You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
(1) |
3
(4) |
4
|
5
|
6
(15) |
7
(2) |
8
(1) |
9
(3) |
10
|
11
|
12
(8) |
13
(6) |
14
(4) |
15
(6) |
16
(1) |
17
|
18
(1) |
19
(4) |
20
|
21
|
22
(7) |
23
(12) |
24
(2) |
25
(1) |
26
(3) |
27
|
28
(2) |
29
(1) |
30
(2) |
|
Based on a quick look, I think it would be easy to make LineCollection and PolyCollection accept a numerix array in place of [(x,y), (x,y), ...] for each line segment or polygon; specifically, this could replaced by an N x 2 array, where the first column would be x and the second would be y. Backwards compatibility could be maintained easily. This would eliminate quite a bit of useless conversion back and forth among lists, tuples, and arrays. As it is, each sequence of sequences is converted to a pair of arrays in backend_bases, and typically it started out as either a 2-D numerix array or a pair of 1-D arrays in the code that is calling the collection constructor. Using a single 2-D array makes it easier to determine whether one is dealing with 'old-style' inputs or 'new-style' inputs, but it might still be reasonable to allow [X, Y] instead or in addition, where X and Y are 1-D numerix arrays. Any objections or alternative suggestions? Eric
I'm making an errorbar plot with assymetric errorbars. The docstring says: xerr and yerr may be any of: a rank-0, Nx1 Numpy array - symmetric errorbars +/- value an N-element list or tuple - symmetric errorbars +/- value a rank-1, Nx2 Numpy array - asymmetric errorbars -column1/+column2 I think that last line should read: a 2xN Numpy array - asymmetric errorbars -row1/+row2 Darren
How about 'plots'? (i.e., a bunch of plot commands) Perhaps this could also be the function that loops through multiple =20 lines. For example in matlab you can do plot (x, y) plot (x', y') to plot out a grid -- the columns (or is it the rows..) are looped =20 through inside the plot command. Is this the sort of thing you have =20 in mind for the new 'parplot' command? -Rob On Jun 14, 2006, at 1:06 AM, Ga=EBl Varoquaux wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 05:33:57PM +0200, Ga=EBl Varoquaux wrote: >> I find that "parplot" is not a great name for such a function, =20= >> but I >> cannot think of a better one. Maybe the list will have better ideas. > > Talking to a friend we came up with a name like "pathcolor", or > "pathplot". > > Ga=EBl > > > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-devel mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel ----- Rob Hetland, Assistant Professor Dept of Oceanography, Texas A&M University p: 979-458-0096, f: 979-845-6331 e: he...@ta..., w: http://pong.tamu.edu
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 05:33:57PM +0200, Ga=EBl Varoquaux wrote: > I find that "parplot" is not a great name for such a function, but = I > cannot think of a better one. Maybe the list will have better ideas. Talking to a friend we came up with a name like "pathcolor", or "pathplot". Ga=EBl