You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(20) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(47) |
2005 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(75) |
2006 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(51) |
2007 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(519) |
Aug
(151) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(282) |
Dec
(190) |
2008 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(399) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(205) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(261) |
2009 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(119) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(155) |
Jun
(98) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(174) |
Oct
(126) |
Nov
(126) |
Dec
(79) |
2010 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(139) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(164) |
Jul
(184) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(73) |
2011 |
Jan
(235) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(118) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(162) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(44) |
2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(123) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(116) |
2013 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(147) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(122) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(27) |
2014 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(27) |
2015 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
1
(2) |
2
(5) |
3
(2) |
4
(3) |
5
|
6
(3) |
7
(1) |
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
(1) |
13
(2) |
14
(4) |
15
(1) |
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
(1) |
22
(4) |
23
(1) |
24
(5) |
25
(1) |
26
(1) |
27
|
28
|
29
(1) |
30
|
31
(6) |
|
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Nathaniel Smith <nj...@po...> wrote: [...snip discussion of how option D was the favorite of 80% of people in the survey...] > So the next question is where we go from here. We need to pick a color > for this bikeshed at some point. One theory is that the next step is > to propose a bunch of variations on option D and have another round of > voting etc. Another is that we should just call it a day and decide > now :-). > > For reference, here's option D: > https://bids.github.io/colormap/images/screenshots/option_d.png > > And here are the other greenish colormaps that have been mentioned: > https://bids.github.io/colormap/images/screenshots/fake_parula.png > https://bids.github.io/colormap/images/screenshots/erics-RdBuGnYl_r.png > https://bids.github.io/colormap/images/screenshots/erics-RdBuGnYl_r_v2.png > https://bids.github.io/colormap/images/screenshots/joes-blu_grn_pnk2.png > > My personal feeling is that all these alternatives are basically > reasonable colormaps, but compared to option D I find them kinda ugly, > and, more importantly, substantially worse for colorblind users, which > IMO should outweigh a marginal/debateable improvement for the rest of > us. > > So if it were up to me I'd be inclined to declare we've reached the > point of diminishing returns and go with D, but I don't know how > everyone else is feeling. Shall we just go for it? So it's been 2 weeks with no real followup on this. I don't really care where we end up (though I selfishly would somewhat prefer if there is a decision before our SciPy talk next week, just so we can tell people what it is :-)), but we need to resolve this somehow. What's the plan? Michael, Thomas, I see from the credits page that you're the Official Lead Developers :-), so given the intrinsic bikeshedditude of this topic I suspect it may come down to you taking a deep breath and making a decision (or at least declaring some specific concrete process for making the decision)? -n -- Nathaniel J. Smith -- http://vorpus.org
Hey all, I just moved the stand alone cycler repo to be owned by the matplotlib org in preparation for it (hopefully) be a required dep in the near future. The plan is to get a v0.9 up on pypi ASAP and I will be pushing directly to master for the time being. Once it is tagged and posted I would like to go to the standard PR work flow. The idea is to have a tagged version in the wild for people to play with and then tag cycler v1.0 along with mpl v1.5. Tom