was having trouble with > svnmerge, I gave it a try and got > > jdhunter@uqbar:mpl> svnmerge.py merge v0_98_5_maint > svnmerge: "v0_98_5_maint" is not a subversion working directory > > Maybe our svn merge guru (MD) could take a look and see if anything > looks out of whack? John, I don't understand exactly what was going on, but I suspect there may have been two or more problems--especially since you seem to have run into the same error message that I was getting. One problem, I think, is that I was trying to run svnmerge from a subdirectory instead of from the root of my checkout. I simply did not notice that I was in the wrong directory until I had thrashed around for a while. There may be, or have been, a larger problem as well--maybe caused by me, maybe not. In any case, to get things working, I reran svnmerge init https://matplotlib.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/matplotlib/branches/v0_98_5_maint but it looks like I was still in the wrong directory when I did that, so I don't know if it had any useful effect. After getting into the right directory, some combination of svn up and svnmerge merge seemed to get everything straightened out, with a little editing to resolve conflicts along the way. That was last night, in the misty past. Now it looks like I am back with the original problem I started with last night, and which you also reported: efiring@manini:~/programs/py/mpl/mpl_trunk$ svnmerge avail /branches/v0_98_5_maint svnmerge: "/branches/v0_98_5_maint" is not a subversion working directory So, I'm baffled again. It is as if Jae-Joon's commit since mine of last night, and my corresponding "svn up" this morning, wiped out the svnmerge tracking info. I suspect a brief wave of Mike's magic wand tomorrow morning will clear away the fog. Eric
After reading in a separate thread that Eric was having trouble with svnmerge, I gave it a try and got jdhunter@uqbar:mpl> svnmerge.py merge v0_98_5_maint svnmerge: "v0_98_5_maint" is not a subversion working directory Maybe our svn merge guru (MD) could take a look and see if anything looks out of whack? JDH
Hi all, I added an (experimental) bbox_inches option for savefig in the trunk. If provided, only the specified area of the figure will be saved. bbox_inches can be "tight", and a tight bounding box is internally estimated (but this draws the figure twice). Take a look at "demo_tightbbox.py". The implementaion is a bit experimental, and it would be appreciated if others test and review the changes. When bbox_inches is given, savefig temporarily modifies fig.bbox, fig.bbox_inches and fig.transFigure._boxout. The algorithm to determine the tight bbox is rather primitive and should be improved. regards, -JJ