You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
(4) |
2
(3) |
3
(12) |
4
(8) |
5
(10) |
6
(21) |
7
(25) |
8
(3) |
9
(3) |
10
(4) |
11
(6) |
12
(20) |
13
(32) |
14
(15) |
15
(4) |
16
(2) |
17
(4) |
18
(2) |
19
(3) |
20
(3) |
21
(7) |
22
(16) |
23
(2) |
24
(14) |
25
(11) |
26
(4) |
27
(2) |
28
(3) |
29
(5) |
30
(26) |
31
(18) |
|
|
|
|
|
John Hunter wrote: > On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Eric Firing<ef...@ha...> wrote: > > >> I did not commit #3. Apart from my lack of c++ expertise, I don't know how >> to implement it so that it takes effect only in the Solaris case. Therefore >> I am leaving this for John; or maybe he will pass it to Mike when he comes >> back from vacation. Below, I am deleting all but #3, to make it easier for >> John to see what we are talking about. >> > > I can try and take a look at this tomorrow. I do have a solaris box > at work to test on, but we are on an older version of gcc. Ideally, > we could find a c preprocessor macro to indicate the platform rather > than do an uname conditioned patch. If anyone knows of a platform > macro for solaris to check for, let me know. > > We have some people in the Sage project who know Solaris very well and are actively porting Sage and the projects Sage contains to Solaris. I have therefore posted your message to the sage-devel list, and can forward replies from there to here. See http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/ae13e25616779f64 Thanks, Jason
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Eric Firing<ef...@ha...> wrote: > I did not commit #3. Apart from my lack of c++ expertise, I don't know how > to implement it so that it takes effect only in the Solaris case. Therefore > I am leaving this for John; or maybe he will pass it to Mike when he comes > back from vacation. Below, I am deleting all but #3, to make it easier for > John to see what we are talking about. I can try and take a look at this tomorrow. I do have a solaris box at work to test on, but we are on an older version of gcc. Ideally, we could find a c preprocessor macro to indicate the platform rather than do an uname conditioned patch. If anyone knows of a platform macro for solaris to check for, let me know. JDH
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Jouni K. Seppänen<jk...@ik...> wrote: > I think mirroring a directory structure is somewhat more complicated > than caching a set of arbitrary URLs in a flat cache directory. For > example, I think the remove_stale_files method will need to be changed > to walk all subdirectories, and handling cases such as having a > subdirectory named foo that is replaced by a file named foo could be > complicated. > > One thing that's still missing is off-line usage: if the user does not > have net connectivity at the moment but does have the file in the cache, > it should not cause an error. > > Perhaps the base URL should be > http://matplotlib.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/matplotlib/trunk/sample_data/ > instead of > http://matplotlib.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/matplotlib/trunk/sample_data/ > to avoid dependency on the viewvc service of SourceForge. Would you like to take a crack at these fixes? I have scipy coming up and need to start getting my tutorial material together, so I am not going to have a lot of time for bug fixes, though I would be happy to get as many fixes and patches in next week and try to get one bugfix 0.99.1 out before scipy. JDH
jas...@cr... wrote: > Here are a few patches that we in Sage have been applying to our version > of matplotlib. I'm wondering if some or all of these might be > incorporated into matplotlib, or if not, if you could comment on these > patches. I've updated the following diffs to be against 0.99.0. I've > separated the patches with a bunch of dashes. Jason, I have committed versions of all but the third to the v0.99 branch. Please check svn r7442-7444. I also propagated them to the trunk. If you have any questions or reservations about the modifications I made, please raise them! (The modification to #1 is because blanket "except:" is highly discouraged in mpl, and seemed unnecessary here. The modification to #4 is for code clarity, to make it even more obvious that the empty string is used as the version only in case of an exception.) I did not commit #3. Apart from my lack of c++ expertise, I don't know how to implement it so that it takes effect only in the Solaris case. Therefore I am leaving this for John; or maybe he will pass it to Mike when he comes back from vacation. Below, I am deleting all but #3, to make it easier for John to see what we are talking about. Eric > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ttconv/pprdrv_tt2.cpp: This patch is *only* applied when `uname` = > "SunOS". The comment is: Copy patched version of pprdrv_tt2.cpp for > Solaris 10 that builds with gcc 4.3.2. > > > --- src/ttconv/pprdrv_tt2.cpp 2009年08月01日 12:15:15.000000000 -0700 > +++ patches/pprdrv_tt2.cpp 2009年08月08日 23:33:24.000000000 -0700 > @@ -104,7 +104,8 @@ > { /* have a log of points. */ > if(stack_depth == 0) > { > - stream.put_char('{'); > + // Note the below is a hack to make it compile on Solaris > 10 with gcc 4.3.2 > + stream.puts("{"); > stack_depth=1; > } > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------