You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
1
(3) |
2
(4) |
3
|
4
(2) |
5
|
6
(4) |
7
(11) |
8
(7) |
9
(9) |
10
(3) |
11
|
12
|
13
(4) |
14
(1) |
15
(24) |
16
(8) |
17
(11) |
18
(6) |
19
(2) |
20
(14) |
21
(13) |
22
(14) |
23
(3) |
24
(6) |
25
(2) |
26
|
27
(9) |
28
(18) |
29
(7) |
30
(15) |
31
(5) |
|
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Gregor Thalhammer <gre...@gm...> wrote: > Is this really an intended behaviour? Wouldn't it be better if > get_xlim() already returns a copy? Or could at least the documentation > be updated to mention this pitfall? I think it should return a copy -- if I don't hear any objections I'll change it. JDH
Dear developers, the following example shows a somewhat unexpected behaviour of the get_xlim() method of an axis object: it returns a view to the internal data structure used to store the data limits. Because of this saving and restoring the data limits failed in this example (I am using matplotlib 0.98.3): from pylab import * plot([0,1], [0,1]) #create some plot ax = gca() #keep reference to axis #after some time, I want to change the plot content, but keep the data limits xlimits = ax.get_xlim() #save limits print xlimits ax.clear() #first clear axis, then plot([1,2], [1,2]) #create new plot content ax.set_xlim(xlimits) #does _not_ restore old limits print xlimits #since saved xlimits also changed Now I know that I have to use xlimits = ax.get_xlim().copy() if I want to save the data limits. Is this really an intended behaviour? Wouldn't it be better if get_xlim() already returns a copy? Or could at least the documentation be updated to mention this pitfall? Gregor
John Hunter wrote: > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Erik Tollerud <eri...@gm...> wrote: >> Ah, that makes more sense Jae-Joon - thanks! > > Jae-Joon -- could you handle this patch submission? > > Thanks, > JDH Hi, I also had a look at this patch -- as that's a feature I was interested in, too. There are a few things that I think need to be changed; just want to share my thoughts: - the parameter numpoints should be used (it's ignored right now) - Some private variables are accessed and a new RegularPolycollection is created (does this work eg. with a StarPolygonCollection? I haven't checked, but I don't think so !). Instead of creating a new RegularPolyCollection it might be more useful to make a copy of the existing object... I was thinking about a update_from() method for the Collection class(es) similar to update_from() for lines. mm > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-devel mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel