You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
1
(6) |
2
(5) |
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
(4) |
7
(3) |
8
|
9
(5) |
10
|
11
|
12
(1) |
13
|
14
|
15
(4) |
16
(1) |
17
(4) |
18
(1) |
19
(4) |
20
(4) |
21
(5) |
22
(1) |
23
(3) |
24
(6) |
25
(1) |
26
(19) |
27
(13) |
28
(9) |
|
|
|
|
Ew. Ok. No thanks. :-) I'll just stick with numpy 0.9.4 for now. I appreciate the speedy response. --bb On 2/17/06, David M. Cooke <co...@ph...> wrote: > > Bill Baxter <wb...@gm...> writes: > > > After upgrading to numpy 0.9.5 (numpy-0.9.5.win32-py2.4.exe) running th= e > > following script causes a crash of python.exe: > > > > -------------test.py----------------- > > import pylab > > ---------------------------------------- > > > > > > In my .matplotlibrc file I have the following: > > ------------- > > backend : WXAgg > > numerix : numpy > > ------------- > > > > > > Reinstalling numpy 0.9.4 fixed the problem. > > > > Matplotlib version is 0.86.2-win32-py2.4 > > I also tried reinstalling matplotlib, but that didn't help. > > You'll have to recompile matplotlib against the newer numpy. > > -- > |>|\/|< > > /------------------------------------------------------------------------= --\ > |David M. Cooke > http://arbutus.physics.mcmaster.ca/dmc/ > |co...@ph... > -- William V. Baxter III OLM Digital Kono Dens Building Rm 302 1-8-8 Wakabayashi Setagaya-ku Tokyo, Japan 154-0023 +81 (3) 3422-3380
Bill Baxter <wb...@gm...> writes: > After upgrading to numpy 0.9.5 (numpy-0.9.5.win32-py2.4.exe) running the > following script causes a crash of python.exe: > > -------------test.py----------------- > import pylab > ---------------------------------------- > > > In my .matplotlibrc file I have the following: > ------------- > backend : WXAgg > numerix : numpy > ------------- > > > Reinstalling numpy 0.9.4 fixed the problem. > > Matplotlib version is 0.86.2-win32-py2.4 > I also tried reinstalling matplotlib, but that didn't help. You'll have to recompile matplotlib against the newer numpy. -- |>|\/|< /--------------------------------------------------------------------------\ |David M. Cooke http://arbutus.physics.mcmaster.ca/dmc/ |co...@ph...
After upgrading to numpy 0.9.5 (numpy-0.9.5.win32-py2.4.exe) running the following script causes a crash of python.exe: -------------test.py----------------- import pylab ---------------------------------------- In my .matplotlibrc file I have the following: ------------- backend : WXAgg numerix : numpy ------------- Reinstalling numpy 0.9.4 fixed the problem. Matplotlib version is 0.86.2-win32-py2.4 I also tried reinstalling matplotlib, but that didn't help. --Bill Baxter
On Wed, 2006年02月15日 at 20:36 -0800, mat...@li... wrote: > Hello, > > I'm using matplotlib figures in several places at a time in my GTK > based app (means different page in a notebook). > I have trace a bug I partially solved but still doubting if it is a > matplotlib bug or a bad design of my app. > > Matplotlib 0.86.2 > pygtk-2.8.4 > gtk+-2.8.6 > > Here is the problem: > > in matplotlib/backends/backend_gtk.py file, in > class FigureCanvasGTK (gtk.DrawingArea, FigureCanvasBase): > ... in: > > def draw(self): > # synchronous window redraw (like GTK+ 1.2 used to do) > # Note: this does not follow the usual way that GTK redraws, > # which is asynchronous redraw using calls to > gtk_widget_queue_draw(), > # which triggers an expose-event > > # GTK+ 2.x style draw() > 1- self._need_redraw = True > 1- self.queue_draw() > > # synchronous draw (needed for animation) > 2- x, y, w, h = self.allocation > 2- if w<3 or h<3: return # empty fig > > 2- self._pixmap_prepare (w, h) > 2- self._render_figure(self._pixmap, w, h) > 2- self._need_redraw = False > 2- self.window.draw_drawable (self.style.fg_gc[self.state], > 2- self._pixmap, 0, 0, 0, 0, w, h) > > > If I use method 1- (and comment 2-) no problem, all run smoothly... > But using the default method, switching on method 2- (and comment 1-) > I get the followig error message when trying to redraw one of the > figure > (the figure is plotted correctly the first time. No change made to the > figure, just redrawing...) > > ***/python2.4/site-packages/matplotlib/backends/backend_gtk.py:298: > GtkWarning: gdk_pixmap_new: assertion `(drawable != NULL) || (depth != > -1)' failed > self._pixmap_height) > Traceback (most recent call last): > ... > self.canvas_leak.draw() > File > "***/python2.4/site-packages/matplotlib/backends/backend_gtk.py", line > 250, in draw > self._pixmap_prepare (w, h) > File > "***/python2.4/site-packages/matplotlib/backends/backend_gtk.py", line > 298, in _pixmap_prepare > self._pixmap_height) > RuntimeError: could not create GdkPixmap object > > Somebody has a clue ??? > Its difficult to say if its bug in backend_gtk.py, it depends on exactly what your application is doing. You would need to post a minimal test case that demonstrates the bug so we could see whats going on. Steve Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com