You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
1
(2) |
2
(1) |
3
(4) |
4
(4) |
5
|
6
(2) |
7
(1) |
8
|
9
(1) |
10
(4) |
11
(1) |
12
|
13
(1) |
14
(3) |
15
(6) |
16
(1) |
17
(1) |
18
(1) |
19
|
20
|
21
(2) |
22
(2) |
23
(1) |
24
(3) |
25
(2) |
26
(8) |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
(1) |
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Eric Firing <efi...@gm...> wrote: > but as far as I can see, on OSX, there is no *advantage* to non-framework > python. Is this correct? > > Suggestion for anaconda: > make bin/python a link to ../python.app/Contents/MacOS/python > NOTE: the python.org python build has been doing this (or something like it) for years and many versions -- I had gotten pretty used to it and was pretty annoyed when I discovered Anaconda keeps anon-framework binary as the default. It was annoying enough that I had to explicitly call pythonw (or alter the #! line) for my wxPython scripts, but with ipython it's even worse -- how would I start up ipython with a framework build? NOTE: if the Anaconda folks really think there is a real downside to using the framework executable for the default python, maybe the ipython start up script could use pythonw ? Eric - have you tried recent MPL with the python.org builds to confirm the issue? I'm a bit surprised that it would even semi-work -- when I try wxPython with the regular executable, I get an error message and it wont run at all. > (On 2.7, I think this would also make wxpython applications work, but I > haven't checked recently.) > yup -- it should -- does for me anyway. If there is some reason why this default to a framework is not a good idea, > and/or cannot be implemented very soon in Anaconda, then I think we need to > immediately remove macosx as a default in matplotlib. A situation where a > new Anaconda user fires up ipython and tries to plot, and it fails, is > intolerable. for what it's worth, I get odd os-x errors trying to se default MPL with Anaconda as well -- haven't tried pythonw for that yet. (kludged it by using the Agg back end only) -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer Emergency Response Division NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception Chr...@no...
Can you make a blocker issue for this? Is it worth looping the ipython devs in on this email/issue as well? On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Eric Firing <ef...@ha...> wrote: > On 2014年08月13日, 1:19 PM, Eric Firing wrote: >> Unless there is something odd about my machine and attempted setups, we >> have a very bad situation. I have OS X 10.9 (Mavericks). I am seeing >> the same problem with homebrew python and pip-installed numpy, >> pip-installed mpl from git 1.4rc3, and from Anaconda 2.0.1, all with >> python 3.4. >> >> Do the normal thing: fire up ipython, use %matplotlib magic, import >> numpy and pyplot, make a plot. The macosx backend comes up as the >> default. A plot appears, but it is not interactive. >> >> Maybe this is related to the framework vs non-framework build question. >> In a way, I don't care--the important point is that using *common* >> methods of trying to get started with ipython and mpl on up-to-date >> python, one immediately runs into a basic failure. >> >> If this can't be fixed *fast*, I suggest we make the macosx backend >> available only by special request, not by default, as of a 1.4 release. >> >> Yes, this can go to a github issue if appropriate, but first I want to >> get thoughts from a wider audience. >> >> Comments? >> >> (I'm wondering why this hasn't driven someone else nuts some time >> ago--hasn't anyone else run into this?) >> >> Eric > > Clue: my first try with homebrew was in a virtualenv. Now I installed > everything directly, without the virtualenv, and the first plot trial > worked. Then I tried restarting ipthon and using "%matplotlib qt". > Plotting was OK, but after closing the plot window and going away for a > bit, upon coming back, the ipython terminal was extremely sluggish. > App-nap problems? I was having similar response problems in some > earlier trials as well, with ipython in anaconda. I thought all this > was supposed to have been cleared up by now... > > I went back to anaconda, and verified I am still getting the > unresponsive window--it can't even be resized. > > Eric > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-devel mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel -- Thomas Caswell tca...@gm...
On 2014年08月13日, 1:19 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > Unless there is something odd about my machine and attempted setups, we > have a very bad situation. I have OS X 10.9 (Mavericks). I am seeing > the same problem with homebrew python and pip-installed numpy, > pip-installed mpl from git 1.4rc3, and from Anaconda 2.0.1, all with > python 3.4. > > Do the normal thing: fire up ipython, use %matplotlib magic, import > numpy and pyplot, make a plot. The macosx backend comes up as the > default. A plot appears, but it is not interactive. > > Maybe this is related to the framework vs non-framework build question. > In a way, I don't care--the important point is that using *common* > methods of trying to get started with ipython and mpl on up-to-date > python, one immediately runs into a basic failure. > > If this can't be fixed *fast*, I suggest we make the macosx backend > available only by special request, not by default, as of a 1.4 release. > > Yes, this can go to a github issue if appropriate, but first I want to > get thoughts from a wider audience. > > Comments? > > (I'm wondering why this hasn't driven someone else nuts some time > ago--hasn't anyone else run into this?) > > Eric Clue: my first try with homebrew was in a virtualenv. Now I installed everything directly, without the virtualenv, and the first plot trial worked. Then I tried restarting ipthon and using "%matplotlib qt". Plotting was OK, but after closing the plot window and going away for a bit, upon coming back, the ipython terminal was extremely sluggish. App-nap problems? I was having similar response problems in some earlier trials as well, with ipython in anaconda. I thought all this was supposed to have been cleared up by now... I went back to anaconda, and verified I am still getting the unresponsive window--it can't even be resized. Eric