You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1
(1) |
2
|
3
(1) |
4
|
5
|
6
(1) |
7
(1) |
8
|
9
(4) |
10
(2) |
11
(1) |
12
(6) |
13
(1) |
14
(1) |
15
(3) |
16
(1) |
17
(8) |
18
(6) |
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
(5) |
24
|
25
(1) |
26
|
27
(4) |
28
|
29
|
30
(1) |
|
|
|
On this topic, I have a patch that tells BboxImage whether or not to always apply interpolation (as is the desire when doing data analysis) or to apply interpolation only when the image is at a non-native resolution (as is the desire when using an image to annotate something). The pull request is here: Since we cannot attach files on github, I've attached the test script, image file that I was using, and the before/after here. And can the max post size be increased on matplotlib-users, so that when even smallish images are attached, the messages don't go into moderation? On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Daniel Hyams <dh...@gm...> wrote: > Ah yes, I forget :/ I was focused on images as being "pure" things that > should be displayed, and forgot about the image processing angle. > So would the solution be a keyword argument that tells imshow/BboxImage and > friends not to interpolate when at native resolution, which is set to the > current behavior as default? > If that's not an acceptable solution, I can just leave the patch in my own > personal code and not worry about any further...I thought that I was fixing > a bug there :) > > I guess the main difference is whether the image is treated as sacred and > should be displayed perfectly when possible, versus the ability to modify > the picture on purpose via the interpolations, for whatever reason the user > wants. Understandably, matplotlib has taken the latter approach, because > the context has always been (as far as I can tell from the examples) > displaying the pixels for a scientific purpose. However, when you want to > display an image for a annotational type purpose, the former approach should > be taken, in my opinion. > > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:13 AM, John Hunter <jd...@gm...> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Daniel Hyams <dh...@gm...> wrote: >> >> > Isn't the purpose of interpolation to handle situations where the image >> > is >> > being displayed at a different size than its native resolution? It >> > seems >> >> Not solely, it can also be used to do local average of noisy images to >> get a smoother view, eg bilinear or bicubic averaging of neighboring >> pixels. > > > > -- > Daniel Hyams > dh...@gm... > -- Daniel Hyams dh...@gm...